logo
Trump's first 100 days: America first, tariff war, meetings and meltdowns

Trump's first 100 days: America first, tariff war, meetings and meltdowns

Indian Express30-04-2025

Vladimir Lenin once said, 'There are decades where nothing happens, and there are weeks where decades happen.' US President Donald Trump's first 100 days back in the White House have felt just that — a whirlwind that's scrambled American foreign policy, weakened old alliances, empowered adversaries, and plunged global diplomacy into uncertainty.
With an unrelenting 'America First' approach, Trump has taken a wrecking ball to the post-World War II international order. Military aid slashed. Institutions gutted. Allies slighted. Foreign policy veterans warn that the world is witnessing a permanent shift: an isolationist superpower that no longer leads, but disrupts.
America First
Trump's foreign policy remains deeply rooted in nationalist rhetoric and transactional logic. He has walked away from multilateral commitments, including NATO, with former US Ambassador to NATO Ivo Daalder calling it a 'historic rupture' that's 'upended 80-some years of American foreign policy.'
The administration has gutted soft-power programs, defunded Voice of America, withdrawn from the WHO, and elevated loyalists with little foreign policy experience into top diplomatic roles.
Redrawing the map
In one of the more bizarre turns, Trump proposed annexing Greenland, claimed the Panama Canal as US property, and floated the idea of turning Canada into the 51st state. Danish PM Mette Frederiksen called the Greenland remarks 'a threat to the world order.'
Reuters reported that Trump may be reviving Cold War-style spheres of influence, where global power is carved up, not shared.
Meetings and meltdowns
Trump met with at least 11 world leaders, but few meetings ended well. The most combustible came with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Following public sparring with Vice President JD Vance, the US abruptly pulled all military aid to Ukraine. Vance blamed Zelenskyy — not Russia — for the war's continuation, insisting Ukraine accept territorial concessions and renounce NATO membership.
Support for Ukraine has cratered. A Reuters/Ipsos poll shows more than half of Americans believe Trump is too close to Russia.
Institutional crisis
Within Trump's national security team, chaos reigns. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is under fire for leaking classified details via Signal chats. National Security Advisor Mike Waltz mistakenly added journalist Jeffrey Goldberg to one such group. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, despite his hawkish stance on China, has been sidelined in favour of Trump loyalists.
Middle East flashpoints
A fleeting ceasefire in Gaza quickly collapsed. US backing for Israel remains unconditional, with reports confirming shipments of 2,000-pound bombs. Trump's proposal to turn Gaza into a 'Mediterranean-style resort' drew global outrage as a thinly veiled act of ethnic cleansing.
In Yemen, the US has escalated its military campaign against the Houthis. 'Operation Rough Rider' launched over 200 strikes in just one month, killing hundreds. Simultaneously, backchannel nuclear talks with Iran have resumed in Oman, though Trump insists war remains on the table.
Atlantic rift widens
At the Munich Security Conference, VP Vance declared, 'America can do nothing to help you,' signaling a withdrawal from Washington's traditional role as Europe's security guarantor. NATO partners are scrambling. The EU has launched an €840 billion rearmament initiative. Poland and Lithuania are boosting defense budgets to 5 per cent of GDP.
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen summed up the shift: 'The West as we knew it no longer exists.'
Trade wars redux
On the President's self-proclaimed 'Liberation Day,' Trump unveiled sweeping tariffs meant to fund tax cuts, revive US manufacturing, and pressure allies — all at once. Economists have warned that these goals are incompatible. 'It's economic nationalism without a map,' said James Lindsay of the Council on Foreign Relations.
Trade advisor Peter Navarro promised 'ninety deals in ninety days,' but not a single trade pact has materialised. China remains a primary target, with 145 per cent tariffs levied on its imports — while other nations enjoy 90-day suspensions. Beijing retaliated with 125 per cent tariffs and a video declaring it would 'never kneel.'
Trump also stunned Washington by accusing Taiwan of 'stealing' US semiconductors and questioning whether the US would defend the island if China invades.
India
One bright spot was Trump's meeting with Indian PM Narendra Modi. The two launched 'Mission 500,' aiming to double bilateral trade to $300 billion by 2030. The U.S. also approved the sale of F-35 stealth jets to India and agreed to extradite 2008 Mumbai attacks suspect Tahawwur Rana.
Strategic drift
Despite aggressive posturing, Trump's foreign policy lacks a coherent framework. Analysts say the US now approaches diplomacy purely as a transaction — alliances viewed as burdens, values as optional. Matthias Matthijs of the CFR observes, 'Trump doesn't see alliances as assets. He sees them as liabilities.'
Global fallout
Some overtures — such as resumed nuclear talks with Iran and closer ties with India — may bear fruit. But the overall picture is stark: American diplomacy is erratic, impulsive, and increasingly irrelevant on the global stage.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

New normal amid a new cold war
New normal amid a new cold war

New Indian Express

timean hour ago

  • New Indian Express

New normal amid a new cold war

The effect of Donald Trump's return to the White House is being felt in capitals all over the world. At the recently-concluded Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore, the spectre of a new cold war rose once again to dominate discussions. In his ASEAN chairman's statement, Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim categorically asserted the return of a cold war to systemic interstate relations. The reference does not augur well for the ASEAN, which has been trying to build resilience within while maintaining a degree of balance between the US and China. The second important aspect of this year's dialogue has been the tough stand India has placed on its recent military stand-off with Pakistan following the devastating terror attack at Pahalgam. The subsequent Indian political and military action against Pakistan has highlighted what the political leadership is calling the 'new normal', signalling that tolerance has its limits. Both these indicated a changed environment at the Shangri-La Dialogue, especially as they implied certain defining shifts. First, the very definition of the term 'cold war' and how this period will be different from the earlier cold war. Second, the Trump administration's impact on the wider Indo-Pacific and what it expects from the region vis-á-vis the US-China rivalry. Third, the choices for ASEAN states, particularly in light of the extending US-China rivalry. And finally, how this affects the role India plays within multilateral forums and how India's definition of the new normal affects the region. First, the reference to a new cold war is not new. Even during the first Trump term, a National Security Strategy paper released by the administration in November 2017 clearly reiterated that the foremost threats to American interests and leadership in the global order were from China and Russia, articulating the tensions at systemic levels.

