'Mentally Ill, Not Murderous': After 23 Years, Allahabad HC Acquits Man Of Killing Wife, Son
Last Updated:
The high court held that the trial court had failed to consider vital evidence relating to the mental health of the accused.
The Allahabad High Court recently acquitted a man, who had been serving a life sentence for allegedly murdering his wife and son in 2002, citing lack of mens rea due to mental illness.
A division bench of Justices Sangeeta Chandra and Shree Prakash Singh set aside the 2005 conviction delivered by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bahraich, in which Rajesh alias Sajesh Tewari, was found guilty of killing his wife Kamlesh and their son Durgesh with a sharp-edged weapon while they slept.
The high court held that the trial court had failed to consider vital evidence relating to Tewari's mental health, which included documented psychiatric treatment and eyewitness accounts of his disturbed behavior. 'The overall examination of the evidences including the statements of the prosecution witnesses, is enough to establish that the appellant was suffering with certain impaired mental condition and thus, the instant matter obviously, falls in a category of general exception (under Section 84 IPC)," the court observed.
A gruesome double murder occurred during the intervening night of August 31–September 1, 2002. The first information report was lodged by Tewari's father, Prahlad Kumar Tewari, who stated that his son had been mentally unwell for over a year and was undergoing psychiatric treatment. He had initially informed police that his son committed the crime, but later turned hostile in court.
The medical evidence showed multiple deep incised wounds on both victims, consistent with injuries inflicted by a sharp weapon. A weapon ('Banka') was recovered from the crime scene based on the appellant's disclosure. However, crucial witness testimonies—including that of the couple's surviving elder son—supported the narrative of long-standing mental illness. The boy had informed his grandfather about a quarrel the night of the incident, prompting the latter to discover the bodies.
While the prosecution argued that the circumstantial evidence was conclusive, the high court disagreed. It ruled that the trial court had mechanically ignored the appellant's mental condition and failed to apply the legal standards for evaluating an insanity defense.
'The learned trial court has erred in convicting and sentencing the appellant," the bench concluded, emphasising that it is the duty of courts to interpret criminal actions in the light of both physical and mental capacity.
The high court cited multiple Supreme Court precedents including Trimukh Maroti Kirkan Vs. State of Maharashtra (2006) and Chunni Bai v. State of Chhattisgarh (2025), stressing that lack of criminal intent, due to insanity, nullifies culpability.
First Published:
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
5 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Gurugram school murder: Cops summoned for ‘framing' bus conductor
Gurugram: A special CBI court in Panchkula has summoned four Haryana Police officers accused of tampering with evidence and falsely implicating a school bus conductor in the 2017 murder of a seven-year-old boy inside a school toilet in Gurugram's Bhondsi. The CBI court has directed all four accused — then DSP Birem Singh, inspector Narinder Singh Khatana, sub-inspector Shamsher Singh and executive sub-inspector Subhash Chand— to appear on July 15, officials aware of the matter said. Eight years after the murder of the child, the CBI court has summoned the four accused officers following a petition filed by the victim's father, highlighting the prolonged delay in action against them and urging swift judicial intervention. The four police officials face serious charges under IPC sections 120B (criminal conspiracy), 166A (disobeying legal direction), 167 (framing incorrect document), 194 (fabricating evidence to procure conviction of a capital offence), 330 (torture to extort confession), and 506 (criminal intimidation). The order was passed by Special Judicial Magistrate Anil Kumar Yadav. The incident occurred on September 8, 2017, when the body of the Class II student—referred to as Prince to protect his identity— was discovered in a toilet in the school with his throat slit. Within hours, the Haryana Police arrested Ashok Kumar, a school bus conductor, claiming he had confessed to the crime. The arrest was met with massive public outrage, especially after glaring inconsistencies surfaced in the investigation. Days later, the probe was handed over to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), which later apprehended a Class XI student from the same school—referred to as Bholu—for the murder. Kumar was acquitted on February 28, 2018, by a special court. He recalled the trauma that continues to haunt him. 'I was tortured, beaten, hung upside down, and had my head submerged in water by the police just to force a confession,' he said. 'I was innocent, yet they paraded me before the media, ruined my reputation, and humiliated me in front of my family. Even now, I struggle to find work. I was framed to protect the real accused. I want to see all four officers behind bars,' he said. Kumar had earlier rejected a compensation of ₹1 lakh offered by the Gurugram Police in May 2019, calling it 'an insult' to the trauma he and his family endured. 'That money cannot erase what I went through. It was never about money—it is about dignity and accountability,' he said. The child's father, who moved the latest application leading to the summons, expressed satisfaction over the court's order. 'It is a step closer to truth and justice. Those who tried to bury the truth must face the law,' he said. The court also dismissed the Haryana home department's claim that sanction was needed to prosecute the officers, stating that acts like fabricating evidence to implicate an innocent man cannot be passed off as 'official duty' under Section 197 of the CrPC. The summons will be served using email and WhatsApp, to ensure the accused appear before the court without further delay. The court said there is incriminating material on the file collected by CBI and all the documents allegedly showing involvement of the conductor, have been fabricated with the intention of implicating him falsely. 'It becomes clear that these accused have misused their official position under the colour of their official duty and they have committed serious offences that is why CBI, the premier investigating agency of our country has filed a charge-sheet against these accused under section 120B read with section 166A, 167, 330 and 506 of IPC and substantive offences thereof,' read the order. Meanwhile, the victim's counsel Sushil Tekriwal said, 'The most brutish, barbaric, cruel and diabolic acts commissioned by the four senior police officers are prima facie construed to be extra-judicial acts. They will now face sentence up to life if convicted. The pedestal of substantial justice can never be denied though delayed. The acts of police force was also gruesome to the extent that they all jointly and collectively and knowingly were not only fabricating the evidence, preparing false and incorrect documents with an intention and knowledge to falsely implicate an innocent as an accused without any evidence but were planting evidence for the said purpose, and writing case documents and case diaries at the subsequent stage and without physical presence but in back date corroborated by CDR locations.' The development comes more than three years after the CBI filed its supplementary charge sheet on January 6, 2021, but the case remained stalled due to lack of prosecution sanction. The CBI had accused the officers of collusion and procedural misconduct during the initial investigation in 2017.
