Budget 2025: The Teenagers Feeling Ignored By Government's Decisions
Article – RNZ
A group of youths grappling with some of the decisions made by the government expressed their concerns at a post-Budget chat hosted by the Child Poverty Action Group.
Checkpoint
Louise Ternouth , Checkpoint reporter
'Do not just invest in stats and numbers, invest in us.'
That is the message from a group of teenagers grappling with some of the decisions made by the government in this year's Budget.
They came together along with child advocates, researchers and rangatahi to unpack the budget. with KiwiSaver, pay equity, employment and climate change all top of the discussion.
Save the Children Generation Hope Youth ambassadors opened the post-Budget chat hosted by the Child Poverty Action Group in Tāmaki Makaurau with these words.
'A budget is numbers, but numbers don't heal people, a budget is a promise but promises break without action, a budget is pointless without a plan.
'We've heard the speeches we've seen the headlines roll in; the words roll in like tides the tides that never quite reach the shore.'
One of the youth ambassadors is 17-year-old Sonya.
She was concerned about what she feels are important parts of daily life that were missing from the budget.
'There was a lot about infrastructure and funding for big things, but not really the things that matter or the things that impact people on their daily lives.
'Kids that go to school, what are we going to do about buses? What are we going to do about traffic? What are we going to do about families and school lunches?'
One of the big changes affecting rangatahi is the tightening of the job seeker and emergency benefits.
18 and 19-year-olds on those will now have them means tested against their parents' incomes.
Year 12 students at Kelston Boys' High School Uelese and Nikolao are concerned about this.
'Do they know, especially in Polynesian households like our parents, have their own struggles, relying on them for the funding will put more stress and you know, more troubles on our parents,' said Uelese.
'Yeah, I think it all goes back to the purpose of the government itself to provide positive outcomes for the general public, whether or not you have stable parents, I feel like everybody deserves what they're promised,' Nikolao said.
The issue was of particular relevance for Uelese – whose mother has been impacted by the pay equity reform.
While its overhaul will save the government $2.7 billion a year.
The changes mean workers now face a higher threshold to prove they are underpaid due to sex discrimination.
Uelese is worried about how it will affect his mum and dedicated his opening speech to her.
'If my mom can't get ahead, how am I supposed to?
'This year's budget was meant to be about growth, but for so many families, especially those led by women, it feels more like being told to grow something from dry soil.
'You can't cut down the people who carry the load and expect the next generation to rise.
'This budget forgets the people who hold our communities and our children together, women, especially mothers.'
Then there is KiwiSaver.
From July, 16 and 17-year-olds are eligible to get the government contribution and requirements for employers to match their deposits will kick in next year.
But the minimum contribution will go up from three percent of wages to four percent over the next three years.
The amount the government is contributing is being halved to a maximum of $261 a year.
The government said the increase in the default amount could leave KiwiSaver members with more than $100,000 in retirement.
But the Labour Party claims not everybody will benefit, especially younger people.
It claims the changes could mean an 18-year-old ends up with $66,000 less for their retirement.
Uelese and Nikolao are disappointed with the change.
'You know, finance is everything it would be good to, like, have that support that they've sort of halved.
'I mean, it's still there, but is half really enough to start something in, in this ever growing society,' said Uelese.
The students also said there is one big thing missing in the budget, addressing climate change.
Instead, the government has set aside $200 million to invest in fossil fuel development at gas fields, reduce climate finance to the pacific and clawed back funds for government agencies working on ways to save energy.
Uelese said it was worrying.
'We're really educated on climate change and we know that it's like one of the biggest issues, if not the biggest issue that we're facing right now.
'We actually need to get our butts up and start moving.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
an hour ago
- Otago Daily Times
Watch: How does Jacinda Ardern see her time as PM?
