logo
Navy veteran who proved CNN defamed him files another lawsuit, alleges Puck republished ‘defamatory lies'

Navy veteran who proved CNN defamed him files another lawsuit, alleges Puck republished ‘defamatory lies'

Fox News31-03-2025

U.S. Navy veteran Zachary Young, who successfully sued CNN for defamation earlier this year, filed a lawsuit on Friday against Puck for alleged "republication of CNN's defamatory lies."
Young successfully alleged that CNN smeared him by implying he illegally profited when helping people flee Afghanistan on the "black market" during the Biden administration's military withdrawal from the country in 2021. In January, a six-person jury ruled Young was awarded $4 million in lost earnings, $1 million in personal damages such as pain and suffering and said that punitive damages were warranted against CNN. A settlement was reached before punitive damages were decided by the jury.
While the CNN trial is in the rearview, Young is not finished attempting to clear his name.
"A year into his CNN lawsuit, during which he was under constant attack by CNN's high-powered lawyers, he reached out to Puck News—which had a reputation for covering media-related lawsuits—to offer them his side of the story," Young's attorney wrote in the lawsuit.
"Initially, Puck News ignored him. But another year later, when Mr. Young's court victories gathered wider media attention, Puck's so-called 'entertainment law expert,' Eriq Gardner, wrote an article about the lawsuit," the complaint continued. "Rather than contact Mr. Young and write a fair account of the case, he chose to repeat and spread the false claims of CNN, telling Puck's tens of thousands of readers that Mr. Young and his company were charging the 'panicked locals . . . hefty fees—sometimes tens of thousands of dollars—to escape the Taliban.'"
In September, Puck News published a story by Gardner headlined, "Netflix on Trial & CNN's Financial Colonoscopy" that detailed a discovery request that required CNN to hand over sensitive financial documents to comply with a pre-trial ruling.
"Why the deep dive into CNN's finances? It goes back to a November 11, 2021, segment on The Lead with Jake Tapper, when reporter Alex Marquardt detailed how, following President Joe Biden's withdrawal from Afghanistan and the collapse of the government, panicked locals turned to private contractors to help them flee the country. One such contractor was Zachary Young, a Navy veteran whose firm was charging people hefty fees—sometimes tens of thousands of dollars—to escape the Taliban," Gardner wrote.
Young believes Puck News "committed the same indefensible error" that CNN was found to have committed.
"Puck's malicious repetition of this false claim—which it has not bothered to retract or even correct after Mr. Young sent them a demand letter—continues to devastate his reputation and income, punishing him once again for his work that saved lives. Mr. Young, who should be spending his time with family and friends, and rebuilding his security consulting business, is now forced to sue yet another large media entity to defend his good name and hold Puck accountable," the complaint states.
Young is seeking the same venue for his lawsuit against Puck as he had with CNN: Bay County, Florida. In the filing, Young's attorney noted that Gardner referred to the area as "one of Florida's deepest-red outposts" when suggesting it was a poor venue for CNN. The filing also suggests Gardner "clearly" adopted "CNN's characterization of events" in his reporting.
"Gardner was entirely aware of the facts of the case and knew that Mr. Young never charged any Afghan 'to escape the Taliban.' Mr. Young contracted with large corporate sponsors, not individuals," the lawsuit says, which goes on to allege Gardner's article used the same language as in CNN's report.
Young's attorney called Puck's reporting a "republication of CNN's defamatory lies" and stated that "another national news outlet had painted him as an exploitative opportunist who was preying on vulnerable Afghans."
"Mr. Young's activities were fully legal, and he never demanded or accepted money from, or exploited Afghans," the suit continues. "This is not reasonably disputed, and this Court granted Mr. Young summary judgment on this in the CNN case."
Puck stands by its reporting.
"Puck stands behind our reporting and we are confident the facts will hold up to any scrutiny," a Puck spokesperson told Fox News Digital.
Young is seeking "compensatory, special, and punitive damages, as well as disgorgement of any and all income Puck has made off of its lies" and is requesting a trial by jury.
14th Judicial Circuit Court Judge William S. Henry, who oversaw the CNN trial, was assigned to the lawsuit.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Russia launches one of war's largest air attacks days after Ukraine's bomber raid
Russia launches one of war's largest air attacks days after Ukraine's bomber raid

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Russia launches one of war's largest air attacks days after Ukraine's bomber raid

