Egypt: Authorities must immediately reveal whereabouts of Egyptian-Libyan activist Nasser al-Hawari
Egyptian authorities must immediately reveal the whereabouts of Egyptian-Libyan activist and TV anchor Nasser al-Hawari, who was forcibly disappeared after being seized by plainclothes security officers outside his family home in Alexandria on 9 February, escorted into an unmarked van, and driven away, Amnesty International said today.
He was arrested on the same day his TV show addressed violations against prisoners held in eastern Libya, an area under de facto control by the self-proclaimed Libyan Arab Armed Forces (LAAF) armed group, under the command of Khalifa Heftar. During the show, aired on the Libyan channel Al-Jamahiriya and broadcast from Egypt, Nasser al-Hawari promised to reveal further evidence of these violations.
'Nasser al-Hawari's distressed family have not heard from him since he was seized without explanation or an arrest warrant and subjected to enforced disappearance. Egyptian authorities must immediately reveal Nasser al-Hawari's whereabouts and allow him to contact his family and lawyers,' said Amnesty International Researcher Mahmoud Shalaby.
"Egyptian authorities must immediately reveal Nasser al-Hawari's whereabouts and allow him to contact his family and lawyers" Mahmoud Shalaby, Amnesty International
'They must also drop any investigations and charges solely related to his legitimate media work or for exercising his right to freedom of expression. The close relationship between the Egyptian government and Khalifa Heftar should never justify retaliating against Nasser al-Hawari for exposing human rights violations committed by forces under Khalifa Heftar's command.'
Nasser al-Hawari's younger brother, who was with him at the time, was also arrested, briefly blindfolded and handcuffed in a van before being released and threatened with arrest if he reported his brother's arrest. Security forces also confiscated his mobile phone.
Since then, the family's attempts to get information about Nasser al-Hawari's whereabouts from the authorities have gone unanswered. Amnesty International reviewed copies of complaints sent by the family to Public Prosecution on 10 February to inquire about al-Hawari's whereabouts. The family have yet to receive a response.
Nasser al-Hawari, who established and headed the Libyan organization, Victims for Human Rights, fled Libya for Tunisia in January 2024, and reported being briefly detained by the Deterrence Apparatus for Combatting Terrorism and Organized Crime (DACTO) militia in Tripoli on 29 January 2024. He travelled to Egypt in June 2024.
After videos appeared online in January 2025 showing detainees in Libya being subjected to torture and other ill-treatment, including beatings and flogging, in Gernada prison, under the control LAAF, Nasser al-Hawari made a number of public statements and TV appearances highlighting impunity for such crimes in eastern Libya, and calling for independent and impartial investigations. Amnesty International has long documented crimes under international law and other serious human rights violations committed by LAAF and allied armed groups, amid a climate of impunity and a brutal crackdown on all forms of dissent.
Distributed by APO Group on behalf of Amnesty International.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
2 days ago
- Middle East Eye
'We don't want them': Trump issues latest iteration of controversial travel ban
US President Donald Trump instituted a long-anticipated travel ban on Thursday, prohibiting US entry to citizens from 12 countries and restricting the entry of citizens from seven others. Trump's proclamation 'fully' restricts nationals from largely African and Muslim countries, including Afghanistan, Chad, the Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Yemen, and Myanmar from entering the US. It also partially restricts nationals from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela. In a video he released on social media on Thursday, Trump said the Colorado attack had 'underscored the extreme dangers posed by foreign nationals who are not properly vetted'. The suspect in the attack is alleged to be an Egyptian national who overstayed his visa and previously lived in Kuwait. Rumors had been circulating for months about what countries would be on the list after Trump signed an executive order on 20 January and gave the US State Department 60 days to identify countries for which 'vetting and screening information is so deficient as to warrant a partial or full suspension on the admission of nationals from those countries'. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters According to the Trump administration, the ban is designed to 'protect its citizens from aliens who intend to commit terrorist attacks, threaten our national security, espouse hateful ideology, or otherwise exploit the immigration laws for malevolent purposes'. How does the ban work? The order goes into effect at midnight on 9 June, and both the full and partial bans apply to foreign nationals from the designated countries who are outside the country on 9 June and do not have a valid visa as of that day. The proclamation outlines that no visas issued before that date will be revoked. Citizens from countries facing a complete ban will not be issued any non-immigrant or immigrant visas. Countries facing a partial restriction will see the suspension of entry of all immigrants and the following temporary visas: B-1, B-2, B-1/B-2, F, M, and J visas. The order has made room for exceptions including the following: any lawful permanent resident of the United States; dual nationals; diplomats travelling on valid non-immigrant visas; athletes or members of an athletic team and immediate relatives; travelling for the World Cup, the Olympics or other major sporting event; immediate family immigrant visas; adoptions; Afghan special immigrant visas; special immigrant visas for United States government employees; immigrant visas for ethnic and religious minorities facing persecution in Iran. 'Unecessary and ideologically motivated' Nihad Awad, national executive director of the Muslim civil rights organisation, the Council on American-Islamic Relations, said in a statement released on Wednesday that Trump's new travel ban 'is overbroad, unnecessary and ideologically motivated'. 'Are they troublemakers?': Trump questions why Harvard has so many international students Read More » He criticised the targeting of mostly Muslim and African nations and said it raised 'the specter of more vague free speech restrictions'. "Automatically banning students, workers, tourists, and other citizens of these targeted nations from coming to the United States will not make our nation safer." He added that the screening tests being undertaken by the US government were "vague" and could easily be abused to ban immigrants based on religion or political activism. He said the new travel ban risks separating families, deprives students of educational opportunities, blocks patients from accessing unique medical treatment, and would create a chilling effect on travellers. 'Automatically banning anyone based on their nationality or vague allegations of 'hostile attitudes' to American culture or policies undermines our nation's values,' he added. World reacts Like Trump's controversial tariffs, the latest iteration of the travel ban has continued to ruffle feathers and wear leaders down. Venezuela's interior minister, Diosdado Cabello, lambasted the Trump administration as 'bad people' on state television, saying 'they are supremacists who think they own the world and persecute our people for no reason". "The truth is being in the United States is a big risk for anybody, not just for Venezuelans," he added. Meanwhile, the ban prompted Chad's president, Mahamat Deby, to issue a reciprocal ban on US citizens. In a statement, he said, 'Chad has no planes to offer, no billions of dollars to give, but Chad has its dignity and pride'. Republic of Congo government spokesman Thierry Moungalla told a news conference he thought it was 'a misunderstanding'. 'Congo is not a terrorist country, does not harbour any terrorists, is not known to have a terrorist inclination,' he said. The Somali ambassador to the US, Dahir Hassan Abdi, took a more resigned tone. He said in a statement that Mogadishu 'values its longstanding relationship with the United States. [Somalia] stands ready to engage in dialogue to address the concerns raised'. Trump's history with travel bans Six of the countries on the new list were on different iterations of Trump's 2017 predominantly Muslim travel ban list, and continue to remain on the banned list. These countries include Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Yemen, and Venezuela. Trump upset national sensibilities when he issued a "Muslim" travel ban within a week of taking office during his first term in January 2017. The countries on his original list were seven Muslim-majority countries: Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen. The order also indefinitely suspended the entry of Syrian refugees This order affected individuals regardless of their immigration status, including green card holders and those with employment-based visas. Travellers with valid visas and permanent residency were denied entry. Following large-scale protests and chaos at airports, courts pushed back on the ban, leading to the first ban being blocked by a temporary restraining order in Washington v. Trump in February 2017. US judge blocks Trump order banning foreign students at Harvard University Read More » Three more iterations of the ban followed, leading to numerous lawsuits being filed in federal court against the Trump administration. One of the most successful lawsuits was Trump v Hawaii, a lawsuit on behalf of the state of Hawaii, where the Muslim Association of Hawaii, Dr Ismail Elshikh, and two John Doe plaintiffs challenged the various iterations of the ban. After Trump issued the second iteration of the ban in March 2017, the Hawaii district court issued a nationwide injunction against the second version of the ban, which was affirmed by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals on 12 June 2017. The Court prohibited the government from enforcing the ban