Elon Musk's Trump clash backfires; Tesla CEO's net worth takes massive hit, federal contracts under risk
Elon Musk's Trump clash backfires; Tesla CEO's net worth takes massive hit, federal contracts under risk

Hindustan Times

timean hour ago

  • Hindustan Times

Elon Musk's Trump clash backfires; Tesla CEO's net worth takes massive hit, federal contracts under risk

Elon Musk's clash with President Donald Trump appears to have backfired on him. The 53-year-old, who accused the president of being ungrateful, lost $15 billion on Thursday, and his company Tesla's shares tumbled as much as 9% during trading hours. According to Forbes' real-time billionaires list, Musk is worth $399.5 billion, down 3.63%. Tesla slumped 8.9% amid Musk's criticism of Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill'. This comes after the president lashed out at his former ally on Thursday, saying he was 'disappointed' by the billionaire's opposition to the sweeping tax-cut and spending bill that is at the heart of his administration's agenda. 'Look, Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore. He said the most beautiful things about me, and he hasn't said bad about me personally, but I'm sure that'll be next. But I'm, I'm very disappointed in Elon. I've helped Elon a lot,' he said. Meanwhile, Musk unleashed a series of responses on X, platform formerly known as Twitter. Read More: 'Such ingratitude': Elon Musk claims Trump would've lost election without him "Without me, Trump would have lost the election," he wrote. 'Such ingratitude.' The Tesla CEO also used the president's own words against him. He retweeted the 78-year-old's part criticisms about raising the debt ceiling. In a 2013 tweet, Trump wrote, " I cannot believe the Republicans are extending the debt ceiling—I am a Republican & I am embarrassed!" "Wise words," Musk commented on the post. Read More: 'Disgusting': Why Elon Musk attacked Donald Trump's 'Big Beautiful' bill In his latest attack on Musk, Trump said that he is terminating the tech billionaire's subsidies and contracts. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' the president wrote on Truth Social. 'Elon was 'wearing thin,' I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!' he added.

Trump ally Laura Loomer says Republican law makers wondering if they should side with President Trump or Elon Musk; Tesla CEO responds: Trump has 3.5 years left as President, but I ...
Trump ally Laura Loomer says Republican law makers wondering if they should side with President Trump or Elon Musk; Tesla CEO responds: Trump has 3.5 years left as President, but I ...

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Trump ally Laura Loomer says Republican law makers wondering if they should side with President Trump or Elon Musk; Tesla CEO responds: Trump has 3.5 years left as President, but I ...

The escalating feud between President Donald Trump and billionaire Elon Musk has reached a critical juncture, with Republican lawmakers now questioning their loyalties as the two most powerful figures in conservative politics engage in an unprecedented public battle over Trump's signature domestic policy bill. Trump ally Laura Loomer reported Thursday that GOP legislators are actively debating whether to support the president or the Tesla CEO. "I know lawmakers who are asking if they should side with President Trump or Elon," Loomer posted on social media. "I've been on the hill all day and it's all anyone is talking about. The most powerful man in the world vs the richest man in the world." Musk's response was characteristically provocative, telling Loomer: "One thing's for sure, it ain't boring!" He then delivered what appears to be a veiled threat to Republican politicians weighing their options: "Oh and some food for thought as they ponder this question: Trump has 3.5 years left as President, but I will be around for 40+ years." Musk claims credit for Trump's Presidential election victory The public rupture intensified Thursday when Musk explicitly took credit for Trump's 2024 election victory after the president expressed disappointment in his former adviser. "Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate," Musk wrote on X. "Such ingratitude." Trump had earlier told reporters during a meeting with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz that he was "very disappointed in Elon" and that he had "helped Elon a lot." The president accused Musk of opposing the legislation only after Republicans removed electric vehicle subsidies that would benefit Tesla. "He had no problem with it. All of a sudden, he had a problem. And he only developed the problem when he found out that we're going to have to cut the EV mandate because that's billions and billions of dollars," Trump said. Battle over 'Big Beautiful Bill' escalates The conflict centers on Trump's massive domestic policy bill, which Musk has repeatedly attacked as a "disgusting abomination" that will increase the federal deficit. Musk has urged Americans to "KILL THE BILL," arguing it doesn't cut government spending deeply enough despite projections it will remove health coverage from millions. Trump disputed Musk's claim that he wasn't consulted on the legislation, stating: "Elon knew the inner workings of this bill, better than almost anybody sitting here." Musk fired back on X: "False, this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!" The president also mocked Musk's appearance, referencing the billionaire's recent black eye and suggesting he might be developing "Trump Derangement Syndrome." Trump compared Musk to other former advisers who "become hostile" after leaving his administration, noting that "some of them actually become hostile" when "the glamour's gone." AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store