Anthony Albanese goes into damage control as Penny Wong declares the Aboriginal body is inevitable in bombshell pre-election move... so do YOU buy it?
Anthony Albanese has denied that one of his most senior ministers claimed a resurrected Voice to Parliament was inevitable in Australia.
Foreign Minister Penny Wong sparked a political firestorm three days before Aussies head to the polls by suggesting that there will one day be a Voice – and people will wonder why there was ever an argument about it.
'I think we'll look back on it in 10 years' time and it'll be a bit like marriage equality,' Senator Wong told the Betoota Talks podcast.
'I always used to say, marriage equality, which took us such a bloody fight to get that done, and I thought, all this fuss.
'It'll become something, it'll be like, people go "did we even have an argument about that?"
'Like, kids today, or even adults today, barely kind of clock that it used to be an issue. Remember how big an issue that was in the culture wars? Blimey, just endless.'
But the Prime Minister has rejected out of hand the idea that Senator Wong was drawing an equivalence between the fight for marriage equality and the Voice.
'Well, she didn't say that at all,' Mr Albanese told ABC Radio Melbourne on Thursday morning.
Foreign Minister Penny Wong sparked a political firestorm three days before Aussies head to the polls by suggesting that there will one day be a Voice – and people will wonder why there was ever an argument about it
'She spoke about how people will look back on what the issues were. That's very different from saying it's inevitable.'
The Labor spin machine went into overdrive on Thursday morning, trying to claim that Senator Wong was not referring to the Voice.
'The Minister was clearly reflecting on the heated debate on how we address reconciliation and close the gap – and saying that as progress is achieved, today's arguments will no longer be an issue,' a campaign spokesperson said.
'The Government has been clear that we respect the outcome of the referendum, and we need to find different paths to achieve reconciliation in this country.'
Mr Albanese has repeatedly said there will be not be another referendum.
Asked by Channel Seven's Political Editor Mark Riley during Sunday night's leaders' debate whether he still believed in the Voice, Mr Albanese responded: 'It's gone'.
'I respect the outcome (of the referendum), we live in a democracy,' he said.
Pushed on his position, he added: 'We need to find different paths to affect reconciliation.'
But now it can be revealed that on the day before the election was called, a top government official refused to rule whether work was progressing on Voice, Treaty and Truth.
At Senate Estimates on 27 March, Senator Wong refused multiple times to answer a simple question from Senator Michaelia Cash: 'Is the Prime Minister still committed to Voice, Treaty, Truth?'
Instead, Senator Wong directed a government official to answer.
'The government remains committed to the principles of the Uluru Statement and continues to engage in good faith with leaders and communities around next steps,' Greta Doherty, First Assistant Secretary of the Social Policy division responded.
'I guess government acknowledges there is considerable work underway at a state and territory level on treaty and truth telling process - and government welcomes this work.'
Wong's comments threaten to undermine the official Labor position, which has sought to distance the administration as much as possible from the disastrous result.
The disastrous Voice campaign was a major blow for the Labor government and Albanese, who hinged his legacy on the proposal.
Senator Wong's comments are a political gift to Peter Dutton who is trailing badly in the polls three days out from the federal election.
The Opposition Leader tried to bring up the failure of the Voice in the leaders' debate on Sunday night in the context of Welcome to Country ceremonies.
He said he thought the ceremonies were 'overdone', cheapening their significance.
'It divides the country, not dissimilar to what the Prime Minister did with the Voice,' he said.
HOST: It's an interesting thing because we have all this stuff happening elsewhere in the world, and obviously, you know, that's, that's your job to deal with all that and look at that at least be aware of it.
But in Australia we've got a federal election happening and we've got domestic politics which of late – and I think really ramped up in the pandemic – is we've seen just such an increase in the culture wars, you know what I mean?
It distracts from a lot of things, , but, you know, we kind of have, Trans rights, Aboriginal flags, woke schools, yada yada yada, all that stuff.
Is this a new thing or as someone who's been (the) longest serving cabinet minister, female cabinet minister, has this always been around?
WONG: I think it's just Peter Dutton doing what John Howard did is you try and pick a fight in order to define yourself and so that people don't ask you what you're really gonna do. Frankly, that's it. That's just end of story.
HOST: Throwing dead cats on the table.
WONG: You remember the fight over the apology or the black armband view of history or whatever, the fight over school curriculum. I think we all know he wants to talk about that because he wants to define himself on those grounds because he doesn't want to talk about cuts to Medicare, doesn't want to talk about $600 billion of nuclear reactors, all of that kind of stuff.
But can I go back to the world that you're just.
I mean, it's not just me dealing with this, I mean, the government and Albo,he's had to be a prime minister to in a time where we've got to navigate a pretty different world, .
The thing that is, and he's a mate of mine… there are many things that I think are really great about him, doesn't forget where he came from, but he's also really disciplined and really firm about the direction he wants to take. He's good to work with.
HOST: That's the funny thing, right, with the referendum: is this an example of that? You know, the referendum looked like it was going to fail, everyone who was supporting it had hope, but back to the culture wars, that's what it turned into. The opponents turned it into that. Albo had the chance to, to pull the pin on that…early days before we'd even seen… all the confusion set in, 'if you don't know, vote no'.
