logo
New Hampshire is facing many child care challenges. Red tape doesn't have to be one of them.

New Hampshire is facing many child care challenges. Red tape doesn't have to be one of them.

Yahoo15-04-2025

"Our state lawmakers have the power to remove unnecessary barriers Child Care Scholarship participants have experienced. " (Photo by)
Child care in New Hampshire has become increasingly unaffordable for working families, creating a challenge that affects not only parents and children but our entire state economy. While the New Hampshire Child Care Scholarship Program exists to help families afford quality care, administrative red tape has caused this vital resource to be underutilized.
Recent reports from both the UNH Carsey School of Public Policy and the New Hampshire Fiscal Policy Institute confirm what many families already know: our Child Care Scholarship system is hampered by 'substantial paperwork and complicated application processes' that limit its reach and effectiveness.
In a series of focus groups, participants applying for the Child Care Scholarship said they found the process 'particularly complicated,' and reported experiencing 'substantial stress' and investing 'significant time' in applying. As one parent described the process, 'You literally have to have all your ducks in a row for you to even apply.' This parent explained, 'You have to have the day care that they're going to, the hours that they're going to be, and then you have to have that all set up with your work.'
Even with all those pieces in place, the parent described a frustrating 'runaround' in the application process. 'There's been a few times when I'm, like, OK, what do you need? Do you need blood at this point? Because it's just like I've given you everything at this point.'
And while going through this process, the parent explained, 'You see those [child care] balances adding up and if you miss one thing and they deny [your application], then you have to redo it all over again hoping that [the child care provider won't say] you need to pay this until they can reimburse us.'
Our state lawmakers have the power to remove unnecessary barriers Child Care Scholarship participants have experienced.
Senate Bill 243, for example, would create a pilot program for 'presumptive eligibility,' allowing families who meet basic screening criteria to receive up to 60 days of scholarship funding while their full application is processed. This addresses a critical gap during which families could have to delay the start of a job while waiting for scholarship approval. Parents should not have to turn down employment opportunities because they can't afford child care while their paperwork is being processed.
The bill would also require a study of the application process itself. In recent listening sessions across the state, New Futures learned that families applying for Child Care Scholarship funding face time-consuming requests for information and documentation, often beyond what's needed to determine eligibility for the scholarship program. Blended or foster families, parents with disabilities that exempt them from the program's work requirements, families with limited technology, and families with a primary language other than English can face additional hurdles in the application process. This study will ensure eligible families aren't unreasonably discouraged from participating in the program.
And, the bill aligns scholarship processes with the realities of modern child care businesses. Currently, providers waste valuable time reporting detailed attendance data despite the fact that payments are now based on enrollment, not attendance. The legislation would streamline these processes and also create a system of up-front payments for child care providers — just as they receive from non-scholarship families — offering greater economic stability and encouraging more providers to accept scholarship families.
Such updates to the Child Care Scholarship program would address problems that are preventing an existing program from reaching its full potential. The benefits of these improvements would extend far beyond administrative convenience. When more families can access the scholarship program, more children receive quality care linked to positive developmental outcomes, child care businesses receive much-needed support, and parents can participate more fully in our state's workforce. And importantly, the federal government more than matches every state dollar spent on the program.
At a time when child care costs are crushing family budgets and limiting our workforce, we can't afford to let administrative barriers restrict access to this important program.
Cora Hoppe, the executive director of the Rochester Child Care Center, has noted that when families secure a scholarship: 'The sense of relief is huge. I don't see parents coming in panicked about paying their bill or afraid to see me. [Parents] can build better relationships with the teachers and administration because they're not worried about [paying their bill].'
The New Hampshire Legislature has an opportunity to make our Child Care Scholarship program work as intended — supporting children, families, providers, and our economy.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

California Senate passes bill that aims to make AI chatbots safer
California Senate passes bill that aims to make AI chatbots safer

