Mayors clash with Tarrant County judge over "unlawful" redistricting plan
The Brief
A proposed redistricting plan for Tarrant County, led by County Judge Tim O'Hare, could split Arlington into three districts.
Arlington Mayor Jim Ross and nine other Tarrant County mayors oppose the plan, citing a lack of transparency, insufficient community involvement, and potential violations of state law and the Voting Rights Act.
The Tarrant County Commissioners Court is scheduled to vote on the new maps on June 3, with legal challenges expected if approved.
TARRANT COUNTY, Texas - Proposed redistricting maps for Tarrant County, if adopted, could see the city of Arlington split into three separate districts.
The plan is led by Republican county judge Tim O'Hare to re-draw the county's district lines.
What they're saying
Mayor Jim Ross says that would be cumbersome for Arlington residents, but it isn't necessarily a bad thing. He points to additional issues.
"I've never seen a redistricting process go this quickly without any significant community involvement whatsoever," said Ross. "Where I draw the line in speaking up and standing in opposition to things is if it is done outside the boundaries of the law, and it is done without sufficient transparency."
Ross tells FOX 4 that an expert law firm out of Austin was hired to examine what has been done or not with the Tarrant County commissioners' court.
"They've come back to us with a report that there appear to be violations of state law, and the voting rights act federally. That's when I reached out to other mayors…"
Ross is the mayor who initiated the letter of opposition addressed to county judge Tim O'Hare, that was signed by 9 other Tarrant County mayors, mostly from the southern sector.
Mayor Ross says he reached out to O'Hare before sending the letter.
"I told Judge O'Hare our preference was to pull it off the agenda for June 3 and let's slow the jets a little bit and look at this thing thoroughly, and we could be collaborative on it. He told me 'I'm not pulling it off the agenda. I'll see you June 3rd.'"
O'Hare has said redistricting is needed due to demographics that have changed. Ross feels there isn't enough data to make any adjustments.
"When you say there's been a change, yet you use the data from a census report from five years ago, you're using old data, but saying there's new changes. Well, the commissioners' court looked at that old data five years ago and didn't find it sufficient to make any adjustments."
Mayor Ross states sufficient data needs to be presented to show that redistricting is not for the purpose of discriminating against minority demographics.
"There's other ways of getting that demographic data to prove your point, but you need that data in order to show that you're not discriminating against minority groups. That's required by the voting rights act."
A group of elected officials led by U.S. congressman Marc Veasey on Tuesday expressed opposition, calling the effort unlawful and discriminatory to minorities.
Dig deeper
With the vote on the new map scheduled for June 3, FOX 4 reached out to Judge O'Hare's office for a response.
In early April, the commission voted 3 to 2, with commissioners Alisa Simmons and Roderick Miles opposing, to approve a contract with the Public Interest Legal Foundation to provide consultation with re-drawing district lines.
FOX 4 contacted the group on Wednesday for feedback on its work, but it has not yet responded.
The Source
FOX 4's Dionne Anglin gathered details for this story at a town hall event hosted by Congressman Mark Veasey, as well as an interview with Mayor Jim Ross.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
MAGA Svengali Wants Trump to Pull Ukraine Support Over Surprise Drone Attack
MAGA podcaster Steve Bannon is calling on President Donald Trump to nix support for Ukraine after it carried out a surprise drone attack in Russia that blindsided the White House. The attack inflicted $7 billion in damage on Sunday and destroyed a third of Russia's strategic bomber fleet. Ukrainian said the strike had been in the works for over 18 months. Bannon, one of Trump's closest confidants, commended Ukraine for executing the attack. However, he was not pleased that it occurred without Trump's knowledge, as the White House revealed on Monday. 'The White House has to condemn this immediately and pull all support,' Bannon said on his War Room podcast Monday. Bannon said Kyiv should have notified Trump of the escalation. He said the supposed betrayal, which he claims has brought the United States closer to war with Russia, must have consequences for Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. 'If they did not give us a heads up on this, full stop, no minerals deal—walk away from all of it,' he said. 'They're irresponsible. They're dragging us into a kinetic third world war.' The podcaster, who served as a White House adviser during Trump's first term, went so far as to suggest that Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham, one of Kyiv's most prominent backers in Congress, should be arrested if he does not stop traveling overseas and 'stirring it up' in Ukraine. Bannon theorized that Graham, instead of the president, may have given Ukraine the green light to attack deep into Russia. 'Lindsey Graham's over there saying: 'Hey, forget Trump. I got the House and the Senate. We're going to pass it. You're going to see something in a couple of days.' Remember that? He's stirring it up over there,' Bannon said. 'He's telling them they got backing.' Ukraine reportedly carried out its attack by smuggling drones across the Russian border in wooden crates. They were then deployed simultaneously to attack five airbases, including the Belaya airbase in the far-east Irkutsk region, 2,500 miles away from Ukraine. Bannon said he is not convinced that the attack did not involve U.S. intelligence. If Russia reaches a similar conclusion, he fears the three-year-old conflict could soon include America. 'This is a ticking time bomb,' Bannon said. 'And you see what they're going to get us into. Because now we're now, inexorably, we're being drawn into this.' Trump campaigned last year on a promise to end the war between Ukraine and Russia on day one of his presidency. That promise has fallen flat, as have any peace negotiations brokered by U.S. officials. The latest instance of talks falling through occurred on Monday, when a scheduled meeting between Russia and Ukraine to discuss peace in Turkey was brief, with no agreement reached. 'You're supposed to be in Turkey today talking peace,' Bannon said Monday, 'not 3000 miles into Russia, blowing up their strategic bombers.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump's mega-bill faces rocky ride in Senate
