A Bill That Would've Outlawed Running Over Wolves, Coyotes with Snowmachines Failed in Wyoming
Chasing and killing predators like wolves and coyotes with snowmachines remains legal in Wyoming even after some lawmakers tried twice to ban the practice Thursday.
The two efforts, a bill called Taking of Predators on Private Lands and another an amendment to an anti-wildlife torture bill, failed largely because the agricultural community says running over carnivores with snowmachines is necessary to manage domestic livestock in the state's most-rural areas. National media and members of the public, on the other hand, are confusing the practice with hunting.
'I've talked to too many producers, particularly sheep produces, that say using snowmachines has become a tool for them,' says Jim Magagna, executive vice president of the Wyoming Stock Growers Association and retired sheep rancher.
While efforts to ban running over wolves and coyotes with snowmachines have been proposed in past years, this was the first time it gained much traction. Southwest Wyoming Rep. Mike Schmid proposed the amendment and standalone bill in response to an incident last year in Daniel, Wyoming, where a man ran a wolf over with a snowmachine, duct taped its mouth shut, and paraded it around a local bar before shooting it. Backlash after photos and videos of the wolf were released was swift and fierce, with calls to boycott the state.
Schmid said the ordeal was a 'black eye' on Wyoming, and prohibiting the ability to run wolves over would help that to heal. Other lawmakers disagreed, Wyofile first reported.
The bill and amendment would have allowed people to run wolves and coyotes down with snowmachines on private land but not on public land. It's a distinction that Magagna says doesn't matter to the ranching community, who run livestock on a mixture of federal, state and private land.
'We need to move away from the concept that property line boundaries make a difference,' Magagna says. 'If you want to say you can run over a coyote on private land but in 200 feet it's on public land, that's not practical at all.'
Running an animal over with a snowmachine — even if the animal is a predator like a coyote or wolf — is not fair chase, says Sabrina King, a hunter and lobbyist for the Wyoming Chapter of Backcountry Hunters and Anglers. BHA's Wyoming board voted to support the bill to ban the practice.
'Our members found what happened in Daniel offensive and there was a lot of blowback to the sporting community' she says. '…We need to be sure on public land — whether it's a big game animal like elk or a carnivore like a wolf — that we treat animals with respect. And running them over with a snowmobile should not be allowed on public land.'
She adds that the agricultural community cannot claim that property lines don't matter when chasing predators but do matter when hunters face trespassing violations if they touch private land while trying to access public land.
'If the boundaries exist for us then boundaries exist for them too,' she says.
While the ability to run animals down with snowmobiles will still continue in Wyoming, a bill to prohibit torturing wildlife was passed out of the House and is now in the Senate. That bill, called simply Treatment of Animals, says that once a wild animal is in someone's possession, they are legally required to kill it quickly.
Related: Activists Are Defining Hunters by One Wyoming Man Who Tortured a Wolf. What Are Actual Hunters Doing About It?
The bill would prevent something like what happened in Daniel, says Magagna. The livestock lobbyist agrees that bringing a wounded wolf into a bar was 'horrible' and is a bad look for Wyoming. If the anti-torture bill passes and someone runs a wolf or coyote down with a snowmachine, they would be required to dispatch the creature. At that point, he says, the snowmachine is no different than any other method of hunting an animal, he says, adding, 'any tool has the potential to cause suffering to an animal.'
