Universal Processing Receives Prestigious Honors at the 2025 ETA TRANSACT Awards
New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - February 27, 2025) - Universal Processing ("uP"), the leading financial technology company empowering underserved businesses across America, is proud to announce that several of its team members have been recognized by the Electronic Transactions Association ("ETA"). The ETA awards are highly regarded in the payments industry, spotlighting leaders and organizations that push the boundaries of innovation and contribute significantly to the industry's growth. These awards underscore Universal Processing's commitment to excellence and innovation in the payments industry.
Sophie Zhai
To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10373/242746_3b6ac626d451689b_001full.jpg
Sophie Zhai has been distinguished as a 2025 ETA Forty Under 40 honoree. Her leadership and profound impact on the payments landscape have set new benchmarks within the industry, demonstrating the transformative potential of focused dedication and expertise. This also marks the fourth time that a member of our team has been recognized as a Forty Under 40 honoree.
"Embrace mistakes-they're proof that you're trying, learning, and growing. Every misstep is a step forward if you choose to learn from it."
Aris Gao
To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10373/242746_3b6ac626d451689b_002full.jpg
Aris Gao, a dedicated and visionary member of the uP team, has been honored with the 2025 ETA Young Payments Professionals (YPP) Award. This accolade recognizes rising stars who are reshaping the future of payments through outstanding contributions and innovative approaches.
"It is a true honor to be recognized as one of the Young Payment Professionals. This industry is evolving rapidly, and I am grateful for the opportunity to contribute to its growth. This recognition is a testament to the hard work, innovation, and teamwork that drive progress in payments. I'm excited for what's ahead."
Additionally, Mingxi Chen and Catherine Xu have both been celebrated as Top Payments Sales Professionals. Their exceptional ability to drive strategic growth and navigate complex market dynamics has significantly contributed to the company's success as well as the broader payments ecosystem.
"These distinguished recognitions from the ETA celebrate the hard work and innovative spirit of our talented team," said Saint Hung, CEO of Universal Processing. "We are immensely proud of Catherine, Mingxi, Aris and Sophie for their well-deserved honors and for their transcendent performance within the payments industry."
Universal Processing is looking forward to celebrating at TRANSACT 2025 in Las Vegas, April 2-4, where the leaders in payments will come together to recognize their achievements.
About Universal Processing
Founded in 2003, Universal Processing is a leading financial technology company dedicated to empowering underserved businesses with innovative payment processing solutions and exceptional support. Recognized for its commitment to fostering economic growth, Universal Processing partners with over 34,000 businesses and processes more than $3.5 billion annually. For more information about Universal Processing and its services, please visit www.letsgoup.com.
About ETA
The Electronic Transactions Association (ETA) is the world's leading advocacy and trade association for the payments industry. Its members span the breadth of payments and fintech companies, from the largest incumbent players to the emerging disruptors in the U.S. and in more than a dozen countries around the world. ETA members make commerce possible by processing approximately $52.7 trillion annually in purchases and P2P payments worldwide and deploying payments innovation to merchants and consumers.