Former New Zealand prime minister Jacinda Ardern says her dad wasn't sure she could handle politics, but Ardern says she led with empathy, and now talks to others about how to do the same. Ardern's father thought she didn't have thick enough skin to get into politics, the former PM recalls. 'Dad really worried … 'Politics? Not for Jacinda she's too thin-skinned' and he was right,' Ardern tells RNZ's Jesse Mulligan, sitting in the JFK School of Government at Harvard University where she is leading a fellowship on empathetic leadership. Ardern, whose memoir A Different Kind of Power hit shelves this week, recalls in the book the time she was accosted in an airport bathroom and thanked for "ruining the country". 'I put it into the book not to give a singular personal experience but to speak to what I've noticed is an exchange in a political environment generally, and I don't mean just in New Zealand. 'The conversations I have with leaders past and present, they've noticed a shift in the last five years in particular.' But Ardern, who juggled first time motherhood while in power (becoming just the second woman in history to have a baby in office), says the skin her father feared would let her down, defined the kind of leader she became. 'I think the lesson for me was maybe we need thin-skinned people in politics because usually that is emblematic that you are empathetic that you're motivated to do the right thing by people and it really deeply offends you if you're critiqued for not doing your job well.' During her time at the helm of New Zealand, Ardern led the country during the March 2019 Christchurch mosque attacks, then the Whakaari White Island tragedy soon after. During these 'darker moments' Ardern describes herself as agnostic, but acknowledges her religious background did shape her take on things. 'I think it also gave me a respect for people who do have faith in their lives, and an understanding of faith communities,' she says. And unpacking all of that during writing the book was one of the hardest parts of the experience, which she says someone described as 'therapy with a deadline'. 'Because it's an unusual career path people are often interested in where your motivation and your values come from, and when you write a memoir you're digging back a little bit and giving a bit of an explanation of how you came to be on the path that you were. 'The thing that I ended up finding the trickiest was going back and talking about the role that faith had for me. Not because I hadn't disclosed it, it was very much on the record that I had been raised on the LDS church. The thing I found difficult was, after I left, I put that away in a box and didn't reflect on that again. 'When I came to write I had to pull it all back out again.' Ardern's tumultuous term was then hit with the Covid-19 pandemic and criticism that came with the decisions she was forced to make. A recent Royal Commission concluded that the government was too harsh with mandates and lockdowns at the time, Mulligan points out. 'The one thing I would say … is my goal from the outside of this horrific experience was save people's lives and keep people together,' Ardern says. 'I think we did one, and the other we didn't. But when I look around the world, we weren't the only ones that struggled with the second part. Places who had very different strategies are having the same experience in the aftermath. 'We were operating on certain information in a certain environment but with now the ability to reflect back, and I wouldn't' argue with that.' To those who say Ardern's government did not get enough done during that tenure: 'I would strongly disagree with you. Did Covid dominate internationally? Of course it did … it's hard for a pandemic not to … The idea that we haven't had an impact, I disagree'. She lists their work improving the lives of New Zealander's living in poverty, easing the burden on families during cost of living struggles, changes made to benefit rates, school lunches and climate change framework amongst some wins. And always circling back to the importance of kindness: 'I wouldn't underestimate the difference it makes when you demonstrate that the way you do government can be different as well,' Ardern adds. 'We set out to do things differently … we set out to be an empathetic government, a kind government, one that didn't make personal attacks. I hope we raised expectations that you can do things differently.'
Otago Daily Times
an hour ago
- Otago Daily Times
Watch: How does Jacinda Ardern see her time as leader?
Former New Zealand prime minister Jacinda Ardern says her dad wasn't sure she could handle politics, but Ardern says she led with empathy, and now talks to others about how to do the same. Ardern's father thought she didn't have thick enough skin to get into politics, the former New Zealand Prime Minister recalls. 'Dad really worried … 'Politics? Not for Jacinda she's too thin-skinned' and he was right,' Ardern tells RNZ's Jesse Mulligan, sitting in the JFK School of Government at Harvard University where she is leading a fellowship on empathetic leadership. Ardern, whose memoir A Different Kind of Power hit shelves this week, recalls in the book the time she was accosted in an airport bathroom and thanked for "ruining the country". 'I put it into the book not to give a singular personal experience but to speak to what I've noticed is an exchange in a political environment generally, and I don't mean just in New Zealand. 'The conversations I have with leaders past and present, they've noticed a shift in the last five years in particular.' But Ardern, who juggled first time motherhood while in power (becoming just the second woman in history to have a baby in office), says the skin her father feared would let her down, defined the kind of leader she became. 