logo
Nuclear strikes, secret bunkers for Royals, & massive cyber attacks… how Britain is secretly bracing for war with Russia

Nuclear strikes, secret bunkers for Royals, & massive cyber attacks… how Britain is secretly bracing for war with Russia

The Sun06-05-2025

BRITAIN is bracing for a devastating Russian offensive that could involve nuclear strikes and crippling cyber attacks as amid fears the country is not ready war.
Government officials are racing to update decades-old contingency plans to help the country's defence stand back on its feet.
4
4
4
4
The classified "home defence plan" would lay out how Downing Street will respond if Vladimir Putin declares war on the UK, including putting the Royal Family into bunkers.
Ministers worry Britain could be outfought by Russia on the battlefield, but also poorly defended at home as things stand.
Experts have warned that the country's national infrastructure is vulnerable ahead of the release of Labour's Strategic Defence Review - an examination of the Armed Forces.
As military warfare has evolved in the past two decades, fears are that Putin could launch a combination of attacks, including conventional ballistic missile strikes, sabotage and the latest tactic in the Russian playbook - cyberwarfare.
But Britain, which is just beginning to review and revise its security and contingency plans for the first time in more than 20 years - is feared not to be fully prepared to go to war against the Russians.
Former Nato commander Colonel Hamish De Bretton-Gordon told The Sun: "Britain is very much in the sights of Putin's derision, and we are the ones likely to be attacked first.
"Britain really has got to dust off its contingency plans. Over 20 years of neglect, and we understand that's exactly what this report is about at the moment."
Retired military officer Colonel Richard Kemp, who was working in the Cabinet Office when the contingency plans were last updated, told The Sun: "Contingency plans like this should be updated frequently. Twenty years is far too long, especially given the radically changed threat picture.
"Putin has said Britain is in his crosshairs since the invasion of Ukraine in 2022.
"Even before then, he proved he was willing to attack this country, including with a nerve agent attack in Salisbury in 2018. We should take him seriously."
Putin 'offers to FREEZE Ukraine frontline' as Trump's 7-point peace plan 'to let Russia keep seized land' revealed
The classified plan by the Cabinet Office's Resilience Directorate - which was last updated in 2005 - would set out war strategies in the event of a catastrophic attack by the Russians, which could well involve tactical and strategic nuclear weapons.
The plan is based on the War Book, a Cold War dossier of instructions for government response to nuclear attacks.
Under such plans, Britain could be divided into 12 zones, each governed by Cabinet ministers, and food rationed.
The plans will include scenarios like widespread sabotage and crippling cyber warfare, which were seen as a limited threat back when the document was last updated.
It will also direct the PM on how to run a wartime government, as well as strategies for travel networks, courts and the postal system, reports the Daily Telegraph.
Although the highly-classified document is expected to never be revealed in the public domain, military experts suggest what could be changed to prepare us for a potential war against the Russians.
Colonel Bretton-Gordon said that cyber attacks will be given a major chunk of attention in the latest round of updates.
He believes the Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) would be given additional funding to improve the existing measures against cyber attackers.
There is particular concern for the country's five active nuclear power stations, which if damaged by strikes, could release radioactive material across the country, resulting in long-term impact.
In the event of an all-out war against Vladimir Putin, members of the Royal family and key government officials will be sent to secret hideout bunkers to protect them.
Food circulation and modern logistics systems will be made more robust to ensure essential items can reach people whenever there is a need.
And the public will be made more aware of their wartime duties.
Bretton-Gordon added: "Plans will be to make sure our critical infrastructure is as secure as it can be.
"There will be contingency plans. If one nuclear power station goes down, then other power infrastructure can take up the slack.
"During the Cold War, the people probably had a lot of training and expertise to deal with contaminated nuclear casualties, but the situation has probably changed now.
"These are the sort of things that just need to be reviewed, so that in the event this happens, it's not a complete shock."
"We are up against an autocratic tyrant who has absolutely no concern for collateral damage or civilian casualties.
"I'm sure Putin wouldn't think twice about firing a missile, nuclear or conventional, at London cities and the UK's critical national infrastructure."
Meanwhile, Colonel Kemp warned that Russia could attack Britain in several ways that could wreak havoc on nation - and our armed forces are simply not prepared enough to fight Putin's troops.
He added: "We could be the target of large-scale ballistic missile, cruise missile, drone, cyber, chemical and even nuclear strikes as well as sabotage.
"I would hope that what has recently been happening in Ukraine and the Middle East has galvanised our leaders so that we are prepared. But we have a huge amount of ground to make up."
"The best way to avoid such things happening to us is deterring an attack. That means we need to substantially increase our own offensive as well as defensive capabilities."
NOT GOOD ENOUGH
The Cabinet Office ran a risk assessment in January in which it modelled a scenario in which a hostile foreign state launched various types of attack on the UK's infrastructure.
It found that any such successful strike could be devastating.
A senior RAF official said last month if Russia had attacked the UK in the same way as it had Ukraine more than three years ago - within hours missiles would have broken through defences and destroyed key targets.
Military experts agree that Britain's air defence systems are not adequate to thwart a large-scale missile attack.
Colonel Kemp said: "One of our major weaknesses is air defence, both for our forces and homeland defence.
"Putin has significant long-range missile and attack drone capability, which could be used against us.
"The other day, a Houthi ballistic missile from Yemen penetrated Israel's air defences and struck their international airport.
"Israel has the most comprehensive and advanced air and missile defence systems in the world.
"That shows how vulnerable any country can be to attack, and we have nothing even approaching Israel's capabilities."
Bretton-Gordon added: " I expect, as part of the Strategic Defence Review, a lot of focus will be on air defence.
"But it's not just missiles and fighter jets, the Ukraine war shows how effective drone warfare could be."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Lord Hermer defended suspected Iraqi bomber
Lord Hermer defended suspected Iraqi bomber

