
MI6 gets its first female chief - but here's 5 top UK jobs that a woman has never done
For the first time ever a woman has been appointed the head of the UK's Secret Intelligence Service.
Career spy Blaise Metreweli will become the 18th chief of MI6 in the autumn when Sir Richard Moore steps down.
Her appointment follows in the footsteps of the other main spy agencies, GCHQ, which currently has a female director, Anne Keast-Butler, and MI5, which has had two female directors.
However, there are still a handful of powerful positions in the UK that have never been held by a woman. Here are five of some of the most high-profile.
Leader of the Labour Party
There might be more female MPs than ever in this current Parliament, but a woman has never been elected as head of the Labour Party.
Margaret Beckett, who served as the first female foreign secretary under Tony Blair in the early 2000s, technically became the first ever female Labour leader after the death of John Smith in 1994. Likewise, Harriet Harman also had the role in a caretaker capacity twice, after the resignation of Gordon Brown in 2010 and Ed Miliband in 2015.
But it remains that a woman has never been elected to lead the party.
During the last Labour leadership election in 2020, two female candidates, Rebecca Long-Bailey and Lisa Nandy, came close, but it was Sir Keir Starmer who triumphed, denying a female MP the top job.
Speaking on Sky's Electoral Dysfunction podcast - which Harman is co-host of - last year, the politician said it is "shameful" that her party has never had a woman in the top job.
"It is sort of embarrassing and sort of shameful that we think we are the party of women and equality when we have never had a woman leader and the Conservatives have had three," Harman said.
"I keep saying to the men in the Labour Party, be ambitious, that's a good thing, but strive to be deputy.
"They all want to be leader, but they have got to just now strive to be deputy and support a woman leader. It takes a strong man to be leader, but an even stronger man to support a woman as leader."
49:15
Head of the Bank of England
One of England's most important officials, the head of the Bank of England, has always been a man.
The role, which also involves heading up the country's Monetary Policy Committee (MPC), is currently held by Andrew Bailey. Before him, it was Mark Carney - who was the first non-Briton to be appointed to the role - and before him, Mervyn King.
In its latest annual report on the gender pay gap, the Bank of England said only 35% of employees in the highest-paid quarter are women, with women on average earning 83p for every £1 that men earn an hour.
However, after the appointment of Clare Lombardelli as deputy governor for Monetary Policy in July last year, five of the nine positions on the MPC are now filled by women for the first time in its history.
Mr Bailey's term as Bank of England chief will come to an end in 2028, which could pave the way for the first ever woman leader.
Archbishop of Canterbury
Women have been ordained in the Church of England for a number of years. In fact in 2015 Bishop Libby Lane became the first woman to be consecrated (formally ordained).
But no woman has ever been in the top role - the Archbishop of Canterbury.
The archbishop is the most senior bishop and is the spiritual leader of the church and worldwide Anglican Communion. After the resignation of Justin Welby in January, the chance for a woman archbishop is more likely than ever.
Last year, the Archbishop of York, Stephen Cottrell, who has stepped in as Mr Welby's replacement, told The Guardian that he would welcome a woman in the top role, adding that he expects some of his "excellent female colleagues" to be put forward as candidates.
However, Martyn Percy, a priest and theologian, told Catholic newspaper La Croix International that some members of the Crown Nominations Commission (CNC). which helps appoint the Archbishop of Canterbury, may oppose female bishops.
Manager of England's men's football team
The manager of England's men's team has always been a man.
The only one to seemingly have come close is Sarina Wiegman, manager of England's women, who was hotly tipped as an outsider to succeed Gareth Southgate. But it was Thomas Tuchel who landed the job in the end.
Wiegman has said in the past it is "only a matter of time" before women are coaching men's teams in the professional game, but some of her counterparts disagree.
Former Chelsea women's head coach Emma Hayes, said last year there is still work to be done.
She said: "I've said this a million times over - you can find a female pilot, a female doctor, a female lawyer, a female banker, but you can't find a female coach working in the men's game, leading men. It just shows you how much work there is to be done."
Director-general of the BBC
When Tony Hall stepped down as the BBC director-general in 2020, there were calls for his successor to be a woman, but the job went to Tim Davie instead.
Speaking in April this year, former Newsnight presenter and BBC Radio 4 presenter Kirsty Walk said she thinks the reason why the job has never gone to a woman is because the corporation needs to "be a bit more adventurous".
"It's definitely not because there hasn't been anyone good enough. I can think of three women who would be brilliant," she told The Telegraph.
"We've got brilliant women running departments and running programmes, but I think we just need to be a bit more adventurous.
"The BBC has so many other ways it's on the front foot - technology, iPlayer, BBC audio and other things - and I would really love to see a woman take hold of that."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
18 minutes ago
- BBC News
Casey report pulls no punches - but will it lead to meaningful change?
