Hoots and grunts from bonobos show signs of complex communication, researchers say
The peeps, hoots and grunts of wild bonobos, a species of great ape living in the African rainforest, can convey complex thoughts in a way that mirrors some elements of human language, a new study suggests.
The study says bonobos — humanity's closest living genetic relative — can combine several types of calls to construct phrases in which one vocalization modifies the meaning of another. This is the first time such behavior has been documented clearly in an animal, the researchers behind the study said.
The research, published Thursday in the journal Science, challenges the prevailing thought that humans are the only species with that ability, which is called nontrivial compositionality and is considered a fundamental building block of human language.
'We would never say that bonobos have language because language is specific to humans. It's our very special communication system,' said Simon Townsend, a professor at the University of Zurich who studies cognition and is an author of the study. But, 'we're showing that features of language seem to be present in the communication system of bonobos.'
Outside experts said the work was convincing. And because humans and bonobos share a common ancestor, the work could help explain how humans developed their ability to use language in the distant past.
'This is a terrifically novel and creative study,' said Robert Seyfarth, a professor emeritus at the University of Pennsylvania, who studied primates and cognition and was not involved in this study. 'The evolutionary origins of language are kind of like the evolutionary origins of bipedalism, walking on hind feet. It doesn't occur overnight. It occurs gradually and there are intermediate stages along the way. How do you get started and get on this evolutionary trajectory? This begins to help us be more precise in deciding the answers to these questions.'
It's possible that other animals, like chimpanzees, could also have the ability to form phrases where words modify each other's meaning.
'It could be that bonobos are exceeding chimpanzees in that capacity. It could be that they're doing the same. It could be that many other species are doing this,' Townsend said. 'Now, we've got the method to really test this.'
It took months of slogging through the rainforest and chasing after wild bonobos with microphones to pave the way for this discovery.
The study's lead author, Mélissa Berthet, of the University of Zurich, spent about six months in the Democratic Republic of Congo following three groups of wild bonobos with colleagues at the Kokolopori Bonobo Reserve. Berthet and her colleagues took detailed notes about what was going on as the bonobos were making their vocalizations, recording about 400 hours of audio.
'I would have a list of about 300-something contextual parameters that I would use,' Berthet explained. 'Was my caller feeding? Was it resting? Was it grooming?'
Bonobos have complicated, matriarchal social structures with lots of movement and activity, so Berthet took careful notes about group dynamics.
The researchers ultimately mapped more than 700 vocal calls, including combinations, and the circumstances of these vocalizations' use. Then, they mapped the relationships between all the data points and found at least four instances in which the bonobos were combining different calls to create new meanings.
The researchers don't have a precise understanding of what each bonobo call is intended to communicate, but they were able to make some assumptions about their purpose based on the context.
The researchers said some calls meant things like 'I'm feeding,' 'Let's build a nest' or 'Let's keep traveling.'
The size of the groups often change as bonobos come and go.
'They mostly talk about things to coordinate the group,' Berthet said. 'Just like humans, you know, they're in the family, then they go to work, then they go with friends, then again with family and so on. They really need complex communication to coordinate that. And so it's not surprising that most of the communication is about coordination, because this is actually a very important part of their social life.'
Bonobos and chimpanzees are the closest genetic relatives to humans. The research suggests that the last common ancestor of these species — which likely roamed the Earth between 7 million and 13 million years ago — could have had the capacity to communicate with the same fundamental building blocks of language bonobos are displaying.
The researchers behind this study said bonobos are almost akin to a time machine into humanity's past.
And this research raises questions about what happened so long ago that pushed ancient humans to evolve and develop a more complex form of verbal communication.
'If bonobos and chimpanzees, in their natural communication systems, have a lot of these building blocks, it can help us understand what is that tipping point where humans jumped off into a language that is far more complex,' said Sara Skiba, a research scientist and director of communications for the Ape Initiative, a bonobo research facility in Des Moines, Iowa. Skiba was not involved in the new study.
Bonobos are difficult to study in the wild. They live in fragmented habitat in Congo, which has experienced human conflict in recent years.
The species is endangered and its population is likely less than 20,000, said Martin Surbeck, an assistant professor in the department of human evolutionary biology at Harvard University and an author of the study.
'Bonobos really have this unique opportunity to hold kind of a mirror to humankind,' Surbeck said. 'I think they offer a unique opportunity, right, for us to really understand ourselves in ways that wouldn't be possible without them, and I think losing them, I think we lose a lot of, a part of our heritage to a certain degree.'
