Assisted dying risks being Labour's Brexit
Tomorrow, the Commons will vote on the third reading of the assisted dying bill. Most MPs expect it to pass by a narrower margin than the majority of 55 MPs last time. There has been a shift in momentum throughout the bill's passage through parliament, with at least a dozen more names now voting against Kim Leadbeater's legislation. This shift has coincided with the steady erosion of much of the goodwill which characterised second reading in November. The subsequent committee stage was characterised by fraught exchanges, with the changes Leadbeater made to the bill infuriating some colleagues.
The private tensions within the Labour party were on public display last Friday. Leadbeater sat with her group of supporters on the fourth bench back; on the row in front was Jess Asato, Rupa Huq and a cluster of opponents. There was a tempestuous undercurrent to the debate. Paul Waugh delivered withering rejoinder to Esther Rantzen's ill-judged jibe about assisted dying opponents being motivated by 'undeclared personal religious beliefs.' 'Some of those who passionately support assisted dying,' said Waugh. 'Have a faith, a devout faith, that their world view is the right one.' In parliament, the subject is testing friendships and straining interactions in the tea room. As one Labour MP told my colleague Madeline Grant, assisted dying risks becoming 'Labour's Brexit'.
The passions aroused are certainly evocative of the debate on Britain's membership of the European Union. Much as how a generation of Tory politicians came to define their identity on how they stood on the European question, so too has personal testimony featured heavily in Labour MPs' motivation in how are casting their votes. 'Brexit was about one side who thought the other was unpatriotic,' reflects one Tory veteran. 'And another which thought the other side was stupid. This [assisted dying] is about much more fundamental questions of the cosmos.' Assisted dying will likely serve as a filter for other debates for the rest of this parliament. Expect it to crop up again and again in conversations around the NHS – the state institution which Labour MPs hold most dear.
Before the election, senior Labour figures debated whether to start a 'national conversation' on assisted dying. Eventually, they decided against, reasoning, as one told Katy Balls: 'We didn't want to become the death party.' Yet the assisted dying bill clearly enjoys the tacit approval of the Prime Minister. It is sponsored by a Labour MP, backed by a majority of Labour MPs and will be enacted in law by a Labour government. Much as the Tory party came to own Brexit, so too will Labour – like it or not – own assisted dying.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Argus
31 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
No 10 says abortion law change must be ‘safe and workable'
The Commons voted by a majority of 242 to back Labour MP Tonia Antoniazzi's amendment to the Crime and Policing Bill. The issue was treated as a matter of conscience, with MPs given a free vote and the Government remaining neutral. But Downing Street said that now MPs had made that decision, the Government had a responsibility to ensure that if it makes it to the statute book it is in an effective form. Labour MP Tonia Antoniazzi, who led the amendment to change the law on abortion (Chris McAndrew/UK Parliament) The Bill still has further stages to go through in Parliament and changes could be made to the measures in the House of Lords. A No 10 spokesman said: 'We'll look at this in detail, considering whether any changes are necessary to make it workable and safe. 'But, of course, this would not change the intent of the amendment passed.' The spokesman added: 'As with all laws, the Government has a responsibility to ensure it is safe and workable.' Gower MP Ms Antoniazzi said the change will remove the threat of 'investigation, arrest, prosecution or imprisonment' of any woman who acts in relation to her own pregnancy. She pushed for the change in the law after cases of women being investigated by police over suspected illegal abortions. Medics or others who facilitate an abortion after the 24-week time limit could still face prosecution if the change becomes law. Though the Government took a neutral stance on the vote, several Cabinet ministers were among the MPs who backed the amendment. They included Energy Secretary Ed Miliband, Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster Pat McFadden, Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall, Defence Secretary John Healey, Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander, Environment Secretary Steve Reed, Northern Ireland Secretary Hilary Benn, Scotland Secretary Ian Murray, Wales Secretary Jo Stevens and Commons Leader Lucy Powell. Kemi Badenoch and many members of the Conservative frontbench voted against it, but shadow education secretary Laura Trott voted in favour. Abortion in England and Wales currently remains a criminal offence unless with an authorised provider up to 24 weeks into a pregnancy, with very limited circumstances allowing one after this time, such as when the mother's life is at risk or the child would be born with a severe disability. It is also legal to take prescribed medication at home if a woman is less than 10 weeks pregnant. Efforts to change the law to protect women from prosecution follow repeated calls to repeal sections of the 19th century law the 1861 Offences Against the Person Act, after abortion was decriminalised in Northern Ireland in 2019. Kate Ellis, joint head of litigation at the Centre for Women's Justice, said: 'It is high time that these outdated, Victorian laws were removed from the statute books. 'This proposed change in the law will only impact a relatively small number of women each year who find themselves – in already desperate circumstances – threatened with imprisonment for a criminal offence they probably didn't know existed.' The changes do not cover Scotland, where a group is currently undertaking work to review the law as it stands there.
