Pataudi Legacy To Remain Despite Tendulkar-Anderson Trophy Renaming. BCCI Source Reveals How
The Pataudi name will remain a part of the India-England cricket rivalry with the winning captain of the upcoming five-Test series set to be presented with a medal named after the royal family that has a rich connect with the game in both countries. The decision to rename the Pataudi Trophy to Tendulkar-Anderson Trophy was taken by the England and Wales Cricket Board. A formal announcement was due on the sidelines of the WTC final at Lord's last week but it was put off in light of the horrific Air India plane crash in Ahmedabad.
Renaming the trophy drew criticism from the likes of former India captain Sunil Gavaskar.
However, it has been learned that Tendulkar himself reached out to the ECB and expressed that the Pataudi name should remain a part of India-England cricket. ICC chairman Jay Shah also had a role to play.
"When this happened Sachin reached out to ECB and conveyed that Pataudi name should remain a part of the India-England rivalry. Mr Jay Shah was involved in the discussions. ECB has agreed to the request and decided to present Pataudi Medal to the winning captain," said a BCCI source.
With the planned ceremony not going ahead in the UK, a formal announcement on the renaming of the trophy is scheduled for June 19, a day before the series-opener at Leeds.
Tendulkar is the leading run getter in Test cricket while Anderson has the most wickets in the traditional format as a fast bowler.
The Pataudis, on the other hand, have deep ties to the India-England cricketing landscape. Iftikhar Ali Khan Pataudi and his son Mansur both captained India and both played county cricket in England.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
'He's the best bowler in the world': Jasprit Bumrah receives massive praise from former foe ahead of England Tests
Jasprit Bumrah's former adversary has hailed him as the best fast bowler in the world ahead of the India vs England Test series. Bumrah received the praise for his calm persona, his competitiveness, and unique bowling action. read more Former England fast bowler Stuart Broad has praised Jasprit Bumrah , calling him the best fast bowler in the world at the moment. Speaking on the For The Love Of Cricket podcast with Jos Buttler, Broad said that Bumrah is going to be a big threat for England in the upcoming Test series. India and England are slated to kick-start their five-match Test series on 20 June at Headingley, Leeds. Ahead of the crucial encounter, which will mark the start of the new cycle of the World Test Championship for India, Broad showered massive praise on the ace bowler. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Broad says Bumrah is the best bowler in the world 'No doubt in my mind he's the best bowler in the world at the moment. He showed that in Australia. He's going to be pretty dangerous in these conditions, isn't he? Certainly someone England won't want to face across five Tests — if he plays them all, he'll pick up a shedload of wickets,' Broad said. Broad also spoke about Bumrah's personality. He said Bumrah is usually calm and laid-back, but he has a strong fighting spirit when he's on the field. 'He's such a calm guy, quite laid-back most of the time — but there's this amazing competitive streak in him,' Broad said. 'That spell in Australia, when he got into a scrap with Sam Konstas and then got Usman Khawaja out — he was screaming and roaring. Every great fast bowler needs that emotion.' Broad explains why facing Bumrah is difficult Broad further explained why facing Bumrah is so difficult for batters, especially in Test cricket. He said Bumrah's smooth run-up and quick delivery can catch batters by surprise, as he releases the ball from about a foot closer than most bowlers. He even compared Bumrah to legends like Shoaib Akhtar and Glenn McGrath. 'When he jogs in, you might think he's bowling at 70 miles an hour, but then he surprises you at 90. That makes it really hard for a batter to get used to him,' Broad said. 'Shoaib Akhtar would sprint in and bowl 100 miles an hour, so you were always ready. Bumrah's different. His short run-up is very balanced and controlled, and he never loses his rhythm. I always admired Glenn McGrath's smooth delivery, and Bumrah is very similar in that way,' he added. Bumrah will not play all five Test matches in England due to workload management. The Indian pacer did not take up the captaincy for the same reason. With Shubman Gill as the new captain, India will look to win even without Bumrah, but there's no denying that his presence will definitely help. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The Hindu
5 hours ago
- The Hindu
Make the World Test Championship more inclusive in two groups
In the next 15 months, South Africa, World Test champions, play no series at home. This says something important about their win in the final at Lord's where they beat Australia convincingly in what their low-key leader, Tenda Bavuma, the first Black man to captain the country called, 'a win for the 'small' teams. These currently being nine of 12 Test nations outside the so-called Big Three of India, England, Australia who have greater resources, larger talent pools and more victories in ICC tournaments. In England — where the final was played — fans of English cricket (and some players) thought South Africa didn't deserve to be in the final; their cricket board focused on two-Test series like someone forced to meet a requirement while the real thing was being played elsewhere. They had sent a 'B' team to New Zealand and unsurprisingly lost the series while the main players remained at home to play T20 franchise cricket. While other cricket boards at least made a show of encouraging Test cricket, South Africa's gave up all pretense and simply gave in to the current money machine. They played neither Australia nor England in the third cycle of the World Test Championship which now has three different winners, after New Zealand, another small team, won the inaugural final and Australia the next. Twists and turns The final was everything Test cricket is about. Unpredictable, for one, with as many twists and turns as a road to a hilltop. Emotionally draining for supporters, with every