
Domestic abuse review delays are 'hell', bereaved families say
Just 1% of reviews into domestic abuse-related deaths are being completed in the recommended time, BBC research suggests.Home Office guidance says these reviews, which make recommendations to help prevent people being killed by partners or family members, should be finished within six months.But BBC analysis has found most are taking years.Bereaved families say the review process is "hell on earth" and if it was speedier, further deaths could be prevented.Surrounded by photos of her only child, Pauline Jones points to the wall where the final Mother's Day card she received from her daughter Bethany Rae Fields is pinned in a frame.The 21-year-old was killed by her former partner, Paul Crowther, in Huddersfield in September 2019.Bethany, a university student, had repeatedly reported Crowther to police over threats he made to her and others in the weeks before her death.Six years on, Ms Jones tearfully recalls the moment she received news of her daughter's killing."I got taken into this room, and my poor Bethany's father was sat there, and I have never seen a man so broken and in such despair," says Ms Jones."I was told the words no mother ever, ever needs to hear or wants to hear: 'Your daughter didn't survive her injuries'."
After Bethany's death, a domestic homicide review (DHR) was commissioned by a safety partnership, made up of organisations including the police, councils and health care providers.Every domestic killing or suicide involving people aged 16 and over in England and Wales is subject to a DHR, recently renamed as a domestic abuse-related death review (DARDR).They examine the role of professionals who had contact with the victim or the perpetrator before an attack, but do not issue blame.The review into Bethany's death found there had been nine "missed opportunities" to arrest Crowther - in some cases when he had visited police stations - after she reported his abuse. He was jailed for life after admitting manslaughter with diminished responsibility in 2020.
West Yorkshire Police has since apologised for its failings.Ms Jones, a school worker from Apperley Bridge near Bradford, says she was told the review would take nearly a year – six months more than the government's recommended timeframe – but it took almost three years to complete.The delay, and the process in general, has been "hell on earth", she says, leaving her "broken".Bethany's DHR was eventually made public in August 2024, almost five years after her death.Ms Jones is one of a number of bereaved families the BBC has spoken to who have criticised the length of time the reviews take.
More than 1,200 reviews have been carried out since their introduction in 2011, according to Advocacy After Fatal Domestic Abuse, a charity which supports families affected by domestic homicide.BBC analysis of all reviews in a government library, dating back to 2011, found almost every review was taking longer than it was supposed to. Of the 495 with sufficient data:Only seven were finished within the six-month timeframeOne in six took more than two years to be completedIn Yorkshire and Humber, where Bethany was killed, 97% of reviews were not completed within the six-month timeframeReasons given for the delays include the complexities of a police investigation or court proceedings, contact with family members or others to enable them to contribute to the review and safety partnership meetings.
The delayed reviews are not the only concern bereaved families raise when they meet to discuss their experiences of the process.Phyllis Daly's daughter Jessica Laverack, 34, took her own life at home in Beverley, East Yorkshire, in February 2018 after experiencing domestic abuse.Although a report found the number of victims of domestic abuse who took their own lives in England and Wales surpassed the amount of people killed by their partners, Ms Daly says she had to push for a review into her daughter's death."It's taken me away from my children, my grandchildren, my husband - everybody, because all I wanted to do was to be focused and try to contribute," Ms Daly said.Seven years on, the family are still waiting for the review to be finished, something Ms Daly described as an "excessive time for emotional impact"."I just see that great massive cost and it is not going to serve a purpose because after seven years, no learning can come out of that now," she said.
Jess Phillips, minister for safeguarding and violence against women and girls, said the reviews were "a really important opportunity for agencies on a local and national level to consider each individual victim, improve their safeguarding practices and ultimately prevent these deaths from happening in the first place"."Every death related to domestic abuse is a devastating tragedy and should not be overlooked," she said.Phillips accepted that more needed to be done to ensure the process was "effective and timely".She said the government was creating a new oversight board with publicly appointed members to make the process of reviewing reports faster.A Home Office consultation last year suggested increasing the timeframe to complete a review from six to 12 months - but no change has yet been made.Even with the extension, BBC analysis suggests most would still miss the deadline - only 18% of the reviews were completed within one year.
If you are affected by any of the issues raised in this story, support and advice is available via the BBC Action Line.
Frank Mullane campaigned for domestic homicide reviews to be introduced after his sister Julia Pemberton and nephew William were murdered by Julia's estranged husband in Berkshire in 2003.Mr Mullane, who set up charity Advocacy After Fatal Domestic Abuse to help other families, admits he is "hugely disappointed and somewhat angry" to hear about the slow progress other grieving relatives have experienced.However, he praises the impact of domestic homicide reviews."Now we have evidence and detail of what it is like to live a life of domestic abuse, which then culminates in either homicide or suicide," he says."This is detail that never existed before."