Media Contact：
Yin Yupr@letsgoup.com
To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/242746
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNET
25 minutes ago
- CNET
After 20 Years of Reviewing TVs, I Actually Found One with Good Sound
CNET's key takeaways The Roku Pro Series (2025) features some of the best sound quality I have heard in years of testing AV equipment. Based on preliminary tests, the TV appears to perform better than the existing Pro series for audio and picture quality. While it sounds good for a TV, a soundbar with a wireless subwoofer will sound even better. As a 20-year veteran of TV and soundbar reviews, I can say, with certainty, that you can't expect good sound from a television. Sound quality may be a priority for you and me, but today's TVs typically perform on a spectrum somewhere between muddy and indistinct. The reason for this is that a flat-screen TV is inherently compromised, and onboard sound is usually one of the last considerations. As a result of this, if you want to buy a TV, you almost definitely need some sort of external speaker. Then again, there are rare exceptions like the newest Roku Pro Series TV, which goes on sale Tuesday and starts at $899 for the 55-inch model. The 2025 Roku Pro Series continues the thoughtful touches of previous models -- tool-less stands, an on-TV remote finder -- and adds even better sound to the mix. Other companies, such as Loewe and Panasonic, have even tried making soundbars a part of the TV, though with varying degrees of success. I've heard those TVs, and they're typically expensive flagships, but the Roku is simply trying to do what any TV should: Make dialogue understandable and not require a separate purchase. Also read: Best TVs of 2025 The designer of the TV's sound system, Roku's Kasper Andersen, told me he came up with the idea for its unique sound drivers during the pandemic, when he was left to his own devices in an empty audio lab. Andersen's "compression loaded" system appears to work like a horn speaker in that it pipes sound through a tapered opening, which helps reduce the muddying reflections that usually occur in TV speakers. To help achieve this, this speaker system is side-mounted, while most TVs point their speakers down, or even back, resulting in muffled or even 'ghostly' sound. The Roku Pro TV is not perfect. For instance, there was noticeable audio compression during loud sequences. But this is acceptable for a TV speaker and something I've even experienced with some soundbars. At the same price as the model it replaces, the Roku Pro Series TV is well put-together, sounds great and, based on initial tests, has picture quality that is better than before. If it performs as well as I anticipate, the new Roku Pro Series could be the TV to beat for the price. My experience with the Roku Pro Series Listening to Nick Cave on the new Roku Pro Series. Ty Pendlebury/CNET I tested the new Roku Pro's sound against its predecessor, also called the Roku Pro, as well as a high-end 2025 LCD, the Hisense U8Q. I tested each one using a mix of movies and music to see how the TVs performed when playing dynamic material. I started my evaluations with one of my soundbar benchmarks," a scene from Avatar that combines surround effects, quiet dialogue and dynamic explosions: the Thanator chase. Of the three TVs, the new Roku Pro was able to convey the deep rumble of the Hammerhead Titanotheres as well as the high-end energy of buzzing insects. It was also best able to convey a stereo image. At the start of the scene, Jake (Sam Worthington) leaves Grace (Sigourney Weaver) behind in a clearing, and the new Roku's audio system followed her position as it moved across the screen. However, not surprisingly, I found that the TV didn't deal with big dynamic swings as well as a full audio system might. I could hear the audio peaks compress when the Thanator chased Jake under a tree, and as he fired rounds at the creature. Yet, this is no sin; I've heard great soundbars like the Zvox SB500 do the same thing. The TV is essentially throttling the sound to prevent distortion or, worse, damage. I then switched to the Hisense and found that this TV was not at all convincing with this scene. While Grace's voice sounded front and center on both Roku TVs, she sounded like she was in another room on the Hisense. Her voice was muffled and indistinct. While the older Roku Pro still sounds pretty good, I found it could not reproduce bass at all. While listening to Peter Gabriel's track, Olive Tree, on both Roku TVs, I heard a thick bed of bass on the new Pro, where there was nothing but a flatulent pop on the older TV. You know when someone drives past listening to bass-heavy music and the subwoofer is so loud it sounds like the car is going to fall apart? That's what Nick Cave's Red Right Hand sounded like on the Hisense U8K. I even held the mount and the back of the TV, and the rattle was coming from inside the TV. One of my few complaints about the Roku Pro Series is that, while you can add Roku speakers, you can't add a standalone subwoofer. Granting this ability may reduce the dynamic compression artifacts I heard, as the sub can then take the hit and leave the TV's speakers to produce dialogue. I did perform a brief picture quality comparison, though only the older Roku had had its picture evaluated with a Konica Minolta CS2000 spectroradiometer. The other TVs were simply set in Filmmaker mode. Using a test scene from the war movie 1917, I found the new Roku had more solidity and better contrast than the other TVs. The Roku also had finer shadow detail than the Hisense, which was surprising given the Hisense is around 2.5 times the price. While I'm going to leave my thoughts for a full review, I can at least say that the black levels of the new Roku have improved over the previous generation's. The specs Sizes: 55-inch ($899), 65-inch ($1,199), 75-inch ($1,699) Resolution: 4K Technology: Mini-LED LCD with QLED Refresh rate: 120Hz, AMD FreeSync Premium Pro, ALLM HDR support: HDR10 Plus, Dolby Vision, Dolby Vision IQ Connectivity: Bluetooth, Wi-Fi 6 HDMI: 4, including eARC CNET's buying advice The No. 1 reason to buy a TV has been, and should always be, how good its picture quality is. Yet this shouldn't mean that sound quality can't be No. 2 on the list, especially when your budget is tight. While I'm still in the process of evaluating the Roku Pro's display, I can say that this is one of the better TVs I've heard, and at any price. It's worth mentioning that the existing model is currently being sold at a 30% discount to make way for the new TVs, and while its black levels don't appear to be as good, this is still a relatively accurate TV. It's also great at playing video games, and may be a decent deal if you're looking for a secondary TV for a playroom or bedroom.
