logo
No. 2 US diplomat questions need for NATO in deleted social media post

No. 2 US diplomat questions need for NATO in deleted social media post

Reuters19 hours ago

WASHINGTON, June 12 (Reuters) - The number two U.S. diplomat questioned the need for NATO in a post on X - which he later deleted - as the alliance prepares for an annual summit expected to be dominated by a U.S. demand for higher defense spending and Russia's war on Ukraine.
Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau was replying to a social media thread by Matthew Whitaker, the U.S. ambassador to NATO. Whitaker in his post said that what happened in the Indo-Pacific mattered for transatlantic security.
"He obviously didn't get the memo our [sic] of our Deputies Committee meeting on this very issue," Landau wrote at 6:56 pm on Wednesday, referring to Whitaker. "NATO is still a solution in search of a problem."
It was not clear if Landau meant for his message to be public or if he intended to send Whitaker's post to a third person.
"This was a casual, lighthearted remark intended for a brief, private exchange," a State Department spokesperson said in emailed comments.
"The Deputy Secretary's comment was in the context of his desire to improve NATO and ensure it remains focused on its mission," the spokesperson said.
Landau's post was later deleted. The Deputies Committee is subordinate to the National Security Council and composed of deputy secretaries of State, Defense and other agencies, according to the White House website.
The administration of former President Joe Biden had pushed the European allies to pay more attention to the threats in the Indo-Pacific, particularly from China, but the Trump administration has encouraged those allies to focus on their own security.
Landau's post contrasts with views of most of NATO's European members, who see Russia and its war on Ukraine as an existential threat, and the U.S.-led alliance as their main means of defense.
His post came as NATO leaders prepare for a two-day summit in the Hague beginning on June 24, where they will consider U.S. President Donald Trump's demand that they boost defense spending to 5% of GDP.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy is expected to attend the meeting. Since Russia's full-scale invasion in February 2022, he regularly has attended NATO summits, and alliance members have pledged billions in weapons and condemned Russia for an illegal war of conquest.
Trump has shifted U.S. policy, partially accepting Moscow's justifications for its full-scale invasion in February 2022 and disparaging Zelenskiy.
European allies have expressed concern about Trump's commitment to the 32-member alliance and its support for Ukraine's battle against Russia's occupation forces.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The longest-serving legislative leader in US history will be sentenced on corruption charges
The longest-serving legislative leader in US history will be sentenced on corruption charges

The Independent

time38 minutes ago

  • The Independent

The longest-serving legislative leader in US history will be sentenced on corruption charges