Telegraph

time32 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Lord Hermer defended suspected Iraqi bomber

Sir Keir Starmer's law chief represented a suspected Iraqi bomb maker who won more than £33,000 in compensation from the Government. Court documents show that Lord Hermer, the Attorney General, represented Abd Ali Hameed Ali Al-Waheed, who was arrested by British troops after a partly assembled IED (Improvised Explosive Device) and explosives were found at his sister's home in Basra. In the case, Al-Waheed won a total of £33,500 for unlawful detention by the British forces, beating by soldiers and 'inhuman and degrading' treatment after an internal review cleared him of any involvement in the insurgency against the British. It is the latest case highlighted by shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick, who last week published a video claiming Lord Hermer was unfit to be Attorney General because he had spent his life 'defending Britain's enemies.' The Attorney General has previously defended his record by pointing to the 'cab rank' principle, which requires barristers to accept cases within their area of expertise regardless of the client. Allies also maintain that his extensive previous private practice as a barrister does not impinge upon his current role providing independent legal advice to the Government. However, Mr Jenrick said: 'Even Hermer's colleagues acknowledge he is an activist lawyer that made his career acting against the British Government. He is uniquely ill-suited to being Attorney General. 'But Sir Keir Starmer won't sack him because he's cut from the same cloth as Hermer: his loyalty is to the human rights brigade, not the British people.' List of clients The shadow justice secretary has previously criticised Lord Hermer for acting for Gerry Adams, Shamima Begum and Al-Qaeda chief Rangzieb Ahmed, Osama bin Laden's right-hand man. A professional friend of Lord Hermer last week noted how the 'cab rank' principle did not prevent barristers from picking and choosing cases. Al-Waheed was arrested after soldiers raided his sister's house looking for his brother-in-law, Ali Jaleel, who was suspected of involvement in terrorist activities. Ali Jaleel was out, but a partly assembled IED and a large quantity of explosives were found in the house. Al-Waheed claimed he was 'systematically beaten and tortured' by soldiers on his arrest and subjected to multiple forms of inhuman and degrading treatment during his detention, including sleep deprivation and denied sight and hearing by being hooded. Despite an internal review clearing him of involvement, he claims he was held for 33 days unlawfully in breach of Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). A spokesman for the Attorney General said: 'Over a 30-year career the Attorney General has represented very many people including victims of the Grenfell Tower fire, military veterans killed and injured in service, victims of rape and serious sexual abuse, victims of human trafficking and modern slavery, the Ukrainian Legal Taskforce as well as thousands of victims of environmental disasters. How barristers work 'It is a feature and cornerstone of our legal system that legal professionals operate the cab rank rule when it comes to clients, and barristers do not associate themselves with their clients' opinions. The Code of Conduct for Barristers prohibits them from refusing instructions on the basis of their views of the character, reputation, cause, conduct, guilt or innocence of the client. Some Conservatives have criticised the attacks on Lord Hermer as unfair. Dr Ben Spencer, a shadow minister, said: 'It's absolutely right to question Lord Hermer's judgement based on his decisions in role. But, even the worst of us must have legal representation.' Former attorney general Dominic Grieve said Mr Jenrick's video was a 'disgraceful' attack on the UK's 'principles of justice and freedoms', which relied on a 'level playing field' for individuals' legal representation under the cab rank rule. Lord Hermer has, however, faced a barrage of criticism in recent days after comparing calls by Tory and Reform politicians to leave the ECHR to the rise of Nazism.