'I think the lesson for me was maybe we need thin-skinned people in politics because usually that is emblematic that you are empathetic that you're motivated to do the right thing by people and it really deeply offends you if you're critiqued for not doing your job well.' During her time at the helm of New Zealand, Ardern led the country during the March 2019 Christchurch mosque attacks, then the Whakaari White Island tragedy soon after. During these 'darker moments' Ardern describes herself as agnostic, but acknowledges her religious background did shape her take on things. 'I think it also gave me a respect for people who do have faith in their lives, and an understanding of faith communities,' she says. And unpacking all of that during writing the book was one of the hardest parts of the experience, which she says someone described as 'therapy with a deadline'. 'Because it's an unusual career path people are often interested in where your motivation and your values come from, and when you write a memoir you're digging back a little bit and giving a bit of an explanation of how you came to be on the path that you were. 'The thing that I ended up finding the trickiest was going back and talking about the role that faith had for me. Not because I hadn't disclosed it, it was very much on the record that I had been raised on the LDS church. The thing I found difficult was, after I left, I put that away in a box and didn't reflect on that again. 'When I came to write I had to pull it all back out again.' Ardern's tumultuous term was then hit with the Covid-19 pandemic and criticism that came with the decisions she was forced to make. A recent Royal Commission concluded that the government was too harsh with mandates and lockdowns at the time, Mulligan points out. 'The one thing I would say … is my goal from the outside of this horrific experience was save people's lives and keep people together,' Ardern says. 'I think we did one, and the other we didn't. But when I look around the world, we weren't the only ones that struggled with the second part. Places who had very different strategies are having the same experience in the aftermath. 'We were operating on certain information in a certain environment but with now the ability to reflect back, and I wouldn't' argue with that.' To those who say Ardern's government did not get enough done during that tenure: 'I would strongly disagree with you. Did Covid dominate internationally? Of course it did … it's hard for a pandemic not to … The idea that we haven't had an impact, I disagree'. She lists their work improving the lives of New Zealander's living in poverty, easing the burden on families during cost of living struggles, changes made to benefit rates, school lunches and climate change framework amongst some wins. And always circling back to the importance of kindness: 'I wouldn't underestimate the difference it makes when you demonstrate that the way you do government can be different as well,' Ardern adds. 'We set out to do things differently … we set out to be an empathetic government, a kind government, one that didn't make personal attacks. I hope we raised expectations that you can do things differently.'
Otago Daily Times
2 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Left bloc could turf coalition out of power: poll
By Russell Palmer of RNZ After the Budget and pay equity changes the left bloc would have the support to turf the coalition out of power, the latest RNZ-Reid Research poll shows. The preferred prime minister and leadership ratings are also bad news for the government, with the exception of Winston Peters who has seen his highest result since 2017 - and ratings of the government's general performance have also continued to slide. With Labour, the Greens and Te Pāti Māori all gaining compared to the previous poll taken in March, they would have a majority with 63 seats between them, compared to the coalition's 57 - again, New Zealand First was the only coalition party to see a boost. The poll was taken in the seven days following the release of the Budget and in the wake of the $12.8 billion pay equity changes - which RNZ's polling also shows attracting more opposition than support. National continued a downward trend from the March survey, dropping 2.2 percentage points to 30.7 percent of the party vote - and overtaken by Labour, which gained 0.9 percentage points to 33.2 percent. The Greens' 1.6 percent increase brings them back to their election-night result of 11.6 percent, while Te Pāti Māori's 0.5 percentage point boost lifts them clear of the 5 percent threshold and - presuming they held all Māori seats - nets them a list MP. ACT dropped 2.8 points to 6.6 percent - the largest shift in party polling - while New Zealand First gained 1.9 points to 9.1 percent, upending the trend facing their coalition partners. Undecided or non-voters made up 6.5 percent of those polled - up from 6.1 in the previous poll. For parties outside Parliament, TOP (The Opportunities Party) gained 0.4 points to 2.2 percent, New Conservatives fell 0.3 points to 0.8, and all others combined were at 0.3 points, a 0.1 point increase on the last survey. More New Zealanders polled say the country is going in the wrong direction (46.6 percent) than in the right direction (37.8 percent), giving a net negative result of -8.8, a substantial decrease on March's 2.9 result. Little surprise then to see National leader Christopher Luxon's net favourability ratings drop further into the negative, from -3.9 percent in March to -9.8 percent, with significantly more respondents (45.5 percent) saying he performed poorly or very poorly, than said he performed well or very well (35.7 percent). That compared to Labour's Chris Hipkins on net 5.1 percent rating (34 percent negative, 39.1 percent positive) - though Hipkins also saw a steeper fall of 7.1 percentage points. The survey shows New Zealanders' preferred prime minister as Hipkins (23.2 percent, up 2.3), taking the lead over Luxon (18.8 percent, down 3.1). NZ First leader Winston Peters at 8.9 percent (up 1 point) recorded his highest result since 2017. Chlöe Swarbrick in fourth was at 6.9 percent (up 0.8) - a personal best and just ahead of ACT's David Seymour on 6.4 percent (down 0.4). The next highest ratings were former PM Jacinda Ardern (3.7 percent, up 0.1), Te Pāti Māori MP Hana-Rawhiti Maipi-Clarke (1.7 percent, up 0.5), Finance Minister Nicola Willis (1.1, up 0.3) and Education/Immigration Minister Erica Stanford making her first appearance at 1 percent. 