Waymo begins testing robotaxis in Houston
Waymo — the company behind self-driving robotaxis in cities like Austin and Los Angeles — is getting the lay of the land in Houston starting this week.
Why it matters: Described as a "road trip," Waymo's visit marks its introduction to the Bayou City, signaling another possible rollout of autonomous vehicles for locals.
How it works: For now, trained specialists will manually drive around 10 Waymo vehicles to help the company gather data on Houston streets.
The intrigue: Although testing is underway, Waymo spokesperson Sandy Karp tells Axios the company has "no plans to share about launching a service in Houston at this time."
What they're saying:"Like other visitors to Space City, we can't wait to take in the sights, immerse ourselves in Houston's distinct driving culture, and meet with locals," Karp said in a statement.
Zoom out: Waymo began test runs in other cities this year, including Dallas, San Diego, Las Vegas, New Orleans, Nashville and Boston.
Along with Houston, San Antonio and Orlando are the latest cities where Waymo recently began testing.
Reality check: Several Austin residents have filed complaints against Waymo, citing safety concerns and a "near-miss" since the company began testing there in March 2024.
Flashback: That story similarly played out in Houston when GM's now-shuttered Cruise robotaxi experiment proved problematic.
Between the lines: Karp says Waymo is committed to working with communities and public officials in the cities it enters, but Mayor John Whitmire's office says they didn't get a heads-up from the company about their plans.
"City departments and emergency responders have been briefed on protocols for interacting with autonomous vehicles," Whitmire spokesperson Mary Benton tells Axios. "The mayor will continue to monitor the situation."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
How San Antonio wants to catch up on mass transit
San Antonio is the largest U.S. city without a light rail system, but experts say two new rapid bus lines can offer similar transportation benefits with lower costs. Why it matters: As the city cements its status as one of the most populous in the U.S., it has lagged behind its peers in public transit efforts. Context: A decade ago this month, San Antonio voters passed a charter amendment that said the city would have to get voter approval for any light rail or streetcar systems. In 2000, voters rejected a light rail proposal; in 2014, a streetcar project died. State of play: Fast-forward 10 years, and VIA Metropolitan Transit leaders and transit experts say two coming bus rapid transit routes — the Green and Silver lines — will offer an experience similar to rail and move almost as many people. And officials are betting on it to increase public transit use. VIA's buses had nearly 27 million trips in 2024, up more than 11% from 2023, per American Public Transportation Association data. "People taking the Green Line are going to be able to get to their connections to other lines faster and more reliably than ever before," Rod Sanchez, VIA's senior vice president of planning and development, tells Axios. "We're definitely taking our service to an all-new level." The latest: The Green Line will run along San Pedro Avenue from San Antonio International Airport on the North Side through downtown to the Missions on the South Side. Construction is slated to begin in July. The Silver Line will run from the Frost Bank Center on the East Side through downtown to North General McMullen on the West Side. It's still undergoing design; construction could begin in 2027. How it works: A rapid bus runs in a dedicated lane, rather than sharing the street with cars. It's expected to arrive every 10 minutes, and riders can pay their fare before boarding to speed up the process. Construction of both rapid bus routes is largely funded with federal dollars. Despite threats to funding under the Trump administration, Sanchez says VIA feels confident the city will keep it. It's already secured $268 million for the Green Line. Maintenance and operation will fall to VIA. Follow the money: The Green Line is projected to cost a total of $480.8 million and the Silver Line $289.2 million. What they're saying: Frequency is what matters most to convince riders to take public transit over driving, Kelly Blume, associate research scientist at the Texas A&M Transportation Institute, tells Axios. If San Antonio creates "a transit service that achieves high frequencies and fast speeds and can carry a lot of people, you could meet that need with bus rapid transit or with rail," Blume says. Zoom out: As San Antonio builds out its transit future, systems in major U.S. cities are faltering. Ridership and revenue tanked during the pandemic and has still not fully recovered. Federal funding is uncertain.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
The ‘white-collar bloodbath' is all part of the AI hype machine
A version of this story appeared in CNN Business' Nightcap newsletter. To get it in your inbox, sign up for free here. If the CEO of a soda company declared that soda-making technology is getting so good it's going to ruin the global economy, you'd be forgiven for thinking that person is either lying or fully detached from reality. Yet when tech CEOs do the same thing, people tend to perk up. ICYMI: The 42-year-old billionaire Dario Amodei, who runs the AI firm Anthropic, told Axios this week that the technology he and other companies are building could wipe out half of all entry-level office jobs … sometime soon. Maybe in the next couple of years, he said. He reiterated that claim in an interview with CNN's Anderson Cooper on Thursday. 'AI is starting to get better than humans at almost all intellectual tasks, and we're going to collectively, as a society, grapple with it,' Amodei told Cooper. 'AI is going to get better at what everyone does, including what I do, including what other CEOs do.' To be clear, Amodei didn't cite any research or evidence for that 50% estimate. And that was just one of many of the wild claims he made that are increasingly part of a Silicon Valley script: AI will fix everything, but first it has to ruin everything. Why? Just trust us. In this as-yet fictional world, 'cancer is cured, the economy grows at 10% a year, the budget is balanced — and 20% of people don't have jobs,' Amodei told Axios, repeating one of the industry's favorite unfalsifiable claims about a disease-free utopia on the horizon, courtesy of AI. But how will the US economy, in particular, grow so robustly when the jobless masses can't afford to buy anything? Amodei didn't say. (As an aside: I asked labor economist Aaron Sojourner about this scenario of high unemployment plus strong economic growth, and he said there is a theory of the case, if you squint really hard. Amodei may believe that AI can increase productivity and make each hour of labor create more goods and services. But if that's the case, he's imagining 'a 30% jump in labor productivity to get that combination of unemployment and GDP growth,' said Sojourner, a senior researcher at the W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research. 