Prof Jane Monckton-Smith, a criminologist specialising in domestic homicide who has chaired several reviews, says when done properly they can bring about real change."They have been absolutely crucial in building our knowledge of intimate partner homicides, domestic homicides and suicides," she adds.However, she says they could be improved by having fewer people involved and having a chair to run the process.For Ms Jones, she still feels anger about the process of the review into Bethany's death."At the start of this, I was hoping that I'd get answers, some kind of clarification of what went wrong," says Ms Jones."The whole process has been horrendous, because you are reliving the most traumatic and painful experience of your life."Additional data journalism by Lauren Woodhead and Jonathan Fagg.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
16 minutes ago
- The Sun
House of Lords canteen slammed for serving rainbow-coloured ‘Pride crumble' dessert
A HOUSE of Lords canteen has been given a roasting for serving a rainbow-coloured 'Pride crumble' dessert. Peers and staff working on the Parliamentary estate have been offered the woke sweet treat, pictured above, to mark Pride month. Portions of the pudding were on offer yesterday for £2.15 with custard. Only last week, rainbow couscous was on the menu in the River Restaurant overlooking the River Thames. But campaigner Fiona McAnena questioned whether the colourful crumble had been created after so-called Progress Pride flags were removed from the cafeteria earlier this week. Ms McAnena, who represents the Sex Matters charity, added: 'Whoever is behind this may think that they are supporting a noble cause. 'But do they really support the reality of what the transgender rights flag represents, including sterilising surgeries, cross-sex hormones that cause permanent physical damage, and rapists in women's prisons?' Tory peer Baroness Nicholson had demanded the cafeteria's Pride flags be taken down as they had not been given proper permission. The latest row comes weeks after Nigel Farage's Reform UK party said town halls under its control would be stopped from flying LGBTQ+ and Pride flags. Reform said it would allow only the St George's Cross and the Union flag to be displayed. 1


Telegraph
18 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Revealed: The spiralling cost of housing foreigners
Foreign-born heads of households in London cost Britain around £3.6 billion a year in discounted rent, Telegraph analysis suggests. Nearly half of all social housing in the capital, 48 per cent, is occupied by foreign-born heads of household, data from the 2021 census shows. This is well over the national average of 19 per cent. These households benefit from cheap rents which, when compared to private rent in London, average out at a discount of around £11,600 per year per household. Responding to the figures, Robert Jenrick, the shadow justice secretary, said: 'This research shows how the huge costs of mass, low-skilled migration are often hidden from the public. When you lift up the bonnet, it's clear that the level and composition of immigration have been hugely economically harmful for decades'. The figures also show some 35 per cent of working age foreign-born heads of households in London's social housing are either unemployed or economically inactive, despite living in one of the UK's most prosperous regions. The most recent ONS figures show that output per hour worked in the capital is approximately 26 per cent higher than the UK average. The figures cast further doubt on the UK's migration policies. Last year, the Office for Budget Responsibility found that low-paid migrant workers were costing taxpayers more than £150,000 each by the time they hit state pension age The proportion of social housing allocated to foreign-born lead residents varies drastically across the capital. A majority of social housing is occupied by a foreign-born lead tenant in 14 of the city's 32 boroughs, with only 10 areas in the capital falling below the level of 40 per cent. Over 60 per cent of social housing in Brent and Westminster is allocated to foreign-born lead residents but this drops to 16 per cent in Havering. To come to the figure of £3.6 billion, The Telegraph matched rents for London's 'general needs' social housing stock across local authority and private registered providers with median private sector rents for properties with equivalent numbers of bedrooms. This suggested that socially rented properties were approximately £11,992 cheaper per year in 2021. Adjusted for estimated service charges, the net discount works out at £11,610. Added up across the city across the whole of the population, this suggests a total subsidy of approximately £7.7 billion. If households headed by foreign-born residents take up a proportional share of this sum, it would amount to roughly £3.6 billion per year in total discounts. Separate data from the English Housing Survey suggests that there is significant variation between ethnic groups with regards to social housing use. Roughly 48 per cent of Black Caribbean households, 40 per cent of Black African households, and 40 per cent of Bangladeshi households in England live in social housing, compared with 16 per cent of White British households, and 5 per cent of Chinese and Indian households.


The Sun
18 minutes ago
- The Sun
I was 15 when my nude pics were leaked – grown men sent them around at the football club & everyone blamed ME
LIKE many young girls, Jess Davies wanted to impress her school crush and decided to send him an explicit photo of herself. Little did the 15-year-old know that he would send it around the school and she would become a victim of image abuse. "That image got bluetoothed around my school, and then it got shared around my hometown, which was a small hometown in Wales, everyone knows everyone," she explained on the Should I Delete That podcast. Image-based sexual abuse is a criminal offence, it's when someone takes, shares, or threatens to share sexually explicit images or videos of a person without their knowledge or consent, and with the aim of causing them distress or harm. This can include digitally altered images, also known as 'deepfakes' - something Jess has gone on to lobby the government to include in the Online Harms Safety Bill. Now 32, Jess has opened up about the trauma it caused and more shockingly, how she was blamed for the abuse. She revealed that once the photo had circulated in her hometown, it was then shared to grown adult men on the local football team. Instead of seeing Jess as a victim, whose private photo was shared without her consent, people blamed her. "Everyone knew my age because it was a small town, and yet, the whole narrative was around how it was my fault," Jess added. "That I shouldn't have sent it, what kind of girl are you? "There was never any conversation around why are men in their twenties and thirties passing around a child's image?" Jess was left as a teenage girl worrying about how to navigate the situation, and she decided she had to laugh it off. Vicky Pattison shares deepfake porn clip of herself as she warns of dangers on C4 doc She revealed that boys in year 7 would run up and ask for a hug as they had seen the image as well. "I was laughing but secretly, this was humiliating," she said. In the end, her parents also found out about the image, as her nan was told about it from one of the men on the football team, where the image was being circulated. Now, as Jess has gotten older, she realises that the way people treated her for the image was not okay and that she was held more accountable than the grown men sharing the image. It has now led Jess to become an advocate for female rights and sexual abuse. Her BBC documentary 'Deepfake Porn: Could You Be Next' was used to lobby the UK government to criminalise deepfake porn. Jess also has a new book, No One Wants To See Your Dick, a guide for surviving the digital age to help us understand and tackle online misogyny and question society's understanding of consent.