
I mourn the decline of Atlantic salmon. I need politicians who get what's at stake
This First Person column is the experience of Roger Jenkins, who lives in Storeytown, N.B. For more information about CBC's First Person stories, please see the FAQ.
In the summer of 1962, I was allowed to tag along with my father on his job. He had been hired by a local association through the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) to haul adult salmon whose path had been blocked by a dam on the Saint John River.
Our task was to scoop the salmon from a cage on the Beechwood Dam using a hand net onto the back of a five-tonne truck fitted with a water tank and transport them 50 kilometres upriver to Arthurette, N.B., on the Tobique River. We also had to deposit any lamprey (a predator of the salmon) that we found into a 170-litre drum on the deck of the dam.
Why did we spend all summer doing this? A typical Atlantic salmon can leap about three metres high. So the installation of a hydroelectric dam 18 metres high on the St. John River presented an impassable obstruction.
Trucking the salmon became the only option to ensure this key species returned to its spawning grounds. Returning to the ocean after spawning also presented an additional obstacle as the only way back to the ocean was over the dam spillway or through the turbine. Think of it like putting your goldfish in a blender for a few seconds.
When I look back, I can't help but think of just how absurd the whole situation was to put the future of the species in the trust of a 10-year-old boy and a middle-aged man with only Grade 3 education.
Now, some 60 years later, I see my old friend is in trouble again. That's why in this federal election, the management of Atlantic salmon is my ballot box issue.
I was born near the Tobique River in the early 1950s and raised in the small community of Riley Brook, N.B.
We had running water in the house at the time but no toilet until I was in my teens. Life was simple in those days and running across the road to catch a salmon for supper was a normal occurrence. My first summer job was at a fishing lodge. One of the lodge guests, an executive with a major resource company, felt my technical skills could be better served in the industrial divisions of the company.
I became an engineer and eventually a management executive, but I continued to fish as a hobby. Fishing was also a networking tool. We'd take clients up to salmon lodges. I remember a time when I could go out and easily come back with the allowable limit on any given day.
Now, as a retiree, I live beside the Miramichi River in Storeytown, N.B., but I no longer fish salmon. It's not fun to go out and stand for hours and catch nothing.
WATCH | Shockingly few Atlantic salmon in N.B. rivers, says this biologist:
Atlantic salmon population is in serious trouble, says fish biologist
5 months ago
Duration 3:43
'The times have never been this dire,' says Tommi Linnansaari, a biology professor at the University of New Brunswick in Fredericton, talking about the low numbers of Atlantic salmon in the province's waterways.
The last time I hooked and landed an adult female salmon full of eggs, it made me feel like a hypocrite. I had been aware for some time that salmon returns to the Miramichi were in decline and I felt I had just let the entire species down by jeopardizing her life and the future of thousands of her offspring. In my corner of New Brunswick, the Atlantic salmon is listed as a species of special concern. It's endangered in other parts of the province.
As I carefully removed the hook and released her, I realized at that moment in a small way I once again held the future of the species in my hands.
Salmon returns in the Miramichi River have been on a dramatic decline for some time and have accelerated dramatically since 2010. This time, the obstruction is not physical in the form of dams and is instead bureaucratic.
The Miramichi Salmon Association, under the direction of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans, manages and maintains a salmon barrier on the Dungarvon River. To protect them from poaching, adult salmon are held between two barriers in the river during the summer months and released to continue up the river to spawn in the fall.
I live close enough to one such station and can easily visit several times during the summer using my ATV. Each trip has left me saddened and more discouraged. Under DFO management, the annual count of adult salmon returning to the barrier has steadily declined from 1,039 fish in 2011 to a mere 51 in 2024.
At the same time, DFO reports that because of its successful management plan, populations of the striped bass — which eat Atlantic salmon smolt — have rebounded in the same river system from several thousand in 2010 to an estimated 500,000-plus fish in 2024. Both fish species are native to the region, but one is being protected at the expense of the other.
