Megyn Kelly rages over ‘misleading BS' that she's ‘back in the Murdoch fold' after Fox deal
Former Fox News star Megyn Kelly is very upset over the way several media outlets have framed Fox Corporation's recent purchase of Red Seat Ventures, a media company that produces and markets podcasts by a number of conservative personalities — including Kelly.
'We are 100% INDEPENDENT,' Kelly raged in one tweet, while lashing out in another post about the 'misleading BS' that her show's 'home' was acquired by Fox.
After months of speculation that Rupert Murdoch's media empire would expand its investment in the podcast space, which included eyeing a potential acquisition of The Daily Wire, Fox announced on Monday morning that it had reached a deal with the buzzy startup Red Seat Ventures.
Besides Kelly, Red Seat's client list includes former Fox News hosts Tucker Carlson and Bill O'Reilly, who were both the conservative cable giant's top-rated anchors before they were fired and lost their primetime Fox News programs. Additionally, Red Seat works with several true crime podcasts and British tabloid journalist Piers Morgan, who moved his daily show from Murdoch's News UK and the digital streaming service Fox Nation to YouTube last year.
According to The New York Times, the deal will allow Red Seat and its founding partners, Chris and Kevin Balfe, to 'operate independently within Fox's Tubi Media Group,' which is Fox Corp's digital and streaming arm. The purchase also comes after the New York Post, another Murdoch media property, commissioned Red Seat to help the paper develop a new podcast.
'The deal means that Mr. Carlson and Mr. O'Reilly — former Fox News stars who both lost their shows — will once again be tied to the Murdoch universe, albeit at a remove. (The same goes for Ms. Kelly, who rose to fame on Fox News before leaving for NBC in 2017.) Because Red Seat is only a service provider, none of the three will be paid by Fox or report to its executives,' the Times reported. 'In addition, Tubi Media and Fox News are housed in separate divisions of the Fox Corporation.'
Kelly, meanwhile, took exception to other publications' reporting that she felt suggested she was back on the Fox News payroll.
'To be clear, Red Seat sells ads for our show. They do not 'create content' for us as Variety [reporter Brian Steinberg] claim[s],' she wrote while sharing a Variety story on the deal. 'My producers & I do that. Nor does Red Seat have any ownership in our show which is owned 100% by me. Happy for Fox & Red Seat but it has virtually nothing to do with me.'
She had a bigger issue with TheWrap's report on the purchase, which described Red Seat as the 'home' to her and other Fox News alumni.
'Look at this misleading BS,' Kelly tweeted. 'No one has acquired my show's 'home.' The 3d party firm that sells my ADS has been acquired. Thats all. The @MegynKellyShow is NOT controlled or owned by anyone other than ME.'
The ex-Fox News host was also upset over a passage in a Reuters' story on the deal, which stated that she, Carlson and O'Reilly were 'back in the Murdoch fold' following the acquisition of Red Seat.
'NO, it doesn't,' she posted. 'We are 100% INDEPENDENT. Fox bought the co that sells our ads, period.'
Following the purchase of Red Seat, Fox announced that the Tubi CEO Paul Cheesbrough will become the chairman of Red Seat. 'The creator economy is one of the fastest growing media categories worldwide by measure of reach and influence, and consumers are increasingly looking to get their information, insights, and entertainment directly from the voices and brands they trust across these platforms,' Cheesbrough said in a statement.
