logo
Philippine Cardinal David emerges as ‘dark horse' in papal race

Philippine Cardinal David emerges as ‘dark horse' in papal race

Straits Times08-05-2025

Philippine Cardinal Pablo Virgilio David leads a procession at the start of a mass to pray for the healing of Pope Francis at a church in Manila. PHOTO: AFP
MANILA - Not just one but two Filipinos are being reported by international media as among the 'papabile', or cardinals likely to be elected to succeed Pope Francis during the conclave which began on May 7.
Aside from Cardinal Luis Antonio Tagle, who has been dubbed the 'Asian Francis', the other contender is Cardinal Pablo Virgilio 'Ambo' David, who is viewed as a 'dark horse'.
In a press briefing in Rome organised by Bishop Accountability, Father Shay Cullen, an Irish missionary widely respected for his human rights work, said that Cardinal David is a good candidate for the papacy.
'I support Cardinal Pablo 'Ambo' David, a human rights defender who stood up to the killings during former President Rodrigo Duterte's regime. He denounced the abuses and insisted that crimes committed by clergy be judged in civil courts.
'He is a person of integrity, and it would be very positive if Cardinal David were elected pope, representing the Philippines,' Father Cullen said through a video conference call.
'It's time for a Filipino pope who defends human rights and protects children,' he added.
Father Cullen was one of three priests arrested on Sept 23, 1972, upon the declaration of martial law in the Philippines.
According to a report by Argentina-based conservative newspaper La Nacion, Cardinal David was also being scrutinised during the General Congregations, the meetings of all the members of the College of Cardinals in preparation for the conclave.
'According to analysts, he could become a compromise candidate after initial rounds of voting reveal that the top two favorites lack the necessary consensus to reach the required 89 votes,' it said.
Cardinal David, the Kalookan bishop and president of the Catholic Bishops' Conference of the Philippines, was made a cardinal by Pope Francis in his last consistory in December 2024.
The 66-year-old Cardinal David was described by the report as 'similar to Tagle, charismatic —but reportedly bolder and less reserved. He also participated in the Synod on Synodality, where at least 60 cardinals got to know him'.
For Ms Fides Lim, spokesperson of the political prisoners group Kapatid, Father Cullen's endorsement of Cardinal David 'sharpened' the choices among the front-runners of the papacy.
'Cardinal Ambo may just be the dark horse the universal Church needs now more than ever. After all, he's cut from the same cloth as Pope Francis: humble, grounded, compassionate, merciful yet unafraid,' she told the Inquirer. THE PHILIPPINE DAILY INQUIRER/ASIA NEWS NETWORK
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

North Korea internet hit by a major outage, Asia News
North Korea internet hit by a major outage, Asia News

AsiaOne

time3 hours ago

  • AsiaOne

North Korea internet hit by a major outage, Asia News

SEOUL - North Korea's internet is experiencing a major outage on Saturday (June 7), said a UK-based researcher, adding that the cause may be may be internal rather than a cyberattack. North Korea's main news web sites and its Foreign Ministry internet site were inaccessible on Saturday morning, according to checks by Reuters. "A major outage is currently occurring on North Korea's internet - affecting all routes whether they come in via China or Russia," said Junade Ali, a UK-based researcher who monitors the North Korean internet. North Korea's entire internet infrastructure is not showing up on systems that can monitor internet activities, he said. "Hard to say if this is intentional or accidental - but seems like this is internal rather than an attack," he said. Officials at South Korea's Police cyber terror response centre which monitors North Korea's cyber activities could not be reached for comment. [[nid:718737]]

North Korea internet hit by a major outage, analyst says
North Korea internet hit by a major outage, analyst says

Straits Times

time4 hours ago

  • Straits Times

North Korea internet hit by a major outage, analyst says

SEOUL - North Korea's internet is experiencing a major outage on Saturday, said a UK-based researcher, adding that the cause may be may be internal rather than a cyberattack. North Korea's main news web sites and its Foreign Ministry internet site were inaccessible on Saturday morning, according to checks by Reuters. "A major outage is currently occurring on North Korea's internet - affecting all routes whether they come in via China or Russia," said Junade Ali, a U.K.-based researcher who monitors the North Korean internet. North Korea's entire internet infrastructure is not showing up on systems that can monitor internet activities, he said. "Hard to say if this is intentional or accidental - but seems like this is internal rather than an attack," he said. Officials at South Korea's Police cyber terror response centre which monitors North Korea's cyber activities could not be reached for comment. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