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ocean currents can generate electricity – and our study shows Africa's seas have some of the strongest
The world's oceans cover more than 70% of Earth's surface. They're filled with currents, some much stronger than the fastest flowing large rivers. These currents can be harnessed as clean, marine renewable energy. Marine energy is much more predictable and reliable than many other forms of renewable energy because unlike sun and wind, which regularly do not produce electricity, ocean currents never stop moving around the planet. New research has found that the eastern and south-eastern coasts of Africa have currents that put them among the world's top potential locations for ocean energy production. Researchers Mahsan Sadoughipour, James VanZwieten, Yufei Tang and Gabriel Alsenas explain what is needed to bring renewable marine energy into African countries' electricity mix. Ocean currents contain kinetic energy that can be converted to electrical power using turbines. This is similar to offshore wind farms, or wind turbines positioned in the ocean, that convert wind to electricity. The difference is that converting ocean currents to energy means the turbines would float on the surface or just under the surface of the ocean. The electricity they generate can be brought to shore using power cables under the sea (as is currently done with wind turbines in the sea). It could also be used to generate hydrogen offshore which could be transported and used as fuel. This would eliminate the need for subsea cables. We looked at 30 years of water velocity data – measurements of how fast the water moves (currents). We got the data from drifting buoys in the ocean. These devices are fitted with meteorological and oceanographic sensors that have been sent into the ocean. There are 1,250 of these buoys floating around the world's oceans today. They are designed to follow the water circulation in oceans so that they can constantly measure the speed and direction of ocean currents. They aren't blown around by the wind. They transmit information about ocean currents via satellite so that it can be made publicly available and used by scientists. We looked at 43 million measurements of ocean current speed and direction at specific locations and times over 30 years. From this, we were able to calculate the amount of energy stored in every metre squared of the ocean. This is known as energy density. This is a foundational step in determining the potential of ocean currents for generating clean and renewable energy. Our research is the first time this information has ever been generated. Prototypes have been developed and tested at sea from as far back as 1985. But there are no ocean current turbines feeding power to electrical grids at present. This delay between testing the prototypes and getting turbines up and running has happened because of the technical challenges in setting up these systems in deep water offshore environments. Developers have recently made new advances, however, improving the undersea cables and the microcomputers used in ocean current energy systems, and enhancing the design of the turbine blades. There have also been advances in developing stronger anchors for these systems. Read more: The new and advanced systems are being developed and tested in the waters off Florida (US), North Carolina (US), Japan and Taiwan. Engineers in South Africa and Mexico are also investigating the potential of ocean current turbine systems. We've identified high energy areas in the waters off Somalia, Kenya, Tanzania and Madagascar. They have some of the most energy dense currents on Earth, higher than the standard for wind energy resource to be classified as 'excellent'. These are potential sites for ocean energy production. An area in the ocean off the coast of South Africa also has potential. For example, we found areas with power densities ranging from 500 to 2,500 watts per square metre over an area around 800km by 30km off South Africa and around 2,000km by 30km off Somalia, Kenya and Tanzania. To put this into perspective, the average small household in South Africa uses on average about 730 watts of power. Therefore, every metre squared in the ocean that generates power could provide enough power for one small South African household. Read more: More research is needed, however. This is because we haven't been measuring the currents in the Indian Ocean as long as we have for other oceans. For example, Pacific Ocean currents have been measured since 1979 but the Indian Ocean currents have only been measured since 1994. Also, most of these high-energy areas are located in relatively deep water (over 1,000 metres deep). This could make it challenging to install ocean current turbines. On the positive side, these areas are relatively close to shore. There are also areas off South Africa, Somalia, Kenya and Madagascar where strong ocean current energy densities are found in waters as shallow as 100 metres. There is a good chance that relatively shallow and nearshore locations such as these will be the first places where ocean current based electricity will be generated off Africa. Scientists all over the world are conducting research into how to use the oceans' waves, tides and currents to generate energy. So, what's needed is for the projects to be developed. Usually, this starts with a project developer, community or electric company setting up a business to attract investment to get the project started. Then more technical work will be needed. This includes measuring the ocean currents closely to select the precise locations for the turbines, and figuring out how to connect the turbines to shore. The project developer then needs to bring everything together. Each project will cost a different amount, depending on how big it is and what technology is needs. Finding the start-up funds could be a challenge. The other stumbling block is that the technologies to harness ocean currents are not commercially viable yet. But they are developing fast. Ocean current energy is a compelling prospect for African countries in times of climate change. This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: James H. VanZwieten Jr., Florida Atlantic University; Gabriel Alsenas, Florida Atlantic University; Mahsan Sadoughipour, Florida Atlantic University, and Yufei Tang, Florida Atlantic University Read more: Climate change is disrupting ocean currents. We're using satellites and ships to understand how Six areas where action must focus to rescue this planet The untapped power of ocean winds – why New Zealand is looking offshore for future renewable energy James H. VanZwieten Jr. receives funding from the US National Science Foundation and US Department of Energy. Gabriel Alsenas receives funding from the U.S. Department of Energy, National Science Foundation, State of Florida, and marine energy sector partners. Florida Atlantic University's Southeast National Marine Renewable Energy Center is a member of the U.S. National Hydropower Association Marine Energy Council, the U.S.-based industry association for marine renewables. Mahsan Sadoughipour receives funding from DOE. Yufei Tang does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.