'Working with two outstanding entrepreneurs like Chris and Kevin, we see tremendous opportunities to drive additional scale in genres such as sports, news, and entertainment and look forward to supporting the continued growth of this business,' he added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Liverpool agree £116m deal to sign Florian Wirtz from Bayer Leverkusen
Liverpool are close to securing the signing of Florian Wirtz from Bayer Leverkusen in a British record transfer deal worth £116m. Liverpool saw two bids rejected by Leverkusen, who had initially put a £126m price tag on Wirtz, before accepting an initial £100m payment, plus bonuses of up to £16m. These bonuses are understood to be heavily tied to Liverpool winning major trophies with Wirtz playing a key role. Advertisement The fee surpasses the previous British record set by Moisés Caicedo's £115 million move to Chelsea and smashes Liverpool's own record transfer of £85 million for Darwin Núñez. It also eclipses the £75 million the club paid for Virgil van Dijk in 2018. Despite serious interest from Bayern Munich and Manchester City, Wirtz opted to join the Merseyside club after being convinced by Arne Slot's vision for the future of the team. The 22-year-old, widely regarded as one of Europe's top young talents, is believed to be excited by the prospect of being a central figure in Slot's new era at Anfield. The Bundesliga Players' Player of the Season for 2024/25, Wirtz made his debut for Leverkusen at the age of 17, and has scored 57 goals in 197 games for the club. He helped them win the Bundesliga for the first time in 2024 and has scored seven goals in 31 appearances for Germany since making his national debut in 2021. Advertisement According to Paul Joyce, Liverpool's sporting director Richard Hughes led the club's negotiations with Leverkusen's Simon Rolfes, with talks intensifying over the past few weeks. David Ornstein reports the German international has signed a five-year contract running until June 2030, and is expected to undergo a medical on Merseyside next week once the transfer window officially opens. This move signals a bold new era at Anfield under Arne Slot. The Dutchman has wasted no time in stamping his authority on the squad. Wirtz will become Liverpool's second signing of the summer following the arrival of former Leverkusen teammate Jeremie Frimpong. Both players chose Liverpool not just for the club's stature, but for the ambitious project being built under Slot's leadership. Wirtz's arrival is not just a statement of intent, it's potentially a foundation for the next great Liverpool side.
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Liverpool break British transfer record to sign £116m Florian Wirtz – and here is why
Liverpool have agreed a £116 million fee with Bayer Leverkusen for Florian Wirtz, in a deal that could become a British transfer record. After weeks of negotiations, the Premier League champions have secured the Germany international's services, with the 22-year-old becoming the most expensive Liverpool player ever. He will sign pending a medical. Advertisement Liverpool will pay an initial £100 million with a further £16 million in add-ons, based on performance triggers. Although the initial outlay does not break the British record Chelsea paid Brighton for Moises Caicedo two years ago, it has the potential to eclipse it should Wirtz's Anfield career prove successful. Liverpool hope that proves to be the case. Wirtz's arrival represents a major coup as Bayern Munich and Manchester City were forced to concede defeat in the race for his signature after he indicated his preference to move to Anfield. City withdrew after citing the financial commitment required to complete the deal, before the Bundesliga champions were also informed of Wirtz's intentions. Wirtz will be a key player for Germany at next summer's World Cup - PA/Bradley Collyer Liverpool's move will be seen as a major statement in their bid to defend their title, Wirtz becoming the second recruit as the promise of a 'big' summer is realised. Advertisement Liverpool have already bought Wirtz's former Bayer Leverkusen team-mate Jeremie Frimpong for £30 million and are expected to sign left-back Milos Kerkez from Bournemouth. The previous Anfield transfer record – the £85 million paid for Darwin Nunez in 2022 – has been shattered. Wirtz has been earmarked to play as a No 10, but is equally comfortable as a wide attacker. He was the stand-out player in a Leverkusen team that became one of Europe's most talked-about clubs. Liverpool can display Olympian levels of smugness Towards the end of Liverpool's march to their 20th title, an Anfield anniversary of sorts casually slipped by without fanfare. Advertisement It is just over two years since a lone fan arranged for a light aircraft to circle the stadium demanding owners Fenway Sports Group sell up to an unspecified organisation with 'more ambition'. 