2 Indian students sentenced in multi-million dollar fraud schemes targeting elderly Americans
Two Indian nationals studying in the United States have been sentenced to federal prison in separate but similar fraud cases involving elaborate scams that targeted elderly Americans and resulted in millions of dollars in losses.
Kishan Rajeshkumar Patel, 20, who entered the U.S. on a student visa, was sentenced this week to 63 months (over five years) in prison after pleading guilty to conspiracy to commit money laundering. According to the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), Patel participated in an online phishing conspiracy that impersonated U.S. government officials and used fear tactics to extract money and gold from senior citizens.
'The conspiracy used various online phishing methods and impersonated U.S. government officials, while Patel fraudulently received the cash and gold from victims, conveying a portion to co-conspirators and keeping a percentage for his own benefit,' the DOJ said.
An investigation determined the scheme defrauded at least 25 elderly victims, with an intended loss of $2,694,156. Patel was arrested on August 24, 2024, in Granite Shoals, Texas, while attempting to collect what he believed was $130,000. He has remained in federal custody since August 29.
'This defendant took advantage of his visa status in our country and participated in an international fraud scheme,' said U.S. Attorney Justin Simmons, adding, 'Patel defrauded vulnerable American citizens out of millions of dollars by impersonating government officials and preying on his victims' fears of adverse government action.' His co-defendant, Dhruv Rajeshbhai Mangukiya, also an Indian national, pleaded guilty on June 16, 2025, and is awaiting sentencing.
In a related but separate case, Moinuddin Mohammed, another Indian student, was sentenced earlier this year to eight years in prison for a similar scam that defrauded elderly Americans of nearly $6 million. His case also involved impersonation tactics and international laundering of the stolen funds.
While all three were in the U.S. on student visas, U.S. authorities have not disclosed the educational institutions they were enrolled in.
The U.S. Justice Department and FBI continue to urge caution, particularly among seniors, against unsolicited communications from individuals claiming to represent government or law enforcement agencies.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
Air India crash: 210 victims identfied, 187 bodies handed over to families
A week after the deadly Air India crash that took place in Ahmedabad, DNA samples of 210 victims had been matched with their families and 187 mortals had been released, announced Gujarat Minister of Health, Family Welfare and Medical Education Rushikesh Patel on Thursday. In a post on social media X, Patel wrote "UPDATED UP TO :- 19/06/2025, 8:30 a.m. NO. OF DNA MATCH - 210 NO. OF RELATIVES CONTACTED- 210 NO. OF MORTAL RELEASED- 187 Remaining Mortal remains will be handed over soon." Meanwhile, the Ministry of Civil Aviation released new draft rules to tighten control over structures that pose a risk to aircraft safety. The draft, titled Aircraft (Demolition of Obstructions) Rules, 2025, was issued on June 18 and will come into force once published in the Official Gazette. The rules aim to give authorities the power to take prompt action against buildings and trees that exceed height limits in designated aerodrome zones. This is seen as a proactive step to prevent potential accidents caused by obstructions in flight paths. "Where any notification has been issued by the Central Government under sub-section (1) of section 18 of the Act and the officer-in-charge of the concerned aerodrome has reason to believe that any building or tree exists in violation of the provisions of the aforesaid notification, he shall serve a copy of the notification on the owner of the building or tree, as the case may be, in accordance with the procedure laid down in sub-section (3) of said section," the draft reads. Under the draft, any structure found violating the prescribed height limits may be served a notice by the officer-in-charge of an aerodrome. Owners must submit detailed information - including structure dimensions and site plans - within sixty days. Failure to comply could result in enforcement action, including demolition or height reduction. "The officer-in-charge of the concerned aerodrome shall forthwith send a report of such violation to the Director General, or any officer authorised by him in this behalf," it added. For physical verification, officers are empowered to enter the premises during daylight hours after informing the owner. In cases of non-cooperation, officers may proceed based on available information and refer the matter to the DGCA. "Before forwarding the details to the Director General, the officer-in-charge of the aerodrome shall satisfy himself about the correctness of the details and for that purpose, he shall be empowered to enter the premises in question and carry out physical verification of the dimensions of the building or tree, as the case may be, during daylight hours and with reasonable prior notice to the owner, who shall be duty bound to extend full cooperation during such physical verification," it further added. If there is non-compliance, the officer-in-charge must report the matter to the District Collector, who is then responsible for ensuring the demolition or trimming is carried out in accordance with the order. The procedure will mirror the process used for removing unauthorised constructions.