possibility alive almost till the end. One moment Australia looked like a team that could not lose, next, like one that could not win. After the first day, Mitch Starc the batter turned out to be more effective than Mitch Starc the bowler. Commentators told us the pitch was slow, it was fast, the ball was coming on, it wasn't coming on, Australia were too far ahead for it to be competitive, perhaps merely giving breath to their biases. Aidan Markham played the innings of his life; so did Bavuma, who went from being a symbol (he was called a 'quota captain' when he took over) to an individual with a big heart and a calculating head. He has won nine of his first ten Tests, leading South Africa to eight wins in a row at the end of it. Does this mean Test cricket will get a boost in South Africa or that the country's reputation of being chokers will no longer apply? The former depends on their administrators and the latter on the players. But what of the WTC itself? Is it time to have at least a three-Test final because a series win is the essence of the format? Importantly, is it time to look at some other changes? We must begin with an understanding — that we cannot allow the perfect to be the enemy of the good. Looking for the perfect system is fine, but waiting till we have one before starting the World Test Championship cycles would have worked against it. That only nine of the 12 countries playing Test cricket are involved in the WTC cycle means that 'lesser' teams ( one step below Bavuma's 'small' teams) will continue to struggle. Most experts are against the notion of splitting the teams into two groups, fearing that this will lead to endless matches among India, England, Australia with the others getting further marginalised. New structure But if the two groups are divided so that every alternate team is in one group – thus, teams ranked in the odd number, one, three five in one and two, four, six in the other, it would mean all twelve get to be involved. Going by the current rankings, therefore, Australia, England, New Zealand, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Afghanistan would be in one group while South Africa, India, Sri Lanka, West Indies, Ireland and Zimbabwe would be in the other. No promotion or relegation, no greater and lesser group. It will also help with the scheduling too. The cycle could be of three years rather than the current two. And the points system simplified. England skipper Ben Stokes has called the competition 'utterly confusing'. The aim should be to make it less confusing and more inclusive, as any World championship ought to be.
Time of India
6 hours ago
- Time of India
Jasprit Bumrah says he had ruled out India captaincy during IPL, informed BCCI before Rohit's retirement
Leeds: The peerless Jasprit Bumrah has revealed that he had ruled out Test captaincy during the IPL itself as part of his workload management , and had informed the BCCI of his desire to prioritise his bowling responsbilities over leadership duties. During an interaction with former India wicketkeeper-batter Dinesh Karthik on Sky Sports Cricket, Bumrah explained the thought process behind his decision to turn down the Indian Test captaincy. "There's no fancy stories to it. There is no controversy or a headlining statement that I was sacked. Before Rohit and Virat retired, I had spoken to the BCCI during the IPL about my workload going forward in a five-match series," Bumrah said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Play this game for 3 minutes, if you own a mouse "I've spoken to the people who have managed my back, I've spoken to the surgeon as well, who's always spoken to me about how smart you have to be about the workloads. "And then we came to the conclusion that I have to be a little smarter. So then I called the BCCI and said I don't want to be looked at in a leadership role, because I won't be able to give all matches coming to a five-match Test series ," added Bumrah. Live Events After Rohit's retirement and with Bumrah ruling himself out, the BCCI appointed Shubman Gill as the skipper of the Test team with his first assignment being the five-match Test series against England, beginning in Leeds on Friday. During the interaction, Bumrah stressed on the need for continuity in leadership, particularly in a long series, something he would not be able to offer because of his heavy workload as the team's premier bowler. "The BCCI was looking at me at (a) leadership (role). But then I had to say no as it's not fair for the team as well. It's not fair to the team if in a five-Test series, three matches somebody else is leading and two matches somebody else is leading. "I always wanted to put the team first, even if me being there as a player offers a lot more just not as a captain," Bumrah said. "Captaincy is a position. But you always have leaders in the team and I wanted to do. Obviously, if I'm not careful, I don't know about the future, and I don't want to be in a situation where I have to abruptly go away from this format. "So, I thought that for continuity, and it is only fair to the team that you know the team goes in that direction, where they look at long-term and I could help in whatever way," he added. Bumrah acknowledged that leading the Indian Test team is a huge honour but added that he loves the game more than captaincy. "Captaincy meant a lot. I had worked very hard for it. But, unfortunately, sometimes you have to look after the bigger picture. I love cricket more than captaincy so I want to contribute more as a cricketer and to the Indian team as a player. "Obviously ambitions are there but that's how it is and I called the BCCI and said that I don't want to be looked at in a leadership role," said the magnificent fast bowler. Plan to play three Tests in England As far as his participation in the England series in concerned, Bumrah is planning to play in at least three Test matches, including the opener at Headingley. "Obviously, the number is not decided. First (Test) is definitely on, that is going to happen. Rest, we will see how things are, what is the workload and scenario... but yes, 3 Tests is what I can manage at the moment." India head coach Gautam Gambhir had also said Bumrah could play three Tests in the coming weeks.
