
Blaise Metreweli
The best way for real to reflect reel could well be a spy thriller, arguably. James Bond's 'M' is now 'C', a woman, powerful and savvy enough to take on the world. And in a world where, increasingly, fact seems like fiction and fiction, fact, Britain has appointed a woman to its secret intelligence agency. Seldom have the two overlapped so effortlessly as when Blaise Metreweli was named as the first woman chief of Britain's MI6.
Ms. Metreweli will be the 18th Chief of the MI6, coming in at a time when geopolitics is more in tune with a Mission Impossible world than the racy, but dated intrigue of the Cold War espionage that James Bond played amidst. Adversaries have changed, goalposts have shifted, and the tools of war constitute even more fancy technology than Bond's most creative tech guy 'Q' could even fathom. Ironically enough, Ms. Metreweli is currently Director General 'Q' in MI6, responsible for technology and innovation. Earlier she was with the MI5, Britain secret service agency for domestic intelligence.
Ms. Metreweli, who will succeed Sir Richard Moore, will be referred to as 'C', as all chiefs of the MI6 are, going back to the initial used by the agency's first head, Captain Sir Mansfield Smith-Cumming.
The main mission of the MI6 or the Secret Intelligence Service is to collect foreign intelligence for the United Kingdom. U.K.'s Prime Minister Keir Starmer, said: 'The historic appointment of Blaise Metreweli comes at a time when the work of our intelligence services has never been more vital. The United Kingdom is facing threats on an unprecedented scale — be it aggressors who send their spy ships to our waters or hackers whose sophisticated cyber plots seek to disrupt our public services.'
While a female 'M' played fabulously by a formidable Dame Judi Dench dominates recent public memory, it was only in 1995 that, inspired by Stella Rimington (the first female head of MI5), 'M' became female.
It was about the same time that Ms. Metreweli, born in 1977, entered Cambridge University, to study anthropology. She graduated in 1998, and as per official records, joined the MI6 the very next year.
She reportedly spent her early career in West Asia, and has since, worked as an intelligence officer, handling counter-terrorism on the field, and taking on director level roles at the MI5.
Brush with technology
In her role as 'Q', she addressed sophisticated threats including Chinese biometric surveillance and cyberattacks from Russia.
Since her headship was confirmed, Ms. Metreweli's felicity with technology has been flaunted as a key strength in leading espionage operations in an increasingly 'post-truth' world, where guns and poisons are no longer the only weapons of choice.
The news of her appointment has been welcomed, by and large, not only because she is the first woman head of the MI6 in 116 years, but also because she is perceived as 'one of their own', one who has risen through the ranks.
Ms. Metreweli too acknowledged her kinship with the agency: 'I am proud and honoured to be asked to lead my Service. MI6 plays a vital role — with MI5 and GCHQ — in keeping the British people safe and promoting U.K. interests overseas. I look forward to continuing that work alongside the brave officers and agents of MI6 and our many international partners.'
U.K.'s Foreign Secretary David Lammy too echoed this sense of propinquity: 'With a wealth of experience from across our national security community, Blaise is the ideal candidate to lead MI6 into the future. At a time of global instability and emerging security threats, where technology is power and our adversaries are working ever closer together, Blaise will ensure the U.K. can tackle these challenges head on.'
Clearly, with Ms. Metreweli, the U.K. has made a studied choice. Perhaps we must let 'M' have the last word, slightly altered. As Dench tells Daniel Craig's James Bond in Skyfall, 'she knows the rules of the game. She has been playing it long enough.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

New Indian Express
42 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Mainland autonomy requires oceanic depth
The Chinese reaction to the American immigration fracas has strategic undercurrents with a view to not only create alternate models but also emerge as a global education hub. I have previously written on the Chinese build-up towards building world class universities through state facilitated policies with a long-term plan. The size and speed at which they are advancing is shaking certain fundamentals of the game. The 'haigui' (sea-turtles) as the foreign educated returning Chinese are called, have been instrumental in building the science and engineering education in many universities like Tsinghua and Peking comparable to America. Some Chinese are looking at Singapore, Hong Kong, Japan, etc. as alternate geographies besides the increasing others who want to develop Chinese University using this turbulence as an opportunity. The Chinese government cannot change what America is doing but certainly is changing what it can do. The Indian side of the foreign landscape is a mixed bag. Surpassing China in terms of growth rate last year, China still retaining the top status of sending the largest number of Chinese to top five destinations—the US, UK, Canada, Australia and France, India is second to China in absolute numbers. India also seems to find an alternate growing interest in Australia, EU, Japan, etc. but needs more efforts to build the native Indian university ecosystem with a foreign touch. Though India and China have invested roughly the same in education (averaging 4.1 per cent to 4.6 per cent of GDP), the Chinese per capita investment is five times more that of India. The lucrative research grants and the magnetic incentives luring back overseas Chinese to China are the double engines of university reforms in China besides revitalising its university autonomy. The UGC Regulations for establishing foreign university campuses in India is a route for foreign universities taking the Pacific or Atlantic or Arabian Sea route to enter India with an oceanic depth in autonomy. The global academic freedom index is a pointer for more university autonomy in India. The regulatory framework for Indian universities in India requires more autonomy which may be given to the top 100 NIRF universities to begin with. There will be marginal collateral damage but it is worth the effort as mainland institutional autonomy requires the oceanic depth that others enjoy. Is anybody listening?