against foreign nationals who possess a 'bona fide relationship' with a person or entity in the US. But the government interpreted that ruling narrowly, issuing new guidance that would still ban 'grandparents, grandchildren, aunts, uncles, nieces, nephews, cousins, brothers-in-law and sisters-in-law, fiancés, and any other 'extended' family members' on the theory that they are not 'close' family. In July 2017, the Hawaii district court ruled that this definition 'represents the antithesis of common sense' and prevented the government from enforcing it. After a government appeal, the Ninth Circuit largely left the district court's order relating to travel, in place, while staying part of the order relating to refugees. Trump issued a third iteration of the ban in September 2017, and the lawsuit returned to the Hawaii district court. The court ruled that it violated the Immigration and Nationality Act, the Ninth Circuit affirmed, but the Supreme Court permitted Muslim Ban 3.0 to go into effect as appeals progressed. In January 2018, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the case and eventually reversed the grant of a preliminary injunction after a 5–4 decision. The third iteration of the ban imposed full visa restrictions on citizens from eight nations, six of them predominantly Muslim. These countries included Chad, Iran, Libya, North Korea, Syria, Venezuela, Yemen, and Somalia. Iranian nationals were allowed to enter under valid student (F and M) and exchange visitor (J) visas, although such individuals were subject to 'enhanced screening and vetting requirements'. In January 2020, a fourth travel ban was instituted and included additional countries such as Eritrea, Kyrgyzstan, Myanmar, Nigeria, Sudan, and Tanzania, which restricted applications to immigrants from those countries but did not restrict entry by non-immigrants.
Sharjah 24
2 days ago
- Sharjah 24
Trump signs proclamation banning citizens from 12 countries
Part of broader immigration crackdown The directive is part of Trump's broader immigration agenda in his second term, which includes mass deportations, restrictions on student visas, and removal of suspected gang members—especially Venezuelans—back to their home country. Countries affected by the travel ban The ban fully restricts entry from the following 12 countries: Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen. In addition, Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela face partial travel restrictions. Trump: Security first In a video posted on X, Trump said: 'We will not allow people to enter our country who wish to do us harm.' He noted that the list could be revised and that new countries might be added. The order goes into effect on June 9, 2025, at 12:01 a.m. EDT. Visas issued before that date will remain valid. African Union expresses concern The African Union Commission raised concerns about the impact of the travel ban on diplomacy, trade, and educational exchanges. In a statement, it called on the US to engage in 'constructive dialogue' with the affected nations and adopt a more consultative approach. Background: Trump's previous travel bans During his first term (2017–2021), Trump imposed a travel ban on seven Muslim-majority countries—a policy that faced legal battles but was eventually upheld by the Supreme Court in 2018. His successor, Joe Biden, repealed the ban in 2021, calling it 'a stain on our national conscience.' Reasons cited for ban Trump said the most heavily restricted countries harbor a strong terrorist presence, lack proper identity verification systems, and have poor visa record-keeping and high overstay rates. 'We cannot have open migration from any country where we cannot safely and reliably vet and screen those who seek to enter,' he said. He referenced a recent incident in Colorado involving a gasoline bomb attack by an Egyptian national with an expired visa, although Egypt is not on the current ban list. Mixed international reactions Somalia pledged to work with the U.S. to address concerns, reaffirming its strong ties with Washington. In contrast, Venezuelan Interior Minister Diosdado Cabello criticized the ban, calling the US government fascist and warning Venezuelans of the risks of staying in the U.S. Other countries, including Afghanistan and Myanmar, did not immediately respond to the policy. Personal Impact: Programmes and dreams disrupted The ban has already begun to affect individuals. A 31-year-old teacher from Myanmar, accepted into a U.S. exchange programme, said her plans are now uncertain. 'It is not easy to apply nor get accepted,' she said, expressing frustration at the lack of updates after the ban announcement. Policy roots and political strategy Trump previewed this expanded travel ban during a 2023 campaign speech, targeting several regions including Gaza, Libya, and Somalia. He also signed an executive order in January requiring stricter vetting for all foreign nationals entering the US Initial report and media coverage The new travel restrictions were first reported by CBS News, while Reuters had earlier indicated that such measures were under consideration for dozens of countries.
