Opposition wants to know why PSB didn't pass reports of inappropriate touching to police
Social Sharing
The case of a former substitute teacher's sex crimes was once again the focus of debate in the P.E.I. Legislature Wednesday.
Questions from both opposition parties centred around the issue of duty to report, which is the legal obligation for anyone to report a suspected case of child abuse to authorities as soon as possible.
It's a provision of P.E.I.'s Child, Youth and Family Services Act, and similar phrasing exists in the province's Education Act.
Green and Liberal MLAs said in the house Wednesday that in the case of incidents involving Matthew Alan Craswell, the Public Schools Branch didn't follow the law.
"Information was brought to our education leaders within the PSB but duty to report was not followed, a clear contravention of the act," interim Green Leader Karla Bernard said in a question directed at Barb Ramsay, the minister responsible for child protection in the province.
"Complaints suggesting possible sexual assault were made to a director within your government. The legal duty to report was not followed. What consequences will you be employing to address this serious issue?"
Ramsay replied that the director of child protection was contacted by the RCMP in August 2024, after police had already laid criminal charges against Craswell.
WATCH | P.E.I. MLAs ask questions about when and why officials must report cases of suspected wrongdoing:
P.E.I. MLAs ask questions about when and why officials must report cases of suspected wrongdoing
3 hours ago
Duration 3:49
P.E.I. has a legislated 'duty to report' requiring anyone with reasonable grounds to suspect a child is being abused to report that to the director of child protection or police as soon as possible. That didn't happen in the case of a substitute teacher who pleaded guilty last week to sexual interference in an incident involve an Island primary school student. As CBC's Kerry Campbell reports, opposition parties want to know why.
Last week, the 40-year-old Craswell pleaded guilty to sexual interference in a case involving an elementary student at Stratford's Glen Stewart Primary.
He was first arrested and charged last summer with possession and distribution of child pornography after the U.S.-based National Center for Missing and Exploited Children flagged his internet activity.
New information came to light during the RCMP investigation, details of which were shared in court last week as Craswell pleaded guilty to four charges.
CBC News is aware of one other incident involving a student at an unidentified Charlottetown elementary school in June 2023, but Craswell faces no charges in relation to that.
Court documents indicate school officials were made aware of both reports of suspected sexual touching, but police were not contacted in either case.
The Public Schools Branch has said it did its own investigation into the reports and concluded, incorrectly, that the incidents were not sexual in nature. That's why authorities were not told, the education agency said.
Craswell continued to work in schools with older children as late as the spring of 2024, after the Public Schools Branch was informed.
'Reasonable grounds' up for debate
The Craswell case has led the province to order a third-party review into relevant Public Schools Branch policies and procedures that will be headed up by former P.E.I. chief justice David Jenkins. That inquiry is scheduled to begin June 2.
Public Schools Branch speaks after substitute teacher's sexual touching revealed
5 hours ago
Duration 9:47
Public Schools Branch Director Tracy Beaulieu tells the CBC's Nicola MacLeod what steps were taken when Matthew Craswell's inappropriate touching of students was brought forward, and why officials did not feel the need to contact police.
The issue of whether the schools branch had a duty to report the incidents involving Craswell may come down to the terminology of the act. It states that someone must have "reasonable grounds to suspect a child requires protection."
Bernard, who worked as a school counsellor earlier in her career, argued Wednesday that the PSB doesn't have the latitude to conduct its own investigations under the law.
"If a child comes and discloses that to you, you're not really the judge and jury there. You call child protection or the police and report that right away," she said.
"There was a law broken here — and as a result harm against children was able to continue in the school system."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
23 minutes ago
- CTV News
Mother, toddler drown in Lachine swimming pool
A 34-year-old woman and her three-year-old son are dead after drowning in a residential swimming pool in Montreal's Lachine borough. (Cosmo Santamaria/CTV News) A 34-year-old woman and her three-year-old son are dead after drowning in a residential swimming pool in Montreal's Lachine borough Tuesday night. First responders received a 911 call at 9:35 p.m. about the incident on 20e Avenue near Provost Street. 'They located two unresponsive persons,' said Caroline Chèvrefils, a spokesperson with Montreal police. 'Paramedics performed CPR on both the victims, but unfortunately, they were pronounced dead at the scene.' She adds that investigators determined that there was 'no criminal element' in the incident. 'It was an accident,' Chèvrefils affirmed. The file has been transferred to the coroner's office.