Time of India
6 hours ago
- Time of India
2 get life in jail for murder of kin over dispute at feast
Lucknow: A special Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) court here on Saturday sentenced Manoj Verma (35) and Anubhav Verma alias Abhinav alias Digambar Verma (27) to life imprisonment for the 2019 murder of their relative Shiv Kumar. They beat him to death after a quarrel during a family feast in Ibrahimpur. Judge Ramvilas Singh also levied a fine of Rs 50,000 on each convict; failure to pay will result in an additional four months' simple imprisonment. The duo were convicted under IPC Section 302 (murder) of the IPC and Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST (PoA) Act, which prescribes enhanced penalties for crimes committed against Dalits. Special Public Prosecutor, Sudip Mishra, told TOI that according to the FIR filed by Anshu Lata of Qazipur village, a 'bahu bhoj' (post-wedding banquet) was hosted at her home on May 3, 2019. During the meal, the accused verbally abused Shiv Kumar—allegedly using casteist slurs—after complaining the food was cold. Witnesses told police the duo threatened to "settle scores later." Around 11 pm the same night, as Shiv Kumar was cycling home, Manoj and Anubhav intercepted him near a canal bridge outside Qazipur. They bludgeoned him with sticks and fled. His body was discovered at first light in a nearby field belonging to a local farmer. FIR was registered at Ibrahimpur police station for murder and atrocity offences. "A charge sheet was filed on May 24, 2019; charges were formally framed on Oct 22, 2021. During trial, the prosecution examined 12 witnesses, including complainant Anshu Lata, eyewitness Amit Kumar, investigating officers, and autopsy surgeon Dr Pradeep Kumar Singh, whose testimony corroborated the fatal assault," said Mishra. Judge Singh, in a detailed 47-page order, held the attack was premeditated, motivated by caste animus and proven "beyond all reasonable doubt." He directed that Rs 40,000 from each convict's fine be paid as compensation to Shiv Kumar's next of kin, elaborated Mishra. Follow more information on Air India plane crash in Ahmedabad here . Get real-time live updates on rescue operations and check full list of passengers onboard AI 171 .
The Print
7 hours ago
- The Print
Syrup deaths in Uzbekistan: Allahabad HC quashes order that cancelled licence of drug firm
The judge quashed an order dated October 4, 2023 passed by the reviewing authority that the drug company (petitioner) shall produce the certified copies of the orders passed by different courts of Uzbekistan and submit a report to the Drugs Licensing and Controlling Authority, UP and Drug Controller General of India after implementing the process of corrective and preventive action. Justice Dinesh Pathak, allowing a writ petition filed by M/s Marion Biotech Private Limited, observed that he was surprised that Indian authorities are 'trying to validate their proceedings' based on the judgement of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Prayagraj(UP), Jun 14 (PTI) The Allahabad High Court has quashed the order that cancelled the licence of a drug company in 2023 after around 15 children died in Samarkand, Uzbekistan due to consuming a syrup manufactured by the company. The petitioner is a private limited company having its manufacturing unit at Noida Sector 67. A Joint Inspection Team of central and state drug authorities conducted several inspections at the factory premises of the petitioner in between and collected samples of drugs for testing and analysis. Later, they found the samples to not be of standard quality. Subsequently, the drugs licensing-cum-controlling authority in the state cancelled the licence of the petitioner by an order dated March 13, 2023. Quashing the order, the court observed, 'I am surprised to see that Indian authorities are trying to validate their proceedings conducted under the Indian law on the basis of judgment passed by the Supreme Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan'. Indian laws relating to drugs are exhaustive and self-sufficient code which does not require any validation of the judgement passed by a foreign court, the high court order said. The court added that the premises of the petitioner's factory has been inspected more than once and the samples collected from the factory has been examined by the government analyst, as per provisions. Authorities concerned have delved deep 'to examine the manufacturing process of the drugs at the factory premises of the petitioner and the quality of drug as well as legal requirement enunciated under the Act 1945 and Rules 1945,' it said. 'There is nothing convincing, as to what special the state and central authorities have found in the judgement passed by the foreign courts intending to validate their official duties performed under the Indian law. 'Nothing special has been demonstrated before this court in the orders passed by different courts of Republic of Uzbekistan except certain observations with regard to the quality of drugs, which have been found unfit for use and the said observation was subsequently modified to certain extent,' the judge said. 'The order impugned is illegal, unwarranted under law and without jurisdiction. Existence of such order would prejudice to the right and interest of the petitioner and amounts to miscarriage of justice to him', the court added in its judgment dated May 19. PTI COR RAJ SKY SKY This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
