Former Hong Kong lawmakers released from prison after serving sentences for 'subversion'
April 29 (UPI) -- Four former Hong Kong pro-democracy lawmakers were released from prison Tuesday after completing their sentences for allegedly attempting to overthrow the government of the special administrative region of China.
Claudia Mo, 68; Kwok Ka-ki, 63; Jeremy Tan, 49; and Gary Fan, 58; pleaded guilty to being members of the so-called "Hong Kong 47" group charged under a controversial National Security Law imposed by Beijing over organizing an unofficial primary ahead of 2020 elections in a bid to help pro-democracy parties win a majority in the legislature.
"[I am] going home to reunite with my family now. Thanks for the care from Hong Kong people and the media," Fan said as he departed Shek Pik Prison on Lantau Island.
Mo's family confirmed she was home after being released from the Lo Wu Correctional Institution, which is close to the border with Shenzhen.
"I am very pleased that she is home, but she is resting so I cannot really say any more," Mo's husband, British journalist Philip Bowring, told reporters.
"I am sorry about that, but as you know the circumstances, so that is all I can say."
The four were all sentenced to four years and two months in prison in November but were freed due to time served since being arrested in 2021.
They were among 45 of the Hong Kong 47 pro-democracy activists jailed for between 50 months and 10 years on charges of conspiracy to commit subversion under the NSL imposed in the wake of mass protests against it in 2019 that snowballed into wider pro-democracy protests that brought the territory to a standstill.
The four received the shortest sentences based on a one-third discount for their early guilty plea and reductions for their past public service and "ignorance of the law."
Former law professor Benny Tai received the longest sentence of the group -- 10 years for his role in masterminding the primary elections strategy -- and remains behind bars.
The other two were cleared of the charges against them in May.
The judges in the trial, three hand-picked national security justices, ruled that the democrats' plan was to abuse their control of the legislature to trigger a "constitutional crisis" by vetoing the budget, shutting down the government and forcing the chief executive to resign.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
UPI
43 minutes ago
- UPI
D.C. police officer gets 18 months in prison for leaks to Proud Boys leader
Former Washington, D.C. Police Intelligence Chief Lt. Shane Lamond got 18 months in a federal prison Friday for obstructing an investigation by lying regarding contact he had with Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio (pictured, 2020). Tarrio had called for Lamond to be pardoned by President Donald Trump. File Photo by Gamal Diab/EPA-EFE June 6 (UPI) -- Former Washington, D.C., Police Intelligence Chief Lt. Shane Lamond got 18 months in a federal prison Friday for obstructing an investigation by lying regarding contact he had with Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio. Lamond leaked information to Tarrio that he was being investigated and then lied about doing that, according to prosecutors. Lamond was convicted of one count of obstructing justice and three counts of making false statements to federal law enforcement. Judge Amy B. Jackson said Lamond showed no real contrition for his actions. "The entire attitude throughout has been, 'How dare they bring these charges!," Jackson said. Lamond attorney Mark Schamel urged Judge Jackson to not incarcerate Lamond. He told the judge he fundamentally disagrees with her about the facts in the case. He said Lamond's destroyed police career should be enough punishment. The investigation into Lamond's communication with Tarrio revealed hundreds of message exchanges that included encrypted Telegram messages. Lamond contended they were intended to gather intelligence on extremist groups. Tarrio was pardoned for his federal conviction by President Donald Trump, who also pardoned hundreds of other people convicted in connection with the violent pro-Trump attack on the U.S. Capitol Jan. 6, 2021. Tarrio was sentenced to 22 years in prison for seditious conspiracy, but Trump freed him with a presidential pardon. Tarrio testified for Lamond and urged Trump to pardon the D.C. police officer. When Lamond was convicted in December 2024, U.S. Attorney Matthew Graves said in a statement, "As proven at trial, Lamond turned his job on its head-providing confidential information to a source, rather than getting information from him-lied about the conduct, and obstructed an investigation into the source."
