logo
Cristina Kirchner: divisive left-winger tainted by fraud

Cristina Kirchner: divisive left-winger tainted by fraud

DURING two decades at the forefront of Argentine politics, Cristina Kirchner inspired love and loathing in equal measure, but rarely indifference.
She has made several comebacks over the years – even escaping unscathed from an assassination attempt – but may now have come to the end of her political tether.
On Tuesday, the country's Supreme Court upheld Kirchner's six-year prison sentence for a graft conviction and confirmed a lifetime ban on her holding public office.
The 72-year-old has five days to present herself to authorities for arrangements to be made for serving her sentence.
Kirchner was born in 1953 in the small town of Tolosa, just outside the Argentine capital Buenos Aires.
The daughter of a bus driver and a housewife, she often played up her lower middle-class roots, though she could never hide her love of luxury brands and travel.
She first came to prominence as one half of the ultimate political power couple with husband Nestor.
The pair met at university when they were both law students passionate about Peronism – a leftist ideology based on the legacy of former ruler Juan Peron.
Nestor Kirchner became president in 2003, serving one term, before Cristina was elected in 2007. They expected to continue their term-for-term tango, but he died of a heart attack in 2010.
Together, the couple served a collective 12 years in the Casa Rosada, the pink presidential palace, with Cristina exiting the top office for the last time in 2015.
She later served as vice-president to her former chief of staff Alberto Fernandez.
To their working-class base, the Kirchners were saviours after Argentina's 2001 economic meltdown and the social unrest that followed the largest debt default in history.
They were seen as standing up for the little guy against bullies both foreign and domestic.
Addressing supporters outside her party headquarters after the Supreme Court ruling, she depicted her tenure as a golden era, when Argentine workers "had the highest salaries in Latin America and pensioners had the highest pensions."
Her two terms, during a commodities boom, were characterised by protectionist trade policies and major investments in social programs and subsidies, which caused public spending to spiral.
Under her stewardship Argentina became a regional bastion of LGBTQ rights, allowing gay marriage in 2010 and passing a gender identity law in 2012.
For her detractors, however, Kirchner is a corrupt, overbearing interventionist who steered the country toward economic ruin and rampant inflation with her debt-fuelled spending sprees.
One of her major critics is incumbent President Javier Milei, whose budget-slashing austerity policies Kirchner has in turn slammed as inhumane.
In December 2022, Kirchner was found guilty of fraudulently awarding public works contracts during her time as president in her southern Patagonian stronghold of Santa Cruz.
Just months earlier, at a pro-Kirchner demonstration, a man pointed a revolver in Kirchner's face and pulled the trigger. The gun did not fire.
On Tuesday, after Argentina's Supreme Court upheld Kirchner's conviction on appeal, and confirmed a six-year prison sentence that she may ask to convert to house arrest given her age.
Kirchner has been defiant throughout, accusing the justice system of persecuting Peronism.
Just a week ago, she announced she would seek election to the government of Buenos Aires province in September elections. A win would have given her immunity for the duration of her term.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Can Madani backers' hailing of Yusoff Rawther's acquittal as court freedom still exists hold water?
Can Madani backers' hailing of Yusoff Rawther's acquittal as court freedom still exists hold water?

Focus Malaysia

timean hour ago

  • Focus Malaysia

Can Madani backers' hailing of Yusoff Rawther's acquittal as court freedom still exists hold water?