Skift
an hour ago
- Skift
Corporate Travel's New Boss: The Finance Department
Finance teams have quietly become power players in corporate travel. The shift began years ago but has sped up post-pandemic. The challenge now? Ensuring that the traveler experience and domain expertise aren't lost in the numbers. The balance of power in corporate travel decision-making has been shifting for years — but in 2025, the trend has become unmistakable. Travel programs, once firmly in the hands of procurement or travel departments, are now increasingly led or co-owned by finance teams. According to travel managers interviewed by Skift, finance is no longer just reviewing expense reports — it's shaping policy, selecting platforms, and tightening oversight. 'We provide input, but HR, finance, and procurement all weigh in,' said Sushant Saini, a corporate travel and expense manager. 'Post-Covid, finance has taken a much more active role. They're focused on every detail.' One travel manager, who requested anonymity, said the shift began before the pandemic but accelerated significantly during it. Do Finance Departments See the Whole Picture? Companies are embracing a more cross-functional approach to travel management, but the finance-first mindset is clearly gaining ground. In many organizations, finance departments now hold primary or shared ownership over travel policy, signaling a deeper strategic integration. While the increased structure and data rigor are welcomed, the transition hasn't been frictionless. 'Travel management goes beyond numbers and data,' Saini said. 'While finance brings structure, travel requires soft skills and negotiation to deliver real value. Being proactive and using smarter tools helps build trust across teams.' The anonymous travel manager echoed the sentiment. 'Finance often overlooks the human side of travel programs. Sometimes you need to be more than logical to get better deals or compliance,' she said. Still, both agreed that finance's growing role — when paired with the operational expertise of travel managers — has the potential to create smarter, more agile programs. Travel Managers Adapt to Finance's Growing Influence Travel Management Companies (TMCs) are rolling out new tools to support finance's deeper role in travel oversight. 'Eighty-one percent of CFOs now see themselves as primary growth drivers,' said Chris Juneau, SVP of Product Marketing at SAP Concur, citing findings from the company's CFO Insights report. Concur's new tools, including Concur Verify and the AI copilot Joule, aim to improve accuracy, streamline expense audits, and deliver real-time analytics. At Navan, Chief Financial Officer Amy Butte emphasized the need for visibility and control. 'In the past, finance only saw travel spend after the fact,' Butte said. 'Now, with our Advanced Analytics, they can spot trends, policy violations, and savings opportunities in real time.' Emburse: General Motors Finance Had Improved Control Emburse CEO Marne Martin said its Travel and Expense Analytics platform was built to solve finance leaders' pain points, including fragmented systems, unclear data, and poor visibility. Martin cited General Mills as a case study. With over 34,000 employees, General Mills adopted Emburse Go to centralize travel and expense management via a mobile app. This helped improve compliance and gave finance and employees better control and visibility. AI-driven features, Martin said, are increasingly helping finance teams enforce policies dynamically, adjusting per diems by city, identifying fraud, and analyzing spending behavior with little manual intervention.