Leader Live
31 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Minister says she will ‘sort out' HS2 and confirms opening will be delayed
Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander told the Commons there is 'no route' to meet the target date of having HS2 services running by 2033. The project has suffered repeated delays and soaring costs despite being scaled back. Ms Alexander said: 'It's an appalling mess, but it's one we will sort out. 'We need to set targets which we can confidently deliver, that the public can trust, and that will take time. 'But rest assured, where there are inefficiencies, we will root them out.' The Cabinet minister said an interim report by Mark Wild, the chief executive of HS2 Ltd, who was appointed late last year, 'lays bare the shocking mismanagement of the project under previous governments'. She added: 'He stated, in no uncertain terms, the overall project with respect of cost, schedule and scope is unsustainable. 'Based on his advice, I see no route by which trains can be running by 2033 as planned. 'He reveals costs will continue to increase if not taken in hand, further outstripping the budget set by the previous government. 'And he cannot be certain that all cost pressures have yet been identified.' Ms Alexander said she is 'drawing a line in the sand, calling time on years of mismanagement, flawed reporting and ineffective oversight'. The Transport Secretary claimed the word 'affordable' was 'clearly not part of the HS2 lexicon'. She went on: 'This Government will get the job done between Birmingham and London. 'We won't reinstate cancelled sections we can't afford, but we will do the hard but necessary work to rebuild public trust.' HS2 was originally due to run between London and Birmingham, then on to Manchester and Leeds, but the project was severely curtailed by the Conservatives in power because of spiralling costs. The first phase was initially planned to open by the end of 2026, but this was pushed back to between 2029 and 2033. In 2013, HS2 was estimated to cost £37.5 billion (at 2009 prices) for the entire planned network, including the now-scrapped extensions from Birmingham. In June last year, HS2 Ltd assessed the cost for the line between London and Birmingham would be up to £66 billion. Ms Alexander said the Government has accepted all the recommendations of a review into the governance and accountability of HS2 Ltd, led by senior infrastructure delivery adviser James Stewart. She told the Commons: 'Quite simply, there have been too many dark corners for failure to hide in. 'The ministerial taskforce set up to provide oversight of HS2 had inconsistent attendance from key ministers, including the then-transport secretary and the then-chief secretary to the Treasury. 'The Government has re-established the taskforce with full senior attendance, as per the review's recommendations – and new performance programme and shareholder boards will offer much-needed oversight and accountability.' Ms Alexander also confirmed the appointment of Mike Brown as chairman of HS2 Ltd. Mr Brown is a former commissioner for Transport for London, who helped to oversee the delivery of Crossrail, the transport project which became London's Elizabeth line.
Leader Live
31 minutes ago
- Leader Live
No 10 says abortion law change must be ‘safe and workable'
The Commons voted by a majority of 242 to back Labour MP Tonia Antoniazzi's amendment to the Crime and Policing Bill. The issue was treated as a matter of conscience, with MPs given a free vote and the Government remaining neutral. But Downing Street said that now MPs had made that decision, the Government had a responsibility to ensure that if it makes it to the statute book it is in an effective form. The Bill still has further stages to go through in Parliament and changes could be made to the measures in the House of Lords. A No 10 spokesman said: 'We'll look at this in detail, considering whether any changes are necessary to make it workable and safe. 'But, of course, this would not change the intent of the amendment passed.' The spokesman added: 'As with all laws, the Government has a responsibility to ensure it is safe and workable.' Gower MP Ms Antoniazzi said the change will remove the threat of 'investigation, arrest, prosecution or imprisonment' of any woman who acts in relation to her own pregnancy. She pushed for the change in the law after cases of women being investigated by police over suspected illegal abortions. Medics or others who facilitate an abortion after the 24-week time limit could still face prosecution if the change becomes law. Though the Government took a neutral stance on the vote, several Cabinet ministers were among the MPs who backed the amendment. They included Energy Secretary Ed Miliband, Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster Pat McFadden, Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall, Defence Secretary John Healey, Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander, Environment Secretary Steve Reed, Northern Ireland Secretary Hilary Benn, Scotland Secretary Ian Murray, Wales Secretary Jo Stevens and Commons Leader Lucy Powell. Kemi Badenoch and many members of the Conservative frontbench voted against it, but shadow education secretary Laura Trott voted in favour. Abortion in England and Wales currently remains a criminal offence unless with an authorised provider up to 24 weeks into a pregnancy, with very limited circumstances allowing one after this time, such as when the mother's life is at risk or the child would be born with a severe disability. It is also legal to take prescribed medication at home if a woman is less than 10 weeks pregnant. Efforts to change the law to protect women from prosecution follow repeated calls to repeal sections of the 19th century law the 1861 Offences Against the Person Act, after abortion was decriminalised in Northern Ireland in 2019. Kate Ellis, joint head of litigation at the Centre for Women's Justice, said: 'It is high time that these outdated, Victorian laws were removed from the statute books. 'This proposed change in the law will only impact a relatively small number of women each year who find themselves – in already desperate circumstances – threatened with imprisonment for a criminal offence they probably didn't know existed.' The changes do not cover Scotland, where a group is currently undertaking work to review the law as it stands there.