'THE Kuala Lumpur High Court's decision to acquit Yusoff Rawther of charges related to possessing drugs and a replica firearm clearly proves that Malaysia's judicial system operates fairly, independently and transparently.' Such is the counter argument coming from pro-Madani government influencers after the Kuala Lumpur High Court yesterday (June 12) acquitted Yusoff who was Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's former research assistant of trafficking cannabis and possession of two fake pistols. 'This case serves as a concrete example of how the principles of rule of law and separation of powers continue to be upheld under the administration of PMX Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim,' penned CIKYANie (@lady_bugg11) on X. This came about as observation pointed to the Madani machinery having mobilised its cybertroopers to rubbish claims of conspiracy and persecution – as per the statement of Opposition Leader Datuk Seri Hamzah Zainudin – which led to Yusoff having to spend nine months and 10 days in prison without bail. Itu kerana dulu mahkamah tidak bebas. Sekarang, mahkamah bebas tanpa campurtangan. Sebab itu, takde mana2 penyokong yang waras terutamanya penyokong Rafizi menggelupor dengan pembebasan penyokong 1Israel ini. Kalau masih ada campurtangan PMX, penyokong 1Israel ini konfirm ke… — Amer Hamzah (@amer7211) June 12, 2025 Additionally, the Opposition has also mooted the idea of suing the police and Home Ministry with such call coming from PAS information chief Fadhli Shaari. Miscarriage of justice The case serves as a grim reminder of how power – when unchecked – leads to selective justice, according to former de-facto law minister Datuk Zaid Ibrahim. 'In Malaysia where law, business and politics are deeply intertwined, the abuse of prosecutorial discretion is not a theoretical concern – it's a real and recurring threat to the rule of law,' tweeted the opposition-slant UMNO member in a reaction to Yusoff's acquittal. 'At the heart of this problem is the public prosecutor's virtually unchallengeable discretion. The current legal position where the Attorney General's (AG) decision to prosecute or not prosecute is almost immune from judicial scrutiny is untenable in a modern democracy.' Based on the KL High Court's judgment, former Bukit Bintang MP and lawyer Wee Choo Keong wondered how the AG could allow the police to charge Yusoff based on insufficient evidence while his appeal for bail was repeatedly denied for nine months. 'Grave injustice inflicted upon Yusoff Rawther! The Madani government must find ways to compensate this innocent young man!' the former DAP lawmaker reacted on X. 'Yusoff's acquittal underscores the need for an in-depth investigation into malpractices by the authorities, transparent accountability and due diligence – especially in high-profile or politically sensitive cases.' In acquitting Yusoff, Judge Datuk Muhammad Jamil Hussin has ruled that the two investigating officers failed to investigate Yusoff's claim that he was a victim of entrapment by a certain individual. 'The police officers had ample time to verify his statement but didn't do so,' contended Jamil, adding that this had prejudiced the accused. Meanwhile, the Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture (MADPET) calls for the repeal of provisions in law that deny bail given that Yusoff had been held in remand for more than nine months prior to his acquittal. 'The fact that the police didn't investigate is unacceptable, more so when it a crime that carries the death penalty,' lamented the NGO's co-founder Charles Hector. 'In the case of Yusoff as he sued our PM for sexual harassment/abuse, it becomes even more important to identify who ordered or put the drugs in his car. 'As many suspect that the sitting PM may be involved, a thorough investigation would identify the real perpetrators and clear any doubts about Anwar Ibrahim's involvement.' – June 13, 2025 Main image credit: Bernama

Ukrainian refugees in Sumy fear Russian advance, shelling
Ukrainian refugees in Sumy fear Russian advance, shelling

The Star

time9 hours ago

  • The Star

Ukrainian refugees in Sumy fear Russian advance, shelling

Margaryta Husakova, 37, mother of eight children, who fled the Ukrainian town of Bilopilia, sits with her children near a refugee centre, amid Russia's attack on Ukraine, in Sumy, Ukraine June 12, 2025. REUTERS/Sofiia Gatilova SUMY (Reuters) -Margaryta Husakova, her broken arm secured in a metal orthopedic fixation device, smoked nervously as she sat on the staircase of a refugee shelter in Sumy, a city in northern Ukraine, contemplating what the future holds. In May, Husakova, 37, a mother of eight, lost her mother, sister, and uncle in a Russian drone attack on a van near the town of Bilopillia, west of Sumy. Nine people died in total and Husakova was among the five wounded. 'A man pulled me out of the bus, emergency services arrived, and I was sitting there on the grass,' she said. Despite talk of peace, the war is creeping closer to Sumy, a regional capital of 250,000 people, located just 25 kilometers (15 miles) from the border with Russia. After the bus attack, Husakova and her family fled their native town Bilopillia, now a target of Russian artillery, and sought shelter at a refugee center in Sumy. 'What's next? We're sitting here, but if they offer us somewhere else, we'll go with the children,' she said. Her father, Vyacheslav, expressed worry about the future. 'I don't know what's next … the most important thing for me is to take the children away, because katsapy will come to Sumy too,' he said, using a pejorative term for Russians. Russia, which controls just under one-fifth of Ukrainian territory, has seized over 190 square kilometers (73 square miles) of the Sumy region in less than a month, according to pro-Ukrainian open-source maps. Russian troops have captured more ground in the past days, advancing to around 20 kilometers from Sumy's northern suburbs, bringing the city closer to being within the range of long-range artillery and drones. The number of displaced people arriving in Sumy is increasing, said Kateryna Arisoi, head of Pluriton, a non-governmental organization that operates the shelter for internally displaced people. 'We are seeing the frontline slowly moving toward Sumy,' she said. "So far evacuation has been ordered in more than 200 settlements." Last week, a Russian rocket attack on Sumy killed three people and injured 28, including three children, while also damaging several buildings. Both Russia and Ukraine deny targeting civilians in their attacks, but thousands of civilians have died in the three-year-long conflict, the vast majority of them Ukrainian. (Reporting by Vitaly Hnidyi; Writing by Aleksandar Vasovic; Editing by Nia Williams)