But for King and others who testified in favor of the snowmachine amendment, the torture bill doesn't go far enough by still allowing an animal to be chased by a machine.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
01-04-2025
- Yahoo
Wyoming town leaders balk at immigration jail
Andrew GrahamWyoFile The private prison industry has again come knocking in southwestern Wyoming, pitching the for-profit detention of immigrants as a potential boon for the region's transitioning economy. But unlike during President Donald Trump's first term, this time the corporations don't seem to be finding a foothold. Last week, a company called Sabot Consulting pitched the Kemmerer City Council, and a packed room of townspeople, on the construction of a 900-bed jail to hold immigrants detained by U.S. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement. Construction of the facility would have been paid for by the city through a bond issuance, two council members told WyoFile. Kemmerer would have owned the jail, and a third entity — an Alaskan Native corporation that is heavily invested in the private immigration detention business, including a controversial encampment in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba — would have staffed it through a contract with the federal government. Sabot's role was to work with the city, ICE and the Alaskan corporation, Akima, to bring the project to fruition. The jail would have brought both high-paying jobs and revenues to Kemmerer, Sabot cofounder Darren Chiappinelli told the city council. But the proposal got a poor reception from the public, and the council has no plans to pursue it, the two council members told WyoFile. 'There's no interest among council members or even the majority of our constituents to keep it on our plate,' Kemmerer Mayor Robert Bowen said, describing the community reaction as 'overwhelmingly 'no.'' Council member Bill Ellis also told WyoFile the city wasn't interested. 'We said, 'We can't do it, and we don't want it,'' he said. ICE has put out notice to private prison companies that it is seeking an 850-950 bed facility within a two-hour drive of the Salt Lake City airport, according to a Facebook stream of the presentation that a Sabot Consulting official made to the Kemmerer council. Though the proposal came as President Trump does everything in his power to deport immigrants — both those here without documentation and increasingly those with it — the latest quest for large numbers of holding cells near Salt Lake City stretches back to former President Joe Biden's administration. Promoters of the project first contacted the city last May, well before November's election swept Trump back into office, Kemmerer City Administrator Brian Muir told WyoFile. Representatives for Sabot Consulting did not respond to messages from WyoFile seeking comment. It's unclear if the company is pitching other Wyoming communities on the immigration jail idea. An elected official in nearby Uinta County, where Evanston saw years of divisive debate over for-profit prison companies' proposals from 2017 into 2020, told WyoFile the county commission had recently received outreach from a company he believed was also Sabot. But Uinta County Commissioner Mark Anderson said this time around, his board is also choosing not to pursue the idea. The reluctance to engage with the private prison company comes even as Wyoming's elected officials, including legislators and many county sheriffs, are moving the state in line with Trump's deportation agenda. Kemmerer is the county seat of Lincoln County, where voters, as they did statewide, backed Trump by a large margin. Nearly 83% of the 10,580 Lincoln County residents who cast a vote for president in November chose to send Trump, with his campaign promises of mass deportation, back to the White House. But ideological support for more detainments and deportations doesn't make a large immigration jail an automatic fit for the coal town, which is in the midst of an ongoing economic transition, the council members said. Trona mine expansions, carbon dioxide storage projects and a $4 billion innovative nuclear power project have been driving a construction boom in southwestern Wyoming. Kemmerer in particular is benefitting from the nuclear plant, a project of Microsoft-founding billionaire Bill Gates, as its coal industry continues to contract. Gates visited Kemmerer in June for a groundbreaking ceremony on the project, which received its construction permit in January and is slated to be generating electricity in 2030. Amid those developments, getting into the private prison industry isn't needed in Kemmerer and could even be counterproductive, Bowen said. 'It's not a bad thing,' Bowen said of Trump's immigration initiatives, but the jail 'is not the right fit for our community.' He wondered if Gates would have pursued his energy project in Kemmerer if it was known as the host of a large immigration jail. Though the Trump administration is determined to deport growing numbers of people, Bowen also noted that tech billionaire Elon Musk and the DOGE initiative are gutting government contracts, raising questions about the federal government's reliability as a business partner. Since Kemmerer would have owned the facility, the city would have been responsible for making it pay for itself were a contract with ICE to change or dry up. He and Ellis both said they feared a day where the city was hunting for inmates of any kind to fill its big jail. 