This misguided approach of managing and promoting a predator species at the expense of a prey species is the same as releasing wolves into our northern forests and letting the caribou sort it out for themselves. I can't imagine we'd do that to either iconic species, so why should the Atlantic salmon deserve any less?
To argue the Atlantic salmon is just another fish is the same as suggesting the monarch butterfly is just another bug. Its unique life cycles make it an environmental messenger — a canary in a coal mine — for the health of our oceans and rivers and we should be paying more attention.
For villages, tourist operators, guides, birds, Indigenous communities and the environment, the salmon represent a way of life that cannot be easily replaced by any other species. It represents food for many people and wages for others.
And, for me, losing this particular fish is like losing an old friend. The Atlantic salmon epitomizes what it means for me to be a proud Maritimer.
The New Brunswick government has called on the federal government to take immediate action on the province's historically low salmon population. Too often, it feels like we have politicians who have little appreciation or understanding of what's at stake.
I have yet to see any federal party put together a concrete plan for how they want to manage Canada's fisheries and the implications will ripple across Atlantic Canada.
During his visit to Newfoundland and Labrador early in the campaign, federal Liberal Leader Mark Carney's first stop in St. John's was met with angry protesters who were upset with cuts to crab quotas off the northeast coast of Newfoundland. They said his party needs to do better.
In Nova Scotia, the lobster industry is a cornerstone industry, and a major campaign issue. Ottawa has struggled to satisfy both commercial fishermen and Mi'kmaw communities that are asserting their treaty right to fish for a moderate livelihood. In Newfoundland and Labrador, the opening of the northern cod commercial fishery was described as a political decision.
The Atlantic salmon is barely surviving and is but one painful reminder of how Ottawa needs to do better by Atlantic Canadians.
I hope before it's too late, we can elect we can elect a government that ensures its fisheries minister is a knowledgeable person who creates a workable plan to protect the Atlantic salmon. Then I will feel much better about my vote.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

13 hours ago
Experts warn of Bill C-2 as 'anti-refugee' and 'anti-immigrant' giving Canada 'unchecked powers' like the U.S.
Mbonisi Zikhali came to Canada in 2009 from Zimbabwe to pursue a master's in journalism at Carleton University. Post-graduation, the international student found himself homeless in Windsor and applied for refugee status – a privilege soon unavailable if Bill C-2 becomes the law. The bill is unnecessary and not sympathetic at all to people's well-being, Zikhali said. Many experts and community groups working with newcomers in Canada agree. They are calling the Liberal government's sweeping new legislation, Bill C-2 or the Strong Borders Act, anti-immigrant and anti-refugee, and say they hoping the legislation does not become law. Zikhali said he came on scholarship and in 2012 found himself in Windsor picking tomatoes at a greenhouse. Soon enough, he was living on the streets, and lost his passport which also had his study permit in it. Applying for refugee status, Zikhali said, was his saving grace and worries this bill will deprive vulnerable people of a safe haven. What is Bill C-2? The legislation proposes changes to a number of laws including the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act. Specifically it allows officials to cancel, suspend or change immigration documents immediately, pause the acceptance of new applications and cancel applications already in process if deemed in the public interest. Début du widget Widget. Passer le widget ? Fin du widget Widget. Retourner au début du widget ? Critics say new border legislation aligns Canada's immigration system with the U.S. 2 days agoDuration2:43The Liberal government proposed new border legislation this week. But critics say they worry the law will do more harm than good. The CBC's Pratyush Dayal reports. Asylum claims would also have to be made within a year of entering the country, including for international students and temporary residents. Take this hypothetical: An Afghan international student who came to study here in July 2020. When the Taliban takes over in August 2021 and things become uncertain back home, that student could have applied for asylum. But with this bill, the one-year time period would have lapsed and they would be ineligible. The immigration changes would also require irregular border crossers — people who enter Canada between official ports of entry — to make an asylum claim within 14 days of arriving in Canada. Immigration Minister Lena Metlege Diab is defending the measures (new window) . There's a lot of applications in the system. We need to act fairly, and treat people appropriately who really do need to claim asylum and who really do need to be protected to stay in Canada, Diab told CBC News. We need to be more efficient in doing that. At the same time, Canadians demand that we have a system that works for everyone. 