The Print
an hour ago
- The Print
There's no demand for safety in India's adventure industry. Tourists should ask questions
Though safety guidelines, licensing norms, and SOPs exist and many operators follow them, the sheer scale of the industry, combined with cutthroat competition, often overwhelms even the best-intentioned systems. The recent accident in Manali, where a 12-year-old girl from Nagpur fell into a gorge after her zip line's harness rope broke, is just the latest in a string of mishaps. A similar incident in Bhor, Pune, had raised alarms only weeks earlier. But the warnings go unheeded. And here we are again. Every time tragedy strikes in Indian adventure tourism, the pattern is predictable: Public outrage, media frenzy, finger-pointing and then silence, until the next time. Even after multiple fatal accidents this year, most participants, especially parents of young thrill-seekers, fail to ask critical questions about operator registrations, licenses and certifications. In the battle between adrenaline and awareness, adrenaline still wins. Also read: Adventure tourism is not accessible for women—sexual harassment, safety risks Illusion of safety Adventure will never be risk-free; it's about managing risk. Yet a culture of impulsive thrill-seeking is on the rise. Participants often arrive at a destination and jump into zip-lining, rafting, or trekking with little idea of what's at stake. The mindset is simple: If it's available and everyone's doing it, it must be safe. A helmet goes on, a rope is clipped, and no one asks about safety checks, certifications, or instructor training. Blind trust replaces basic caution. Social media only adds to the illusion. Adventure is sold as picture-perfect reels, showing the fun but not the fitness, training, or safety protocols behind it. For young minds still learning to weigh risk, it creates a dangerously false sense of effort-free thrill. The silent crisis This is the hard truth: Safety is the last thing on people's minds. For those who conduct activities, safety should be the priority and not an afterthought, irrespective of whether there is one participant or there are 50 participants. But safety isn't just the responsibility of operators. Most people don't ask important questions such as Does the operator have the license to operate? When was the equipment last checked? Do I or my child have the skill, strength, or sense to take this on? And that is where the crisis lies. For adventure tourism to operate safely, RAMS (Risk Assessment and Management Systems) need to be in place. Think of it as a safety blueprint, anticipating what could go wrong and planning how to prevent or handle it. Following RAMS makes adventure safe, not sorry. In adventure sports, where speed, height, water, terrain, and weather intersect, RAMS isn't just paperwork. It's essential to safety. Good RAMS includes: Hazard identification (e.g., rockfall, fatigue, gear failure) Likelihood and impact analysis Preventive steps (route checks, equipment inspection, skill-based grouping) Emergency response plans Clear roles for staff and guides Adventure will always involve risk, but RAMS ensures it's a calculated challenge, not a careless gamble. RAMS is standard in countries like New Zealand, the UK, and Canada, where the sector is tightly regulated. In India, it's still not an industry norm, a serious gap in our safety culture. Without RAMS: Altitude sickness may go unnoticed Equipment may be unchecked Participants may not know emergency procedures Weather alerts may be ignored This isn't just carelessness, it's a recipe for disaster. To professionalise India's adventure tourism, we must build a culture of safety through training, licensing, regulation, and public awareness. If demand for safety grows, responsible supply will follow. Also read: Everyone should learn wilderness first aid. It's more than just dressing wounds What needs to be done now Back in 2018, the Adventure Tour Operators Association of India (ATOAI) submitted a comprehensive set of Adventure Tourism Guidelines to the Ministry of Tourism. These weren't mere suggestions; they were detailed safety protocols, risk assessment models (including RAMS), and SOPs for land, air, and water-based activities. The guidelines emphasised operator training, participant briefing, and environmental responsibility. Yet in most states, these guidelines lie dormant. There is an urgent need for stakeholders to work alongside the government towards ensuring the enforcement of these guidelines. This means building a National Adventure and Outdoor Activity Policy Framework that brings together the Ministries of Tourism, Skill Development & Entrepreneurship, Environment & Forests, and industry stakeholders. This national scaffold can guide state governments to adapt and implement safety and inclusion standards based on local needs. The goal isn't central control but a shared vision: safety, skill, and sustainability embedded in every adventure offering, from Himachal to Goa to the Southern states. Why convergence matters India's adventure potential is vast, but the sector is fragmented. The sector relies too much on informal skills. A standardised training ecosystem—via NSQF (National Skills Qualification Framework) aligned programmes and Recognition for Prior Learning (RPL) can formalise adventure careers, especially for local and marginalised communities. From trekking and rafting to aero-sports and jungle safaris, each activity falls under different jurisdictions. A unified framework can ensure terrain-specific regulation while upholding national safety and inclusion norms. All activities must follow core operational standards: RAMS (Risk Assessment & Management Systems) Guide-to-participant ratios Seasonal access & ecological protocols Equipment and infrastructure standards Waste management & Leave No Trace policy Inclusive design (e.g., gender-sensitive, accessible spaces) The Ministry of Tourism can anchor this by linking licensing to compliance and safety audits. Participant education is of the utmost importance. It can be done by launching awareness campaigns that encourage asking questions and integrating safety modules in schools and NCC/NSS programmes. Another key aspect is to reframe safety checks as smart, not sceptical. Done right, adventure builds confidence and connection. Done wrong, it invites trauma and loss. India's adventure sector is growing fast. But to earn global respect, we must lead not just in thrill, but in standards, responsibility, and safety. Anusha Subramanian is an independent journalist, mountaineer, and entrepreneur who has been writing specifically about adventure and mountaineering for over a decade. She posts under @sanushas. Views are personal. (Edited by Theres Sudeep)
