Catholic Bishops Defy New US State Law to Report Child Abuse
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Catholic bishops in Washington state are rejecting a new law that requires clergy to report child sexual abuse revealed during the sacrament of confession — setting up a constitutional clash between church doctrine and state law.
The law requires clergy of all faiths and traditions throughout Washington to come forward about child abuse, including priests who are told about abuse during confession.
However, a priest who reveals anything told to him during confession will be excommunicated from the Church, even when it comes to a crime being committed within their congregation.
The Basilica of the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception is seen adorned with an American flag in Washington, D.C., on May 8, 2025, as a new law in Washington state generates controversy.
The Basilica of the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception is seen adorned with an American flag in Washington, D.C., on May 8, 2025, as a new law in Washington state generates controversy.
Aaron Schwartz/Sipa via AP Images)
Why It Matters
The law raises significant First Amendment questions and could reshape how religious confidentiality is handled across the U.S. While clergy are mandated reporters in most states, the majority still protect confessions as privileged communication. Washington is set to become one of the few states to explicitly deny such an exemption.
The Department of Justice (DOJ) has launched a civil rights investigation into the law, with Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon stating that it "demands that Catholic Priests violate their deeply held faith."
What To Know
The new statute — signed by Governor Bob Ferguson and set to take effect July 27 — mandates clergy report suspected child abuse within 48 hours, aligning them with existing reporting laws for police officers, nurses and teachers.
The law's sponsor, State senator Noel Frame, wrote the law in part due to practices within the Jehovah's Witness church that were preventing information on child abuse from coming out.
Jehovah's Witnesses have an internal review process which is entirely secretive. When taken to court for this, following an investigation into their church, the Jehovah's Witnesses likened their approach to secrecy to Catholic confession.
Speaking to the New York Times, former Jehovah's Witness Marino Hardin said: "Leaving an exception in for the confessional when it comes to mandatory reporting would allow any religious group that had a mandate for secrecy to say, 'We don't have to report anything.'"
State senator Frame also spoke to her experience as a survivor, saying: "This is about making sure we, the state, have the information we need to go make sure that kid is OK," she told lawmakers.
Bishops Thomas Daly of Spokane and Paul Etienne of Seattle have publicly stated that they will not comply with the law in cases where abuse is revealed during the sacrament of confession.
"Shepherds, bishops and priests, are committed to keeping the seal of confession – even to the point of going to jail," Daly said in a statement.
Archbishop Etienne echoed that stance, warning that priests who break the seal of confession face automatic excommunication.
"All Catholics must know and be assured that their confessions remain sacred, secure, confidential, and protected by the law of the Church," he wrote.
The Spokesman-Review reported that although prior to this law clergy in Washington State were not mandatory reporters, according to Etienne, current internal church policies already designate priests as mandatory reporters for information given outside of confession.
This lawsuit over the reporting law comes after the DOJ launched its task force to "Eradicate Anti-Christian Bias."
This task force is set up to prosecute cases on behalf of Christians who feel they have been targeted by the government for their faith.
This lawsuit also comes amid the election of the first American pope. Pope Leo XIV, originally from Chicago, weighed in on American politics prior to his appointment. However, it is unclear whether he will get involved in this case.
The Vatican did speak out against a similar bill which was proposed in California in 2019, saying that the secrecy of confession was an "intrinsic requirement" of the sacrament. That bill was withdrawn before it became law.
State senator Frame has said the Washington law is not anti-Catholic because it applies to all clergy in the state, including imams, rabbis, and other spiritual leaders.
Pope Leo XIV, left, formerly Cardinal Robert Prevost, appears on the central loggia of St. Peter's Basilica at the Vatican shortly after his election to become the 267th pontiff of the Roman Catholic Church on...
Pope Leo XIV, left, formerly Cardinal Robert Prevost, appears on the central loggia of St. Peter's Basilica at the Vatican shortly after his election to become the 267th pontiff of the Roman Catholic Church on May 8, 2025. More
Domenico Stinellis/AP Photo
What People Are Saying
Washington Governor Bob Ferguson said in a statement on Wednesday: "We look forward to protecting Washington kids from sexual abuse in the face of this 'investigation' from the Trump Administration."
The Reverend Bryan Pham, an assistant professor at Gonzaga University School of Law in Spokane, Washington, told The New York Times: "The law has good intentions, but it's really misguided."
Archbishop Paul D. Etienne of Seattle said: "This law is a clear intrusion into the practice of our Catholic faith. The state is now intruding into the practice of religion, and if they're allowed to get away with that, where do we draw the line?"
