Colleges to use summer break to regroup after rough start with Trump
U.S. colleges and universities will have three months to regroup after a brutal beginning to the second Trump administration that included sweeping funding cuts, foreign students arrested and the launch of investigations from multiple federal agencies.
President Trump is living up to his promise of a crusade against higher education, leaving campus administrators struggling for a path forward after watching both defiance, such as in Harvard University's case, and compliance, as exemplified by Columbia University, result in devastating funding freezes.
School leaders are stuck between a rock and a hard place as they navigate how to keep community trust while also working with the administration when possible. Some experts are advising strength through numbers.
'I don't think that schools should be attempting to engage in conversations or negotiations with the Trump administration one at a time. I think they have to go in groups. They have to go in coalitions. By coalitions, I mean all eight of the Ivy League universities, for example, all of the Big Ten universities, for example,' said Shaun Harper, a professor of education, business and public policy at the University of Southern California.
'These are the most powerful and the wealthiest universities in the nation. Their alumni are incredibly powerful. These are also schools that have powerhouse sports teams, many of them. … They just have so much muscle that can be collectively flexed. But, again, any one of these schools attempting to go it alone is going to be eaten alive,' Harper added.
That strategy could be building momentum after hundreds of schools, from those in the Ivy League to community colleges, banded together to call for 'constructive engagement' in April and denounce attacks on higher education.
Faculty from Big Ten schools are also working to create a 'mutual defense compact' that would support institutions that defy the demands of the federal government.
Schools 'absolutely should be thinking strategically in both the short and long term about the current effects on higher education and what it means for moving forward in ways that are grounded in the mission, vision and values of their institutions,' said Lynn Pasquerella, president of the American Association of Colleges and Universities.
'You must take this time to reflect, to engage in both retrospective and prospective analysis about how they will respond if these attacks continue, and to communicate clearly with their campuses, with all of their constituents, around what priorities they will put in place,' Pasquerella added.
The Trump administration has also sought to deport numerous international students and faculty under a legal provision that gives the secretary of State the authority to go after foreign-born individuals he believes threaten the foreign policy of the United States. Many of the high-profile cases are students who participated in pro-Palestinian activism on campus.
And several schools are under investigation for policies around transgender athletes, with institutions including the University of Pennsylvania losing funding over the issue, although the school argues its policies match those of the NCAA, which no longer allows transgender women on female sports teams.
Campus Compact, the largest and oldest higher education association, believes 'the summer will be about understanding what is in their realms of control, putting plans in place, meeting students and community members where they are, and ensuring they are ready to open the doors in the Fall,' according to Bobbie Laur, the organization's president.
It will be a time 'of close collaboration among colleges and universities, knowledge and resource sharing, and solidarity among higher education institutions,' Laur added.
The quick devastation wrought by Trump has caused some to question the financial relationship between the government and universities, prompting ideas such as schools finding more financial independence.
'The reason why the United States of America has the most advanced research infrastructure in the world is because of its relationship to the federal government, and if we want to stay the most important nation in the world … there is no way forward without the federal government being intimately involved in the support of, not control over, but support of our research infrastructure,' said Todd Wolfson, national president of the American Association of University Professors.
While universities also used last summer to reevaluate their policies around protests after the pro-Palestinian encampments, this task will be even more difficult as Harvard and others have warned the Trump administration's actions will devastate medical advancements and technological research.
Higher education communities will be watching the multiple lawsuits against the federal government's actions, including Harvard's case that has a hearing set for July.
Others emphasize that any negotiations or discussions with the Trump administration should be done as a united front with the agreed upon purpose of not being bullied into any concessions.
'The Trump administration and their approach to higher education is probably the worst and most destructive approach to higher education I've ever seen in the history of this country,' said Wolfson.
While he believes there should be conversations with the federal government, university leaders should not 'bend the knee' in the talks, 'whether it's confirming rampant antisemitism on campus, which does not exist … or if it means allowing the Trump administration get greater control over what we teach and what our students learn and what we research.'