Baroness Louise Casey's report into group-based sexual exploitation pulls no punches in its description of the failures at all levels to tackle what it calls one of the most horrendous crimes in our the question many will be asking is will her report bring about meaningful change?Certainly, for survivors of abuse, who have often had to fight hard to get their voices heard, practical, on-the-ground change will be government accepted all Baroness Casey's recommendations, but the grooming gangs report itself made the point that many of the problems highlighted have been known about for years – yet there was a failure to act over decades. The report said too often the children being abused were blamed, not helped."If we'd got this right years ago – seeing these girls as children raped rather than 'wayward teenagers' or collaborators in their abuse, collecting ethnicity data, and acknowledging as a system that we did not do a good enough job - then I doubt we'd be in this place now," Baroness Casey said in her foreword to the fact, if you were to read many past reports, including Baroness Casey's own 2015 investigation into the failure to tackle grooming gangs by Rotherham Council, you would find many of the same issues being instance, ten years ago she recommended tighter checks on Rotherham taxis because of their use by grooming gangs. In Monday's audit she called for legal loopholes to be closed nationally so cab drivers can't simply move to another area to get a she described the lack of action by the authorities over the years as "denial" or a collective "blindness", particularly when it comes to the ethnicity of government has accepted her call for better data collection on the ethnicity of grooming gang suspects and has promised research into what that tells us about the factors driving reliable information, Baroness Casey argues there is a vacuum which different sides can use to "suit the ends of those presenting it."The national inquiry will be watched closely to again see if its recommendations are put into one experienced lawyer put it, this can't be another exercise in simply gathering evidence and producing recommendations that are quietly shelved.


The Guardian
18 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Abortion laws in England and Wales face biggest shake-up in nearly 60 years
Parliament is set to vote on whether to decriminalise abortion on Tuesday, in what would be the biggest shake-up to reproductive rights in England and Wales in almost 60 years. Fierce battles have been fought behind the scenes, with Labour backbenchers Tonia Antoniazzi and Stella Creasy lobbying in a bid to have their rival amendments taken forward for a vote. It is understood only one will be voted on, and with Antoniazzi's being the lead amendment on the order paper, it is more than likely that hers will be selected. The amendments, which are due to be considered during the report stage of the Crime and Policing Bill, would see the biggest change to abortion law since the Abortion Act of 1967. 'Inducing a miscarriage' remains a criminal offence, with the Abortion Act setting out strict criteria under which terminations can legally take place. Calls for law reform have increased in recent years, alongside an increased number of prosecutions of women suspected of illegal abortions. Antoniazzi's amendment has a higher number of backers, with more than 170 names, and significant cross-party support, with signatories from parties including Labour, the Liberal Democrats, the Greens, the SDLP, and the Conservatives. If both the amendment and its parent bill are passed, it would mean women would no longer be prosecuted for ending their own pregnancies. However, it would not change the framework by which abortion is accessed, with time limits, telemedicine, the grounds for abortion, and the requirement for two doctors' approval all remaining in place. Among the organisations supporting a change in the law are the Royal College of Surgeons, the Royal College of Nursing, and the British Medical Association. 'Under the current laws, women who have experienced unexplained pregnancy loss may also be vulnerable to criminal investigation, and health professionals placed under unacceptable and unwarranted scrutiny,' Dr Ranee Thakar, president of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists said. 'Worryingly, the fear of being investigated by the police may deter women from seeking urgent medical attention. We believe this is not in the public interest and that these women should be treated with care and compassion, without judgment or fear of imprisonment.' Sarah Salkeld, deputy medical director at MSI Reproductive Choices, said: 'In no other part of healthcare do you face prison potentially by taking a medical treatment.' She said that during what is often a 'very upsetting scenario already,' police investigations 'can turn people's lives upside down' and that some women have spent months or years under investigation before cases were dropped. Salkeld said that 'the vast majority of people are under 10 weeks' when they have a termination, but that those who access abortion outside the legal framework are 'potentially very vulnerable people' such as those in abusive relationships, or who have serious mental health problems. Creasy's more complex amendment, seeks to go further, also removing doctors from the criminal law, and seeking to prevent abortion law from being changed by a future parliament. Several MPs have signed both amendments, although in recent days, some have withdrawn their name from Creasy's, following public and private lobbying. There has been disquiet among MPs and campaigners about the rival amendments, dividing a camp of people who essentially want to achieve the same aim. There are worries the row over the right way to improve women's rights will in fact have the opposite effect, and draw attention to what can be a divisive issue. Reform leader Nigel Farage said the current 24 week time limit is 'utterly ludicrous.' The British Pregnancy Advice Service (Bpas) has been one of the most vocal supporters of Antoniazzi's amendment – and a vocal critic of Creasy's. The second of the country's biggest abortion providers, MSI Reproductive Choices, is also backing the Antoniazzi amendment, which Louise McCudden, UK head of external affairs said, 'is designed to fix a very specific, urgent problem that we're seeing at the moment, which is women facing criminal investigation and prison for ending their own pregnancies. 'Getting abortion law reform right will take time … we don't want to rush that. But also, the women who are being investigated and facing prosecution and jail can't afford to wait.' She added that the vote would represent 'a massive milestone.' 'We see in the United States within rollbacks on reproductive rights and rollbacks on gender equality,' she said. 'So it sends a really powerful signal, not just to women here, that they're being supported, [but] also to countries around the world … that the rollback isn't inevitable.'


Telegraph
25 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Read the grooming gang report in full
Baroness Casey's review of the grooming gang scandal was published on Monday. The crossbench peer's 197-page report found that flawed data were used by public bodies to dismiss claims about Asian grooming gangs as 'sensationalised, biased or untrue'. Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, told MPs the Government would accept all its recommendations, including setting up a national inquiry into grooming gangs. You can read the report in full here.