'The risk versus reward wasn't really there for us,' Bowen said, 'not in a community of our size.' During the first Trump administration, first one and then another large corporation pushed for an immigration jail in Evanston, a community of about 12,000 people about 50 minutes southwest of Kemmerer. Over three years, the idea drove local controversy, before the companies ultimately walked away from the idea. Management Training Corporation, a private prison company, first brought the idea to Evanston in summer 2017, proposing Uinta County use a county-owned property near Bear River State Park to build the jail. At the time, ICE was seeking 500 beds in the area. In 2019, however, the agency doubled the size of its request, to 1,000 beds. The proposal spurred contentious public hearings and drove a bitter divide in Evanston. Opponents accused Uinta County public officials of steamrolling them and operating in the shadows. Though the decision remained local, both the Wyoming Legislature and candidates during the bitter 2018 gubernatorial primary campaign debated the idea. Local proponents of the private prison meanwhile suggested outside influences were keeping a possible boon from the economically struggling town. The American Civil Liberties Union of Wyoming threatened litigation to force state-level elected officials to weigh in, while local and statewide activists coalesced into a group called WyoSayNo to oppose the project. In summer 2019, Management Training Corporation abruptly, and quietly, walked away from the idea it had pushed for two years. CoreCivic, another large and controversial, private prison corporation, stepped into the void, and pushed the project further, to the point of submitting environmental review documents to the federal government. The Uinta County Commission in January 2020 passed a resolution to sell CoreCivic the land it needed once the company had secured an ICE contract. But in April of that year, CoreCivic too walked away, without offering any detailed reason why. Akima, the company Sabot's representative cited as its partner on the proposal for Kemmerer, is another major player in the lucrative private prison industry. Akima is a subsidiary of the Nana Regional Corporation, one of 13 regional Alaskan Native corporations. Such companies pay dividends to indigenous Alaskans but are not staffed solely by Native Americans. Subsidiaries of the corporations like Akima are effective at securing government contracts as minority-owned businesses, according to a report in The Guardian. Akima's detention centers have been faulted by federal auditors and advocates for poor conditions and civil rights violations, The Guardian reported. It was Uinta County and Evanston officials who first directed the latest bid for a southwestern Wyoming immigration jail to Kemmerer, city manager Muir told WyoFile. During the previous effort in Evanston, the Uinta County Commission was staunchly supportive of the project, despite hard lessons from other communities that bet on private prisons and the often rancorous local opposition. But the ultimate abandonment of the idea by two consecutive companies left a bad taste behind, commissioner Anderson told WyoFile. 'All the public hearings, all of these promises of jobs and then these companies pulling out,' he said, 'it's just been so inconsistent that the appetite for it is just not there right now.' Anderson had received a voicemail in recent months from one of the private prison companies, and though he did not have the message at hand when he spoke with WyoFile by phone Wednesday, he said he believed it to have been Sabot. But it didn't really matter which company had reached out. 'I haven't even returned the phone call,' he said.
Yahoo
27-03-2025
- Yahoo
Republicans who back Trump get an earful at raucous town halls
Booing crowds, a man jabbing his finger and swearing -- it is not easy these days for some Republican members of Congress as they face their constituents in town halls dominated by rage over President Donald Trump's radical cost-cutting policies. And while Republican politicians risk running into loud and angry voters, Democratic lawmakers have found themselves getting berated in public for not doing enough to oppose Trump. The ill-tempered landscape reflects the level of polarization in the United States just two months into Trump's second presidency. At one such town hall gathering this month in Asheville, North Carolina, congressman Chuck Edwards was jeered by people demanding he explain his support for Trump, who has fired off multiple executive orders to shrink the federal government and axed legions of civil servants. At one point, a man in the crowd stood up, pointed his finger at Edwards and screamed, berating him over some of the many spending cuts Republicans plan to carry out in the coming months. "You're lying. I'm a veteran and you don't give a fuck about me. You don't get to take away our rights," the man yelled. Edwards signaled for security to escort him out of the meeting. In Wyoming, a conservative pro-Trump state in the West, Republican lawmaker Harriet Hageman also had a rough time as she met with constituents in her district. As people whistled at her and held up hostile signs, Hageman said she got the message. According to the local outlet Wyofile, one man at the meeting then said to her, "Fuck you! That's what we're saying." - 'Paid agitators' - In recent weeks, these town hall meetings -- meant for lawmakers in congressional recess to confer with the people who put them in office -- have become echo chambers of angst. They have emerged as a key way for Americans to express opposition to Trump as he also enacts his anti-immigrant, anti-trans, nationalist and right-wing agenda. At the start of his first term from 2017 to 2021, Trump faced huge demonstrations against him. But this time around, since he returned to office America's streets have been relatively quiet. Trump has made clear he wants to move quickly and aggressively with all his executive orders, aimed among other things at gutting or even eliminating some departments altogether as part of a small-government, laissez-faire conservative theory of governance. So many town hall meetings are turning into anti-Trump shouting matches that Republican Party officials are telling their lawmakers to just stop holding them, US media have reported. On Sunday, Trump embraced a theory first advanced by his press team that people who speak out against him at these meetings are "agitators" paid by the Democrats. "The room was 'littered' with Radical Left Lunatics, mostly Democrats, and all they did was scream, shout and use filthy language. They were largely paid agitators, with fake signs and slogans, and were only there to make TROUBLE!" Trump wrote on his platform Truth Social, refering to the Edwards meeting. - 'Fighting oligarchy' - After