What Happens Next
Unless blocked, the law takes effect July 27. Catholic leaders say they will defy the law, as their choice is either jail time for ignoring the law or excommunication for following it. The DOJ's ongoing review could determine whether the measure stands or is deemed unconstitutional.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
14 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Aurora exhibit explores impact of 9/11 terror attacks: ‘It's really powerful'
An exhibit focusing on the impact of the attacks on the United States on Sept. 11, 2001, is running now through Sept. 13 at the Aurora Regional Fire Museum in downtown Aurora. The exhibit called 'America United: The Days After 9/11' was created by the Children's Museum of Oak Lawn which, according to Brian Failing, executive director of the Aurora Regional Fire Museum, 'reached out to us and offered to share the exhibit.' The display features pieces from two metal beams recovered from the World Trade Center site in New York City that was attacked on Sept. 11, 2001. While the exhibit includes a timeline of the day's events, its focus is on what came after: the emotions, resilience and acts of unity that followed, according to a press release about the display. Two interactive tables prompt visitors to the exhibit to reflect on themes of compassion, community and what it means to be American, the release stated. Failing said the new exhibit is one of the most powerful the museum has ever featured. 'It puts a different spin, a different dimension on 9/11, something that really is meaningful to all of our visitors whether they were impacted by it or are too young to remember it,' Failing said. 'There's something about seeing the beams and having a conversation about that day.' The pieces of the beams themselves are not overly large, Failing said, 'but the weight is substantial.' A special welcoming ceremony was held at 2 p.m. on Monday where members of the Aurora fire and police departments escorted the exhibit to the museum, where it was received by the Aurora Fire Department Honor Guard. 'It's just so impactful seeing it and how something that we know is from the World Trade Center and seeing how it's twisted – words can't even describe it,' he said. 'It's really powerful. It really shows how important physical artifacts are to museums and just showing and remembering,' he said on Tuesday. 'For me, when this happened, I was in fourth grade and was maybe 9 years old. Yesterday I stood looking at it with my daughter who is just 3 years old and I was just thinking – I was in fourth grade and remembering where I was. It's amazing how objects can just evoke those memories.' Jim Levicki, public safety media manager and information officer for the Aurora Police Department, said the exhibit, though small, is 'awe inspiring when you see it.' 'It's pretty cool to see a piece of history,' he said. 'When I was there Monday, I turned to one of the firemen and asked, 'Were you working on 9/11?' and he said he was a high school senior. I was a police officer then and was on duty that day and this, to me, is a reminder there are people out there who don't even know what this was. It was like me reading about Pearl Harbor. 'It's important that people never forget the things that happened that day and the impact they had on the country moving forward,' Levicki added. 'Everybody just had a moment of pause when they saw it and realized what exactly it was.' As the weeks go by, Failing said he hopes that visitors will experience 'the power of artifacts and having this direct piece from history.' 'We always say, 'We will never forget,' but this is also about all the things the exhibit can convey and the stories it can tell and the conversations that can be had,' he said. The Aurora Regional Fire Museum is at 53 N. Broadway in Aurora and is open from 10 a.m. until 4 p.m. Tuesday through Saturday. For more information on the exhibit, go to
Atlantic
16 minutes ago
- Atlantic
‘No One Can Offer Any Hope'
Every month or so I get a desperate message from a 25-year-old Afghan refugee in Pakistan. Another came just last week. I've written about Saman in the past. Because my intent today is to write about her place in the moral universe of Elon Musk and Vice President J. D. Vance, I'll compress her story to its basic details: During the Afghan War, Saman and her husband, Farhad (they requested pseudonyms for their own safety), served in the Afghan special forces alongside American troops. When Kabul fell in 2021, they were left behind and had to go into hiding from the Taliban before fleeing to Pakistan. There the couple and their two small children have languished for three years, burning through their limited cash, avoiding the Pakistani police and Taliban agents, seldom leaving their rented rooms—doomed if they're forced to return to Afghanistan—and all the while waiting for their applications to be processed by the United States' refugee program. No other country will provide a harbor to these loyal allies of America, who risked everything for the war effort. Our country has a unique obligation to do so. They had reached the last stage of a very long road and were on the verge of receiving U.S. visas when Donald Trump came back into office and made ending the refugee program one of his first orders of business. Now Saman and her family have no prospect of escaping the trap they're in. 'The stress and anxiety have become overwhelming,' Saman wrote to me last week. 'Every day I worry about the future of my children—what will become of them? Recently, I've developed a new health issue as well. At times, my fingers suddenly become tight and stiff—almost paralyzed—and I can't move them at all. My husband massages them with great effort until they gradually return to normal. This is a frightening and painful experience … Please, in this difficult time, I humbly ask for your help and guidance. What can I do to find a way out of these hardships?' I've brought the plight of Saman and her family to members of Congress, American activist groups, foreign diplomats, and readers of this magazine. No one can offer any hope. The family's fate is in the hands of Trump and his administration. George Packer: 'What about six years of friendship and fighting together?' And, after all, their story is just one small part of the suffering caused by this regime. A full accounting would be impossible to compile, but it already includes an estimated several hundred thousand people dead or dying of AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria because of the elimination of the U.S. Agency for International Development, as well as the starvation of refugee children in Sudan, migrants deported to a Salvadoran Gulag, and victims of domestic violence who have lost their shelter in Maine. In the wide world of the regime's staggering and gratuitous cruelty, the pain in