logo
Hurricane season begins: Are FEMA and NOAA prepared amid staffing cuts and FEMA chief's 'unaware' remark?

Hurricane season begins: Are FEMA and NOAA prepared amid staffing cuts and FEMA chief's 'unaware' remark?

Hindustan Times2 days ago

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), responsible for responding to emergency situations, and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), tasked with tracking weather conditions to predict hurricanes, have suffered dramatic cuts from the federal government at the start of the hurricane season from June 1. Concerns have risen about the lack of preparedness of these agencies to predict and tackle hurricanes in advance due to a general lack of resources.
Ever since President Donald Trump took office in January, the Department of Government Efficiency (DoGE) has severely pulled back on funding given to organizations crucial in tracking and dealing with climate catastrophes along the coast. This has resulted in several staff cuts, restrictions on travel and training, and a drain of experienced professionals capable of dealing with worst-case scenarios.
'My nightmare is a major catastrophic storm hitting an area that is reeling from the impact of all of this nonsense from the Trump administration and people will die. And that could happen in Florida, that could happen in Texas, that could happen in South Carolina,' said Susan Cutter, the director of the Hazards and Vulnerability Research Institute at the University of South Carolina, in a statement to the Associated Press.
Out of the 122 offices of the National Weather Service (NWS), 8 are down by more than 35% in staffing. Around 2,000 people from the full-time staff at FEMA have left the agency since Trump took office leading experts to raise concern over 'brain drain' in crucial agencies. Several emergency management training sessions have either been canceled or moved online this year. Many attendees' travel to the National Hurricane Conference was restricted this year.
The launch of weather balloons, which are crucial for understanding the flow of currents and predicting storms about to hit the US, has been restricted due to lack of staffing. Former NOAA meteorologist Jeff Masters, now at Yale Climate Connections, said to the Associated Press, 'Hurricane forecasts, I'm expecting not to be as accurate this year because of that lack of balloon data.'
The government has responded to such criticism by reasserting that all agencies are fully capable of dealing with any disasters and the move is meant to give individual states more responsibility in addressing local catastrophes. 'FEMA is shifting from bloated DC-centric dead weight to a lean, deployable disaster force that empowers state actors to provide relief for their citizens,' Associate FEMA Administrator Geoff Harbaugh said to the Associated Press.
Only the National Hurricane Center, which is responsible for tracking developments in the Atlantic, Pacific, and Caribbean, has been spared by the administration and is running at full staff capacity. The agencies are also incorporating artificial intelligence into their tracking systems this year for more accurate predictions. No additional budgeting has been provided to states to help them deal with local disasters.
Local agencies like the Mississippi Emergency Management Agency have started to take matters into their own hands. 'We have just opened our 10th, about to open our 11th DRC, Disaster Recovery Centers,' said Scott Simmons, chief communications officer for the MEMA. 'FEMA has sent just shy of 300 people to the state of Mississippi to help residents apply for what needs to be done in the wake of that storm system.' Short-term duty assignments and reassignments are being used by the NWS to fill staffing gaps.
Amid rising concerns over national agencies' disaster-management capabilities, a statement made by Acting Chief of FEMA, David Richardson, has sent alarm bells ringing. Many staffers and interagency partners who attended Monday's (June 2) daily operational briefing reported Richardson expressing his unawareness about the fact that the US had a hurricane season. Though many were left puzzled by whether he meant it as a fact or joke, most people expressed that the chief genuinely seemed to be in a state of shock.
The DHS tried to defend Richardson with a public statement that said, 'Despite meanspirited attempts to falsely frame a joke as policy, there is no uncertainty about what FEMA will be doing this Hurricane Season. FEMA is laser-focused on disaster response, and protecting the American people.' Richardson is a former Marine Corps officer who served overseas and was the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) assistant secretary in dealing with weapons of mass destruction. He has no direct experience in dealing with high-stakes catastrophes.
Despite these developments, representatives of the FEMA and NOAA say they are prepared to deal with any catastrophe.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump travel ban: Will Iran travel for 2026 FIFA World Cup?
Trump travel ban: Will Iran travel for 2026 FIFA World Cup?

Hindustan Times

time11 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Trump travel ban: Will Iran travel for 2026 FIFA World Cup?