'If they do that, they are failing higher education and they're failing this country. So sure, have a conversation, but do not bend to what are nefarious intentions from this administration,' Wolfson concluded.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

USA Today
33 minutes ago
- USA Today
Will Trump invoke the Insurrection Act? 'We'll see,' he says
Will Trump invoke the Insurrection Act? 'We'll see,' he says Show Caption Hide Caption Anti-ICE raid demonstrators protest into fourth night Anti-immigration raid protests are continuing into the fourth night as the Pentagon deployed active-duty U.S. Marines. President Donald Trump mulled invoking the Insurrection Act, which would give him more leeway to use the military for domestic purposes, as he deploys troops to Los Angeles in response to protests prompted by ICE raids in the region. "If there's an insurrection, I would certainly invoke it,' Trump said June 10 during an event in the White House. 'We'll see. But I can tell you, last night was terrible. The night before that was terrible." Trump deployed the California National Guard to Los Angeles over the objection of Gov. Gavin Newsom, sparking a lawsuit from the state. Marines were also sent to help the guard after protests erupted over his immigration enforcement efforts. The troops are limited to protecting federal property and law enforcement officers. The Insurrection Act would give Trump authority to use them more broadly. More: 'High-stakes game': Trump-Newsom clash pits two political heavyweights Trump said there were parts of Los Angeles on June 9 where "you could have called it an insurrection. It was terrible." Newsom described Trump's actions as "the acts of a dictator" and accused the president of 'inciting and provoking violence,' 'creating mass chaos,' and 'militarizing cities.' Legal experts say invoking the Insurrection Act is an extreme step. It has been done 30 times in U.S. history. "The invocation of it would be viewed as a pretty dramatic act," said Duke Law Professor H. Jefferson Powell. Powell said the law is "dangerously broad." The last time the Insurrection Act was invoked was in May 1992, by President George H.W. Bush at the request of California's governor, to quell rioting in Los Angeles after four White police officers were acquitted for beating Black motorist Rodney King.
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What the 'Big, Beautiful' tax bill means for municipal bonds
JPMorgan raised its forecast for municipal bond sales in 2025 to $560 billion as US lawmakers deliberate over President Trump's "big, beautiful" tax and spending bill in the Senate. Goldman Sachs Asset Management co-head of municipal fixed income Sylvia Yeh weighs in on what policy changes to the US tax code could mean for municipal bond investors, as well as valuation catalysts in comparison to Treasury yields (^TYX, ^TNX, ^FVX). Goldman Sachs manages several municipal bond ETFs (GMUB, GCAL, GMNY, GUMI). To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Catalysts here. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
LA protests far different from '92 Rodney King riots
The images of cars set ablaze, protesters tossing rocks at police and officers firing nonlethal rounds and tear gas at protesters hearkens back to the last time a president sent the National Guard to respond to violence on Los Angeles streets. But the unrest during several days of protests over immigration enforcement is far different in scale from the 1992 riots that followed the acquittal of white police officers who were videotaped beating Black motorist Rodney King. President George H.W. Bush used the Insurrection Act to call in the National Guard after requests from Mayor Tom Bradley and Gov. Pete Wilson. After the current protests began Friday over Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids, President Donald Trump ordered the deployment of 4,100 National Guard troops and 700 Marines despite strident opposition from Mayor Karen Bass and Gov. Gavin Newsom. Trump cited a legal provision to mobilize federal service members when there is 'a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States.' California Attorney General Rob Bonta filed a lawsuit Monday saying Trump had overstepped his authority. Outrage over the verdicts on April 29, 1992 led to nearly a week of widespread violence that was one of the deadliest riots in American history. Hundreds of businesses were looted. Entire blocks of homes and stores were torched. More than 60 people died in shootings and other violence, mostly in South Los Angeles, an area with a heavily Black population at the time. Unlike the 1992 riots, protests have mainly been peaceful and been confined to a roughly five-block stretch of downtown LA, a tiny patch in the sprawling city of nearly 4 million people. No one has died. There's been vandalism and some cars set on fire but no homes or buildings have burned. At least 50 people have been arrested for everything from failing to follow orders to leave to looting, assault on a police officer and attempted murder for tossing a Molotov cocktail. Several officers have had minor injuries and protesters and some journalists have been struck by some of the more than 600 rubber bullets and other 'less-lethal' munitions fired by police. The 1992 uprising took many by surprise, including the Los Angeles Police Department, but the King verdict was a catalyst for racial tensions that had been building in the city for years. In addition to frustration with their treatment by police, some directed their anger at Korean merchants who owned many of the local stores. Black residents felt the owners treated them more like shoplifters than shoppers. As looting and fires spread toward Koreatown, some merchants protected their stores with shotguns and rifles.