Middle East Eye
2 days ago
- Middle East Eye
Israel's victims in Gaza are nameless in western media. These are their names
A man in a green shirt stands in a Gaza hospital, phone in hand, making a call. "Hello, Hany, come to the hospital. Hany, please come. Send someone. My children died, Hany. Both my sons - they're gone." He hangs up, whispering: "Oh Allah…" Another man, who seems to know him, approaches and asks: "Abu Muhannad, what happened?" He breaks down in tears. "My sons died. Muhannad and Mohammed. They both died. They're gone. I swear to God - they're gone. My sons are gone." New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters This is not fiction. It's a video from one of Gaza's hospitals, where grief is documented in real time. This is not the lonely cry of one man echoing through a hospital corridor. It is one of countless screams confirming that a genocide is unfolding - one body, one child, one neighbourhood at a time. As Israeli ground troops begin their policy of ethnic cleansing in northern Gaza, civilians across the south are - once again - being herded into ever-shrinking spaces where there is no safety from the bombardment. Scrolling horror I spend hours each day scrolling through Telegram channels showing what Amnesty International has described as a "live-streamed genocide". The pain, the horror, the fear, the blood - along with forced starvation and expulsion - are all visible on our screens. Wounded people flood into Al-Awda Hospital in central Gaza after an F-16 air strike on the Al-Hassayna UN school in al-Nuseirat refugee camp, where displaced families had sought shelter. The pain, the horror, the fear, the blood - along with forced starvation and expulsion - are all visible on our screens The names of those killed begin to scroll: five martyrs - Ayda, Asmaa, Yasir, Ismail, Ashraf. Then three more: Awni, Alaa, Mohammed, and many others still uncounted. Soon, videos of the massacre begin to surface. Footage from Al-Awda Hospital in Deir al-Balah shows rows of wounded children. A baby lies in blood-soaked clothes while doctors wrap bandages around his head. He cries while sucking his fingers - perhaps from hunger, perhaps for comfort. In another clip, a father cradles his injured daughter while medics fight to save her shattered limbs. These are the images millions of Americans and Europeans will never see, protected in their bubbled living rooms by corporate propaganda news that shields them from such sights - atrocities that may lead them to question what their governments are supporting. Follow Middle East Eye's live coverage of the Israel-Palestine war Then another video of the same massacre: Mahmoud Allouh, a correspondent for Al-Ghad TV, rushes into the hospital carrying his bloodied daughter. He darts between the wards, searching for space. There are no beds left. He lays her beside another wounded child. The girl starts to cry. A voice behind the camera murmurs: "What happened?" Mahmoud points at his daughter: "Here is what happened." "She's lucky," my all-too-aware son whispered behind my shoulder. "At least she has a bed - and a father." Not every child in Gaza does. 'Where should we go?' More news floods in. This time, from my hometown, Khan Younis, where more evacuation orders have been issued and desperate families are fleeing again. A video shows a man running through rubble-strewn streets with his elderly mother on his back, crying out: "Where should we go?" Many will go to Al-Mawasi - perhaps to be bombed in tents rather than their own homes. The news doesn't stop. The Abu Daqqa family home was targeted in eastern Khan Younis. Jumana Abu Daqqa, the mother, was killed along with her four young children - Wesam, Julan, Jilan and Siraj. Israel killed my family and destroyed my home. The world just kept scrolling Read More » Another artillery strike hit the Al-Omur neighbourhood in Al-Fukhari, also in east Khan Younis, wiping out an entire family: Safaa al-Omur and her six daughters - Sama, Lamma, Saja, Leen, Layan and Nada. All gone in the blink of an eye. Then came the bombardment of a makeshift encampment in Al-Mawasi - the hell zone - what the Israeli army misleadingly called a "safe zone". In less than an hour, around 10 strikes hit the area. One of them obliterated the Kassab family's tent in the southern part of Al-Mawasi, wiping out the entire family. Abeer, the mother, was killed along with her six children: her four daughters - Qamar, Samira, Abeer and Shireen - and her two sons, Imad and Ghali. The attacks come so fast, one after another, it's hard to catch my breath. It feels as though the Israeli occupation forces are racing against time to annihilate as much as they can, as quickly as possible. The Israeli human rights organisation B'Tselem has declared: "Israel is carrying out a deliberate, systematic campaign of ethnic cleansing in the Gaza Strip." 