
Israeli forces kill three Palestinians in violent West Bank settler assault
Israeli forces killed three men on Wednesday after intervening to protect settlers during a violent assault on a Palestinian town near Ramallah in the occupied West Bank.
The incident began at around 7pm when over 50 Israeli settlers descended on Kafr Malik from a recently established outpost between the town and Al-Mazra'a al-Sharqiya, east of Ramallah.
The settlers set fire to parts of three homes and completely torched four vehicles.
As residents gathered to confront the attackers, Israeli soldiers stormed the town and began firing live ammunition.
Three men were killed and at least seven others were wounded, local officials said.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
Jihad al-Qaq, a resident of Kafr Malik, told Middle East Eye that the settlers had targeted the southern part of the town.
'When residents gathered in large numbers, they surrounded the settlers, who were armed and began shooting at us,' he said.
'The army then stormed the town to protect them and opened fire on the residents. All injuries were to the upper body, showing that soldiers intended to kill or seriously injure,' Qaq added.
'All injuries were to the upper body, showing that soldiers intended to kill or seriously injure'
- Jihad al-Qaq, Kafr Malik resident
Emergency medical crews were reportedly blocked from reaching the wounded. Residents had to use private vehicles to transport the casualties to ambulances stationed outside the town.
The main entrance to Kafr Malik has been closed off by Israeli forces with an iron gate for the past six months, forcing ambulances to take a longer route.
'The delay caused a deterioration in the condition of the wounded. Three of them died despite being conscious when we evacuated them. Seven others are being treated in hospital and are in stable condition,' Qaq said.
In addition to the gunshot victims, 10 people suffered from teargas inhalation and bruises sustained during physical clashes with the settlers.
Grief and anger
On Monday, Israeli forces shot and killed 13-year-old Ammar Hamayel while he was walking on the outskirts of Kafr Malik with a friend.
Ambulances were reportedly prevented from reaching him for 40 minutes.
At the time of Wednesday's settler attack, residents of Kafr Malik were still mourning the boy's death and offering condolences to his family.
The grief and anger fuelled a collective response, as residents mobilised to confront the settlers.
'He lay bleeding for a long time. By the time we managed to get him to hospital, he had died'
- Munjed Hamayel, brother of killed Palestinian
Among the three men killed during the confrontation was Lutfi Sabri, who had been released from Israeli detention in October 2023 after serving eight months in prison.
Another was Muhammad al-Naji, a resident who was among those resisting the settler assault.
The third fatality, 30-year-old Murshid Hamayel, was shot outside his home while trying to protect his children.
His brother, Munjed Hamayel, told MEE that Murshid heard screams from outside and went to investigate.
'He found groups of settlers in front of him. Suddenly, the Israeli army opened fire. He was shot directly in the head and collapsed,' Munjed said.
'We couldn't reach him because of the gunfire. He lay bleeding for a long time. By the time we managed to get him to hospital, he had died.'
Ali Salama, a community activist in Kafr Malik, said this was the first settler attack to target homes in the town in years.
Even during the funeral procession for the three men on Thursday, he added, settlers stormed the town's outskirts again.
Fear of annexation
The homes attacked on Wednesday lie in Area C of the West Bank, under full Israeli control. Palestinians fear that such assaults are part of broader efforts to displace them and seize land under Israel's annexation policies.
'The eastern side of the town is surrounded by settlement outposts,' Salama said.
'Every hilltop is occupied by settlers who block residents from grazing livestock or farming while using the land themselves, part of a strategy to eventually take it over.'
The southern side of Kafr Malik is bordered by a settlement road, while the Israeli army has kept the town's main entrance sealed since the start of the year.
'We raised funds to build a new road through a neighbouring town,' Salama said.
'We now have to travel over 40 kilometres to leave the area, instead of the usual 15. Ramallah is only 15 minutes away, but it now takes over an hour to reach.'
Israel to take full control of land registry in West Bank's Area C, cementing annexation Read More »
Ain Samia, a freshwater spring that once supplied the town, was seized by settlers at the beginning of the war on Gaza in October 2023.
Since then, Palestinians have been barred from accessing it, and nearby Bedouin communities have been forcibly removed.
According to the Palestinian Authority's Wall and Settlement Resistance Commission, settlers have carried out over 5,000 attacks and assaults across the West Bank since October 2023.
In a recent statement, the commission said 26 Palestinians have been killed by settler gunfire during this period. It accused Israeli authorities of enabling the violence.
'Settlers have intensified terrorist attacks against defenceless civilians as a result of the job-sharing and full support they receive from the occupying state's official institutions,' the statement read.
'We call on the international community and human rights organisations to act by protecting the Palestinian people and imposing sanctions on the occupying power.'
Around 700,000 Israeli settlers live in roughly 300 illegal settlements in the West Bank and occupied East Jerusalem.
Under international law, settlement construction in an occupied territory is illegal.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Truce and threats, what's next in the Israel-Iran conflict?
