logo
'I don't feel safe living here': UK residents raise alarm about freehold estates

'I don't feel safe living here': UK residents raise alarm about freehold estates

Sky News5 hours ago

Imagine owning your own home only to find yourself subject to regular costs, strict rules and extra fees when you try to sell. Welcome to the world of freehold estates - a type of housing development that property experts have told Money is becoming increasingly common.
With thousands already built across the country, families moving into them are often left with confusing terms and big bills, with the government already taking action to intervene.
What are these kinds of properties?
Unlike with most other freehold properties, shared areas and facilities on a freehold estate are not owned or looked after by the local council. Instead, a private management company or homeowners themselves, via an estate management firm, take on the responsibility.
Andrew Bulmer, CEO of The Property Institute, said this is done by councils to avoid the expense of maintaining new housing developments.
Residents are required to pay the management company for the upkeep of the communal spaces, as well as their council tax to their local authority.
Costs increasing every year
A report by the Competition and Markets Authority published earlier this year found that the amount charged by estate management companies per household per year varies greatly, from around £60 to just under £1,000 in 2022.
It found that charges had been increasing significantly year-on-year. In some cases, they doubled or trebled if a new management company was appointed.
"Projecting these costs over a 25-year period, without accounting for future price rises or increasing prevalence, affected households would pay the equivalent of more than £4.4bn," it found.
Bulmer said residents on smaller estates could be left with "astronomical" fees because management companies have to split the costs between fewer people.
Not only do they need to cover the costs of maintaining the property, but also the running fees associated with it. For example, an out-of-hours call line, accountants, insurance, and risk assessments, he said.
'I don't feel safe - we are stuck with incompetence'
"As long as they are getting their money they don't give a damn about anything else," Thame resident Jane Morton Driscoll said about her management company RMG.
The 40-year-old bought her home six years ago but has been left feeling "unsafe" and "infuriated" by a litany of problems on her housing development.
While she knew about the required fees when she bought her home, she expected to get a better level of service for her money.
Morton Driscoll explained that broken equipment in the children's play area has never been replaced, 25% of the street lamps don't work, tarmac has melted, trees and plants have been left to die, and site managers have failed to upkeep the communal gardens.
"The estate is not being managed well at all. They have left parts to just get wrecked," she said.
"As a woman, I don't feel safe walking home at night. It doesn't feel safe at all, and it's really quite scary."
Despite this, her annual management fee has increased.
"It is really irritating. It is a feeling of hopelessness that this is what we are stuck with. We are stuck with incompetence," she said.
'Absolutely atrocious' customer service
Morton Driscoll showed Money a copy of the income and expenditure account sent to her by the management firm, which shows £20,773.24 was spent on grounds maintenance, £3,373.20 was assigned to playground costs, and £3,106.80 went on tree surgery.
Nearly £19,000 was spent on various "professional fees".
But she struggled to see how any of that money had been spent on improving the estate.
"My perception is that it doesn't cost £3,000 to remove and not replace a children's roundabout, and not fix a swing," she said.
"I have no problem with paying for gardening if it is being done, but it isn't."
She was also disappointed to see the amount spent on "professional fees" when she had received "absolutely atrocious" customer service.
"Things just keep disappearing off their records. Why should we have to keep chasing them up?" she asked.
'We encourage residents to get in touch'
RMG, the management firm of Morton Driscoll's estate, told Money: "We take all resident feedback seriously and remain committed to making meaningful improvements across the development."
The company said the children's roundabout was removed after failing a safety inspection, and it is working to reinstate all equipment "as soon as possible".
It is also working with residents to identify faulty streetlights so repairs can be carried out efficiently, and it's "actively progressing discussions with both the developer and contractors to resolve the tarmac issue".
"We recognise that some issues have taken longer than expected to address and are taking steps to improve our communication and responsiveness. Further conversations with residents are being arranged to better understand their experiences and ensure everyone feels listened to and supported," it added.
"To date, we have no record of any complaints being lost or disregarded. All concerns are tracked internally, and we encourage residents to get in touch if they feel an issue remains unresolved."