Judge in Harvey Weinstein trial declares mistrial on rape charge following sex abuse conviction
Judge in Harvey Weinstein trial declares mistrial on rape charge following sex abuse conviction

The Star

time10 hours ago

  • The Star

Judge in Harvey Weinstein trial declares mistrial on rape charge following sex abuse conviction

Harvey Weinstein's case continues with his retrial in New York, June 11, 2025 Steven Hirsch/Pool via REUTERS (Reuters) -The judge overseeing Harvey Weinstein's criminal trial in Manhattan on Thursday declared a mistrial on a rape charge against the former Hollywood movie mogul, after one of the jurors refused to continue deliberations. The mistrial came a day after the jury convicted Weinstein on a separate sex abuse charge. It also acquitted him on a different sex abuse charge. Weinstein, once one of the most powerful figures in Hollywood, faced a retrial that began on April 23 after a New York state appeals court last year overturned his 2020 conviction. He was accused by prosecutors in this case of raping an aspiring actress and assaulting two other women. Weinstein, 73, pleaded not guilty and has denied assaulting anyone or having non-consensual sex. The jury found Weinstein guilty on one of the three counts he faced, which stemmed from his alleged assault of former production assistant Miriam Haley in 2006. The jury found Weinstein not guilty of a charge stemming from his alleged assault of Kaja Sokola in 2002 when she was a 16-year-old aspiring actress. Supreme Court Justice Curtis Farber declared a mistrial after the judge said the jury could not reach a verdict on a third count, which charged him with raping aspiring actress Jessica Mann in 2013. Weinstein faces up to 25 years in prison when he is sentenced. He has separately been sentenced to 16 years in prison following a rape conviction in California. In a startling development on Wednesday, the jury foreperson told Farber that other members of the panel were shouting at him and threatening him for refusing to change his vote on the rape count. Farber sent jurors home for the day to give them time to cool down and instructed the foreperson to arrive in court separately on Thursday. In closing arguments on June 3, the prosecution told the 12 jurors that the evidence showed how Weinstein used his power and influence to trap and abuse women. The defense countered that the accusers lied on the witness stand out of spite after their consensual sexual encounters with the Oscar-winning producer failed to result in Hollywood stardom. A jury found Weinstein guilty in February 2020 of raping Mann and sexually assaulting Haley. Sokola's allegation was not part of that case. The conviction was a milestone for the #MeToo movement, which encouraged women to come forward with allegations of sexual misconduct by powerful men. But the New York Court of Appeals, the state's highest court, threw out that conviction in April 2024. It said the trial judge erred by letting women testify that Weinstein had assaulted them, though their accusations were not the basis of the criminal charges. Though the conviction was thrown out, Weinstein, who has had a litany of health problems in recent years and attended the retrial in a wheelchair, has remained behind bars because of his California conviction. He is appealing that verdict. More than 100 women, including famous actresses, have accused Weinstein of misconduct. He co-founded the Miramax studio, whose hit movies included such Academy Award winners as "Shakespeare in Love" and "Pulp Fiction." Weinstein's own eponymous film studio filed for bankruptcy in March 2018, five months after sexual misconduct accusations against him became widely publicized. (Reporting by Jack Queen in New York; Editing by Mark Porter)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store