Former Sky Sports presenter banned for football betting scam
Football betting firm boss Alan Bentley, who worked for the broadcaster between 1996 and 2001, allowed his Bentley Global (UK) Limited company to obtain more than £1.5 million from investors during late 2019 and the first half of 2020, promising returns of up to 20%.
Investors' funds were to be used to place bets on the outcomes of football matches using an artificial intelligence algorithm called Algol88.
READ MORE: SNP urge Rachel Reeves to abandon disability cuts after winter fuel U-turn
However, no evidence was produced that Bentley Global (UK) Limited was actually betting on football matches in that period.
Bentley Global (UK) Limited also had no known source of trading income in that time, having suffered losses of more than £5 million by August 2019 and over £4 million by August 2018.
The 63-year-old from Essex has been banned as a company director for 11 years.
Bentley's brother, Brian Bentley, was also disqualified as a company director in 2024 for misconduct while he was a director at Bentley Global (UK) Limited.
Kevin Read, chief investigator at the Insolvency Service, said: 'Alan Bentley's company secured more than £1.5 million from hundreds of investors under a bond investment scheme during a nine-month period in 2019 and 2020 when there was no evidence of any trading.
'Bentley knew the company had made huge losses and was unable to pay its debts. His company had no reasonable prospect of being able to repay the investments and interest payments under the bond scheme because of its dire financial position.
'Directors have a responsibility to be honest and transparent with investors, especially when handling their money. This case sends a clear message that those who abuse their position and mislead investors will not be able to continue to act as company directors.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
STV News
37 minutes ago
- STV News
Swinney to chair youth violence summit after stabbings and classroom violence
John Swinney is set to chair a summit on youth violence as he attempts to clamp down on knife crime among young people. The cross-party meeting follows the deaths of two teenagers in Scotland this year from separate stabbings. It also comes as teachers report rising levels of classroom violence and misogynistic behaviour among pupils. Thursday's summit will hear from the justice and education secretaries, ministers for children and for victims, along with cross-party MSPs, youth workers and those delivering violence reduction in Scotland. It follows discussions led by Mr Swinney to hear young people's and families' experiences and ideas on possible solutions, and will focus on education and community engagement with young people and possible strategies preventing them from turning to anti-social behaviour or carrying a weapon. Angela Constance, the Justice Secretary, has admitted that 'more needs to be done' to clamp down on violence. Earlier this month, the Scottish Government pledged that funding for the Scottish Violence Reduction Unit will rise by 7% to £1.217 million, which reversed earlier plans to cut its budget. Despite several high-profile recent murders among teenagers, Police Scotland said that serious assaults by those aged 11 to 18 fell by 27% between 2019/20 and 2024/25, from 428 to 313. Ahead of the meeting, Scottish Liberal Democrat leader Alex Cole-Hamilton called for greater investment in youth work. Mr Cole-Hamilton, who was a youth worker before becoming an MSP, accused the SNP of presiding over the 'quiet death' of youth work. He said: 'For the best part of 20 years, I was a youth worker, helping some of the most disengaged young people get their lives back on track. 'That experience taught me that no child is inherently bad. Most of the time, they are just in need of some direction, a need that has only been fuelled by the isolating impact of lockdown. 'That's where youth work comes in: it provides young people with the direction they need and gives them a positive adult role model who is neither a teacher nor a parent. 'It teaches teenagers to come out of their comfort zone, helps them rebuild their sense of self-worth and fosters a whole host of key life skills. 'Since the pandemic, however, the SNP have presided over the quiet death of youth work. Budgets have been squeezed, services have struggled to survive, just when we need them the most. 'While acts of violence require a strong response, punishing predominantly law-abiding young people cannot be our broader solution. We need youth work to pre-empt and prevent those acts of violence, to properly engage young people in society and lay the foundations for them to succeed in life.' The Scottish Government has been approached for comment. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Swinney promotes ‘rising star' McAllan in cabinet reshuffle