'FSG OUT – KLOPP IN – ENOUGH IS ENOUGH,' read the attached banner. Two years ago, a light aircraft circled Anfield demanding the current owners sell up - PA/Peter Byrne As commemorations go, admittedly this rates low on the notability scale of memorable Anfield moments of recent times. Nevertheless, when the plane circled it was a dilemma for the reporters rolling their eyes looking to the skies as they contemplated whether one attention-seeker reflected deep-rooted and broad frustration among the Liverpool fanbase, or if the looks of bemusement and slight embarrassment from the 55,000 fans told a more accurate story. Most of those present decided upon the latter. Advertisement The trigger for the 'protest' before Liverpool's home fixture with Manchester United in March 2023 was the club's transfer strategy over successive windows, the American owners often accused of counting the pennies with their net spend while Premier League rivals seemingly splashed out mega-millions every summer. Given Liverpool won 7-0 on the day of the aircraft stunt, the stand against the regime was as badly timed as one of Darwin Nunez's runs to beat the offside trap. Now, in the immediate aftermath of the Premier League champions committing to a British record transfer to sign Wirtz, the misguided demonstration has aged worse than a heavily botoxed Hollywood actor. Mocking aside, the anti-American sentiment was not entirely without support among those sympathetic to the idea of pressuring Liverpool's hierarchy to, if not sell up, spend more on the team. When the club confirmed they would be stepping away from the pursuit of Jude Bellingham in April 2023, for example, it triggered another episode in a long-standing philosophical debate about the pros and cons of self-sustainability models in the era of nation states with unlimited budgets, or (as subsequently occurred) clubs selling hotels and women's teams to circumvent profit and sustainability rules. Liverpool's 'moneyball' policies Predictably, supporters of Manchester City and Chelsea will note the huge fee for Wirtz and wag an accusatory finger at Liverpool and yell 'hypocrisy' as the club which has made as much noise as any about the wild west of football's transfer system has ditched the Wyatt Earp impressions and opted to go on a spree worthy of Butch Cassidy's Hole-in-the-Wall gang after a particularly profitable heist. Advertisement In reality, Wirtz's signing is entirely in keeping with Liverpool's long-standing 'moneyball' policies. The critical difference is, in the FSG era, they have never been in such a strong position to flex financial muscle befitting their status, the most seismic shift with the Wirtz deal being that 10 years ago it was unthinkable that Liverpool could go head to head with Manchester City and Bayern Munich for a transfer-record-breaking prime target and emerge victorious. They have always had the will. Now they have the way. Internally, the Anfield message in 2025 is exactly the same as when the flak about prudence was at its worst. While there are limits to what any Liverpool manager can afford, every deal is scrutinised to the same degree whether the valuation is £3.5 million, £85 million or, as in this case, heading towards £116 million. The fewer the red flags, the more likely the green light. Liverpool broke the transfer record for a central defender when they bought Virgil van Dijk in 2018. They did the same for a goalkeeper when recruiting Alisson Becker in 2019. They would have spent more than anyone in English football history for a midfielder two years ago if Moises Caicedo could have been persuaded to ditch Chelsea for Liverpool. In all instances, the decision to 'go big' was the consequence of incremental increases in revenues via commercial activity and on-field success, and the equally crucial skill of being as adept at selling as buying. Advertisement Since FSG's 2010 takeover, Liverpool's revenues have increased from less than £200 million to more than £600 million, the promise John W Henry made to oversee slow and steady progress until the club's model enabled them to pitch for the world's best spectacularly vindicated. The concept of 'Liverpool spending the Philippe Coutinho money' to sign Van Dijk and Alisson has done plenty of heavy lifting in the years since. The club would have signed Van Dijk whether Coutinho had left for Barcelona or not, as was demonstrated by the fact they had tried to do the deal six months earlier. But whatever Liverpool pay for new players this summer, they can expect to recoup plenty as the combined valuations of those available could exceed £150 million. It remains to be seen what offers materialise, but it needs no stretch of the imagination to believe Wirtz will be signed with 'the Kelleher, Nunez, Elliott, Jota and Doak