Shelby County commissioners debate possible advisory board for MSCS board
MEMPHIS, Tenn. — The Shelby County Commission met on Wednesday to discuss state involvement with the Memphis Shelby County school district.
WREG has kept you informed of the saga surrounding the school board following the ousting of former superintendent Dr. Marie Feagins earlier this year.
A bill is now moving through the Tennessee legislature that would allow the state to appoint a 9-member managerial board from Shelby County the current board would then work in an advisory capacity.
House bill for state control of MSCS advances
Commissioners who put forth this resolution are against state involvement with the school district.
'This is a path forward from a local standpoint because a state takeover would be detrimental to us and in this community,' said Commissioner Shante Avant.
An add-on resolution discussed by Shelby County Commissioners Wednesday creates an advisory committee to provide support to MSCS school board members in areas of governance, operation, and academic support.
MSCS state takeover could move forward this week
Commissioner Michael Whaley says it recognizes there is a challenge and a problem to solve and it opposes the current proposal for state intervention.
'Our conversation needs to be focused on solutions of actually trying to work to solve the problem,' Whaley.
Multiple commissioners said they don't believe the board is willing to listen to outside voices.
'There is no indication on the current school board, from my perspective that they give a damn what anyone on this board believes or what the public believes and we know that because they plowed through their decision, which they did in secret, to terminate the superintendent,' said Commissioner Mick Wright.
MSCS board members call state takeover bill 'attack on democracy'
'I cannot tell you right now that I have confidence that you are going to create an advisory board when so many were silent during the process of ousting the superintendent,' said Commissioner Erika Sugarmon.
At one point commissioner Henri Brooks moved to rescind the vote of no-confidence commissioners voted on earlier this year that motion did not pass.
Commissioner Amber Mills said not changing things is unacceptable.
'The fear and division that people place so that we don't come together to try and better Memphis and Shelby County we have got to be fed up with that, we have got to stop tolerating that because it is used time and time again,' said Mills. 'And then we have the race card too. Well, it was Black women who ousted the Black superintendent, remember that.'
The resolution passed with a favorable recommendation for the county to create an advisory board for the school board. That will go before the full commission next week.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mayor Adams offers a surprising compliment to Democratic primary challenger Zohran Mamdani
Mayor Adams Tuesday offered a surprising compliment to challenger Zohran Mamdani as the democratic socialist makes a run at knocking off frontrunner Andrew Cuomo just two weeks before the Democratic mayoral primary. During his weekly press conference on Tuesday, Adams, while acknowledging he's 'diametrically opposed' to Mamdani's policies, said he respects him for being consistent. 'Mamdani is the same Mamdani that he was before, same person,' Adams said of the current state assemblymember. 'I disagree with him, but at least he's not this politician that puts a finger in the air and sees where the wind is blowing. The rest of these guys are not consistent, you know?' Adams has chosen to skip the June primary and instead run for reelection as an independent in the November election. Mamdani is polling second to ex-Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who resigned in disgrace in 2021 amid allegations of sexual harassment but has now mounted a powerful comeback campaign. The results of the June 24 primary typically determine who the next mayor will be in the heavily Democratic Big Apple, but with Adams running outside party lines and both Cuomo and Mamdani possibly also running on independent or the Working Families Party lines, the November general election could be competitive, as well. The mayor has slammed Cuomo for his pledge to work to do away with Tier 6 pensions despite instating them as governor, a promise to advocate for a $20 minimum wage despite rejecting a similar proposal from Mayor de Blasio and his support for crime crackdowns despite signing off on bail reforms laws. 'I respect people who are authentic and consistent, not who talk out of both sides of their mouths,' Adams said from City Hall on Tuesday. The mayor said that, no matter how the Democratic primary shakes out, he expects to compete against Mamdani in November because he's earned the support of the Working Families Party. During the press conference, Adams also took shots at Cuomo and his so-called rose garden campaign strategy, under which he rarely takes questions from the press. Adams also claimed that Cuomo is touting endorsements from communities that don't overwhelmingly back him. 'I have a Master's in public administration, but I have a PhD in Andrew,' Adams said. 'He comes out on weekends, he'll stop at a Black church, and then they'll list him as an endorsement, and oftentimes they call me and say, we never endorse him. He'll go and identify one or two people in a community and say, I have the community.' Cuomo spokesperson Rich Azzopardi said in response: 'You can quote me shrugging — another Tuesday and another unhinged rant from the MAGA mayor going through the seven stages of grief,' he said. 'He sold out the city to Trump for his own personal benefit and New Yorkers aren't going to ever forget that.'
