Why we need the Humanities
There has been some bad news for the Humanities. A year ago, the University of Kent, the U.K., confirmed that it would phase out Art History, Anthropology, Health and Social Care, Journalism, Music and Audio Technology, and Philosophy and Religious Studies. Citing financial reasons, Canterbury Christ Church University in Kent announced in November 2024 that it would stop offering English Literature programmes from September 2025. Cardiff University does not want to continue with the Ancient Language modules due to a huge financial deficit. Goldsmiths, University of London, has also decided to scrap a few Arts and Humanities modules. In India too, certain Arts departments are not secure about their future and some Humanities programmes have already been staggered.
During the Renaissance, the focus in educational institutions was on studia humanitatis or 'studies of humanity,' especially Greek and Latin classics, Grammar and Rhetoric and Languages, Literature, Philosophy and History. The Humanities refer to those academic disciplines that focus on human beings and rely on hermeneutics or theories of interpretation as their predominant methodology. They differ from Pure Sciences because of their content and pedagogy. Subjects like Physics and Chemistry focus on matter and depend on laboratory experiments for their data. Sociology, Anthropology and Psychology deal with human beings but their insistence on positivistic and empirical methodology differentiates them from the Humanities and categorises them as Social Sciences.
Why are the Humanities being side-lined? We need to realise that the neglect of the Humanities is not a recent phenomenon, for as early as the 19th century, German philosopher Wilhelm Dilthey classified all academic disciplines into two groups: the Human Sciences and the Natural Sciences. What is appalling is that even the Humanities were forcibly brought under the sciences. Dilthey went a step further and proclaimed that, to survive, the Humanities should adopt the empirical methodology.
Challenges
What are the problems that plague the Humanities departments? First, it is a fact that there are not many takers for certain Arts programmes. In India, very few applications are received for programmes like History and Philosophy, making them financially unviable. In the West too, not many students are enthusiastic about the Humanities. Second, in the job market all over the world, STEM students pocket most of the placements. Humanities students are increasingly ignored by recruiting companies.
Third, Sciences depend on laboratory experiments and deal with facts, and believe that truth is singular. But the Humanities, especially from a postmodern perspective that has called for an 'incredulity towards metanarratives', speak of truths in the plural. This has unnerved not only the hard sciences but also the Social Sciences that rely predominantly on quantitative data.
Fourth, there is sometimes a feeling that Humanities students are not quite as diligent and hard-working as their Science counterparts who spend long hours in their labs. Put differently, poetry, novels and films are considered subjects that do not rigorous classroom teaching. Last and most important, today's digital world is heavily data-based and everything is worked out in terms of numbers, percentages and ratios. Such a world has deepened the divide between the Sciences and the Humanities.
Pressing need
The world certainly needs the Humanities, which talk about transcendence while the Sciences are confined to immanence. This is one of its strengths. Second, a study of the Humanities ingrains a sense of empathy, which is vital to the survival of the humankind. Aristotle talked about pity and terror and the resultant catharsis. Only because the learners are empathetic to the tragic protagonists do they experience pity and fear. Third, the Humanities help enhance the learners' emotional intelligence. Fourth, the Humanities promote hermeneutics, the theory of interpretation. The Social Sciences — and Pure Sciences too to some extent — need hermeneutics to interpret data, both quantitative and qualitative. Finally, the Humanities teach us to look at the world aesthetically and appreciate even 'the meanest flower that blows'.
C.P. Snow in his Rede Lecture (1959) remarked that 'the intellectual life of western society is increasingly being split into two polar groups ... literary intellectuals at one pole — and at the other scientists' ('Two Cultures'). Ultimately, there should be a rapprochement between the two and we should strive to bridge the gap, making the Humanities incrementally scientific/systematic as in the case of Digital Humanities, and the Sciences more humanistic, especially in terms of methodology. Without ethics, aesthetics and hermeneutics that constitute the soul of the Humanities, the world will not be an ideal place for human beings.