Ukrainian attack damaged 10% of Russia's strategic bombers, Germany says
Ukrainian attack damaged 10% of Russia's strategic bombers, Germany says

Reuters

timean hour ago

  • Reuters

Ukrainian attack damaged 10% of Russia's strategic bombers, Germany says

BERLIN, June 7 (Reuters) - A Ukrainian drone attack last weekend likely damaged around 10% of Russia's strategic bomber fleet and hit some of the aircraft as they were being prepared for strikes on Ukraine, a senior German military official said. "According to our assessment, more than a dozen aircraft were damaged, TU-95 and TU-22 strategic bombers as well as A-50 surveillance planes," German Major General Christian Freuding said in a YouTube podcast reviewed by Reuters ahead of its publication later on Saturday. The affected A-50s, which function similarly to NATO's AWACS planes by providing aerial situational awareness, were likely non-operational when they were hit, said the general who coordinates Berlin's military aid to Kyiv and is in close touch with the Ukrainian defence ministry. "We believe that they can no longer be used for spare parts. This is a loss, as only a handful of these aircraft exist," he said. "As for the long-range bomber fleet, 10% of it has been damaged in the attack according to our assessment." The United States estimates that Ukraine's audacious drone attack hit as many as 20 Russian warplanes, destroying around 10 of them, two U.S. officials told Reuters, and experts say Moscow will take years to replace the affected planes. Despite the losses, Freuding does not see any immediate reduction of Russian strikes against Ukraine, noting that Moscow still retains 90% of its strategic bombers which can launch ballistic and cruise missiles in addition to dropping bombs. "But there is, of course, an indirect effect as the remaining planes will need to fly more sorties, meaning they will be worn out faster, and, most importantly, there is a huge psychological impact." Freuding said Russia had felt safe in its vast territory, which also explained why there was little protection for the aircraft. "After this successful operation, this no longer holds true. Russia will need to ramp up the security measures." According to Freuding, Ukraine attacked two air fields around 100 kilometres (62 miles) from Moscow, as well as the Olenya air field in the Murmansk region and the Belaya air field, with drones trained with the help of artificial intelligence. A fifth attack on the Ukrainka air field near the Chinese border failed, he said. The bombers that were hit were part of Russia's so-called nuclear triad which enables nuclear weapons deployment by air, sea and ground, he added.