'That is a wildly unprecedented vision,' he added, noting that in the 1980s and 90s, computer adoption gave the world all kinds of tools that reshaped the labor market. But labor productivity grew just 2% to 3%.) Anyway. The point is, Amodei is a salesman, and it's in his interest to make his product appear inevitable and so powerful it's scary. Axios framed Amodei's economic prediction as a 'white-collar bloodbath.' Even some AI optimists were put off by Amodei's stark characterization. 'Someone needs to remind the CEO that at one point there were more than (2 million) secretaries. There were also separate employees to do in office dictation, wrote tech entrepreneur Mark Cuban on Bluesky. 'They were the original white collar displacements. New companies with new jobs will come from AI and increase TOTAL employment.' Little of what Amodei told Axios was new, but it was calibrated to sound just outrageous enough to draw attention to Anthropic's work, days after it released a major model update to its Claude chatbot, one of the top rivals to OpenAI's ChatGPT. Amodei stands to profit off the very technology he claims will gut the labor market. But here he is, telling everyone the truth and sounding the alarm! He's trying to warn us, he's one of the good ones! Yeaaahhh. So, this is kind of Anthropic's whole ~thing.~ It refers to itself primarily as an 'AI safety and research' company. They are the AI guys who see the potential harms of AI clearly — not through the rose-colored glasses worn by the techno-utopian simps over at OpenAI. (In fact, Anthropic's founders, including Amodei, left OpenAI over ideological differences.) Look, I want to live a cancer-free utopia where I only have to work a few hours a week and there's no poverty and stuff just works. But do I believe that generative AI is the key to unlocking that fantasyland? I do not. And no tech pioneers have proven their case. Generative AI from large language models like ChatGPT and Claude are really good at some very specific stuff: They can summarize documents, write dumb emails, help kids cheat on their homework, and even recommend summer reading lists so obscure not even the authors knew they'd written them. Heck, they could probably generate this newsletter and mimic my voice. But they hit their limits fast. They hallucinate. They get basic facts wrong. They are susceptible manipulation. (And those are all things we human beings can do just fine on our own.) If AI companies can take these handy, quasi-reliable text predictors and turn them into an economic revolution, fine. But that seems so far off in the future that Amodei's warnings feel more like an ad than a PSA. It's on them to show their work: Show us how AI could be so destructive and how Anthropic can fix it — rather than just shouting about the risks. . Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Axios
2 hours ago
- Axios
One year after water main breaks, Atlanta prepares for future systemwide needs
Saturday marks one year since two large water main breaks stymied most of Atlanta, and the city has spent the last 12 months working on a long-term plan it hopes will prevent similar catastrophes from happening in the future. Why it matters: Atlanta's aging water infrastructure system is in dire need of an overhaul, and city officials will have to determine whether an increase in rates or a new fee will help fund the improvements. The latest: In an interview with Axios, Atlanta chief strategy officer Peter Aman said Thursday the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is about halfway through its task of assessing the state of the city's drinking water system. The corps is reviewing data, including where breaks have happened in the past, to determine which parts of the system should be prioritized. Aman said the corps' work should be done by the end of the year. In the meantime, the city will explore what path to take to fund any of those projects. What they're saying: Even if the city had billions of dollars, it wouldn't be able to fix every problem main or valve at once, Aman told Axios. "There's only so many streets you want to tear up and so many bulldozers you want to to rent," he said. "You want to prioritize it where you're going to have your largest, most impactful leaks." Between the lines: Department of Watershed Commissioner Greg Eyerly told Axios that most of the revenue the city collected from the 1% Municipal Option Sales Tax (MOST) has gone toward projects that put the city in compliance with a federal consent decree to improve its sewer system. "It's very expensive (and) Atlanta's rates have been very high for a long time," Eyerly said. "And (with) the amount of breathing room you have …Atlanta has been closer to that ceiling than a lot of other similar-sized communities." Follow the money: Mayor Andre Dickens said in March that the city would need around $2 billion to upgrade its aging infrastructure. Aman said that number could change but the city already knows a total system replacement won't be necessary. As far as funding, Aman stressed that everything was being explored, including a potential water and sewer rate hike and a possible stormwater utility fee. Catch up quick: The water main break that started it all happened the morning of May 31, 2024, on Joseph E. Boone Boulevard and James P. Brawley Drive, in Vine City. Another break occurred several hours later in Midtown, at 11th and West Peachtree streets. Businesses and neighborhoods in Midtown, Downtown and to the east and west were left without water, and many residents took to social media to express frustration at the lack of information provided by the city. The big picture: "The mayor has made it crystal clear that external communication is absolutely a top priority, and we will never again have a situation where there's any gaps or lack of information being passed along," Aman said. Now, Atlanta strives to push out water main break details to the public, even if crews are unsure of the precise location, and info on where affected residents can pick up water during an outage. State of play: The city is still utilizing AI technology to detect leaks sooner and deploy fixes quicker. Aman said the city installed hundreds of devices at more than 1,600 locations since last year's breaks. They were able to detect eight "significant" leaks in the system. Repairs for six have been completed and work on the remaining two is still ongoing, Eyerly said. What's next: Eyerly said the city is also exploring technology that will give Atlanta water customers real-time data about their water usage, potentially leading to more consistent water billing.