'They are killing us like chickens' Still, the news doesn't stop. In northern Gaza, Israeli forces bombed the power generators at the besieged Indonesian Hospital - one of the last remaining medical lifelines in the north. The rest are out of service. This caused a total power outage that now threatens the lives of every patient still breathing. Calls to the Palestinian Red Crescent Society to coordinate firefighting efforts go unanswered. Similarly, Khan Younis's Nasser Hospital is "suffering immensely" from a shortage of medical supplies after an Israeli attack hit a medical warehouse in the early morning on 19 May. This is not collateral damage. It is a deliberate strategy - a methodical execution of a declared plan, since the much-argued bombing of the al-Ahli Hospital on 17 October 2023, which killed about 500 people. As I write, all hospitals in northern Gaza are currently out of service. Then Gaza City was struck. The target: the al-Khour family in the Sabra neighbourhood - where I lived for two years in the 1990s, after I began working in Gaza. Six members of the family were killed, and many others were wounded. Still, the news floods in faster than I can absorb. I am reminded of words my brother said to me almost a year and a half ago: "We survived, but we don't know what tomorrow holds. It is like living in a chicken coop, waiting to be slaughtered. Every day, they come and pick 300, 400 or 500 to slaughter. Our turn is yet to come." Molly Moore in The Washington Post quoted an older woman in southern Gaza saying much the same more than 20 years ago: "They are killing us like chickens." Dying nameless And yet on and on it goes - back to 1967 and 1948. The horror of that woman in southern Gaza in 2002 is now seen multiple times a day all over the coastal territory. Then we at least had names. Now we die nameless - no western journalist fighting to learn our names, to tell the story of the headless men, women and children killed as they slept in their homes or tents. Each day brings a tally of more than 100 Palestinians killed. Since Nakba Day on 15 May, Israel has killed nearly 150 people a day. On 15 May alone: 120 lives lost. On 16 May: 125. On 17 May: 146. On 18 May: another 140. The numbers mount. The horror deepens. States could acknowledge the genocide. They could impose arms embargoes, block Israeli ports, and sever diplomatic and economic ties. But they choose not to Amid the smoke, the rubble, and the silence of the world, the question remains for the two million souls trapped in the Gaza concentration camp and on the move from one place to another: Where should we go? Israel's policy is not just rhetoric - it is a genocidal policy in action. Yet the world's response remains swallowed by moral decay disguised as diplomacy. Finally, after more than 54,000 Palestinians have been killed - the vast majority women and children - Britain, France and Canada issued a joint statement threatening "targeted sanctions" against Israel if its expanded attack on Gaza continues. While such measures may appear to be a step in the right direction, they are woefully insufficient in the face of genocide, in the face of Gaza's killing fields and the systematic erasure of entire families. This is not just a failure of politics or diplomacy - it is a collapse of our shared humanity. Palestinians are not asking for sympathy. We are demanding accountability under international law. As legal scholar Noura Erakat reminds us, this is not a failure of law: "There is sufficient law to end the genocide. To lift the blockade. To end the occupation. And to realise Palestinian self-determination." The world has the legal tools to act. States could acknowledge the genocide. They could impose arms embargoes, block Israeli ports, and sever diplomatic and economic ties. But they choose not to. They choose impunity. Until foreign governments choose differently, Palestinians will continue to live in a world where journalists carry their injured children instead of cameras, where doctors operate by torchlight, and where a child's scream is the only proof of life. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.