Republicans put out the word to stop holding such meetings, Democrats swooped in to hold town halls of their own in Republican districts. "While Republicans continue to run and hide from their constituents, Democrats are stepping up and meeting them face to face to ensure they know it's Trump, Elon Musk and their MAGA minions in Congress making their lives harder," the Democratic National Committee said Monday, referring to Trump's ever-present billionaire advisor and the slogan "Make America Great Again." But Democrats are also facing angry constituents who complain their party has been too quiet and passive as Trump and Musk carry out what critics call a lawless rampage through the federal bureaucracy. "They should try actually fighting for once. They should try to actually be the opposition party," one man told CNN as he attended a town hall Friday called by Democratic congressman Sean Casten in Illinois. With so many people livid with the Democratic Party and its leaders, some on the American left are trying to step up and lead the opposition to Trump. Senator Bernie Sanders, 83, has embarked on a nationwide "fighting oligarchy tour." He has been joined by another prominent progressive, the much younger congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. They have drawn tens of thousands of people eager to fight Trump and the Republican agenda. It remains to be seen if this opposition energy will eat away at Trump and help the Democrats in isolated special elections on April 1. rle/dw/mlm/cms/lb
Yahoo
27-03-2025
- Yahoo
Republicans who back Trump get an earful at raucous town halls
Booing crowds, a man jabbing his finger and swearing -- it is not easy these days for some Republican members of Congress as they face their constituents in town halls dominated by rage over President Donald Trump's radical cost-cutting policies. And while Republican politicians risk running into loud and angry voters, Democratic lawmakers have found themselves getting berated in public for not doing enough to oppose Trump. The ill-tempered landscape reflects the level of polarization in the United States just two months into Trump's second presidency. At one such town hall gathering this month in Asheville, North Carolina, congressman Chuck Edwards was jeered by people demanding he explain his support for Trump, who has fired off multiple executive orders to shrink the federal government and axed legions of civil servants. At one point, a man in the crowd stood up, pointed his finger at Edwards and screamed, berating him over some of the many spending cuts Republicans plan to carry out in the coming months. "You're lying. I'm a veteran and you don't give a fuck about me. You don't get to take away our rights," the man yelled. Edwards signaled for security to escort him out of the meeting. In Wyoming, a conservative pro-Trump state in the West, Republican lawmaker Harriet Hageman also had a rough time as she met with constituents in her district. As people whistled at her and held up hostile signs, Hageman said she got the message. According to the local outlet Wyofile, one man at the meeting then said to her, "Fuck you! That's what we're saying." - 'Paid agitators' - In recent weeks, these town hall meetings -- meant for lawmakers in congressional recess to confer with the people who put them in office -- have become echo chambers of angst. They have emerged as a key way for Americans to express opposition to Trump as he also enacts his anti-immigrant, anti-trans, nationalist and right-wing agenda. At the start of his first term from 2017 to 2021, Trump faced huge demonstrations against him. But this time around, since he returned to office America's streets have been relatively quiet. Trump has made clear he wants to move quickly and aggressively with all his executive orders, aimed among other things at gutting or even eliminating some departments altogether as part of a small-government, laissez-faire conservative theory of governance. So many town hall meetings are turning into anti-Trump shouting matches that Republican Party officials are telling their lawmakers to just stop holding them, US media have reported. On Sunday, Trump embraced a theory first advanced by his press team that people who speak out against him at these meetings are "agitators" paid by the Democrats. "The room was 'littered' with Radical Left Lunatics, mostly Democrats, and all they did was scream, shout and use filthy language. They were largely paid agitators, with fake signs and slogans, and were only there to make TROUBLE!" Trump wrote on his platform Truth Social, refering to the Edwards meeting. - 'Fighting oligarchy' - After Republicans put out the word to stop holding such meetings, Democrats swooped in to hold town halls of their own in Republican districts. "While Republicans continue to run and hide from their constituents, Democrats are stepping up and meeting them face to face to ensure they know it's Trump, Elon Musk and their MAGA minions in Congress making their lives harder," the Democratic National Committee said Monday, referring to Trump's ever-present billionaire advisor and the slogan "Make America Great Again." But Democrats are also facing angry constituents who complain their party has been too quiet and passive as Trump and Musk carry out what critics call a lawless rampage through the federal bureaucracy. "They should try actually fighting for once. They should try to actually be the opposition party," one man told CNN as he attended a town hall Friday called by Democratic congressman Sean Casten in Illinois. With so many people livid with the Democratic Party and its leaders, some on the American left are trying to step up and lead the opposition to Trump. Senator Bernie Sanders, 83, has embarked on a nationwide "fighting oligarchy tour." He has been joined by another prominent progressive, the much younger congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. They have drawn tens of thousands of people eager to fight Trump and the Republican agenda. It remains to be seen if this opposition energy will eat away at Trump and help the Democrats in isolated special elections on April 1. rle/dw/mlm/cms/lb