New York Times
9 hours ago
- New York Times
The Humanist Who Designed a Deadly Weapon
Times Insider explains who we are and what we do and delivers behind-the-scenes insights into how our journalism comes together. Once, during an interview, I saw him in action as he described a run of knotty calculations he was doing in his head — the kind of math his peers usually worked out on paper or with computers. That gift was surely one reason that Enrico Fermi, a founder of the nuclear age who mentored him at the University of Chicago, called Richard L. Garwin 'the only true genius I have ever met.' It also played to a popular image of Dr. Garwin as slightly robotic, even computerlike, a thinking machine that happened to have legs. Dr. Garwin died last month at 97, leaving behind a legacy of contradictions. In 1951, at age 23, he designed the first hydrogen bomb, the world's deadliest weapon, a planet shaker that could end civilization. He then devoted his life to counteracting the terror. Over four decades of interviews, chats and social interactions, I learned that the man behind the stereotypes was full of surprises, which I wrote about in a recent article. He had a reputation for being cruel to those he saw as less talented. That may have been true in the prime of his professional life. But in person during his later years, Dr. Garwin came across as a gentle academic, a humanist whose life turned out to be rich in benevolent acts. Years ago, Gene Cittadino, a friend of mine who taught science history at New York University, asked me if Dr. Garwin might be willing to speak to his class. After the talk, Gene and several students took him to lunch and were regaled with stories about the presidents he advised. 'He was soft-spoken, sharp as a tack and funny,' Gene recalled. The whiz, he added, 'treated us with respect,' as if we were his colleagues. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
16 hours ago
- Yahoo
Dehorning of S.African rhinos slashed poaching: study
The dehorning of rhinos resulted in a nearly 80-percent reduction in the poaching of the animals during a seven-year study in a major South African conservation area, researchers said Thursday. Sawing off the sought-after horns was also a fraction of the cost of other counter-poaching measures such as deploying rangers or tracking dogs, according to the study published in the journal Science. The study was carried out between 2017 and 2023 in 11 reserves around South Africa's famed Kruger National Park that protect the world's largest rhino population. During this period, some 1,985 rhinos were poached in the reserves in the Greater Kruger area despite $74 million spent mostly on reactive law enforcement measures that netted around 700 poachers, it said. By contrast, dehorning 2,284 rhinos cut poaching by 78 percent at just 1.2 percent of that budget, said the study published by the American Association for the Advancement of Science. "Some poaching of dehorned rhinos continued because poachers targeted horn stumps and regrowth, signalling the need for regular dehorning alongside judicious use of law enforcement," the study said. South Africa is home to most of the world's rhinos, including the critically endangered black rhino, and is a hotspot for poaching driven by demand in Asia where the horns are used in traditional medicine. Rhino horn is highly sought after on the black market, where the price by weight rivals that of gold and cocaine. Alongside ivory, the horns are coveted as status symbols or used in traditional medicine for their supposed aphrodisiac properties. "Ongoing socioeconomic inequality incentivises a large pool of vulnerable and motivated people to join, or poach for, criminal syndicates even when the risks are high," the researchers said. Corruption also played a role with gangs receiving insider tips to evade detection and arrest, they said. - Impacts unclear - "Although detecting and arresting poachers is essential, strategies that focus on reducing opportunities for and rewards from poaching may be more effective," the study said. It added, however, that "the effects of dehorning on rhino biology are still unclear, with present research suggesting that dehorning may alter rhino space use but not survival and reproduction." The co-authors of the study are from South Africa's Nelson Mandela University and the University of Cape Town, and various conservation groups including the Wildlife Conservation Network and United Kingdom's Save the Rhino International. South Africa had more than 16,000 rhinos at the end of 2023, mostly white rhinos, according to government data. But at least 34 rhinos were killed each month, the environment minister said in May. In 2024 South African scientists injected radioactive material into live rhino horns to make them easier to detect at border posts in a pioneering project aimed at curbing poaching. The radioactive material would not impact the animal's health or the environment in any way but make it poisonous for human consumption, according to the University of the Witwatersrand's radiation and health physics unit which spearheaded the initiative. Black rhinos are listed by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) as critically endangered. ho/br/rlp