But is that what you're saying there, he said he was going to do it.
WONG: Yeah, he's not a pull the pin kind of guy.
HOST: So he's gonna wear it – wear the bark getting taken off him by his opponents.
WONG: He thought it was the right thing to do and a lot of the First Nations leaders wanted the opportunity. I think we'll look back on it in 10 years' time, and it'll be a bit like marriage equality, don't you reckon?
Like I always used to say marriage equality, which took us such a bloody fight to get that done, and I thought all this fuss, it'll become something, it'll be like, people go, do we have an argument about that?
…kids today, or any, even adults today, barely kind of clock that it used to be an issue.
Remember how big an issue that was in Cultural wars?
HOST: Yes, I remember (Alan) Joyce getting hit with a pie.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Labor reveals plan to deliver 1.2million new homes
Breaking ground on delivering 1.2million homes starts by untangling the maze of bureaucratic approvals, the federal government says. Housing Minister Clare O'Neil has signalled a second-term Labor administration will move quickly to boost construction. 'We've just been elected with a really clear mandate to improve our housing system in this country,' she told reporters on Saturday. 'We've got big reforms to implement, and not a day to waste in getting on with them.' The minister vowed to simplify local, state and federal planning regulations by leading a council of planning ministers. 'If we are going to address the housing needs of Australians, it is going to require the three levels of government to work together in new ways,' she said. She will work with the building sector to implement innovative technologies to move past time consuming and costly methods of construction. Her comments come after an interview with ABC on Friday where she said 'builders face a ridiculous thicket of red tape that is preventing them building the homes we need.' Master Builders Australia CEO Denita Wawn said the cost of building a home had skyrocketed by 40 per cent over the past five years while construction times had ballooned by 80 per cent over the past decade. 'It is critical that we remove the red tape that is hampering our capacity to build homes,' she said. Ms Wawn was hopeful the ambitious goal of 1.2million homes coming onto the market would be achieved, but said the group's projections showed there could be a slight drop-off. She argued that along with the focus on reducing red tape, there was an urgent need to apprenticeships and fast-tracking migration for skilled people. 'For the first time, the federal government is leaning in and trying to ensure that there is a focused attention on housing,' she said. But opposition housing spokesman Andrew Bragg said the government's plans were a 'joke' and described Labor as 'red tape champions.' 'Labor's signature housing policy, the Housing Australia Future Fund has built zero new homes in three years,' Senator Bragg said. 'Approvals are way down under their watch and their 1.2million new home target is a dead duck.' The Paris-based Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development warned Australia on Tuesday to boost housing supply and address falling affordability. The OECD said easing zoning restrictions would strengthen competition and productivity, as well as raise housing investment to 'reverse the long-standing decline in housing affordability'.
The Guardian
a day ago
- The Guardian
Worried about the tax on $3m plus super balances? Here's how you'll survive
Imagine you have $3m in super and have just retired, only to hear that Labor plans to hit you with a new tax. Or perhaps you're worried (dream?) that at some point in the near or distant future you might cross that multi-million-dollar savings threshold. Either way, you might be wondering whether the government's proposal to whack an extra 15% tax on earnings on balances over $3m is going to put a major crimp in your retirement plans. Breathe easy, your annual trips to Europe are safe, as are your smashed avocado brekkies. According to Guardian Australia's analysis, a wealthy Australian retiring with $3m in super today would pay an extra $2,355 in tax. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email And that's from annual retirement income of more than $170,000, based on an estimate from Asic's MoneySmart retirement calculator. In other words, the tax represents barely 1% of your income. If that doesn't make you feel better, then remember that the median full-time salary in Australia is $88,400, according to the ABS, and $72,590 across all employees. So you are making nearly twice the median full-time salary – and those suckers are paying income tax! Well, consider this: The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia reckons that a single person with a paltry $595,000 in savings can generate a 'comfortable' lifestyle in retirement with $51,807 in income a year. You're making more than three times as much, even after paying Labor's damned extra tax! What's that? You only have $800,000 in savings? Gosh, how sad. (If it makes you feel any better, that's still four times the median super balance among 65-69 year-olds, according to the ATO). Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion Don't worry, though, you won't be paying the proposed extra 15% tax - remember it only starts kicking in on balances over $3m. And anyway, you can still live pretty well on $67,000 a year, tax-free. That all sounds OK for the small-fry with $3m in super. But what about the serious savers with $5m? How much extra tax will they have to suffer in the name of making the super system 'fairer'? Bad news. They could be paying something like an extra $25,000 in tax under the proposed policy, if they earn the average 7.5% annual return in the year. The good news is that they'll still have nearly $270,000 left over to … wait, can a single retiree even spend that much in a year?
The Guardian
a day ago
- The Guardian
Nicolette Boele on climate, business and making a difference
Nicolette Boele was declared the winner in the Sydney seat of Bradfield this week, after a month of counting and recounting in her race against Liberal Gisele Kapterian. She is preparing to take her seat in parliament after a wafer-thin victory of just 26 votes. Boele speaks to chief political correspondent Tom McIlroy about why Labor needs to stop 'walking both sides of the fence' on climate and energy and where she thinks the government could improve productivity.