'It was pretty dangerous if my little boy stepped out'
Nigel Betterton was shocked to find that on top of his £600 a year management fee, he also had to pay extra costs when he looked to sell.
He moved from Germany to his estate in Burgess Hill in West Sussex with his partner and three-year-old son in 2018 but ended up feeling like he was the victim of an "elaborate con".
The 64-year-old's home was on a bridal pathway, which appeared on sat navs as a road, causing cars to drive very close by.
"It was pretty dangerous if my little boy stepped out. I insisted we did something about it and wanted boulders put at the end of the bridal way, but other residents thought it was a waste of money," he said.
He tried to talk to the council, who cared for the houses behind his garden fence, but he was told they didn't know anything about the estate and couldn't help.
"It was horrendous. You just didn't know what was happening," he said.
Residents were also required to stick to strict rules, so Betterton was stopped from building a gate at the front of his own home.
In other cases, an elderly neighbour was forced to tear down her car port and people were banned from parking caravans in the driveways, he said.
£700 fees just to sell
After six years of arguments with his management company HML, Betterton decided to sell and move to Cardiff, and that's when he discovered there were more fees to pay.
During the process, management firm Harper Stone took over the estate from HML in October 2024.
"We had to pay £350 for a sale package, which was just information about the house," he said.
"Then the management company changed, and I had to pay another £350 for the same information."
A sale package, also known as a management pack, contains important information about the property for potential buyers. This usually includes documents like accounting information, fire risk assessments, and details of any future maintenance works.
For the seller, it also sets out any requirements or fees payable to the management company for the transaction to be able to go ahead.
This could include any delayed bill payments, a fee for receiving a notice of transfer, or a charge for providing a certificate to comply with a restriction against selling without the management company's consent.
"It was ridiculous," Betterton said. "I'd never, ever, ever consider living in one [a freehold estate] ever again," he said.
How Betterton's management firms responded
Harper Stone said it was not involved in any of the issues raised before it took over management of the estates.
"Any concerns or requests regarding installations or alterations falling under the restrictive covenants would have been addressed appropriately during our period of management," it told Money.
It was responsible for issuing the sales pack Betteron needed.
"Harper Stone acted in accordance with industry best practice, maintaining transparency and clear communication. Preparing a sales pack is an administrative task that involves care and due diligence to ensure accurate disclosure to prospective buyers," it said.
It added: "While we cannot act beyond the scope of our authority, we are committed to ensuring that all residents' enquiries are dealt with respectfully and that requests for consent are relayed appropriately to the freeholder/ freehold company."
HML told Money it could not comment on information provided to Betterton at the time of his property purchase in 2018.
"All covenants, are stated in the legal documentation for each property, either in the Lease or Transfer document (TP1), to which Nigel Betterton would have signed upon legal completion and the purchase of the property, including restrictions on vehicles/caravans and fencing being erected as specifically mentioned by Nigel Betterton," it said.
"The bridle way referenced was not part of the estate managed by HML. It is owned and maintained by the local authority and council and serves as a designated route for right of access and emergency right of way if required."
What needs to be done?
Freehold estates aren't new, and the government has already intervened with the Leasehold and Freehold Act 2024.
This aims to bring greater transparency over charges and more power to residents to challenge unfair costs.
Bulmer said: "A better intervention would be to avoid creating these private areas in the first place and make local authorities adopt them.
"It is easy to understand why councils don't want them, but that is a poor solution that creates long term costs for homeowners. Some complex estates do need those private areas but they should be avoided where possible."
He explained that one of the big issues is that management firms are not putting sufficient funds into reserves to pay for future big bills.
"It saves money for homeowners in the short term, but future owners will be unhappy," he said.
What should you look out for?
Bulmer said residents should make sure they are clear on costs and check what they are buying before going ahead with their purchase.
"Ask your conveyancer to give you advice on what you are buying, and explain the implications, above and beyond simply providing information for you to figure it out by yourself," he said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UK digital wealth platform Sidekick launches
UK digital wealth platform Sidekick launches