money'. Harvey Elliott is expected to leave Liverpool this summer - AFP/Glyn Kirk If the Anfield board wants to display Olympian levels of smugness, they could argue that the reason they can afford Wirtz is because they were prepared to be patient a year ago, the club exceptional at ignoring the 'noise' when the social media 'influencers' equate lack of spending with lack of purpose. Advertisement For all that, the Wirtz deal is a gamble. Granted, it is a calculated and meticulously thought through one, but when you commit so much, the pressure to deliver intensifies, not just on the recruit, but on those who push hardest for his signature. Big money does not guarantee success The greater the proven quality in an elite division such as the Bundesliga, the fewer the doubts. That is why such a premium is paid. But my word, it is a hell of a lot of money for one footballer. Van Dijk and Alisson looked like no-brainers at the time they posed for their club photograph and duly delivered. Naby Keita and Nunez – who cost a combined £145 million – will be filed in the warning from history chapter, despite their impressive medal haul. Advertisement As with all such captures, Wirtz will arrive amid reassuring messages about extensive scouting, data models with performance indicators suggesting the 22-year-old is already one of the world's most creative young footballers on an upward trajectory, the presumption being his value will soar during the course of his contract. The mini biographies will locate youth coaches who always knew he was destined for greatness and there is a reason so many of those with aspirations to win the Champions League next season wanted him. Excited supporters will see only guarantees of success, while rivals will ponder – as Liverpool often have when musing upon the huge fees paid by others – if signing one player for the price of three truly is good value. Either way, Wirtz's Anfield arrival is not just a statement. It is the shoutiest proclamation of intent as Liverpool look to defend their crown and pursue the Champions League. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why Trooping the Color Is More Than Just a Parade for the Royal Family
Why Trooping the Color Is More Than Just a Parade for the Royal Family originally appeared on Parade. Each June, the royal family gathers at Buckingham Palace for Trooping the Color, a centuries-old tradition steeped in pageantry and national pride. This grand event brings together nearly all senior members of the monarchy in a vibrant display of unity, all to honor the legacy of one central figure: the reigning monarch. But the event is more than just a parade, here's why. Trooping the Color is a ceremonial event performed every year on Horse Guards Parade in London, United Kingdom, by regiments of the Household Division to celebrate the official birthday of the British sovereign. However, the event is not actually held on the ruler's birthday. Typically, the event is held in June due to the chance of good weather. Thousands show up to support the royal family and to watch the pageantry they are famous for. However, Trooping the Color is more than just a birthday parade. Per Hello! it is filled with activities such as a procession down the Mall, including the royal family and the Household Cavalry, a 41-gun salute to mark the King's official birthday, and a Royal Air Force flypast. Parade Daily🎬 SIGN UP for Parade's Daily newsletter to get the latest pop culture news & celebrity interviews delivered right to your inbox 🎬 It features the royal family in a positive light as they participate in the aforementioned events and interact with the public. This year, King Charles and Camilla Parker Bowles will attend, as well as Prince William, Kate Middleton, Prince George, Princess Charlotte, and Prince Louis. Prince Edward and Duchess Sophie will also be in attendance as will Princess Anne and her husband, Vice Admiral Sir Timothy James Hamilton Laurence. The Prince of Wales and the Duke of Edinburgh are expected to ride on horseback in the procession, alongside the Princess Royal as they did in 2024. Charles will travel down the Mall in a carriage with Camilla as he continues to receive treatment for an undisclosed type of cancer. The king's second son, and his wife, , will not be in attendance during this family event. The last time the couple appeared alongside other members of the royal family on the Buckingham Palace balcony was in 2019. They left the royal family in 2020 amid growing tensions between the couple and other senior royals. Trooping the Color has taken place for over 200 years. The event will be held on Saturday, June 14 in London, England. Why Trooping the Color Is More Than Just a Parade for the Royal Family first appeared on Parade on Jun 13, 2025 This story was originally reported by Parade on Jun 13, 2025, where it first appeared.