USA, Canada, and Mexico are all set to host the 2026 FIFA World Cup together. However, President Donald Trump's latest travel ban has posed questions about whether certain qualified countries will now be allowed to travel to the US and take part. Starting Monday (June 9), citizens of 12 countries will no longer be allowed to get a US visa, according to a recent decision by Trump. Citizens of Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen have been banned by Trump and tighter restrictions have been applied to seven other nations (Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela). Trump explained his move by stating in a video, 'The recent terror attack in Boulder, Colorado, has underscored the extreme dangers posed to our country, by the entry of foreign nationals who are not properly vetted, as well as those who come here as temporary visitors and overstay their visas. We don't want them.' As of now, Iran is the only country from the list to have already qualified to compete in the FIFA World Cup next year. Cuba, Sudan, and Haiti are currently in contention to contest. Venezuela is five points off the threshold for automatic qualification but a playoff might just cut the deal. Sierra Leone can still be involved through multiple playoff games while Burundi, Equatorial Guinea, and Libya have very slim chances. Under the current policy, sports teams of qualifying countries should still be able to contest since such a provision have been provided for 'any athlete or member of an athletic team, including coaches, persons performing a necessary support role, and immediate relatives, traveling for the World Cup, Olympics, or other major sporting event as determined by the secretary of state.' However, this exception will only continue as long as there is no change to the current ban policy adopted by the US. Iranian fans hoping to catch their national team in the spotlight won't be so lucky however since the policy provides no such exceptions for fans of sporting teams. Getting an American visa had already been tough for Iranians even before the ban was implemented due to tougher vetting procedures. However, considering how those indulging in international travel for sporting events are usually from a higher wealth bracket, such individuals could still try to circumvent the process by using different passport options. The move has stirred a debate about the intersection of politics with global sport. Back in 2017, FIFA President Gianni Infantino had said, "Any team, including the supporters and officials of that team, who qualify for a World Cup need to have access to the country, otherwise there is no World Cup." Infantino has since developed close ties with Trump and has re-emphasized that sporting teams of all countries will face no barriers in coming to the US for participation next year. The event is expected to raise a majority of the soccer body's revenue in the 2023-2026 period. Questions have also been raised about the US' legitimacy to hold the upcoming 2028 Olympic Games with such strict travel policies against certain participating countries.

Tech analyst and Tesla bull warns investors on Elon Musk-Donald Trump 'fight': 'I don't think...'
Tech analyst and Tesla bull warns investors on Elon Musk-Donald Trump 'fight': 'I don't think...'

Time of India

time17 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Tech analyst and Tesla bull warns investors on Elon Musk-Donald Trump 'fight': 'I don't think...'

A day after Elon Musk and US President Donald Trump engaged in a 'fight' online, Wedbush Securities tech analyst and Tesla bull, Dan Ives, has advised investors to brace for further developments in the ongoing public dispute between the Tesla CEO and Trump, a conflict many experts had anticipated, a report has said. "Get the popcorn out," Ives told CNBC, suggesting the dispute is far from over. 'I don't think we're done here,' he added. Ives says the online feud between Musk and Trump is 'bad news' for market Ives expressed concern that Musk's strong reactions to Trump could jeopardise prospects for favourable regulatory outcomes for Tesla. In a research note on Thursday, Ives said the spat will be "jaw-dropping and a shock to the market." 'The quickly deteriorating friendship and now 'major beef' between Musk and Trump is jaw-dropping and a shock to the market,' Ives warned in a research note on Thursday, adding it is 'putting major fear for Tesla investors on what is ahead,' he said. However, Ives later moderated his stance following reports from Politico indicating that White House aides had contacted Musk in an attempt to de-escalate the situation. On Friday (June 6), Ives adjusted his assessment, writing that "Musk needs Trump and Trump needs Musk for many reasons, and these two becoming friends again will be a huge relief for Tesla shares," subsequently labeling the stock as oversold. How Musk-Trump spat started The feud started soon after the introduction of the Trump administration's " One Big, Beautiful Bill ", which Musk publicly branded a "disgusting abomination." Trump later fired back saying he did not need Musk to win in Pennsylvania. Musk replied by saying that if he would have not been involved, Trump would have lost the elections.

'Trump wouldn't have been US President had…': Hakeem Jeffries rips GOP agenda, Trump-Musk feud - The Economic Times Video
'Trump wouldn't have been US President had…': Hakeem Jeffries rips GOP agenda, Trump-Musk feud - The Economic Times Video

Time of India

time24 minutes ago

  • Time of India

'Trump wouldn't have been US President had…': Hakeem Jeffries rips GOP agenda, Trump-Musk feud - The Economic Times Video

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries delivered remarks on Friday morning as Democrats rallied against President Trump's 'big, beautiful bill,' which is encountering substantial obstacles in the Senate. His comments came in the wake of tensions between Trump and tech billionaire Elon Musk, who recently left the administration. Musk's criticism of the GOP megabill frustrated the president, sparking a public dispute between them and providing Democrats with additional material to critique the extensive spending package.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store