
‘It felt like freedom… it was a party like no other' – three remarkable women share their memories of VE Day 80 years on
AS news broke that peace had been declared on May 8, 1945, the people of Britain spontaneously took to the streets for the biggest party the country had ever seen.
And on Thursday, we will mark the 80th anniversary of VE Day, when Nazi Germany formally surrendered.
In a radio broadcast, then PM Winston Churchill said: 'We may allow ourselves a brief period of rejoicing.'
Thousands flocked to the streets of London, waving Union Flags and singing patriotic songs.
King George VI, accompanied by his daughters, Princesses Elizabeth and Margaret, appeared on the balcony of Buckingham Palace to the delight of the cheering crowds.
Today, we share the recollections of three remarkable women who were part of that momentous day eight decades ago.
THE D-DAY HEROINE
AFTER proudly shaping history from a secret bunker in Portsmouth during the war, Marie Scott couldn't wait to join the excited VE Day throng in London.
She had been serving her country as a Royal Navy signaller, but was given special leave to travel to the capital for the extraordinary day of celebrations.
7
7
Marie, now 98, of New Malden, Surrey, fondly recalls the atmosphere.
She said: 'London was manic, everybody was absolutely overjoyed, kissing and embracing.
'And if they saw you in a uniform — as I was — you were assailed by kisses and embraces for hours.
'Some of the kisses were repulsive, others not too bad.
Brits to get Bank Holiday bonanza this year to celebrate VE Day with star-studded concert, flypast & 4 days of events
'People had queued down the Mall and all the spots where they'd see the Royal Family or notables or celebrities.
'I remember, and I remember it well.'
After the war ended, Marie went on to work as a secretary, married Maurice, an accountant, and they had daughters Gill, 66, and Cari, 64.
She will be commemorating the fallen alongside other veterans at Westminster Abbey on Thursday.
Marie believes it is vital to keep memories of VE Day alive.
She said: 'The veterans are becoming quite rare now.
'We're all dropping off the perch and, within a foreseeable future, there will be nobody left to talk about their participation in World War Two.
'We fought for a just cause.
'Millions died and all that sacrifice should be honoured and respected.'
Marie, who was 18 on VE Day, added: 'It really was the best night of my life.
'A lot of time has passed, but I remember it still so clearly.
'It was full of relief, joy and happiness.'
I don't remember if we observed the 10pm curfew, I just remember the noise. It felt like freedom...it was a party like no other
Jean Green
THE NAVAL OFFICER
JEAN GREEN and her pals partied well into the night as revellers rejoiced over the end of the conflict.
Now 102, she vividly recalls the moment she heard that peace had been declared while serving at the Royal Naval Air Station at Eastleigh, Hants, then known as HMS Raven.
7
Jean said: 'The news went round so fast and there was such a hum of excitement.
'Lots of us were given the day off, so we all headed to London.
'The train station was packed, but the atmosphere was amazing.
'I don't remember whether we observed our usual 10pm curfew that night, but I very much doubt it.
'I remember the noise and how happy everyone was.
'It felt like freedom, it was a celebration like no other.'
But while Jean, from Norwich, reflects on the celebrations fondly, victory in Europe also meant a sad end to her military service.
Jean, who looked after the conscripts' rations in the regulating office, said: 'The women I shared a cabin with became some of my best friends.
'We'd spent three years living together in a tiny space and working together, and became so close.
'Knowing we all had to go back home to our lives was tinged with sadness.
'We kept in touch but it was never the same.
'I was delighted the war ended, but it marked the end of a part of my life which I loved.'
After the war, Jean married Bill, an airman she met while serving, and became a full-time mum to their children, Colin and Geraldine.
She will be celebrating VE Day quietly at home.
THE EVACUEE
EVACUEE Doreen Simson, 87, still treasures happy memories of being reunited with her family for VE Day.
As a little girl, she had been dispatched to rural Wales from her home in London to keep her safe from bombs blitzing the capital.
7
7
She said: 'I came back to London and everybody was dressed up.
'I remember that day — it was lovely.'
A former florist from Crawley, West Sussex, Doreen went on to marry Brian, a TV engineer.
They had a son, Lee, 64.
She will be attending the special anniversary concert at the Royal Albert Hall in London on Thursday.
And she agrees that it is important to mark this historic occasion.
Reflecting on how children faced living with strangers to avoid the devastation of the war, she said: 'People forget what us evacuees gave up.
'I was crying because my brother and I had been parted.
'Could you imagine it now? No vetting.
'You're going away to catch a train.