From nuclear talks to a Gaza ceasefire, our expert panel examines the rocky road ahead


Middle East Eye
2 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Why western-led regime change in Iran will backfire spectacularly
The US strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites on 22 June marked the beginning of what many have long feared: direct US involvement in Israel's escalating aggression against Iran. While President Donald Trump has insisted that the strikes are limited and that his administration is not seeking regime change, the region's history suggests otherwise. Israel has repeatedly drawn the US into Middle East conflicts through misleading intelligence - first in Iraq, and now in Iran. Given this precedent and Iran's warning of "everlasting consequences", it is unlikely that US involvement will end here. Instead, it risks aligning with Israel's longstanding objective: the collapse of the Islamic Republic. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has already hinted that Israel's military actions could lead to the removal of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters The US may publicly deny its intent, but historically it often ends up supporting or fulfilling Israel's strategic ambitions - including direct military engagement with Iran, which it had previously ruled out. Indeed, the US strikes triggered further escalation, with Iran retaliating on 23 June by launching what were widely described as "symbolic" missile attacks on US installations, including the al-Udeid Air Base in Qatar and sites in Iraq. Scholars have long warned that the push for regime change in Iran rests on a dangerous and ill-informed strategy However, if the confrontation intensifies, Washington could still seize the opportunity to pursue what some have called an "ultimate solution": the removal of the regime in the name of regional stability. Although Trump announced a ceasefire with Iran on Monday evening, which could yet collapse, the underlying tensions remain unresolved, and the broader strategy behind the strikes remains unchanged. There remains a prevailing assumption, especially among Israeli and US lawmakers, that regime change in Iran would bring stability to the region. Scholars such as Vali Nasr, however, have long warned that this idea rests on a dangerous and ill-informed strategy. It also raises a deeper question, often overlooked in policy circles: would regime change actually dismantle the ideological system that sustains the Islamic Republic? Ideological continuity It is a grave misunderstanding to assume that the political and ideological system in Iran would unravel with the removal of Khamenei. The ideological foundation of the Iranian revolution is deeply intertwined with the concept of wilayat al-faqih, a theological principle that underpins the Islamic Republic. The Iranian people will never forgive or forget US-Israeli attacks Read More » This centuries-old doctrine within Twelver Shia Islam grants senior jurists a guardianship role during the occultation of the twelfth Shia Imam, Muhammad al-Mahdi. Under the leadership of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the 1979 revolution introduced wilayat al-faqih into the political sphere - an idea that had been confined mainly to religious scholarship. While there is disagreement among Shia scholars about the extent of the jurist's political role - Grand Ayatollah Ali Sistani in Najaf, Iraq, for example, does not endorse its political application - there is general consensus that Shias should emulate the most senior jurist, marja al-taqlid, for religious and spiritual guidance in the absence of the Imam. While there are several possible successors to Khamenei, the next leader will almost certainly emerge from the Qom Seminary - the foremost Shia centre of learning in Iran, which continues to promote Khomeini's vision, including his interpretation of wilayat al-faqih. In other words, removing Khamenei would be unlikely to change the system. The ideological basis of the Iranian regime is not dependent on one leader. It is institutionally embedded in Iranian Shia Islam and will continue to reproduce the revolutionary doctrine at the heart of the state. Transnational strength Iran's global soft power is often profoundly underestimated. While most states have diasporic communities, Iran is unique in its ability to command transnational ideological loyalty. The impact of the 1979 revolution extended far beyond Iran's borders and its Shia population. It was a transformative moment in global politics, especially for Muslims - and above all, for Shia Muslim communities. The revolution carried deep theological and philosophical significance, especially regarding the doctrine of wilayat al-faqih. While many Twelver Shia Muslims reject Khomeini's political interpretation of this doctrine, others maintain a strong ideological commitment to the revolution. This allegiance is not limited to Iran: Shia communities in Pakistan, Lebanon, India, Iraq and beyond continue to express solidarity with the Islamic Republic. In diasporic settings, particularly in Europe and North America, support for the revolution is not limited to Iranian nationals. This sets Iran apart from other Muslim-majority countries. For example, while Sunni Muslims may feel a spiritual connection to Mecca and Medina, or even to the Wahhabi tradition, few would defend the Saudi regime. By contrast, admiration for the Islamic revolution and its institutions can be found among various ethnicities within Shia diasporic communities - grounded not in national loyalty, but in ideological and spiritual solidarity. If the regime were toppled by external force, that ideological support for the Islamic Republic would likely deepen. Any externally imposed replacement would face widespread rejection from Shia communities worldwide. Global network Iran has cultivated a vast global patronage network that now spans six continents. From Buenos Aires to Jakarta, from Africa to Europe, from London to New York, these networks maintain connections with followers of Khamenei. Shia communities may face disruption, but the ideological ties that bind them to Iran would remain intact They offer not only spiritual guidance, but also practical advice on daily matters. Even in the event of regime removal, these networks would not simply vanish. Shia communities may face disruption, but the ideological and institutional links would remain intact and could help the regime's global support base stay connected, sustain solidarity, and potentially aid a future ideological resurgence. The essential question remains: what would regime change actually achieve? It is unlikely to weaken the regime's ideological support base, either domestically or globally. If that is the case, then whose interests would such a change actually serve, apart from Netanyahu's expansionist ambitions and those of Israel's far-right government? After US attack, Iran could reconsider its nuclear strategy Seyed Hossein Mousavian Read More » There are serious grievances within Iranian society, particularly among secular and reformist voices. Economic hardship, political repression and restrictions on civil liberties have generated widespread frustration. These realities must not be dismissed. But externally imposed regime change has never worked in the Middle East, and Iran is unlikely to be the exception. On the contrary, such a move would almost certainly trigger chaos with far-reaching consequences. The real question now is not whether Iran's system can endure external pressure - but how far the US and its allies would prioritise Israel's agenda, even at the risk of extending a conflict that would ultimately undermine their own regional interests. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.

Middle East Eye
2 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Report: At least 23 Israeli settler attacks on Palestinians recorded in one week
Israeli settlers carried out at least 23 attacks against Palestinians in the occupied West Bank during the week of 17 to 23 June, Al Jazeera reported the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) saying. OCHA said one Palestinian man was killed and 14 others were injured in the incidents, which also caused property damage including arson, vandalism, and the destruction of sapling trees, mostly olive. The attacks took place in several Palestinian communities across the territory, it said.