Yahoo

time04-06-2025

  • Yahoo

California Senate passes bill that aims to make AI chatbots safer

California lawmakers on Tuesday moved one step closer to placing more guardrails around artificial intelligence-powered chatbots. The Senate passed a bill that aims to make chatbots used for companionship safer after parents raised concerns that virtual characters harmed their childrens' mental health. Read more: Teens are spilling dark thoughts to AI chatbots. Who's to blame when something goes wrong? The legislation, which now heads to the California State Assembly, shows how state lawmakers are tackling safety concerns surrounding AI as tech companies release more AI-powered tools. "The country is watching again for California to lead," said Sen. Steve Padilla (D-Chula Vista), one of the lawmakers who introduced the bill, on the Senate floor. At the same time, lawmakers are trying to balance concerns that they could be hindering innovation. Groups opposed to the bill such as the Electronic Frontier Foundation say the legislation is too broad and would run into free speech issues, according to a Senate floor analysis of the bill. Under Senate Bill 243, operators of companion chatbot platforms would remind users at least every three hours that the virtual characters aren't human. They would also disclose that companion chatbots might not be suitable for some minors. Platforms would also need to take other steps such as implementing a protocol for addressing suicidal ideation, suicide or self-harm expressed by users. That includes showing users suicide prevention resources. The operator of these platforms would also report the number of times a companion chatbot brought up suicide ideation or actions with a user, along with other requirements. Dr. Akilah Weber Pierson, one of the bill's co-authors, said she supports innovation but it also must come with "ethical responsibility." Chatbots, the senator said, are engineered to hold people's attention including children. 'When a child begins to prefer interacting with AI over real human relationships, that is very concerning," said Sen. Weber Pierson (D-La Mesa). The bill defines companion chatbots as AI systems capable of meeting the social needs of users. It excludes chatbots that businesses use for customer service. The legislation garnered support from parents who lost their children after they started chatting with chatbots. One of those parents is Megan Garcia, a Florida mom who sued Google and after her son Sewell Setzer III died by suicide last year. In the lawsuit, she alleges the platform's chatbots harmed her son's mental health and failed to notify her or offer help when he expressed suicidal thoughts to these virtual characters. based in Menlo Park, Calif., is a platform where people can create and interact with digital characters that mimic real and fictional people. The company has said that it takes teen safety seriously and rolled out a feature that gives parents more information about the amount of time their children are spending with chatbots on the platform. asked a federal court to dismiss the lawsuit, but a federal judge in May allowed the case to proceed. Sign up for our Wide Shot newsletter to get the latest entertainment business news, analysis and insights. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

California Senate passes bill that aims to make AI chatbots safer
California Senate passes bill that aims to make AI chatbots safer

Los Angeles Times

time03-06-2025

  • Los Angeles Times

California Senate passes bill that aims to make AI chatbots safer

California lawmakers on Tuesday moved one step closer to placing more guardrails around artificial intelligence-powered chatbots. The Senate passed a bill that aims to make chatbots used for companionship safer after parents raised concerns that virtual characters harmed their childrens' mental health. The legislation, which now heads to the California State Assembly, shows how state lawmakers are tackling safety concerns surrounding AI as tech companies release more AI-powered tools. 'The country is watching again for California to lead,' said Sen. Steve Padilla (D-Chula Vista), one of the lawmakers who introduced the bill, on the Senate floor. At the same time, lawmakers are trying to balance concerns that they could be hindering innovation. Groups opposed to the bill such as the Electronic Frontier Foundation say the legislation is too broad and would run into free speech issues, according to a Senate floor analysis of the bill. Under Senate Bill 243, operators of companion chatbot platforms would remind users at least every three hours that the virtual characters aren't human. They would also disclose that companion chatbots might not be suitable for some minors. Platforms would also need to take other steps such as implementing a protocol for addressing suicidal ideation, suicide or self-harm expressed by users. That includes showing users suicide prevention resources. The operator of these platforms would also report the number of times a companion chatbot brought up suicide ideation or actions with a user, along with other requirements. Dr. Akilah Weber Pierson, one of the bill's co-authors, said she supports innovation but it also must come with 'ethical responsibility.' Chatbots, the senator said, are engineered to hold people's attention including children. 'When a child begins to prefer interacting with AI over real human relationships, that is very concerning,' said Sen. Weber Pierson (D-La Mesa). The bill defines companion chatbots as AI systems capable of meeting the social needs of users. It excludes chatbots that businesses use for customer service. The legislation garnered support from parents who lost their children after they started chatting with chatbots. One of those parents is Megan Garcia, a Florida mom who sued Google and after her son Sewell Setzer III died by suicide last year. In the lawsuit, she alleges the platform's chatbots harmed her son's mental health and failed to notify her or offer help when he expressed suicidal thoughts to these virtual characters. based in Menlo Park, Calif., is a platform where people can create and interact with digital characters that mimic real and fictional people. The company has said that it takes teen safety seriously and rolled out a feature that gives parents more information about the amount of time their children are spending with chatbots on the platform. asked a federal court to dismiss the lawsuit, but a federal judge in May allowed the case to proceed.