US Supreme Court allows Doge broad access to Social Security data
US Supreme Court allows Doge broad access to Social Security data

Straits Times

time5 hours ago

  • Straits Times

US Supreme Court allows Doge broad access to Social Security data

Two labour unions and an advocacy group sued to stop Doge from accessing sensitive data at the Social Security Administration. PHOTO: REUTERS WASHINGTON - The US Supreme Court on June 6 permitted the Department of Government Efficiency (Doge), a key player in President Donald Trump's drive to slash the federal workforce, broad access to personal information on millions of Americans in Social Security Administration data systems while a legal challenge plays out. At the request of the Justice Department, the justices put on hold Maryland-based US District Judge Ellen Hollander's order that had largely blocked Doge's access to 'personally identifiable information' in data such as medical and financial records while litigation proceeds in a lower court. Ms Hollander found that allowing Doge unfettered access likely would violate a federal privacy law. The court's brief, unsigned order did not provide a rationale for siding with Doge. The court has a 6-3 conservative majority. Its three liberal justices dissented from the order. Liberal Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, in a dissent that was joined by fellow liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor, criticised the court's majority for granting Doge 'unfettered data access' despite the administration's 'failure to show any need or any interest in complying with existing privacy safeguards.' In a separate order on June 6, the Supreme Court extended its block on judicial orders requiring Doge to turn over records to a government watchdog group that sought details on the entity established by Mr Trump and billionaire Elon Musk. Doge swept through federal agencies as part of the Republican president's effort, spearheaded by Mr Musk, to eliminate federal jobs, downsize and reshape the US government and root out what they see as wasteful spending. Mr Musk formally ended his government work on May 30. Two labour unions and an advocacy group sued to stop Doge from accessing sensitive data at the Social Security Administration, or SSA, including Social Security numbers, bank account data, tax information, earnings history and immigration records. The agency is a major provider of government benefits, sending cheques each month to more than 70 million recipients including retirees and disabled Americans. Democracy Forward, a liberal legal group that represented the plaintiffs, said June 6's order would put millions of Americans' data at risk. 'Elon Musk may have left Washington DC but his impact continues to harm millions of people,' the group said in a statement. 'We will continue to use every legal tool at our disposal to keep unelected bureaucrats from misusing the public's most sensitive data as this case moves forward.' In their lawsuit, the plaintiffs argued that the Social Security Administration had been 'ransacked' and that Doge members had been installed without proper vetting or training and demanded access to some of the agency's most sensitive data systems. Ms Hollander in an April 17 ruling found that DogeOGE had failed to explain why its stated mission required 'unprecedented, unfettered access to virtually SSA's entire data systems.' 'For some 90 years, SSA has been guided by the foundational principle of an expectation of privacy with respect to its records,' Ms Hollander wrote. 'This case exposes a wide fissure in the foundation.' Ms Hollander issued a preliminary injunction that prohibited Doge staffers and anyone working with them from accessing data containing personal information, with only narrow exceptions. The judge's ruling did allow Doge affiliates to access data that had been stripped of private information, as long as those seeking access had gone through the proper training and passed background checks. Ms Hollander also ordered Doge affiliates to 'disgorge and delete' any personal information already in their possession. The Richmond, Virginia-based 4th US Circuit Court of Appeals in a 9-6 vote declined on April 30 to pause ms Hollander's block on Doge's unlimited access to Social Security Administration records. Justice Department lawyers in their Supreme Court filing characterised Hollander's order as judicial overreach. 'The district court is forcing the executive branch to stop employees charged with modernising government information systems from accessing the data in those systems because, in the court's judgment, those employees do not 'need' such access,' they wrote. The six dissenting judges wrote that the case should have been treated the same as one in which 4th Circuit panel ruled 2-1 to allow Doge to access data at the US Treasury and Education Departments and the Office of Personnel Management. In a concurring opinion, seven judges who ruled against Doge wrote that the case involving Social Security data was 'substantially stronger' with 'vastly greater stakes,' citing 'detailed and profoundly sensitive Social Security records,' such as family court and school records of children, mental health treatment records and credit card information. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store