Saman's fingers might seem too trivial to mention. But hers is the suffering that keeps arriving in my phone, the ongoing story that seems to be my unavoidable job to hear and tell. And sometimes one small drama can illuminate a large evil. Since reading Saman's latest text, I can't stop thinking about the people who are doing this to her and her family—especially about Musk and Vance. As for Trump, I find it difficult to hold him morally responsible for anything. He's a creature of appetite and instinct who hunts and feeds in a dark sub-ethical realm. You don't hold a shark morally responsible for mauling a swimmer. You just try to keep the shark at bay—which the American people failed to do. Musk and Vance function at a higher evolutionary level than Trump. They have ideas to justify the human suffering they cause. They even have moral ideas. Musk's moral idea goes by the name longtermism, which he has called 'a close match to my philosophy.' This reductio ad absurdum of utilitarianism seeks to do the greatest good for the greatest number of human beings who will ever live. By this reasoning, the fate of the hundreds of billions of as-yet-unborn people who will inhabit the planet before the sun burns it up several billion years from now is more urgent than whether a few million people die of preventable diseases this year. If killing the American aid programs that helped keep those people alive allows the U.S. government to become lean and efficient enough to fund Musk's grand project of interplanetary travel, thereby enabling human beings to live on Mars when Earth becomes uninhabitable in some distant era, then the good of humanity requires feeding those aid programs, including ones that support refugee resettlement, into the woodchipper. Refugees—except for white South Africans —aren't important enough to matter to longtermism. Its view of humanity is far too large to notice Saman, Farhad, and their children, or to understand why America might have a moral obligation to give this family a safe home. Longtermism is a philosophy with a special appeal for smart and extremely rich sociopaths. It can justify almost any amount of hubris, spending, and suffering. Sam Bankman-Fried, the cryptocurrency mogul who is serving a 25-year sentence for fraud, conspiracy, and money laundering, was a longtermist. It isn't clear that Musk, during his manic and possibly drug-addled months of power in the Trump administration, applied moral reasoning when hacking at the federal government. His erratic behavior and that of his troops in the Department of Government Efficiency seemed driven more by destructive euphoria than by philosophy. But in February, on Joe Rogan's show, Musk used the loftiest terms to explain why the cries of pain caused by his cuts should be ignored: 'We've got civilizational suicidal empathy going on. And it's like, I believe in empathy. Like, I think you should care about other people, but you need to have empathy for civilization as a whole and not commit to a civilizational suicide. The fundamental weakness of Western civilization is empathy.' Here is another category of the long view, with an entire civilization in place of the planet's future inhabitants. Musk's sphere of empathy is galactic. In its cold immensity, the ordinary human impulse to want to relieve the pain of a living person with a name and a face disappears. Vance once called himself 'a proud member of both tribes' of the MAGA coalition—techno-futurists like Musk and right-wing populists like Steve Bannon. But when Vance invokes a moral code, it's the opposite of Musk's. The scope of its commitment is as narrow and specific as an Appalachian graveyard—the cemetery in eastern Kentucky where five generations of Vances are buried and where, he told the Republican National Convention last summer, he hopes that he, his wife, and their children will eventually lie. Such a place is 'the source of America's greatness,' Vance said, because 'people will not fight for abstractions, but they will fight for their home.' Politically, this is called blood-and-soil nationalism. Religiously, Vance traces his moral code to the Catholic doctrine of ordo amoris, the proper order of love: first your family, he told Sean Hannity of Fox News, then your neighbor, your community, your nation, and finally—a distant last—the rest of humanity. But Vance's theology is as bad as his political theory. Generations of Americans fought and died for the idea of freedom in the Revolutionary War, the Civil War, World War II, and other conflicts. And Christian doctrine does not say to keep out refugees because they're not your kin. Jesus said the opposite: To refuse the stranger was to refuse him. Vance likes to cite Augustine and Aquinas, but the latter was clear about what ordo amoris does not mean: 'In certain cases, one ought, for instance, to succor a stranger, in extreme necessity, rather than one's own father, if he is not in such urgent need.' From the March 2022 issue: The betrayal It's a monstrous perversion of both patriotism and faith to justify hurting a young family who, after all they've suffered, still show courage and loyalty to Vance's country. Starting from opposite moral positions, Musk and Vance are equally indifferent to the ordeal of Saman and her family. When empathy is stretched to the cosmic vanishing point or else compressed to the width of a grave, it ceases to be empathy. Perhaps these two elites even take pleasure in the squeals of bleeding-heart humanitarians on behalf of refugees, starving children, international students, poor Americans in ill health, and other unfortunates. And that may be a core value of these philosophies: They require so much inventing of perverse principles to reach a cruel end that the pain of others begins to seem like the first priority rather than the inadvertent result. Think of the range of people who have been drawn to MAGA. It's hard to see what political ideology Elon Musk, J. D. Vance, Glenn Greenwald, Glenn Loury, Nick Fuentes, Bari Weiss, Lil Wayne, Joe Rogan, Bill Ackman, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, and Kanye West have in common. The magnetic pull is essentially negative. They all fear and loathe something more than Trump—whether it's wokeness, Palestinians, Jews, Harvard, trans people, The New York Times, or the Democratic Party—and manage to overlook everything else, including the fate of American democracy, and Saman and her family. But overlooking everything else is nihilism. Even if most Americans haven't abandoned their private sense of empathy, many don't seem terribly bothered by the rancidness of their leaders. I confess that this indifference astonishes me. It might be the ugliest effect of Trump's return—the rapid normalization of spectacular corruption, the desensitization to lawless power, the acceptance of moral collapse. Eventually it will coarsen us all.