The Wire
2 hours ago
- The Wire
Mamata Banerjee's Censorship Efforts Continue as Bengal Police Asks X to Take Down Manjul's Cartoons on CM
The spirit of democracy is the spirit of criticism and satire. But not exactly in West Bengal. On June 18, political cartoonist Manjul revealed that he received a takedown notice from X (formerly Twitter), acting on a request by the West Bengal Cyber Crime Wing. The agency asked for the removal of two of Manjul's cartoons, posted back in 2019, alleging they violated Indian law. The cartoons in question featured Bengal chief minister Mamata Banerjee, lampooning the mass defections from Trinamool Congress (TMC) to the Bharatiya Janata Party and the party's alleged role in the chit-fund scams that rocked the state several years ago. Satirical, sharp, and unmistakably his own style, the posts are political commentary – nothing more, nothing less. The very act of seeking to remove two cartoons from a social media platform years after they were posted underscores discomfort with critical commentary, even when expressed through satire and artistic interpretation. Manjul's situation is not isolated. It's a clear symptom of a broader, troubling trend of intolerance toward dissent in Bengal, both online and offline. Bengal police filed an FIR against former CPI(M) politburo member Mohammad Salim and BJP spokesperson Amit Malviya. The complaint stemmed from their sharing a video on X depicting the public flogging of a woman by a local Trinamool leader in Chopra, North Dinajpur, an incident that ignited widespread outrage across the state. Just as in Manjul's case, the state police requested the posts be taken down by X. The blueprint for this crackdown goes back years. Way back in 2012, Jadavpur University professor Ambikesh Mahapatra experienced this firsthand. He was arrested for forwarding an email containing a cartoon depicting the chief minister. Mahapatra endured a decade-long legal battle before finally being acquitted, a period during which he had to renew his passport every year. That same year, Banerjee had made news after publicly commanding police to "catch" a farmer, Shiladitya Chowdhury, who had asked her about fertilizer prices at a public meeting. She branded him a "Maoist", initiating a legal case that dragged on for years. Sanmoy Banerjee, a former Congress spokesperson and an outspoken critic of the Trinamool Congress and its leader's nephew, was arrested from his home. He faced multiple serious Indian Penal Code sections, including forgery and defamation, for criticising the government. He required hospital treatment post-release. Kaustav Bagchi, another former Congress spokesperson, was arrested for allegedly making derogatory comments Both Banerjee and Bagchi subsequently joined the BJP. controversial YouTuber Anirban Roy, widely known as 'Roddur Roy', was arrested by Kolkata Police from a resort in Goa for allegedly making abusive comments against Banerjee and her nephew. Scores of social media users routinely face intimidation and arrests that often go beyond standard legal procedure. The frequent use of legal provisions under the new Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), such as sections 353 (public mischief), 352(intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of the peace), and 196 (promoting enmity between different groups), against social media critics highlights a clear willingness to employ legal avenues to suppress dissent. This pattern extends beyond the digital sphere. Last year, during protests related to the rape and murder of a young doctor at the R. G. Kar Medical College and Hospital, a faction of the TMC leadership publicly advocated for a boycott of artistes critical of the West Bengal government and chief minister Banerjee. The boycott call, initiated by TMC leader and state general secretary for the party, Kunal Ghosh, received support from other prominent party figures, including Lok Sabha MP Kalyan Banerjee and state education minister Bratya Basu. Basu, himself an acclaimed actor and playwright, declared that artistes critical of the government had no right to accept state grants or permission for their shows. There are also reports indicating increased difficulty for theatre and film directors critical of the ruling party in booking performance halls. Despite public outcry, Banerjee did not make any public statement against the boycott call. Her silence on such a controversial issue can be interpreted as tacit approval or a strategic move to allow aggressive tactics by party members while maintaining deniability for the party's highest leadership. This subtle yet potent form of suppression has become a new normal in West Bengal, actively undermining cultural freedom, artistic independence, and critical thought. It fosters a pervasive climate of fear and self-censorship, eerily similar to the environment under the Narendra Modi regime in Delhi. Manjul in his post noted, 'For those who think Mamata is different from the BJP.' The latest overreach, along with many others, affirms comedian and writer Varun Grover's assessment of the TMC supremo: 'Mamata Banerjee is Narendra Modi in a cotton saree.'
