Mesabi: Fiscal Q1 Earnings Snapshot
NEW YORK (AP) — NEW YORK (AP) — Mesabi Trust (MSB) on Thursday reported profit of $3.6 million in its fiscal first quarter.
On a per-share basis, the New York-based company said it had profit of 28 cents.
The iron ore miner posted revenue of $4.7 million in the period.
_____
This story was generated by Automated Insights (http://automatedinsights.com/ap) using data from Zacks Investment Research. Access a Zacks stock report on MSB at https://www.zacks.com/ap/MSB
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
21 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Delta, United Suspend Flights to Tel Aviv After Iran Bombing
Delta Air Lines Inc. and United Airlines Holdings Inc. suspended flights to Tel Aviv following Israel's bombing of Iran and the closure of Israel's airspace. Delta has stopped flights through Aug. 31 from New York's John F. Kennedy International Airport, and will continue monitoring 'the evolving security environment in the area,' the Atlanta-based carrier said in a statement on Friday.
Miami Herald
30 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
What do Republicans think of Elon Musk? What a poll found after feud with Trump
In the wake of his public feud with President Donald Trump, Elon Musk's popularity with Republicans has waned slightly, according to new polling. In the latest AP-NORC survey, 26% of Republicans said they had a very favorable opinion of the billionaire businessman. By comparison, that figure stood at 38% in April, marking a 12-point decline over the course of two months. Overall, though, a majority of GOP respondents, 64%, said they had either a very or somewhat favorable view of Musk, which is only down 3 points from 67% in April. Meanwhile, Democrats expressed slightly less aversion to Musk. Sixty-five percent of Democrats said they have a very unfavorable view towards the South African-born SpaceX CEO. This is down from 74% in April, marking a 9-point shift. But, the overall share of Democrats who have either a very or somewhat unfavorable view has remained relatively steady — dropping just 2 points from 87% to 85%. And, among Americans generally, Musk's popularity, or lack thereof, has not changed much. Fifty-seven percent of all respondents have a somewhat or very unfavorable view of him, while 34% have a somewhat or very favorable view. In April, these figures stood at 57% and 32%, respectively. The latest poll — which sampled 1,158 U.S. adults June 5-9 and has a margin of error of 4 percentage points — came one week after Musk and Trump had an explosive falling out. The rift, which played out publicly, appeared to end the high-profile partnership between the world's richest man with the world's most powerful man. It began on June 5, when, during a White House press event, Trump said he was 'very disappointed' with Musk over his opposition to the GOP-backed spending bill. He also claimed Musk — who formally left his position at the Department of Government Efficiency days earlier — may be suffering from 'Trump Derangement Syndrome.' In response, Musk posted a series of inflammatory messages on X directed at the president. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election,' he wrote, adding 'Such ingratitude.' He also claimed the president is named in the Epstein files — a series of documents related to investigations of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein — and shared a post calling for Trump to be impeached. Musk later deleted the post, AP reported. Later, Trump accused Musk of having gone 'CRAZY' and told CNN 'I'm not even thinking about Elon. He's got a problem.' In recent days, Musk has taken a conciliatory approach. 'I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week,' he wrote on X on June 11. 'They went too far.' That post came after a phone call between the two men on June 9, according to the New York Times.
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Opinion - Why are administrative judges trying to help China steal American technology?
A panel of judges is openly defying Trump administration policy — and effectively allowing a Chinese firm to keep stealing an American semiconductor technology used in everything from self-driving cars to satellites. These judges are not members of the judicial branch. They are executive branch employees, and the Trump administration has the authority to overrule their dangerous decision. It should do so immediately to protect American workers and uphold the rule of law. But the administration will also need to implement broader reforms — and work with Congress to codify them — to prevent rogue administrative judges from helping Chinese companies pilfer U.S. intellectual property in the future. The administrative patent judges in question work for the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, a powerful part of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. They just sided with Innoscience, a Chinese firm locked in a years-long legal battle with Efficient Power Conversion, a California-based semiconductor innovator. Efficient Power Conversion accused the Chinese firm of stealing its patented technology and selling knockoff chips. It took its case to the U.S. International Trade Commission, which investigates trade violations and protects American industries from unfair competition. After a 16-month investigation — including a trial, depositions, and expert testimony — the commission found that Innoscience had indeed stolen the technology and that Efficient Power Conversion's patent was valid. As a result, the commission barred the Chinese firm from selling the infringing chips in the U.S. And after its mandatory review period, the White House allowed the ruling to stand. That should have settled the matter. But separately, Innoscience challenged Efficient Power Conversion's patent at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, which ultimately invalidated key claims in the patent. This ruling handed Innoscience fresh ammunition to challenge the import ban and try to resume flooding the U.S. market with stolen technology. This is a direct assault on American innovation and the Trump administration's efforts to crack down on Chinese intellectual property theft. Worse still, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board should never have taken the case. The first Trump administration issued guidance barring the Patent Trial and Appeal Board from reviewing patents already being litigated in parallel forums. This policy was designed to protect smaller American companies from being overwhelmed by duplicative litigation across multiple venues. Put simply, patent disputes should be handled in court, or at the International Trade Commission, or at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board — but not all three. That changed in 2022 when the Biden administration reversed the policy. This gave Innoscience an opening to request a Patent Trial and Appeal Board review in 2023. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board accepted — and in 2024, proceeded with a review of Efficient Power Conversion's patent, even though the International Trade Commission had already completed its exhaustive trial and was days away from issuing its final decision. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board, applying lower evidentiary standards than a court, invalidated the patent. It issued its ruling on March 18, 2025 — weeks after the second Trump administration had reversed Biden's policy and reinstated the original rules, which on its own should have blocked the Patent Trial and Appeal Board from acting. The director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office can reverse this decision. That should happen immediately. Overturning the Patent Trial and Appeal Board 's ruling would align with the commission and block the theft of a vital American technology. But righting this one wrong isn't enough. The system that allowed this must be reformed to prevent future abuses. That means putting the new Patent Trial and Appeal Board guidance through the formal rulemaking process, thus making it harder for a future administration to reverse it arbitrarily. Even more important: Congress must act. Bipartisan legislation like the PREVAIL Act would bar duplicative Patent Trial and Appeal Board challenges and hold it to the same evidentiary standards as federal courts. As a member of the Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party, I know how important it is to protect our innovation from theft by our most determined adversary. Passing this law would reaffirm America's commitment to its inventors, send a clear message to China, and stop unelected bureaucrats from hijacking trade enforcement. America's economic security depends on innovation. We can't afford to let the Chinese Communist Party and other foreign adversaries sabotage our innovators. Nathaniel Moran represents the 1st District of Texas and is a member of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