USA Today
18 minutes ago
- USA Today
Hegseth stripping Harvey Milk's name off Navy ship is weak and insecure
Hegseth stripping Harvey Milk's name off Navy ship is weak and insecure | Opinion Nothing says indomitable warrior quite like, 'I'm afraid of this boat's name.' Show Caption Hide Caption Navy to change name of USNS Harvey Milk oil tanker The U.S. Navy will be renaming the USNS Harvey Milk oil tanker, named after Navy veteran and first openly gay elected California official. In a display of infantile weakness, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has ordered the U.S. Navy to remove iconic gay rights activist and Korean War veteran Harvey Milk's name from a naval ship. A defense official told the ship renaming was intentionally announced during Pride Month, presumably because faux tough guys like Hegseth and others in the Trump administration mistakenly equate toughness with being a complete (expletive). In a statement, a Pentagon spokesman said: 'Secretary Hegseth is committed to ensuring that the names attached to all DOD installations and assets are reflective of the commander in chief's priorities, our nation's history, and the warrior ethos.' Hegseth's plan to scrub Harvey Milk's name from a ship is peak insecurity The 'warrior ethos,' Secretary Hegseth? Are you an insecure 12-year-old boy? Nothing says indomitable warrior quite like, 'I'm afraid of this boat's name.' Opinion: Musk calls Trump's bill an 'abomination.' I hate it when our two weird dads fight. A true warrior would be familiar with American history and would know that Milk served as a U.S. Navy operations officer on rescue submarines during the Korean War, then went on to become the first openly gay man elected to public office in California. He was serving on the San Francisco Board of Supervisors when he and the city's mayor were assassinated in 1978. Milk served in the Korean War and earned his place in history A true warrior would recognize that U.S. soldiers throughout history have proudly served, fought, and died for the rights of all Americans to speak and live freely. A true warrior would be appalled to read the statement Milk's nephew Stuart Milk, who chairs the Harvey Milk Foundation, had to release in response to Hegseth's pathetic renaming plan, saying of the slain activist: 'His legacy has stood as a proud and bright light for the men and women who serve in our nation's military – including those who have served on the USNS Harvey Milk – and a reminder that no barriers of race, gender, sexual orientation, ethnicity, religion, or physical infirmity will restrain their human spirit.' Hegseth apparently sees naval ship names as 'woke' The New York Times reported that there are other ships named after civil rights leaders that might be renamed under Hegseth's feeble leadership. The names include Thurgood Marshall, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Harriet Tubman and Cesar Chavez. Make no mistake that behind these decisions is an administration limply fighting back against any incursion on the power of straight, white men, wholly unaware that people with real power don't need to exert their will on others. Announcing that you're stripping the name of a gay rights activist from a Navy ship at the start of Pride Month is, of course, a transparent provocation. To insecure, whiny, entitled men who spend their days listening to other insecure, whiny, entitled men, it's a show of strength. It's something they can smirk about as they exchange awkward high-fives. Opinion: Joe Biden's decency will always outshine Donald Trump's cruelty Hegseth and others in the Trump administration don't know true strength But that's not strength. It's not a 'warrior ethos.' Heck, it's not even an ethos. It's just a bunch of unconfident losers trying to push others down to make themselves feel tall. If Harvey Milk's name is scrubbed from a Navy ship, it won't alter his legacy. His name, decades upon decades from now, will still echo in the pages of history. the hearts of students of civil rights and the mind of any soldier with a true warrior ethos. Pete Hegseth's name, on the other hand, will prompt only one response: 'Who's that? Never heard of him.' Follow USA TODAY columnist Rex Huppke on Bluesky at @ and on Facebook at