New Indian Express
2 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Death of mediation: Statesmen as showmen
Mediation is the message. Whenever a conflict arises, politicians seeking the tag of statesmen rush in and claim credit. When Donald Trump boomed into the headlines in June 2025 claiming to have brokered a ceasefire between India and Pakistan, the only thing louder than his announcement was the silence from New Delhi—until it was shattered by a phone call. Narendra Modi, with the practised precision of a man who has heard it all before, reportedly spent 35 minutes dismantling Trump's fantasy. The prime minister made it clear that the ceasefire was a result of direct military-to-military understanding rooted in the 1972 Simla Agreement. 'India has never accepted third-party mediation, nor will it ever,' Modi declared, according to sources familiar with the call. His disdain was unmistakable. This sharp exchange exposes a deeper crisis—that in a world fractured by wars like Iran-Israel, Israel-Hamas, Russia-Ukraine and India-Pakistan, there is total absence of credible, universally-accepted mediators. This has paralysed diplomacy, leaving violence unchecked. Going back to the 1970s, Henry Kissinger's secret diplomacy with Mao Zedong during the Cold War to check the Soviet Union exemplified the kind of strategic mediation absent in today's conflicts. Unlike today's self-promoting dealmakers, Kissinger operated with Cold War gravitas, using realpolitik to reshape global alliance. It's a stark contrast to the opportunistic mediation attempts plaguing 2025's fractured world order. If Trump fancied himself a reincarnation of Kissinger, Modi responded like a man unwilling to share the stage with a meddler playing diplomat in his own campaign circus. But behind this diplomatic snub lies a more troubling truth: we live in an age without credible mediators. The global landscape of June 2025 is a tinderbox of conflicts, each defying resolution due to the lack of a trusted peacemaker. The era of diplomatic giants like Franklin Roosevelt, who shaped post-World War II peace, or Jimmy Carter, who brokered the 1978 Camp David Accords, is a distant memory. The world in mid-2025 resembles a geopolitical powder-keg, with Israel and Iran exchanging missiles, Ukraine and Russia locked in a trench war stretching over a decade, Hamas and Israel in a perpetual loop of bloodshed, and India-Pakistan tensions now simmering dangerously post-Sindoor. What's missing isn't just resolution. It's trust. Gone are the days of Kissinger's shuttle diplomacy or handshakes of détente like that between Anwar Sadat and Menachem Begin.


Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
FATF flags Pakistan bid to ship in missile gear from China on sly
(AI image created using ChatGPT) NEW DELHI: A new report by Financial Action Task Force has flagged Pakistan's attempts to procure equipment for its missile programme by mislabeling shipment, drawing attention to the country's failure in implementing measures to combat financing of proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, which is one of the recommendations of the global watchdog. The report not only reveals that critical components for ballistic missiles originating from China were mislabeled in documents but also links the importer to Pakistan's National Development Complex which handles missile production. India is likely to use the revelations in its dossier to make another push for Pakistan's return to the FATF 'grey list' which identifies countries with weaknesses in their anti-money laundering and terror financing systems. These countries are subjected to closer monitoring and must demonstrate progress on corrective action plans. Pakistan has been on the list three times with the most recent sanction of 2018 lifted in 2022. In Feb 2020, a Chinese vessel named 'Da Cui Yun', which was en route to Port Qasim in Karachi, was intercepted at Gujarat's Kandla port. While the equipment was seized, the ship and its crew were allowed to leave after investigation. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo In its latest report titled 'Complex Proliferation Financing and Sanctions Evasion Schemes', FATF refers to the investigation by Indian Customs. "Indian authorities confirmed that documents mis-declared the shipment's dual-use items. Indian investigators certified the items for shipment to be 'autoclaves', which are used for sensitive high energy materials and for insulation and chemical coating of missile motors," it read. "The sensitive items are included in dual-use export control lists of the Missile Technology Control Regime, India, and other jurisdictions. The Bill of Loading of the seized cargo provided evidence of the link between the importer and National Development Complex," it added. FATF may release the report next month amid hopes in India that it would expose Pakistan's inadequacies in combating terror financing - something which could potentially result in the country being placed under enhanced monitoring, and being returned to 'grey list'. This move would subject Pakistan to increased financial scrutiny, impacting foreign investment and capital inflows. India has been pushing for Pakistan's return to the list, citing its brazen support for terrorism and failure to comply with FATF norms.