Michael Madigan's stunning political collapse will culminate Friday when the longest-serving legislative leader in U.S. history is sentenced on federal bribery, conspiracy and wire fraud convictions tied to a scheme to push legislation in exchange for jobs and contracts for his associates. The former Illinois House speaker was convicted in February on 10 of 23 counts in a remarkable corruption trial that lasted four months. The case churned through 60 witnesses and mountains of documents, photographs and taped conversations. Madigan was in court Friday afternoon before U.S. District Judge John Robert Blakey, who will determine his sentence. Federal prosecutors are seeking a 12 1/2-year prison term. Madigan's attorneys are seeking probation, contending the government's sentence would 'condemn an 83-year-old man to die behind bars for crimes that enriched him not one penny.' During a legislative career that spanned a half-century, Madigan served nearly four decades as speaker, the longest on record for a U.S. legislator. Combined with more than 20 years as chairperson of the Illinois Democratic Party, he set much of the state's political agenda while handpicking candidates for political office. More often than not, he also controlled political mapmaking, drawing lines to favor his party. Meanwhile, prosecutors said, the Chicago Democrat built a private legal career that allowed him to amass a net worth of $40 million. Madigan was convicted on 10 counts of bribery, conspiracy, wire fraud and other charges for ensuring approval of legislation favorable to utility giant ComEd in exchange for kickbacks and jobs and contracts for loyalists, including a Chicago alderman seeking a paid job on a state board after retiring from government. The jury deadlocked on six counts, including an overarching racketeering conspiracy charge, and acquitted him on seven others. 'Madigan's criminal activity spanned nearly a decade and was particularly egregious because it involved efforts to enrich himself — both by maintaining his political power by securing do-nothing jobs for his political allies and by attempting to line his own pockets with legal business,' prosecutors wrote in a court filing. 'In so doing, Madigan served his own personal interests and not the interests of Illinoisans.' Defense lawyers called the government's recommended sentence 'draconian' and, given Madigan's age, a life sentence. They asked Blakey to consider the totality of Madigan's life and work and the need to care for his wife in requesting a sentence of five years' probation, with one year of home confinement, a requirement to perform community service and a 'reasonable fine.' In a video submitted to the court, Madigan's wife, Shirley, asks for a sentence of probation, explaining that Madigan is her caregiver and she would have to seek outside help if he is imprisoned. And, she says, 'I'm a part of him.' 'There's some days I keep him going,' Shirley Madigan says on the video. 'He keeps me going sometimes, too, but I think that the impact that I have on him has been much, much larger.' The court received more than 200 letters of support for Madigan, many from constituents, friends, leaders of nonprofits and other organizations that interact with the state. Some noted asking him for help just once. Most lauded him for dedication, integrity or a personal touch. 'Mike Madigan is a good man who has selflessly done an exceptional amount of good for others,' his lawyers wrote in a separate filing. 'He is widely respected for his dedication to honesty and integrity.' Tried alongside Madigan was his former legislative colleague and longtime confidant, Michael McClain. The jury couldn't reach a decision on any of the six counts against McClain. He was convicted, though, in a separate trial over the ComEd conspiracy last year.

Hundreds of US Marines arrive in LA as large protests are planned in California and across US
Hundreds of US Marines arrive in LA as large protests are planned in California and across US

The Guardian

time44 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Hundreds of US Marines arrive in LA as large protests are planned in California and across US