Warning UK's housing crisis will deepen if Reeves makes further cuts in spending review
Warning UK's housing crisis will deepen if Reeves makes further cuts in spending review

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

Warning UK's housing crisis will deepen if Reeves makes further cuts in spending review

It comes as the struggle between the Treasury and Angela Rayner 's Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government over its budget continues, just days before Ms Reeves is set to outline the spending plans until the next election on Wednesday. With no agreement having been reached on housing, the chief executive of one of Britain's largest housing associations has raised the alarm that of a 'cliff edge' over building more homes – which means money is set to run out by 2026. The warning from Fiona Fletcher-Smith, chief executive of L&Q and until last week chair of the G15 group of London housing associations, comes as the Local Government Association (LGA) has warned that 51 per cent of councils are now running deficits on their housing budgets. Homeless charities are also warning of an impending crisis with new supply unable to keep up with increasing demand for social housing. Crisis has pointed out that over the past 10 years there has been a net loss of more than 180,000 social homes in England. Currently, 1.33 million households in England are currently stuck on council waiting lists for a social home. Ms Fletcher-Smith explained that the problem began with George Osborne's austerity budgets in 2010 when he slashed 63 per cent of the capital budget to build new homes. She said he then 'welched' on a deal to allow them to make up for the loss by charging CPI inflation plus 1 per cent in rent. which housing associations and councils now want restored for a decade. This will allow them to borrow money to build as it comes through as guaranteed income. The cumulative effect now means that housing associations no longer have the funds to build projects. Ms Fletcher-Smith said: 'Housing decisions are so long, it's not just planning permission, you've got to get all utilities, everything else lined up to build. It's a five to seven years to run in to build housing. We could see from our own predictions, we were just going to go off cliff edge, by 2025/2026.' The sector is also still struggling with the impact of the Grenfell fire tragedy in 2017, with thousands of homes now subject to problems with cladding which is costing them £2.6bn in London alone. In London alone, £4 million a month is being spent on 'keeping people in temporary accommodation' because homes with cladding are too dangerous to return to and clogged courts mean legal cases to fix the problem are taking years. Ms Fletcher-Smith also noted that the 'combination of Brexit, Covid-19 and the war in Ukraine' has hit the sector not least with inflation which saw building materials go up as much as 30 per cent well above the 11 per cent peak of the headline rate. There are now fears that Ms Reeves and the Treasury will force cuts to the housing budget to balance the books as the chancellor seeks to ringfence health spending, increase defence to 2.5 per cent of GDP and water down proposals on benefit cuts as well as U-turn on ending the winter fuel payments for millions of pensioners. The deputy prime minister is leading a charge to protect budgets and instead push for a series of wealth taxes on big corporations and millionaires. But this has been resisted by Ms Reeves. However, the fears over housing are shared by homeless charities who are calling for 90,000 new social housing homes to be built per year. Matt Downie, chief executive of Crisis, said: 'This spending review is an opportunity for significant investment to start to see homelessness levels come down. 'Small tweaks aren't enough to fix the problems we face.' Mairi MacRae, director of policy and campaigns at Shelter, said: 'With homelessness at a record high and councils spending huge chunks of their budgets just to keep families off the streets, now is the time to invest in building social rent homes, not cut back." The issue is also vexing Labour backbenchers looking at the party's slide in the polls. One Labour MP said cuts in this area would cause upset among backbenchers, especially those with seats in areas with councils that are already on the verge of collapse. Another pointed out that Labour's flagship housing pledge 'means nothing if the current stock of social housing suffers" as a result of cuts. The government provides financial support to local authorities for social housing provision, including funding for new builds, repairs, and improvements. Commenting on the finding that 51 per cent of councils running a deficit with housing, the LGA warned: 'These trends are not sustainable. There is a growing risk to the financial sustainability of some councils' HRAs, and revenue pressures in councils' HRAs are now being passed directly into their HRA capital programmes.' In the Autumn Statement, the government announced over £5 billion total housing investment in 2025/26 to boost supply, including a £500m extension to the current Affordable Homes Programme which runs out in 2026. At the Spring Statement, the government announced a down payment of £2bn for a successor programme. To make it cheaper for councils to finance new development, the government has extended the preferential borrowing rate available for council house building from the Public Works Loan Board until the end of 2025/26.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store