John Swinney has created the largest cabinet since devolution in a 'modest' reshuffle, adding an extra ministerial post to his top team. Màiri McAllan, the MSP for Clydesdale, has returned from maternity leave and been named as the newly created housing secretary, as well as having an extra unofficial responsibility for media interviews. The Scottish cabinet now consists of 12 members with the ministerial team reduced to 11 from 14. Paul McLennan, who had been a junior housing minister, left the government at his own request, it was announced, with McAllan, who had previously been net zero and energy secretary, taking on overall responsibility for the portfolio. With the housing brief promoted to cabinet level, McAllan will be tasked with tackling Scotland's housing emergency as well as passing reforms to ensure homes are more energy efficient — a move that ministers hope can bring down bills while also tackling climate change. Senior SNP sources stressed 'the political significance' of her appointment. McAllan, 32, is highly regarded within the party and seen as a possible leadership contender in future. Some have suggested that Swinney's successor will be one of McAllan, the deputy first minister Kate Forbes and the Westminster leader Stephen Flynn. McAllan's former role as net zero and energy secretary has been filled by the Aberdeenshire East MSP Gillian Martin, who has been covering the post during McAllan's maternity leave. However, Swinney's opponents said that the reshuffle was merely 'rearranging the deckchairs on the Titanic' and contained the 'same old faces who have failed Scotland for far too long'. There was no cabinet place for Ivan McKee, the public finance minister, who has been overlooked for a second time by Swinney despite his reputation as one of the few well-performing junior ministers. Swinney described the reshuffle as 'modest' and said that the government was focused on four aims: eradicating child poverty, strengthening the economy, making the transition to net zero and improving public services, in particular the NHS. Speaking on the steps of Bute House, the first minister said: 'I've decided to make modest changes to the government because I think it is essential that the government, which is far advanced in delivering its programme of improvement in the lives of the people in Scotland, is concentrated on that delivery, it's vital that we have all the time available to us in this parliamentary term to improve the lives of people in Scotland and that is what the government is going to do.' The Scottish government is hoping to prioritise housebuilding on the back of the announcement of £39 billion for affordable and social homes over ten years by the UK chancellor, Rachel Reeves, in the spending review on Wednesday. In the wider reshuffle, Maree Todd, the public health minister, has moved to the drugs and alcohol portfolio, replacing Christina McKelvie who died in March. Todd's role as social care minister has been taken by Tom Arthur, the former employment minister. Some within the SNP had been hoping for a more extensive reshuffle to remove, or at least shift, poorly performing ministers, but claimed that Swinney's natural caution and a lack of talent among junior ministers and backbenchers had hampered big changes. One SNP insider described it as a 'missed opportunity' and another nationalist derided it as 'more a wee shuffle than a reshuffle'. Alex Neil, the former health secretary, said it was 'the same old, same old. Nowhere near the changes needed to win next year's election.' The changes follow the party's unexpected loss in last week's Hamilton, Larkhall & Stonehouse by-election to Labour. After the vote Swinney said that the SNP needed a period of 'soul searching' and that the result showed that Scottish voters were no longer prioritising independence. It had been suggested that the first minister would take the opportunity to replace at least one of Shona Robison, the finance secretary, Fiona Hyslop, the transport secretary, and Mairi Gougeon, the rural affairs secretary, who have all announced they will leave the Scottish parliament next year. Rachael Hamilton, the Scottish Conservatives' deputy leader, said: 'Scots will be forgiven for thinking 'is that it'? John Swinney is leading a government that is not only out of ideas, but out of personnel too. 'He's rearranged the deckchairs on the Titanic and ended up with the same old faces who have failed Scotland for far too long.' Jackie Baillie, Scottish Labour's deputy leader, said: 'The SNP lost the by-election in Hamilton, Larkhall & Stonehouse because they failed to listen to the priorities of people who have been badly let down by the government at Holyrood. 'If, after 18 years in power, the best John Swinney has to offer as an answer to the issues facing Scots is to shuffle his cabinet around, then that is simply not good enough.'
The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Should Scotland blindly follow England down the nuclear power path?