Oregon Senate passes bump stock ban, allows expansion of gun-free zones
Oregon Senate passes bump stock ban, allows expansion of gun-free zones

Yahoo

time02-06-2025

  • Yahoo

Oregon Senate passes bump stock ban, allows expansion of gun-free zones

PORTLAND, Ore. (KOIN) – A gun safety bill is making its way through the Oregon legislature, which would ban bump stocks and allow local governments to decide whether to allow firearms in public meeting spaces. The Oregon Senate passed — the Community Safety Firearms Act — on Thursday, which would create new crimes for possessing bump stocks — or devices that turn semi-automatic guns fully automatic. Under the bill, local governments would also have the authority to limit concealed handgun license holders from bringing firearms in public buildings where official meetings are held, such as city halls. 'Something was not right': Oregon Coast safari park received complaints for nearly a decade Following the bill's passage, Oregon Senate Democrats said the legislation marks 'action for community safety.' 'Being elected to serve means guarding the people who put their trust in us: protecting their safety, defending their rights, and leading with humility and common sense,' said Senator Anthony Broadman (D –Bend). 'As a father, a hunter, a responsible gun owner, and an Oregon Senator, I know Senate Bill 243 honors that responsibility.' 'Rapid-fire activators are simply tools of mass destruction and do not belong in our communities,' added Sen. Floyd Prozanski (D –Eugene & Springfield), chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee and chief sponsor of the bill. Close Thanks for signing up! Watch for us in your inbox. Subscribe Now 'It's time to call these devices what they are. They give legal firearms the same dangerous abilities as machine guns,' said Senator Lisa Reynolds (D –Portland). 'If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it's probably a machine gun.' The bill passed the Senate in a 17-12 vote along party lines, with the Oregon Senate Republican Caucus calling the legislation 'deeply flawed.' 'The people who follow the law deserve policies that respect them. The people who break the law deserve consequences,' said Senate Republican Leader Daniel Bonham (R-The Dalles). 'Senate Bill 243 targets responsible Oregonians, not criminals. That's a mistake we've made before. We should learn from it, not double down on it.' Candlelight vigil marks 15th anniversary of Kyron Horman's disappearance According to the Senate Republican Caucus, 'there is no credible evidence' that banning bump stocks will reduce gun violence. 'This bill does not address the core issues driving gun violence in our communities,' said Senator Bruce Starr (R-Dundee). 'It doesn't target criminals. It doesn't invest in mental health or illegal gun trafficking enforcement. Instead, it creates new penalties for responsible gun owners who already follow the law, store their firearms safely, and have undergone background checks.' The Republican caucus noted they offered their own proposals in a minority report, which was rejected by Democrats. Kohr Explores: Salmon fishing season arrives in Oregon The proposals from Republicans included repealing , a bill from 2021 that allows school districts and local governments to decide whether to allow concealed handgun license holders to bring firearms into public buildings. Other proposals from the Republican caucus included preventing people who have been charged with drug-related misdemeanors from owning guns along with another provision requiring participants in deflection programs to transfer their firearms to a law enforcement agency, a gun dealer or a third party until their deflection program is completed. After passing the Senate on Thursday, the bill moves to the Oregon House of Representatives, where the bill will have its first reading on June 2. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store