Finextra

timean hour ago

  • Finextra

UK digital wealth platform Sidekick launches

Sidekick, a new UK digital wealth platform built to serve six-figure earners who've outgrown basic financial products but don't have the millions needed to access private banks, has launched. 0 Sidekick is one of a number of entrants targeting the mass affluent market, using technology to offer products and services once reserved for the super rich. The company was co-founded by serial entrepreneur Matthew Ford (CEO) and Peter Townsend (CTO). Ford previously founded the mobile banking platform Pariti, where Townsend was CTO, which was sold to Tandem Bank in 2018. 'People in this bracket often don't realise how inefficient their finances are until it's too late,' says Ford. 'They're hit with 60% tax rates between £100,000 to £125,000 earnings, they're sitting on idle cash, or they're overexposed to their own company without even realising it.' Among Sidekick's offerings is access to private equity-style investing for just £10,000. Eligible individuals can get access to a regulated Long-Term Asset Fund, which allows clients to invest in high-growth private companies through a professionally managed fund without needing the six-figure minimums usually required. Beyond investments, users get access to an account that automatically spreads deposits across a panel of UK-regulated banks behind the scenes, enabling up to £255,000 of FSCS protection - all through a single interface. And, for higher target returns, its Smart Cash product invests short-term funds into actively managed money market instruments, designed to outperform traditional savings rates while keeping funds accessible. Says Ford: 'People earning six figures today still get offered the same tools as someone just starting out - and that's wrong. You shouldn't need a UBS account to access smarter ways to build wealth. With Sidekick, we're saying: you've worked hard, now your money should work just as hard for you.'

Sir Sadiq Khan to pedestrianise Oxford Street ‘as quickly as possible'
Sir Sadiq Khan to pedestrianise Oxford Street ‘as quickly as possible'

Rhyl Journal

timean hour ago

  • Rhyl Journal

Sir Sadiq Khan to pedestrianise Oxford Street ‘as quickly as possible'

Two-thirds (66%) of respondents to a consultation support the pedestrianisation plan, Sir Sadiq's office said. A separate YouGov survey conducted in September 2024 indicated 63% of Londoners are in favour of the project. Oxford Street is one of the world's busiest shopping areas, with around half a million visitors each day. Sir Sadiq Khan wants to ban vehicles from a 0.7-mile stretch between Oxford Circus and Marble Arch, with the potential for further changes towards Tottenham Court Road. Detailed proposals for traffic will be consulted on later this year. A previous attempt by Sir Sadiq to pedestrianise that part of Oxford Street was blocked by then-Conservative run Westminster City Council in 2018. His latest proposals depend on him obtaining permission from Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner in her role as Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government to establish a new Mayoral Development Corporation, which would provide planning powers. The aim is for this to be created by the start of next year. Sir Sadiq said: 'Oxford Street has suffered over many years, so urgent action is needed to give our nation's high street a new lease of life. 'It's clear that the vast majority of Londoners and major businesses back our exciting plans, so I'm pleased to confirm that we will now be moving ahead as quickly as possible. 'We want to rejuvenate Oxford Street; establish it as a global leader for shopping, leisure and outdoor events with a world-class, accessible, pedestrianised avenue. 'This will help to attract more international visitors and act as a magnet for new investment and job creation, driving growth and economic prosperity for decades to come.' Ms Rayner said: 'We want to see Oxford Street become the thriving place to be for tourists and Londoners alike, and that's why we welcome the Mayor of London's bold proposals to achieve that. 'We will support the mayor in delivering this ambitious vision, which will help to breathe new life into Oxford Street – driving investment, creating new jobs for local people and providing a boost to economic growth in the capital.' Adam Hug, leader of Labour-controlled Westminster City Council, said: 'While the mayor's formal decision today was not the City Council's preferred outcome, it is far from unexpected, and it is now important for Oxford Street's future to move forward together. 'Since the mayor's new approach was made public last autumn, Westminster has worked pragmatically and productively with the Greater London Authority (GLA) to ensure that the plan for Oxford Street more closely meets the needs of businesses, visitors, and residents. 'Since 2022, Oxford Street has roared back to life after the pandemic. Such is the level of retail confidence that existing brands have spent £118 million refitting their stores in the last 12 months alone, according to Savills. 'Westminster City Council will work constructively with the mayor's team to ensure the nation's high street is re-imagined in a way that works for visitors, shoppers, and our residents.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store