'Very U.S.-like' bill: refugee help centre director says Windsor's Matthew House gives refugees a place to live and helps them with resettlement. Mike Morency, the organization's executive director, says he worries this bill will put more vulnerable people at greater harm. It continues to align our immigration system with that of the United States, Morency said. Refugee claimants are not the problem. The one year-ban is a major concern for us. The other major concern for us is the ability of the government to declare an emergency and suspend applications. That one to me feels very U.S.-like. Morency said he understands the government's will to try to cut back on international students and migrant workers making a refugee claim as a way to stay in Canada, but worries for people who have a legitimate need for protection being unfairly targeted. It also feels very much like a workaround to our commitment to the Geneva Convention. If the government wants to step out of the Geneva Convention, then then we need to do it with integrity and we need to approach the UN and say we're going to withdraw, he said. Syed Hussan, spokesperson for the Migrant Rights Network, agrees saying the bill violates Canada's most basic legal obligations and is immoral . 'Gives the government unchecked power to take away people's status': Migrant Rights Network Hussan asserts the bill infringes upon Canada's legal commitments and ethical standards by granting the government excessive authority to cancel permits. Every refugee gets to have the right to have their case heard. That's now being taken away, he said. Collectively it's a bill that gives the government unchecked power to take away people's status… This is an anti-immigrant and anti-refugee bill. It's illegal. Without any ability for people to appeal or have their case individually heard, Hussan said, the bill allows the government to make people undocumented or just throw people out of the country in the hundreds of thousands . Syed Hussan says the Migrant Rights Network condemns Bill C-2's anti-Refugee and mass deportation provisions. Photo: CBC The changes also allow the federal immigration department to share information more widely with different agencies within Canada. Hussan said anyone who was not a citizen or later became a citizen will have their data impacted by the bill. Hassan said this is similar to the US immigration policies. This is Carney's first test and he's failed it. He's no different from Donald Trump. 'Major rollback of rights,' 'disservice to refugees': Queen's university law professor Sharry Aiken, professor of law at Queen's University, also finds the bill troubling. Very disappointing. It's a betrayal of many Canadians that supported this government in the most recent election, she said, noting these issues weren't part of the Liberal election campaign. The omnibus bill, she said, is quite complicated with 16 different parts and neither serves to reform the asylum system nor address Canadians' privacy rights. Typically, omnibus bills don't get the degree of parliamentary scrutiny and oversight, she said, which is concerning. Aiken said the one year-bar for asylum claimants represents a major rollback of rights . No longer are these claimants eligible for a hearing before the Refugee Protection Division, she said. The division of the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada (IRB) hears and decides claims for refugee protection in Canada. Aikens said this arbitrary bill will also very quickly develop a backlog. The bill proposes a legislative fix for a problem that doesn't require new law. It requires operational intervention, she said. This one year rule mimics what's in place in the U.S. and what has been the subject of extensive international criticism… This bill does a disservice to refugees and betrays the Canadian public's trust in the Liberal government for ensuring a fair refugee determination system consistent with international standards. She urges the MPs to separate out the provisions having the issues desegregated. 'Will make the process more cumbersome': immigration lawyer Toronto-based immigration lawyer, Mario Bellissimo, said with the bill creating arbitrary distinctions of 14 days and one year after June 2020, an individualized assessment approach is being taken away. While the number of refugee claimants have recently dipped, Bellissimo said the bill signals that Canada wants to potentially limit immigration. It wants to send messages to individuals who want to traverse the system over many years without legitimate claims that this is not a destination of choice for you, he said. Bellissimo agrees that targeting individuals who impact the immigration system in a negative way is important but the bill will end up targeting individuals in genuine need of assistance. Pratyush Dayal (new window) · CBC News