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Mission possible: An alternative to facial recognition technology
For decades, Hollywood has presented audiences with futuristic disguises that were once thought only possible in science fiction. Silicone masks, fake contact lenses, and 3D printed biometrics are staples of popular spy movies like the 'Mission: Impossible' franchise. But these forms of 'spyware,' once found only on the silver screen, are, in fact, a reality. The advent of the internet and facial recognition technology has turned disguise work into a matter of national security. Just look at how our adversaries abuse facial recognition technology. Whether it is the Social Credit System or cameras lining public streets to monitor dissent against the Chinese state or oppress minority groups, China's surveillance state is built on facial recognition technology — some of the most sophisticated in the world, due to the amount of data it can access through measures such as its National Security Law. The Chinese Communist Party's monitoring system can essentially control the life of any individual across its regions, freeze payments and track purchases anywhere in the country. With China as an example of how not to use facial recognition technology, the U.S. should be clear-eyed about the vulnerabilities and potential abuses posed by these increasing outmoded forms of biometric security. Advancements in artificial intelligence, deepfakes and three-dimensional printing are successfully tricking facial recognition tools, which should affirm that we cannot continue to rely on them to protect locations critical to national security. Threat actors have developed a variety of tactics to spoof facial recognition software. Some are known as 'replay attacks' and occur when a video is presented to a facial biometric system by an actor other than the intended user. Static photos are another form of attack with the same intention. Currently, the success rate for bypassing facial recognition technologies with these methods is 98 percent and 96 percent respectively — a staggering statistic. Europol even recently noted how artificial intelligence is successfully compromising phones, issuing a warning about 'increased use of artificial fingerprints, deepfake media, and voice cloning to bypass security protocols.' Facial recognition technology also presents challenges with accurate identification. While cheap or generic silicone masks perform poorly in fooling individual biometric devices, they prove effective in avoiding facial recognition technology in a crowd. Let us also not forget that some older versions of facial recognition technology struggled to distinguish between people with darker skin. Knowing this challenge, we must seriously question efforts to use facial recognition to verify voter identity before casting a ballot — one of America's foundational processes. There are three things we must do as we move away from facial recognition technology. First, to protect the privacy of Americans, and until new technology is put into place, the U.S. should begin by exploring implementation of proven biometric security tools on a solely voluntary basis. For example, the Transportation Security Administration uses facial verification technology, and permits individuals to opt out. Second, consequences must be imposed when unsecure technology is developed, or adversaries cross the line. While the Committee on Homeland Security is currently undertaking the challenge to change these economic models in cybersecurity, we have an opportunity to get ahead of them now by pursuing more secure and accurate biometric security tools. We cannot become overly dependent on fallible technology — the risks are simply too high. Finally, while we seek alternatives to facial recognition technology that ensure U.S. law enforcement entities have the best tools to protect us, the U.S. must clearly call out China for its abuse of facial recognition technology. The Chinese Communist Party's use of facial recognition technology to control its citizenry is unacceptable and should concern all Americans. The U.S. must address the risks of facial recognition technology head on to protect the liberties we cherish. It is time we work closely with our innovators to champion biometric solutions that are secure, reliable and aligned with American values. Mark Green, M.D., represents Tennessee's 7th Congressional District and is chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Mahmoud Khalil offers declaration, describes damages to his life
June 6 (UPI) -- Mahmoud Khalil, the Columbia University graduate detained by the Trump administration in March for deportation over his pro-Palestinian views, offered a public declaration that details what he's experienced since his arrest. In a case document filed Thursday, Khalil listed what he described as the "irreparable harms" he has suffered, which he claimed have affected several parts of his life that "include dignitary and reputational harm, personal and familial hardship, including constant fear for personal safety, continued detention, restrictions on my freedom of expression, and severe damage to my professional future." The declaration, which was made from inside the LaSalle Detention Center in Jena, La., where Khalil has been held since March 9, puts focus on the birth of his son, which happened during his incarceration. "Instead of holding my wife's hand in the delivery room, I was crouched on a detention center floor, whispering through a crackling phone line as she labored alone." Khalil described. "I listened to her pain, trying to comfort her while 70 other men slept around me. When I heard my son's first cries, I buried my face in my arms so no one would see me weep." Khalil described that the first time he saw his son was through a window, and the first time he held him was in an immigration courtroom, to which his wife had to travel ten hours to reach, with their newborn. "I speak to her as often as possible, but these conversations are not private, everything is monitored by the government," Khalil said, which makes it impossible for them to comfortably speak freely. "We leave so much unsaid, and that silence weighs heavily on both of us." Khalil said that not only has the situation been "devastating" for him, but that his wife has dealt with harassment since his arrest. Khalil further described the anguish of seeing Trump administration officials post statements and photos of him on social media that he purports as "accompanied by inflammatory language, grotesque and false accusations, and open celebration of my deportation." Khalil expressed concern for his future as well. He said he was hired by the nonprofit equality-focused Oxfam International group only days before his arrest as a Palestine and Middle East/ North Africa policy advisor, and was scheduled to start work in April, but the job offer was formally revoked. He says "I strongly believe" his arrest and continued detention is the reason for this. He added that should the charges against him stand, "the harm to my professional career would be career-ending." Khalil further worried his arrest would result in a lifetime of "being flagged, delayed, or denied when traveling, applying for visas, or engaging with consular authorities anywhere in the world," and not just him, but his wife and son. His mother had also applied for a visa in March to visit the United States to see their child be born, and although that was approved, the U.S. embassy returned her passport without a stamp, and now her case is under "administrative processing," and remains unapproved. Khalil's elderly father, whom he describes as "severely disabled," lives in Germany, and he ponders whether any country allied with the United States will ever grant him entry should the charges stand. Khalil detailed the allegations under which he has been held for deportation, which not only did he deny as testimony at his May immigration court hearing, at which he purports "The government attorneys did not ask me any questions regarding these issues." However, Khalil maintained his greatest concern of all is a determination by Secretary of State Marco Rubio based on a law that an "alien" can be deported should his presence in the United States "have potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences." "I understand that the Rubio Determination is not only a ground for deportation, but it is also a bar to entry," said Khalil. "In other words, no matter what happens to the other charge against me, it is the Rubio Determination that will make this country, the country of my wife and child, a country I cannot return to in the future."