US senators have begun weeks of what is certain to be fierce debate over the mammoth policy package President Donald Trump hopes will seal his legacy, headlined by tax cuts slated to add up to $3 trillion to the nation's debt. The Republican leader celebrated when the House passed his "big, beautiful bill," which partially covers an extension of his 2017 tax relief through budget cuts projected to strip health care from millions of low-income Americans. The Senate now gets to make its own changes, and the upper chamber's version could make or break Republicans' 2026 midterm election prospects -- and define Trump's second term. But the 1,116-page blueprint faces an uphill climb, with moderate Republicans balking at $1.5 trillion in spending cuts while fiscal hawks are blasting the bill as a ticking debt bomb. "We have enough (holdouts) to stop the process until the president gets serious about spending reduction and reducing the deficit," Senator Ron Johnson, one of half a dozen Republican opponents to the bill, told CNN. Democrats -- whose support is not required if Republicans can maintain a united front -- have focused on the tax cuts mostly benefiting the rich on the backs of a working class already struggling with high prices. The White House says the legislation will spur robust economic growth to neutralize its potential to blow up America's already burgeoning debt pile, which has ballooned to $36.9 trillion. But several independent analyses have found that -- even taking growth into account -- it will add between $2.5 trillion and $3.1 trillion to deficits over the next decade. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, meanwhile, found that the combined effects of tax cuts and cost savings would be a giant transfer of wealth from the poorest 10 percent to the richest 10 percent. Republicans muscled the measure through the House by a single vote on May 22 by a combination of bargaining vote holdouts on policies and deploying Trump himself to twist arms. House Speaker Mike Johnson is now pleading with the Senate not to alter the bill too much, as any tweaks will need to go back to the lower chamber. - Faultlines - The Senate wants to get the bill to Trump's desk by US Independence Day on July 4 -- an ambitious timeline given Republicans' narrow three-vote majority and wide faultlines that have opened over the proposed specifics. Independent analysts expect around seven million beneficiaries of the Medicaid health insurance program will be deprived of coverage due to new proposed eligibility restrictions and work requirements. Polling shows that the vast majority of Americans oppose cutting Medicaid -- including Trump himself, as well as some Republicans in poorer states that rely heavily on federal welfare. Senate moderates are also worried about proposed changes to funding food aid that could deprive up to 3.2 million of vital nutrition support. One thing is almost certain -- Trump himself will get involved at some point, though his negotiation tactics may be more subtle than they were when he threatened "grandstanders" holding up the tax bill in the House. Trump took to his Truth Social website on Monday to decry "so many false statements (that) are being made about 'THE ONE, BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL'" -- and to falsely claim that it would not cut Medicaid. "The only 'cutting' we will do is for Waste, Fraud, and Abuse, something that should have been done by the Incompetent, Radical Left Democrats for the last four years, but wasn't," he said. One more wrinkle for Trump: tech billionaire Elon Musk -- no longer one of his closest aides but still an influential commentator -- has already broken with the president to criticize the mega-bill. "A bill can be big or it can be beautiful. But I don't know if it can be both," Musk said in a CBS interview criticizing its effect on debt. ft/jgc
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump's new FEMA head stuns staff by telling them he didn't know US had a hurricane season, report says
The recently installed head of the Federal Emergency Management Agency alarmed staff members on Monday when he reportedly said he was unaware that the U.S. has a hurricane season, which formally began on June 1. The reported comments are the latest sign of upheaval at the federal disaster-management agency, which the Trump administration says it wants to 'eliminate,' handing many of its responsibilities to state governments. The comments from David Richardson, who has been overseeing FEMA since May, came during a briefing with staff members, Reuters reports, citing four sources familiar with his comments. Richardson, a former Marine artillery officer and Homeland Security official, has no formal disaster-management experience. During the briefing, Richardson also allegedly said he was holding off on unveiling a new disaster plan so as not to contradict the administration's review of FEMA activities, despite previously saying in May one would be ready by later that month. The agency quickly downplayed the reporting, telling Reuters the comments were a joke and that FEMA was prepared for the coming hurricane season. "FEMA is shifting from bloated, DC-centric dead weight to a lean, deployable disaster force that empowers state actors to provide relief for their citizens,' the agency said in a statement. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration recently warned this year's hurricane season, which runs through November, has a 60 percent chance of above-normal conditions. The agency has been in turmoil throughout the Trump administration. It has reportedly cut back on training for state and local emergency managers, and acting FEMA administrator Cameron Hamilton was fired in May, after he testified in Congress he didn't think the administration should shutter the disaster response body. Hurricane preparations inside FEMA have reportedly slowed in the face of the roughly 2,000 people who have been fired or resigned under Trump. 'As FEMA transforms to a smaller footprint, the intent for this hurricane season is not well understood,' according to an internal agency review prepared at the direction of Richardson that was obtained by CNN . 'Thus FEMA is not ready.' In January, Trump created a FEMA Review Council to determine the future of the agency. The administration has criticized FEMA from a number of angles, ranging from arguments that it's inefficient, to inaccurate claims the agency diverted emergency funding to house migrants. On the campaign trail, Trump also falsely claimed then Vice President Kamala Harris and President Joe Biden didn't visit the disaster zones in North Carolina after Hurricane Helene, and that the federal government didn't help people in Republican-leaning areas. Trump has also threatened to withhold wildfire aid to California if it doesn't agree to various policy demands.