Russia launched a barrage of drones and ballistic missiles across broad swaths of Ukraine early Friday, killing at least six people and injuring dozens of others, days after Kyiv launched a daring raid on Moscow's fleet of strategic bombers. For residents of Kyiv, the night's soundtrack was familiar: the shrieking whir of drones, air raid sirens and large explosions overhead – whether from air defenses successfully downing missiles, or projectiles puncturing the capital. Three firefighters were killed in Kyiv, two civilians were killed in Lutsk, and another person was killed in Chernihiv, according to the Ukrainian State Emergency Service. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said Russia had used more than 400 drones and 40 missiles in the overnight attack, putting it among the war's largest. He said Moscow's attack injured 80 and targeted 'almost all' of Ukraine, listing nine regions, from Lviv in the west to Sumy in the northeast. Although Russia has pummeled Ukraine almost daily over three years of full-scale war, Ukrainians had been bracing for retaliation since Sunday, when Kyiv launched an audacious operation that struck more than a third of Russia's strategic cruise missile carriers. In a call with his US counterpart Donald Trump on Wednesday, Russian President Vladimir Putin said that Moscow would have to respond to Kyiv's assault. Speaking aboard Air Force One on Friday, Trump told reporters Ukraine 'gave Putin a reason to go in and bomb the hell out of them last night.' Russia's Ministry of Defense said its strikes were in response to what it called Kyiv's 'terrorist acts.' It was not immediately clear if the attack was the extent of Russia's pledged retaliation, or if Putin intends to escalate further. After the embarrassment of Kyiv's operation, there was a chorus of bellicose calls from pro-Kremlin pundits for a severe – potentially nuclear – response. Although Ukrainians had been buoyed last weekend by the news of Kyiv's successful operation, many were wary of how Russia might strike back. But after Friday's strikes, Kyiv residents told CNN they supported Ukraine's strikes against the aircraft Moscow has used to bomb Ukraine for more than three years. 'It didn't break us at all. The morale is as high as it was. We strongly believe in our armed forces,' said Olha, a 39-year-old from the capital who did not wish to give her last name. She said the apparent 'retaliation' from Russia was not so different to countless other nights of the war. 'Maybe (this was the retaliation), but maybe the retaliation is yet to come. Either way, it doesn't change our attitude towards the enemy or towards our country.' Meanwhile, Ukraine's general staff on Friday said it launched overnight strikes on two Russian airfields, where it said Moscow had concentrated many of the aircraft that had not been damaged in Kyiv's 'Spiderweb' operation last weekend. Ukraine stressed that the operation, which blindsided the Kremlin, had targeted the planes that Russia uses to launch missile strikes on Ukrainian cities and kill civilians. After Russia's large-scale attack Friday, Ukraine's Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha said Moscow had 'responded' to its destroyed aircraft by once again 'attacking civilians in Ukraine.' As daylight broke, images from Kyiv showed flames rising over apartment buildings and firefighting crews at work, with residents picking through the debris of damaged apartments. Several cars parked in the streets below were covered with shards of glass and slabs of masonry torn from the walls of residential buildings. Ukraine's air force said Russia's barrage comprised 407 drones, six ballistic missiles, 38 cruise missiles and an anti-radar missile. Of those 452 projectiles, the air force said it had downed 406, including 32 of the cruise missiles and four of the ballistic missiles. The other two ballistic missiles did not reach their targets, it added. The strikes also hit Chernihiv, near the border with Belarus, which was rocked by 14 explosions from drones and ballistic missiles, including cruise missiles and Iskander-M missiles, local officials said. Five others were wounded in strikes in the northwestern city of Lutsk, near the border with Poland. Footage geolocated by CNN showed at least four missiles slamming into the city, kicking up fiery explosions on impact. The Russian Ministry of Defense said it had also intercepted and destroyed 174 Ukrainian drones from Thursday evening to early Friday morning and had destroyed three Ukrainian Neptune-MD guided missiles over the Black Sea. All week, Ukrainians have been bracing for Russia's retaliation to last weekend's drone attack, which struck 34% of Moscow's nuclear-capable bombers stationed at airfields as far away as Siberia. On Tuesday, Ukraine also launched an attack on the Kerch Bridge, the only direct connection point between Russia and the annexed Crimean Peninsula, with 1,100 kilograms of explosives that had been planted underwater. After Trump's call with Putin on Wednesday, the US president said his Russian counterpart had told him that Moscow would have to respond to Ukraine's assaults. Trump's account of the call gave no indication that he had urged Putin to temper his response, to the dismay of many in Ukraine. 'When Putin mentioned he is going to avenge or deliver a new strike against Ukraine, we know what it means. It's about civilians,' Ukrainian lawmaker Oleksandr Merezhko told CNN earlier this week. 'And President Trump didn't say, 'Vladimir, stop.'' Despite Trump's support for recent peace talks in Istanbul between Ukraine and Russia, on Thursday he signaled that he may be adopting a more hands-off approach, likening the war to a brawl between children. 'Sometimes you see two young children fighting like crazy,' Trump said in the Oval Office, while German Chancellor Friedrich Merz looked on silently. 'They hate each other, and they're fighting in a park, and you try and pull them apart. They don't want to be pulled. Sometimes you're better off letting them fight for a while and then pulling them apart.'