National Post
24 minutes ago
- National Post
Canadians reject that they live on 'stolen' Indigenous land, although new poll reveals a generational divide
A majority of Canadians reject the idea they live on stolen Indigenous land, and the older people are, the more likely they are to say they don't, according to a new public opinion poll. Article content Among all respondents across Canada, 52 per cent said they did not live on stolen Indigenous land, with 27 per cent saying they do. The remaining 21 per cent said they didn't know or declined to answer. Article content Article content Article content Notably, there was a significant generational divide among those who answered the national opinion survey, conducted by Leger Marketing for the Association for Canadian Studies and provided to Postmedia. Article content Article content More respondents in the youngest cohort, 18-to-24-year-olds, agreed they did live on stolen Indigenous land (41 per cent) than rejected the idea (37 per cent). That contrasts with those in the oldest age group of 65 years or older, who overwhelmingly said they did not live on stolen land (65 per cent) with only 15 per cent agreeing they did. Article content In between them, the remaining age groups were on an unbroken sliding scale in their answers: the older they were the more likely they were to reject the statement they lived on stolen land, and, conversely, the younger they were the more likely they were to agree that they did. Article content The sentiment rejecting the idea they live on stolen Indigenous land was a low majority regardless of the respondents' region in Canada, except for in Atlantic Canada, where most people still rejected the idea, but at a nationally low rate of 44 per cent, with 29 per cent of Atlantic respondents saying yes, they do live on stolen land. Article content Article content The type of land people live on also impacted their feelings on the issue. Article content Article content Canadians living in rural areas were the least likely to agree they live on stolen Indigenous land, with urban dwellers the most likely to agree. Article content When asked to agree or disagree with the statement 'I live on stolen Indigenous land,' 56 per cent of respondents living in a rural area said they disagree, 24 per cent said they agree, and 20 per cent said they didn't know or didn't answer. For those living in a suburban area, 50 per cent said they disagree, 29 per cent said they agree, and 21 per cent didn't give an answer. For urban dwellers, 46 per cent disagreed, 34 per cent agreed and 20 per cent didn't answer. Article content Those living in Calgary were the most vociferous in rejecting that their land is 'stolen' among the cities named in the polling data. In Calgary, 69 per cent said no, 20 per cent said yes, and 11 per cent didn't answer. Article content That differs sharply from those living in Edmonton, just 300 kilometres away in the same province, where respondents were the most amenable to the idea: 41 per cent said no, 32 per cent said yes, and 27 per cent didn't answer.
National Post
24 minutes ago
- National Post
Opinion: Mixed fleet of fighter jets not the answer for Canada's Air Force
By Alexander Lanoszka, Richard Shimooka and Balkan Devlen Article content The proverbial canary in the mine of U.S.-Canada defence co-operation is grey, flies as fast as Mach 1.6, and has a very low radar signature. Article content Article content Canada has named the F-35 — Lockheed Martin's fifth-generation multipurpose fighter jet — not once, not twice, but thrice as the CF-18s' intended replacement. Alas, the stealth fighter's procurement has come under scrutiny again in view of U.S. President Donald Trump's repeated wish to see Canada become the 51st state. Article content Hence, in his first days on the job, Prime Minister Mark Carney ordered yet another review. However, there was a ray of hope on June 10, when David McGuinty, Carney's new defence minister, issued a statement that made no mention of reviewing the contract. Instead, he said, 'this project will provide Canada with an invaluable air defence capability … well into the future.' Article content Article content Let's hope the government sticks with that plan. Given the history of this procurement, it continues to merit close scrutiny. Article content Politicians and international security analysts from across the political spectrum have supported Carney's temporizing. From their perspective, the U.S. now represents at best an unreliable ally and at worst a territorial menace. Canada would thus be better off acquiring other aircraft made by purportedly more trustworthy European allies. Recognizing that it may be too late to cancel, some propose Canada should acquire a mixed fleet — with either French-made Rafales or Swedish-made Gripens — so as not to rely exclusively on the U.S.-produced aircraft. Article content As Ottawa considers the implications of the June 10 auditor general's report, which found the estimated cost of replacing the F-18s has ballooned to $27.7 billion, it should note that a mixed fleet of fighter jets remains a terrible idea. Much of the costs are exogenous to the F-35 (like rebuilding dilapidated infrastructure), and would be borne by any fighter selected. It further underestimates the complex technologies involved, and takes too optimistic a view of what European defence contractors can provide. Tens of billions of public money could be wasted if Canada chooses a mixed fleet. Article content Article content The idea may sound reasonable. By many attributes — speed, payload, range — the Rafale and Gripen seem comparable to the F-35, thereby making them appear interchangeable. Moreover, diversity in suppliers makes sense to provide resilience over matters related to sovereignty. Article content First, despite overlapping capabilities, these aircraft have become so technologically complex that they have little interchangeability. Each aircraft has its own training program: F-35 pilots and support personnel cannot simply operate Gripens. The Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) would have to offer two distinct training pipelines. Considering it already suffers from a severe pilot shortfall, a bifurcated training regime would further strain personnel capacity. Similarly, each aircraft requires its own logistical supply chain. Aircraft inevitably suffer from wear and tear, even in benign conditions, and their components are not interchangeable between fleets.