CBC
14 hours ago
- CBC
Halifax mayor defends motion to temporarily pause new bike lane infrastructure
Halifax Mayor Andy Fillmore is defending a motion he intends to put forward next week at regional council to temporarily pause awarding new design and construction contracts for bike lanes. In his memo to colleagues, which was posted to Reddit on Friday, Fillmore said the move is in response to frustration among residents and business owners over "worsening traffic congestion" and the escalating project costs for the AAA (all ages and abilities) bicycle network. Fillmore stated the municipality is also failing to deliver a "balanced and efficient mobility system" as per its integrated mobility plan. Fillmore told CBC Radio's Mainstreet Halifax on Friday that his goal is to build cycling infrastructure and active transportation infrastructure "in the right way, in a way that doesn't create the very unfortunate backlash that is very real in our city right now." The mayor said he'd like to create cycling infrastructure in Halifax that doesn't sacrifice the needs of others who use the roads, like bus drivers, people who ride the bus, delivery and commercial vehicle drivers, people who have to drive in a car because they're not on a bus route, and those who aren't able to ride bikes. "We have to have a very balanced approach and I just push back on any commentary that we're facing some sort of a binary choice," Fillmore told Mainstreet. "This is very much a pause so that we can all move forward together in a mindful way that reflects the changing reality we have in our growing and busy city." Only applies to tenders not yet awarded Fillmore said the municipal bicycle network was only meant to cost $25 million. He said $16 million has already been spent, but that the budget for the project now is $93 million. "That leaves $77 million yet to be spent. Only $8 million will come from provincial and federal sources, and that leaves an unexpected $69 million to be funded through the municipal tax rate," Fillmore said. Fillmore said construction being done right now will be finished. Tenders identified in the capital budget for the next four years — but not yet awarded — would be put on hold. "This gives us an opportunity to have staff come back to us with a list of all those projects that are in that capital budget with a red light or a green light," he said, adding projects that threaten to "worsen congestion" will be paused. "All that red light means is, OK, we're just going to take a redesign here," Fillmore continued. "I expect a great percentage of the project on that list will get a green light and may only have a holdup of a month or two." 'Misguided proposal' David Trueman, the chair of the Halifax Cycling Coalition, called Fillmore's recommendation a "misguided proposal." He's calling on people to write to their regional councillor and urge them to vote against it. "We just got the cycling infrastructure projects back on track with the report to council from staff where they took the plan that was supposed to be delivered by the end of 2024 and they presented a detailed plan to get to it by 2028," Trueman said. "If we have a temporary pause, this is going to be delayed by years. We have a lot of staff and consultants tied up in designing these infrastructure protects, which take years through the pipeline. If you stop the pipeline, the flow is cut off and there can be untold delays and escalating costs." Trueman said the roads are already built and cycling is catching up. He said the upkeep cost on cycling infrastructure is a tiny fraction of what it would be for road costs. Divisive issue "These projects include all the costs of revamping a given street, and often there are other aspects of the road improvement ... [that] reduce the impact on car traffic," he said, citing a flyover bicycle bridge planned for the Macdonald Bridge site. "If we weren't worried about cars, we could do a much less expensive solution there. It's our propensity to avoid any impact to cars that raises the cost of cycling." Trueman said he thinks Fillmore's proposal is politically motivated. "Halifax has the second highest rate of active transportation of any city in Canada. Surely we don't want to throw that away," he said. "But what Andy Fillmore is keying in on is that cycling is a divisive issue. There's maybe 30 per cent of the population that has their doubts or their objections to it and he wants to create a wedge issue."


CBC
15 hours ago
- CBC
CBC Igalaaq - June 06, 2025
CBC Igalaaq - June 06, 2025 News Duration 30:08 Viewers from Nunavut and the Northwest Territories are kept up to date by daily current events and news from the Inuit world