'Four years old, label on coat, teddy bear under arm, crying parents, screaming children.
'Strange place, strange people. 'Where's my mum? Where's my dad?'.
'The tears still flow remembering that day they took me away on a train.'
But she said of the household that took her in: 'This little cockney Londoner stayed nearly four years with them.
'It changed my life.
'When I came back, I spoke nicely — soon lost it, though.
'My life has been enriched by the lady that took me.
'It just makes me so emotional, still.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
25 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
POLL: What do you think to Prince Harry's strange plan for his kids?
Prince Harry and Meghan may have stepped back from royal life - but they're not shutting the palace gates for their kids just yet. The couple reportedly want Archie and Lilibet to keep their titles, sparking debate over whether it's about choice … or mixed messages. Despite Prince Harry and Meghan Markle stepping away from their royal duties and all the palace drama a while ago, it seems they're keeping the door open for their kids to walk a different path. They reportedly want Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet to hang onto their royal titles - just in case they decide they do want to be working royals one day. Apparently, Harry and Meghan see it as giving their kids the option when they're older. But here's where it gets a bit sticky, as the 'plan' comes after the source claimed the Sussexes feared passports for their children were being held up due to the use of their royal titles. It has all raised a few eyebrows., with former BBC royal correspondent Jennie Bond asking why the Sussexes are holding so tightly to the titles when they've been so outspoken about wanting out of the royal system in the first place. So, what do you think? Is Harry being thoughtful about giving his kids future choices — or is it a bit contradictory after everything he and Meghan have said about the monarchy? What do you think to Harry's plan? Take our poll below. If you can't see it, click here Jennie Bond told the Mirror: "I really don't understand why, having extricated themselves from a life they did not enjoy and in which Harry has publicly spoken of 'feeling trapped', they want to give their children the option of re-joining. It makes no sense. "Who knows what's going to happen in the future? But it's very hard to see how two children who are clearly now more American than British would want to change their whole way of life and become working members of the royal family." Archie and Lilibet got prince and princess titles when their grandfather King Charles became monarch in 2022. The first time their titles were formally announced was after Lilibet's christening in March 2023. Due to the reported hold-up in their British passports, it is said that Harry started to explore the possibility of changing his family surname to Spencer in a nod to his late mother, Princess Diana. And Jennie added: "I think Harry has always been more Spencer than Windsor, so if he was ever going to change his name, it would be to Spencer. "But this would be a final nail in the coffin of his relationship with his father and his brother. It would amount to a public declaration that he no longer saw himself as part of the royal family." There has been continued controversy over the Sussexes' HRH titles since the pair quit their royal roles five years ago. As part of their Megxit negotiations with the Palace, Meghan and the Duke of Sussex agreed to stop using 'Her Royal Highness' and 'His Royal Highness' at the end of March 2020. They still retain the styles, with Harry having had his since birth, but they are essentially held in abeyance. However, earlier this year, it emerged Meghan had used her HRH style on a gift basket sent to make-up entrepreneur Jamie Kern Lima last year, with a monogrammed card reading: 'With Compliments of HRH The Duchess of Sussex'. Kern Lima showed an image of the present in footage of her podcast interview with Meghan. It contained a jar of Meghan's jam which she has started selling as part of her As Ever lifestyle business brand. A source described the basket as a 'personal gift'. The duchess's representatives denied that the couple used them, but a source later said that the Sussexes did not use HRH publicly but retained the style, and did not use it for commercial purposes.


Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Tony's chocolate fans are just finding out how it's meant to be pronounced
One woman has shared her disbelief after she realised she's been saying the name of popular ethical chocolate brand Tony's wrong her whole life - and she's not the only one Strolling down the chocolate aisle, it's tough to overlook Tony's eye-catching wrappers that make it a firm favourite for many. Yet, despite the brand name emblazoned across each chocolate bar in unmissable letters, it seems a lot of us have been getting the name wrong. The Dutch confectionery company has won over Brits lately, not just for its delicious treats but also for its commitment to sustainability and ethical practices. Tony's mission is clear on their website: they aim to "end all forms of exploitation in the cocoa industry". However, a revelation has surfaced that we've been mispronouncing the brand's name all along. Phoebe, an interior design enthusiast who shares her updates online, recently had an epiphany about her own mispronunciation of the brand, which she felt turned her world upside down. On her @crafternoons TikTok page, Phoebe confessed: "I just realised it's not Tony's Choco-loney. It's Tony's Choco-lonely. I've been saying Tony's Chocoloney this whole time. Tony's Chocolonely. What?" She further questioned things in her video's caption, saying: "Please tell me I'm not the only one who's been getting this wrong. Tony's Chocolonely. Questioning who I really am at this point. Feels like my chocoholic status is a lie." To add to the mix-up, Tony's official account cheekily commented: "Loney... lonely... did we change it overnight... did we not...", adding a playful twist to the confusion. It seems that many fans of the chocolate brand have been left scratching their heads, unsure of its actual name. One person claimed: "No, I swear I did an assignment on this at uni about fair trade chocolate. It was Tony's Chocoloney - I think they just rebranded." Another individual shared the same theory, saying: "I SWEAR the name changed to lonely. It was defo Chocolony. No one can convince me otherwise." A third person even admitted to double-checking the name online, saying: "I just had to Google the name to make sure you weren't messing! I've called it choco-loney too." However, Tony's Chocolonely has since set the record straight in a blog post on their website. They clarified: "POV [point of view]: You've been saying our name wrong all this time. We're lone-ly, not loney." The company went on to explain the origins of their name, which dates back to 2003 when journalist Teun, also known as Tony, van de Keuken investigated human rights abuses in the cocoa industry on a Dutch TV show called Keuringsdienst van Waarde. The investigation, which focused on Ghana and Côte d'Ivoire, uncovered a serious issue with illegal labour, including an estimated 1.56 million children working on cocoa farms. Tony's Chocolonely's name has been a point of confusion for many, but the company has finally put the record straight, confirming that it's always been Chocolonely, not Chocoloney. When his warnings about the scale of the issue fell on deaf ears, he took matters into his own hands. In 2005, he unveiled a range of chocolate bars crafted from ethically sourced cocoa beans. The company's website explains: "'Cause Tony is easier to pronounce than Teun, he decided to brand these bars 'Tony's Chocolonely' – a nod to Teun's lonely fight against exploitation in the cocoa industry."


Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Prince Harry's 'nonsense' plan for kids amid 'nail in coffin' decision
Royal expert Jennie Bond has questioned Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's reported plan they've hatched for the future for their children Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet Prince Harry and Meghan Markle may no longer be working royals or carry out duties for the King. But the couple reportedly don't want to rule out their children opting to support the monarchy, despite their bombshell move to quit their royal roles. Insiders close to the Sussexes have said they want Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet to retain their titles and HRH styles so they can choose to become working royals if they so wish when they are adults. It came after the source spoke out and claimed the Sussexes feared passports for their children were being held up due to the use of their royal titles. The couple are said to have been left exasperated as they waited months for British passports to arrive and reportedly believed it was due to the fact they included their children's royal titles on the application. But former BBC royal expert Jennie Bond has questioned why Harry and Meghan appear so keen to cling onto titles for their children - even though they have previously railed against the institution of monarchy. She told the Mirror: "I really don't understand why, having extricated themselves from a life they did not enjoy and in which Harry has publicly spoken of 'feeling trapped', they want to give their children the option of re-joining. It makes no sense. "Who knows what's going to happen in the future? But it's very hard to see how two children who are clearly now more American than British would want to change their whole way of life and become working members of the royal family." Archie and Lilibet got prince and princess titles when their grandfather King Charles became monarch in 2022. The first time their titles were formally announced was after Lilibet's christening in March 2023. Due to the reported hold-up in their British passports, it is said that Harry started to explore the possibility of changing his family surname to Spencer in a nod to his late mother, Princess Diana. And Jennie added: "I think Harry has always been more Spencer than Windsor, so if he was ever going to change his name, it would be to Spencer. "But this would be a final nail in the coffin of his relationship with his father and his brother. It would amount to a public declaration that he no longer saw himself as part of the royal family." There has been continued controversy over the Sussexes' HRH titles since the pair quit their royal roles five years ago. As part of their Megxit negotiations with the Palace, Meghan and the Duke of Sussex agreed to stop using 'Her Royal Highness' and 'His Royal Highness' at the end of March 2020. They still retain the styles, with Harry having had his since birth, but they are essentially held in abeyance. However, earlier this year, it emerged Meghan had used her HRH style on a gift basket sent to make-up entrepreneur Jamie Kern Lima last year, with a monogrammed card reading: 'With Compliments of HRH The Duchess of Sussex'. Kern Lima showed an image of the present in footage of her podcast interview with Meghan. It contained a jar of Meghan's jam which she has started selling as part of her As Ever lifestyle business brand. A source described the basket as a 'personal gift'. The duchess's representatives denied that the couple used them, but a source later said that the Sussexes did not use HRH publicly but retained the style, and did not use it for commercial purposes.