Federal troops continued to be on duty in the streets of Los Angeles on Friday after a series of court rulings, and more arrived, with large protests planned in California and across the country this weekend against the Trump administration's aggressive anti-immigration raids and a big military parade in Washington DC. Around 200 US Marines arrived in LA on Friday morning. This followed Donald Trump's extraordinary decision to deploy National Guard troops to LA last weekend, over the objections of the governor of California, Gavin Newsom. The marines were to take over protecting a federal building, US Army Maj Gen Scott Sherman, who commands the task force of marines and national guardsmen, said. The streets had been mostly calm overnight going into Friday morning, marking the seventh day of protests across various areas and the third day of an overnight curfew in a small part of the huge downtown area. Sporadic demonstrations have also taken place in cities including New York, Chicago, Seattle and Austin on several days in the last week against Trump's pushing of his mass deportation agenda, undertaken by targeting undocumented communities in the US interior. And millions more are expected to turn out to protest on Saturday at roughly 2,000 sites nationwide in a demonstration dubbed 'No Kings', against growing opposition to what critics see as Trump taking actions on the brink of authoritarianism. The mass protests are timed to coincide with the US president's controversial military parade in Washington DC to celebrate the 250th anniversary of the formation of the US army, and coincidentally his 79th birthday. The protests in Los Angeles and subsequent deployment of California's National Guard by Trump, over the furious objections of Newsom, is a move that had not happened in the US in at least half a century, sparking a legal battle between the president and Newsom. Late on Thursday, a federal judge ruled that the federal deployment of troops by the president to aid in civilian US law enforcement in LA should be blocked. The administration swiftly appealed and a higher court paused the restraining order until Tuesday, when it will hear the case. Judge Charles Breyer's ruling in Newsom v Trump stated that Trump had unlawfully bypassed congressionally mandated procedures. Newsom in an interview with the New York Times podcast on Thursday called Trump a 'stone cold liar' for claiming he had discussed a federal deployment with the governor by telephone. Democrats and advocacy groups view Trump's deployment as an abuse of power aimed at suppressing free speech and supporting aggressive anti-immigration policies. Trump's use of the troops follows earlier, unfulfilled threats during the 2020 Black Lives Matter protests in his first administration, when he considered, but ultimately declined, to deploy federal troops and has since expressed regret about not cracking down more forcefully. The president has continuously defended his decision to send troops to LA claiming without any evidence that the city would have been 'obliterated' and 'burned to the ground' had he not initiated the deployment. In Washington, Saturday's parade is billed as a patriotic celebration, while critics argue it is more about Trump's personal brand and ego than promoting national unity. Organizers of No Kings protests have avoided planning a demonstration in the nation's capital, in a bid to draw attention away from tanks, armored vehicles, troops and aircraft on display. 'The flag doesn't belong to President Trump. It belongs to us,' read a statement from the No Kings protest movement. The parade will culminate on Saturday evening with a procession of 6,600 soldiers, dozens of tanks, and a live broadcast message from an astronaut in space. Inspired by a Bastille Day parade Trump witnessed in France in 2017, but with strong echoes of the kind of regular displays under authoritarian regimes such as Russia, North Korea and China, the event is expected to cost up to $45m, sources told NBC News. Meanwhile, some members and family members of the National Guard troops deployed to Los Angeles have expressed discomfort with their mission, feeling it drags them into a politically charged domestic power struggle. 'The sentiment across the board right now is that deploying military force against our own communities isn't the kind of national security we signed up for,' said Sarah Streyder of the Secure Families Initiative, which advocates for military families. 'Families are scared not just for their loved ones' safety, although that's a big concern, but also for what their service is being used to justify.' Chris Purdy of the Chamberlain Network echoed those concerns: 'Morale is not great, is the quote I keep hearing,' he said, citing multiple National Guard members who contacted his organization. Amid the ongoing legal and political fallout, arrests have continued, although sporadic incidents of early looting have subsided. Jose Manuel Mojica, a 30-year-old father of four, was charged with assaulting a federal officer during a protest in Paramount, a community in southern Los Angeles County. And on Thursday, Alex Padilla, a Democratic US senator for California and vocal critic of the Trump administration's immigration polices, was forcibly removed and handcuffed as he attempted to ask a question at a press conference held by Kristi Noem, the homeland security secretary, in Los Angeles. In video taken of the incident that has since gone viral on social media, Padilla is seen being restrained and removed from the room by Secret Service and FBI agents. He warned that if this was how he was dealt with it spoke ill for ordinary civilians being summarily arrested and detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice). Most Republican national lawmakers criticized Padilla, although some Republican senators condemned his treatment, while Democrats overwhelmingly applauded his challenge to the administration and were appalled at his removal. Andrew Gumbel in Los Angeles contributed reporting.

Democrat turns on his party after arrest of Senator Padilla
Democrat turns on his party after arrest of Senator Padilla

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Democrat turns on his party after arrest of Senator Padilla

Democratic Congressman Jared Golden broke with his party in claiming Sen. Alex Padilla's forceful removal from a DHS press conference was 'political theater' instigated by the California Democrat. The roughly 6'3 Democrat walked into an media event with Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem on Thursday dressed in plainclothes when he attempted to ask her a question. But Maine Democrat Jared Golden told Axios Thursday: 'I don't think politics as theater is what our job is here.' 'I think that it's never good when a senator or member of Congress gets roughed up by law enforcement,' he shared. The startling incident was diffused after law enforcement identified the senator, however, as after Noem's event she claimed to have sat down with the Democrat to speak. Noem has said that Padilla did not identify himself before asking a questions and local news streams of the event appear to back up that claim. 'At one point, I had a question, and so I began to ask a question. I was almost immediately forcibly removed from the room, I was forced to the ground, and I was handcuffed,' Padilla claimed. The FBI put out a statement explaining that since the senator was not wearing his 'Senate security pin' agents were not be able to determine his identity on the fly. Though the Democrat was 'disruptive' he was later released after being 'positively identified,' the FBI shared. Padilla's team sent out a fundraising email on Friday morning highlighting his stand at the DHS press conference. Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., told reporters on Thursday that 'at minimum' Padilla should be censured - a rare and dishonorable distinction Congress votes on to condemn members publicly.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store