The writer is Emeritus Professor, Gandhigram Rural Institute-Deemed to be University.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
13 hours ago
- India Today
Ampere, the Paris professor who turned a needle's twitch into a new science
It was a quiet September afternoon in Paris, 1820, when news from Denmark's Copenhagen reached Andre-Marie Ampere in Paris where he was teaching at cole Polytechnique. Hans Christian Orsted, a Danish physicist, had made a strange observation during a lecture back in April: a magnetic needle shifted direction when placed near a wire carrying electric of just being impressed, Ampere lit up. He rushed back to his laboratory at the College de France, repeated the experiment with his own voltaic pile, and took note of deeper implicationsadvertisementWithin days, he was in front of the French Academy of Sciences, not only confirming Orsted's effect but showing something even bigger: electric currents could create not just magnetic fields, but movement. They could generate motion, forces, patterns -- an entirely new branch of physics. That lightning-rod moment became the heart of electrodynamics -- what we now call it wasn't a fluke. Ampere had spent years quietly battling personal loss, grief, isolation, and the aftermath of the French Revolution. The language of physics and mathematics had become his lifelines. (Photo: Wikimedia Commons) A LIFE SHAPED BY LOSS AND LEARNINGBorn on January 20, 1775, in Lyon, France, Ampere grew up in a home full of books. His father, a devout follower of philosopher and writer Jean-Jacques Rousseau, allowed him to learn was solving calculus problems in Latin by age 13. But tragedy shaped him -- his father was guillotined during the Reign of Terror, and later in life, he lost his wife losses haunted him. Yet, instead of folding inwards, he turned to science and faith for FORMAL SCHOOLING, BUT AN INSATIABLE MINDAmpere never attended a formal university as a student. He was largely self-taught, devouring mathematics, Latin, philosophy, and natural sciences from books in his father's library. (figures from the Memoirs on Electromagnetism and Electrodynamics) (Photos: Wikimedia Commons) Eventually, he secured a teaching post at the Collge de France and later became a professor at the cole Polytechnique in Paris, which is where he had his revolutionary BIG IDEA: CURRENTS CREATE FORCESIn 1820, building on Orsted's experiment, Ampere proposed that two parallel wires carrying electric currents attract or repel each other, depending on the direction of idea, now known as Ampere's force law, gave the world the first mathematical description of how electricity and magnetism are related. He didn't stop there. Ampere laid out an entire theory of electromagnetism, introducing concepts like the electric current loop and how it produces a magnetic field, which became the basis for modern electromagnet HE'S CALLED THE FATHER OF ELECTROMAGNETISMAmpere gave the science a structure. He even coined the term electrodynamics. His careful mathematical work paved the way for later scientists like James Clerk Maxwell to create a unified theory of his honour, the unit of electric current -- the Ampere -- bears his name. (Photo: Wikimedia Commons) AMPERE'S PERSONAL LIFEDespite his scientific genius, Andr-Marie Ampre's life outside the lab was marked by hardship and quiet resilience. Ampere married Julie Carron in 1799, and they had a son, Jean-Jacques just four years into their marriage, Julie died of tuberculosis in 1803, leaving Ampere death deeply affected him, and those close to him said he never fully recovered. Much like what happened when his father died, he turned inward, pouring himself into his research while raising their son modest man, Ampre avoided the spotlight and lived simply, even as his ideas lit up Europe's scientific community. He remained deeply religious all his life, often turning to faith during moments of grief and uncertainty. Ampere and his son are buried in Paris His son, Jean-Jacques, grew up to become a respected historian and literary scholar, and eventually became a member of the prestigious Acadmie Franaise, carrying forward the Ampere name in the world of letters, while his father had already immortalised it in DEATH AND LEGACYAndre-Marie Ampere died on June 10, 1836, in Marseille, France, while on a scientific inspection tour. He was he is buried in Paris's Montmartre Cemetery. His legacy? Every time an electric current flows -- from your phone charger to a massive power grid -- Ampere's equations are at work.
Hindustan Times
14 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
‘Sky in a bag': How NASA's material from outer space meant to catch comet dust found its way into fashion
Greek artist Ioannis Michaloudis has brilliantly fused science and fashion by transforming a NASA-invented material into a striking fashion statement. Originally designed to collect dust from a speeding comet, this space-age substance has found new life in glowing accessories. Michaloudis' visionary work offers a fresh perspective on how art and science can coexist. (Also read: 'Anything goes': Yoshitomo Nara on his creative process as London exhibition opens ) Ioannis Michaloudis' journey into merging space science with fashion began with a spark of curiosity. After learning about Stardust, a mission to collect particles from a comet, he reached out to NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory. There, engineer Steve Jones introduced him to aerogel, an ethereal, lightweight material once used in space missions. A post shared by Michalou(di)s Ioannis (@ Fascinated, he set up his own studio with a reactor ten times larger than the one he had previously worked with. While refining his methods in India, Ioannis stumbled upon something extraordinary. Intending to destroy a sculpture, he dipped a large piece of aerogel into molten brass but instead of disintegration, he witnessed an unexpected phenomenon: the sky lit up with flames, yet the delicate sculpture endured. This moment became a defining revelation, cementing his belief in the poetic potential of science-meets-art. Everything shifted in 2024 when French fashion label Coperni unveiled the "AirSwipe" bag, crafted from aerogel and co-designed with Ioannis Michaloudis. Ethereal, translucent, and softly glowing, it looked as if a piece of sky had been captured in a handbag. Since then, Michaloudis has been flooded with requests for aerogel creations, glasses, chairs, museum sculptures, and even interior installations. Reflecting on this journey, he credits it all to NASA's Stardust mission. "Without it, none of this would exist," he says. "I am who I am today because of that little piece of sky I once held in my hands."
The Hindu
15 hours ago
- The Hindu
What is the origin of gravity?
A: For a long time, people wondered what makes the planets go around the sun and why anything thrown up comes down. The English scientist Isaac Newton probed the origins of this mysterious force and came up with the laws of gravitation. According to these laws, which we would have learnt in school, the force acting between two objects depends on their masses and the distance between them. The mathematics of the laws suggested that the origin of gravity was the object itself. That is, by virtue of its own mass any object may have an influence on another (massive) object. But in his final analysis Newton concluded that massive bodies gravitated at all because god had deemed it so. It wasn't until Albert Einstein published his general theory of relativity that scientists acquired a clearer picture of gravity's origins. According to this theory, gravity is a property of space and time taken together (to be exact, of four-dimensional spacetime). It isn't technically a force that causes objects to move one way or another. Instead, the presence of energy and momentum in a region of spacetime has the effect of deforming spacetime there (like when you lay your head on a pillow). Objects moving there may seem to have been deflected from their straight path by a force. This is gravity. First published on August 29, 1996; updated today.