'I don't recognise the numbers' - Coalition plays down poll Luxon simply rejected the poll results. "Look, I mean, I don't recognise the numbers. There's lots of different polls and frankly I'm just not going to comment or focus on the polls. Frankly what we're focused on is we were elected in '23 and people get to decide again in 2026. "We've done a good job, and that's why we've got to focus on the economy, law and order, and health and education." He said New Zealanders had "responded really positively" to the government's Budget, and saw the economy turning a corner. "There's a sense of optimism that, you know, we actually have had to manage some very difficult things economically to get our books back in order. But we're doing that job, and it's all about growth, growth, growth." Seymour said the numbers would continue to "bounce around" but it was still a tough time for New Zealanders - and the numbers were not a reflection on the Budget. "Different voters will have different reasons for their choices ... so long as people are voting for the economy, it's going to be tough for parties that are tied closely to economic management," he said. It was possible the pay equity changes were changing some voters' minds, he said, "but I also think doing what is right is what is politically popular in the long term, and even if I'm wrong about that, good policy is worth it anyway". "The fact that ACT is close to where it was on election night 18 months into a government with 18 months to go is a good foundation. We have to prove ourselves on election night, and we've got lots of time to do that." Peters refused to comment on whether his coalition partners were suffering from the handling of the pay equity changes. The next 18 months leading up to the election would show the "critical need for stability", he said, and having ruled out working with Chris Hipkins he was "comfortable and confident in our prospects" because the Greens and Te Pāti Māori in government would be "a nightmare". The 80-year-old Peters said economies internationally were in trouble as a result of "unprecedented times for the last, say, 80 years", and the party was looking at New Zealand's fundamentals: asset values, and the need to increase wages and decrease business tax. "We're out there to ensure over the next few months that we can show enough improvement in the economy from what we're doing to make the prospects of an improved tomorrow possible." 'Nice to be popular' - Opposition Hipkins was also not counting his electoral chickens, but was happy to point out the effect of the Budget, saying New Zealanders were "disillusioned" with the government overall. "New Zealanders can increasingly see that this government is taking the country backwards," he said. "I don't think anyone expected the government to cancel pay equity as a way of balancing its books. Nicola Willis and Christopher Luxon told New Zealanders before the election that they knew their numbers, that everything all added up. It's clear that their numbers didn't add up." He said he did not pay much attention to small shifts from the minor parties or his personal ratings in the polls. "It's nice to be popular, but I'm really focused on making sure I win as many votes as possible for Labour at the next election." Swarbrick said New Zealanders wanted a sense of hope. "Things are feeling pretty bloody bleak. You know, we've got 191 New Zealanders leaving every single day, three quarters of them between the ages of 18 to 45, it's not a recipe for a flourishing country. "We had dozens and dozens of folks turn out to talk to us about our Green budget and the sense of hope that they feel that they need - the kind of building blocks that we can have for a fairer society." She said polls did not mean the writing was on the wall, but she was hearing from people that they were exhausted and fatigued - something she suggested was a deliberate strategy from the coalition. Te Pāti Māori's co-leader Rawiri Waititi said the poll numbers showed the party's policies and rhetoric around the government's actions were appealing to new supporters. "The kind of anti-Māori, anti-wāhine, anti-woman, anti-worker, anti-climate, anti-rainbow, anti-woke type agenda that this government is pushing at the moment also is not appealing to the people who are trying to find a place to put their political support and trying to support those who fiercely advocate for them." He said their internal polling showed even higher support for the party and its style of politics - but the decreased support for ACT and increase for NZ First was a zero-sum game. "You've got a hard-right type voter ... I think they think that National is a little bit weak, which I agree [with] because they're allowing ACT to kind of run the show ... they will use Te Pāti Māori as their political football to kick us in the guts the hardest to garner the support of their voters, but at the end of the day the enemy for ACT is New Zealand First, and the enemy for New Zealand First is ACT." Explore the full results with RNZ's interactive charts. This poll of 1008 people was conducted by Reid Research, using quota sampling and weighting to ensure a representative cross section by age, gender and geography. The poll was conducted through online interviews between 21-27 March 2025 and has a maximum margin of error of +/- 3.1 percent at a 95 percent confidence level. The report is available here.