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
3 Key Tax Considerations For The $1,000 Trump Savings Accounts
WASHINGTON, DC - MARCH 06: U.S. President Donald Trump speaks (Photo by) An important provision in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act passed by the House of Representatives is the creation of the Trump Accounts. According to a Forbes article, these savings accounts will be funded by the federal government and they will provide each baby born between January 1, 2025, and December 31, 2028, with $1,000 for investment. This benefit is a unique solution to some of the problems plaguing taxpayers who struggle to invest in their and their children's future. The Milken Institute estimates that this $1,000 investment would grow to over $8,000 by the time the child reaches the age of 18, providing substantial financial support that can be used for education, starting a business, or property ownership. According to CNBC, business leaders like Michael Dell (Dell Technologies), Dara Khosrowshahi (Uber), and David Solomon (Goldman Sachs) have all pledged significant support for this proposal. Despite the benefits of receiving $1,000 from the federal government, the initial set of rules is complicated, and there are three crucial tax considerations based on the current drafting of this provision. Stock prices go up and down on a continuous basis. Investors do not pay taxes on those fluctuations. When investors dispose of their stock, they recognize a gain or loss on the difference between the purchase price and the sales price. However, if the stock is invested in a retirement fund (i.e., a 401k or IRA), then the gain is deferred until the money is withdrawn from the account. This allows the account to grow tax deferred. Tax deferral is a valuable financial tool since it allows taxpayers to pay current tax liabilities at a future date. Given that inflation typically hovers around a couple of percentage points, time value of money principles suggest that deferring tax liability to a future year can save the taxpayer significant amounts of money. This deferral also applied to the Trump Accounts. Taxpayers' children will receive this $1,000, and the money will be invested and tax deferred. Once the child turns 18, the money can be withdrawn, and the person can pay taxes on the difference between the current value and the initial amount invested. Built into the rules is a complex treatment for how the gains will be taxed. According to the Tax Foundation, if the funds are withdrawn and used for school tuition, a first-time home purchase, or a small business expense, they will be subject to capital gains tax. In 2025, single taxpayers who earn less than $48,350 pay 0% capital gains tax. As a typical 18-year-old does not make above this amount, these individuals will tend not to face a tax liability if the funds are applied toward one of these qualified activities. However, if the funds are applied toward a non-qualified activity, the individual will pay taxes on the gains at an ordinary rate. Even among the lowest-earning taxpayers, they would face a 10% income tax rate on this income. Even though the program provides a universal and automatic benefit to taxpayers, according to CNN, it is regressive in nature. Being regressive means that due to some of the tax considerations, it has the potential to benefit higher-earning taxpayers relatively more than lower-earning taxpayers. This relative benefit that makes it regressive is twofold. First, higher-earning taxpayers have a larger tax benefit from these funds. For instance, consider a married taxpayer with $1 million in taxable income. If this taxpayer invests $1,000 for their child when born, the high-earning taxpayer would owe 37% tax on the growth in the fund (20% if the growth receives preferential capital gain treatment). Meanwhile, a married taxpayer with a taxable income of $75,000 would only face a 12% ordinary income tax rate and would not owe any taxes if the gain qualifies for the preferential capital treatment. Thus, the tax treatment for this program has a relatively larger benefit for the higher-income taxpayer. Second, while the federal government will provide $1,000 to all children born during the specified time period, the child can have these contributions of up to $5,000 per year. Even though nothing expressly prohibits families from contributing additional funds to their children's account, this portion of the provision has a clearer benefit for higher-earning families, who are in a better position to provide the additional contributions. Put differently, this provision of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act allows taxpayers a vehicle to defer taxes, and this vehicle can be taken advantage of by higher-earning taxpayers generally more easily than lower-earning taxpayers.