Newsweek
42 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Mike Johnson Says 'Clear Distinction' Between Jan. 6 and Los Angeles Riots
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. House Speaker Mike Johnson said on Tuesday that there's a "clear distinction" between the January 6, 2021, siege on the U.S. Capitol and the widespread demonstrations against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in Los Angeles. What To Know CNN's Manu Raju asked Johnson whether he thinks it's "hypocritical" for President Donald Trump to condemn the anti-ICE protesters in L.A. for clashing with law enforcement when Trump pardoned or commuted the sentences of everyone charged in the deadly Capitol riot, many of whom were convicted of beating or impeding law enforcement. "Look, no, I think there's a clear distinction between those two," Johnson said. "We've seen what's happened in L.A. in the early '90s and other times, when these things get out of control ... you have to stay on top of that and you cannot let it get out of control." Johnson was referring to the deadly 1992 riots that broke out in L.A. after a jury acquitted four police officers accused of brutally beating Black motorist Rodney King after a high-speed chase. "But what's the difference between the violent protesters on January 6 [and anti-ICE demonstrators]?" Raju pressed the House speaker. "Everybody wants me to relitigate January 6, I'm not going to do that," Johnson said. "There's a very clear distinction between the two. People who broke the law and destroyed property [on January 6] were met with the proper consequences on that." He added that the government has to be "consistent" on that issue in L.A., before turning to walk away. The protests in Los Angeles erupted after ICE raided a number of downtown neighborhoods with high immigrant populations and labor-intensive industries. More than 50 people have been arrested as a result of the raids and five Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) officers have been injured, officials said. Senator Majority Leader John Thune was also asked about Trump's "inconsistency" on the L.A. demonstrations and January 6 siege. "Do you see any inconsistency when the president criticizes or condemns the violent Los Angeles protesters but then pardons the violent January 6 protesters?" a reporter asked the South Dakota Republican. Thune dodged the question, saying, "I think the issue that's in front of us right now is the chaos in L.A." "And clearly the local officials there, for whatever reason, didn't seem up to the task of getting the job done there," he added. California Governor Gavin Newsom, local officials and the LAPD have all rebuffed that claim, saying they had the protests under control until Trump deployed the National Guard and mobilized the Marines to crack down on the demonstrations, which led to more unrest. This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Proposal to ban DEI college courses, state policy dies in Louisiana Legislature
A brick wall sign marks the entrance to the University of Louisiana at Lafayette campus on May 15, 2025. (Greg LaRose/Louisiana Illuminator) The Louisiana Senate has refused to refer a bill targeting diversity, equity and inclusion to a committee where it could be debated, an unusual move that essentially means the proposal will die on the vine. House Bill 685 by Rep. Emily Chenevert, R-Baton Rouge, would have banned DEI practices across state government and prohibit state universities and colleges from requiring certain race and gender-based curricula for undergraduate students. It narrowly passed the House last month after a hours-long debate in which Black lawmakers called the bill 'racially oppressive.' 'We couldn't figure out which committee to refer it to,' Senate President Cameron Henry, R-Metairie, said Monday in an interview. Chenevert said she was disappointed her bill didn't get a Senate committee hearing, adding she would consider sponsoring the legislation again in the future. 'Sometimes it's not about getting all the way through,' Chenevert said. 'Maybe it's just bringing up the topic and having some … open conversations about it.' The legislation was originally debated in the House and Governmental Affairs Committee, because its original version only prohibited DEI practices in state agencies. During that hearing, it was amended to restrict college curricula but it was not sent to the House Committe on Education, which handles proposals on curricula and higher education. 'To the extent the bill intended to prohibit the inclusion of certain concepts which are unrelated to specific courses or programs it would be unnecessary as professional best practices already set that standard,' LSU Faculty Senate President Dan Tirone said in a statement to the Illuminator. House Bill 685 was introduced in the Senate on May 20, with more than three weeks left in the legislative session during which it could have been debated in committee, a necessary step before it can get a Senate floor vote. But as the final week of committee meetings passed, Chenevert's proposal remained unreferred. 'I think it's unnecessary,' Henry said, adding it was the Senate's decision, not just his, to stall the bill. 'An enormous amount of people from both parties expressed their reservations.' Chenevert's bill had the support of Gov. Jeff Landry. 'If the governor wants to institute that, he can do an executive order,' Henry said of the legislation. If it had become law, the bill would have prohibited required classes that cover any of the following subjects: Critical race theory White fragility or white guilt Systemic racism, institutional racism or anti-racism Systemic bias or implicit bias Intersectionality Gender identity Allyship Race-based reparations Race-based privilege The legislation would have allowed any of the subjects to be taught if it was 'included at the discretion of the faculty member, is not prescribed by the institution as a program requirement, and is part of a broader pedagogical objective.' Opponents of the bill said even with this language, the legislation could have had a chilling effect on faculty's academic freedom and freedom of speech. The Louisiana chapter of the American Association of University Professors sent a letter to lawmakers asking them to oppose the bill. 'This legislation would stifle the 'marketplace of ideas' and infantilize our students, forcing faculty to avoid concepts the legislature dislikes and presenting only those that have gained their favor,' the letter reads. 'This is antithetical to freedom in a democratic society and hurts our students as they transition into fully enfranchised citizens.' The Southern University Foundation, which is affiliated with Louisiana's largest historically Black university, also opposed the bill. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