Senator Who Called For Abrego Garcia's Return Uses White House's Words Against Trump
Senator Who Called For Abrego Garcia's Return Uses White House's Words Against Trump

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Senator Who Called For Abrego Garcia's Return Uses White House's Words Against Trump

Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) hit back at President Donald Trump's administration Friday after the return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia — the Maryland father mistakenly deported to a prison in El Salvador — to U.S. soil. Van Hollen, who met with Abrego Garcia in April as the Trump administration refused to abide by a Supreme Court order to facilitate his return to the States, responded to a White House statement that asked him and others 'who defended this illegal criminal abuser to immediately apologize' to the man's 'victims.' 'You know, I will never apologize for defending the Constitution,' he told CNN's Anderson Cooper, who read part of the White House statement to Van Hollen. 'In fact, it's the Trump administration and all his cronies who should apologize to the country for putting us through this unnecessary situation and to Abrego Garcia for putting him through this situation and his family,' Van Hollen added. Abrego Garcia, perinitial reports later confirmed by Attorney General Pam Bondi in a press conference, landed back in the U.S. to face federal criminal charges that accuse him of transporting unauthorized migrants into the country. The move to charge Abrego Garcia reportedly led to the resignation of a top federal prosecutor in Tennessee, where the two-count indictment was filed in May and unsealed Friday. In the lead-up to the charges, Trump officials repeatedly stressed that Garcia was 'never' coming back from El Salvador, shifting the responsibility of facilitating such a move to that country. They also pushed claims that Abrego Garcia is a 'known member' of the MS-13 gang, allegations that his family and his attorneys have rejected. Van Hollen said the federal prosecutor's resignation 'raises questions' about the move to charge Abrego Garcia, but the focus should be on his return, adding that it's a 'good news story' for due process rights in America. 'The Trump administration should respect the rule of law and the Constitution of the United States. So really, it's President Trump who should apologize to the country for violating his oath to the Constitution,' he said. 'I'm glad in this moment, they are finally, finally doing what the Supreme Court said but they continue, Anderson, to violate the Constitution in many, many other [deportation] cases.' Kilmar Abrego Garcia Has Returned To The United States Eric Swalwell Blasts Kristi Noem For 'Bulls**t' Over Abrego Garcia Tattoo Pic Trump Admin Reportedly Told Court A Different Story Than The Public In Sealed Communications

Senator Who Called For Abrego Garcia's Return Uses White House's Words Against Trump
Senator Who Called For Abrego Garcia's Return Uses White House's Words Against Trump

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Senator Who Called For Abrego Garcia's Return Uses White House's Words Against Trump

Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) hit back at President Donald Trump's administration Friday after the return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia — the Maryland father mistakenly deported to a prison in El Salvador — to U.S. soil. Van Hollen, who met with Abrego Garcia in April as the Trump administration refused to abide by a Supreme Court order to facilitate his return to the States, responded to a White House statement that asked him and others 'who defended this illegal criminal abuser to immediately apologize' to the man's 'victims.' 'You know, I will never apologize for defending the Constitution,' he told CNN's Anderson Cooper, who read part of the White House statement to Van Hollen. 'In fact, it's the Trump administration and all his cronies who should apologize to the country for putting us through this unnecessary situation and to Abrego Garcia for putting him through this situation and his family,' Van Hollen added. Garcia, perinitial reports later confirmed by Attorney General Pam Bondi in a press conference, landed back in the U.S. to face federal criminal charges that accuse him of transporting unauthorized migrants into the country. The move to charge Abrego Garcia reportedly led to the resignation of a top federal prosecutor in Tennessee, where the two-count indictment was filed in May and unsealed Friday. In the lead-up to the charges, Trump officials repeatedly stressed that Garcia was 'never' coming back from El Salvador, shifting the responsibility of facilitating such a move to that country. They also pushed claims that Abrego Garcia is a 'known member' of the MS-13 gang, allegations that his family and his attorneys have rejected. Van Hollen said the federal prosecutor's resignation 'raises questions' about the move to charge Abrego Garcia, but the focus should be on his return, adding that it's a 'good news story' for due process rights in America. 'The Trump administration should respect the rule of law and the Constitution of the United States. So really, it's President Trump who should apologize to the country for violating his oath to the Constitution,' he said. 'I'm glad in this moment, they are finally, finally doing what the Supreme Court said but they continue, Anderson, to violate the Constitution in many, many other [deportation] cases.' Senator Van Hollen: I will never apologize for defending the constitution. In fact, it's the Trump administration and all his cronies who should apologize to the country for putting us through this unnecessary situation, and to Abrego Garcia for putting him through this situation… — Acyn (@Acyn) June 7, 2025 Kilmar Abrego Garcia Has Returned To The United States Eric Swalwell Blasts Kristi Noem For 'Bulls**t' Over Abrego Garcia Tattoo Pic Trump Admin Reportedly Told Court A Different Story Than The Public In Sealed Communications

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store