She didn't add 'top that, Swinney,' but a gauntlet was unmistakeably proffered. Jobs, apprenticeships, investment – oh, and it's low carbon too: Labour's sales pitch on nuclear power is a challenge to the SNP's 'no new nuclear' policy (conveniently overlooking that the decision to prevent new nuclear was originally taken by the Labour-Lib Dem coalition). Backing new nuclear power hits two spots for Labour – one, it helps with energy security, providing a low carbon baseload power source for when the wind isn't blowing, and two, it will create jobs and rather a lot of them (10,000 at Sizewell C in Suffolk, Reeves claims, including 1,500 apprenticeships). Read more Rebecca McQuillan This is all music to the ears of traditional Labour supporters who are disorientated by the ongoing retreat from traditional industry, alarmed about the wind-down of oil and gas, and sceptical about the capacity of the renewables sector to replace lost jobs. We hear you, the Chancellor is saying. Ian Murray, the Scottish Secretary, has been out reminding people that the SNP is refusing to allow Scotland to benefit from any of this munificence. On the face of it, the SNP's anti-nuclear power stance has become radioactive. But that's only on a narrow reading of the issue. There's more to it than that. The Scottish Government has a long-standing objection to nuclear power mainly on environmental grounds. Those objections are not daft – to this day, governments around the world are vexed by the question of how to dispose safely of highly dangerous radioactive waste. Accidents at nuclear power plants can be catastrophic. More immediately, building new nuclear capacity is also infamously expensive and costs are prone to rise, often astronomically, during the build phase. Hinckley Point C in Somerset, which is currently being built by EDF Energy, was initially projected to cost £18bn but last year EDF estimated it could end up costing up to £46bn. It's also several years late. The Government's £14.2bn projected spend on Sizewell C is only for the next four years, with overall costs officially expected to top out at £20bn, but industry experts suggest £40bn would be more realistic. The UK Government's own figures suggest power from nuclear costs two to three times more than wind power per megawatt hour. Chancellor Rachel Reeves (Image: free) So the Scottish Government aren't wrong to be holding back on nuclear, economically as well as environmentally. Focusing on renewables output is cheaper, cleaner and quicker to bring on stream, as well as producing lasting employment. But wind power and solar won't be enough, on their own, to meet all of Scotland's energy needs. To do that, Scotland needs reliable baseload power generation. The wind blows hard in the North Sea off Scotland but even sailing boats on the Moray Firth are becalmed sometimes. So how can Scotland cover its baseload power needs? That's the question that has yet to be answered clearly. Scottish ministers need a convincing plan or risk losing the argument by default. Yesterday Gillian Martin, the energy secretary, reiterated the no new nuclear stance and cited hydro power stations as 'a way of filling in any gaps in the generation of power". And why not? Scotland already has 88 per cent of the UK's hydro capacity. This country has different geography and a much smaller population than England. England might need to replace its ageing nuclear reactors, but does Scotland? It only has one still operating. It makes sense to check first that we can't meet our baseload power needs from renewables before jumping on the nuclear bandwagon. Pumped hydro storage is one option and is proven tech. Water is pumped from a lower reservoir to a higher one during times when renewable electricity is plentiful so that it can be let down through the turbines again to generate electricity when there's a power shortfall. A large scale pumped hydro scheme already being developed at Coire Glas by SSE Renewables would have 30GWh of storage, doubling Britain's electricity storage capacity. But how many pumped hydro plants would we need? Where would they be? Would they get through planning? How long would they take? The Scottish Government hasn't said. It has urged the UK government to provide better conditions for investment but details are scant. Read more Scottish ministers have also talked about the importance of 'grid-scale batteries' and vehicle-to-grid technology, allowing car batteries to store power and supply it back to the grid. They talk about the role of green hydrogen in 'long term and large scale' energy storage, but we need more details. Reeves has given the green light at last to the Acorn Project carbon capture and storage (CCS) facility in Peterhead, providing 'development funding'. The facility would collect carbon dioxide generated from gas-fired power generation and industrial sources, and store it underground. Environmental campaigners say its assumed benefits are hugely exaggerated, but it's backed by the independent Climate Change Committee and the Scottish Government. Either way, it will take years to get up and running. An aspiration for more hydropower investment, aspirational talk of batteries and hydrogen, and support for CCS is not a concrete plan. There's a strong argument to avoid saddling Scottish people with expensive nuclear power generation when energy security could be provided through cheaper, faster, cleaner methods, but the Scottish Government needs to show the way with a robust clear plan, and fast. Otherwise it's advantage Labour. Rebecca McQuillan is a journalist specialising in politics and Scottish affairs. She can be found on Bluesky at @ and on X at @BecMcQ
