Lawmakers expelled from Greece's parliament over ties to jailed far-right politician
ATHENS, Greece — Three far-right lawmakers in Greece were expelled Tuesday from parliament due to ties with a jailed politician convicted of leading a criminal organization.
A court found that Vasilis Stigas, the leader of the far-right Spartans party, and two other party lawmakers had misled voters in the 2023 parliamentary election. The decision comes as concerns grow among traditionally dominant political parties over the rise of far-right parties across Europe and their willingness to disrespect democratic rules.
The court determined the three had effectively served as proxies for a former member of Golden Dawn, a neo-Nazi inspired party, who was sentenced in 2020 to 13 years in prison for orchestrating violent attacks against migrants and political opponents.
The decision, welcomed by Greece's conservative government, will reduce the number of seats in parliament from 300 to 297 for the remainder of the legislative term through 2027. It also lowers the threshold required to pass legislation from 151 votes to 149.
The Spartans party, which won 4.7% of the popular vote in 2023, has denied any affiliation with Golden Dawn and did not immediately respond to the ruling. Two remaining Spartans lawmakers will continue to serve as independents.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
E&E News
4 hours ago
- E&E News
The world just got closer to an ocean-saving treaty
NICE, France — The race to save the world's oceans is on. The United Nations Oceans Conference in Nice, France, ended Friday with promises from world leaders to ratify a global, binding agreement to help protect the world's oceans by September — paving the way for the world's very first Conference of the Parties for a High Seas Treaty next year. 'This is a considerable victory,' said French Oceans Ambassador Olivier Poivre d'Arvor in a press conference Friday. 'It's very difficult to work on oceans right now when the United States have withdrawn from almost everything. But the Argentinian president helped a lot. China [promised to ratify]. Indonesia just ratified a few hours ago. So, we won.' Advertisement If that happens, it will have been a long time coming. The negotiating process started 20 years ago and the treaty was adopted in 2023, but countries have been slow to ratify and at least 60 must do so for the treaty to come into force. With marine and coastal ecosystems facing multiple threats from climate change, fishing, and pollution, the treaty's main aim is to establish marine protected areas in international waters, which make up around two thirds of the ocean.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Oil Market Long Numb to War Risk Confronts Weekend of Worry
(Bloomberg) -- The past two years of escalating tensions in the Middle East have taught oil traders to be sanguine about the risk of disruption to oil supplies. Shuttered NY College Has Alumni Fighting Over Its Future Trump's Military Parade Has Washington Bracing for Tanks and Weaponry NYC Renters Brace for Price Hikes After Broker-Fee Ban Do World's Fairs Still Matter? As Part of a $45 Billion Push, ICE Prepares for a Vast Expansion of Detention Space The barrage of headlines has revived memories of the political upheavals and prices spikes of the 1970s — and yet even when oil prices have jumped, it inevitably proved short-lived. As Iran and Israel traded volleys of missiles in April last year and again in October, Middle Eastern oil continued to flow to the global market unaffected. Now, the latest assault by Israel is putting oil traders' nonchalance to the test. There's been no impact on supplies so far, but the strikes have shaken a market that for most of this year has been overshadowed by worries about a looming surplus driving down prices, with OPEC+ quickly unwinding production cuts and output rising elsewhere from Brazil to Guyana, while President Donald Trump's trade war threatens demand. Even if many believe that the oil market may ultimately escape unscathed, the widespread uncertainty over how strongly Iran will respond, whether Israel will launch further attacks, and how the US will react is forcing traders to price in a huge range of possible outcomes. With hours left until the end of the trading week, few were brave enough to risk going into the weekend short. Brent futures spiked as much as 13% early on Friday and settled 7% higher at about $74 a barrel. 'When there's a war on you're not going to be short anything over the weekend,' said Andreas Laskaratos, chief executive officer of energy trading house AB Commodities. 'Although the fundamentals haven't changed you can't trade against the headlines over the weekend.' Traders and analysts began to game out scenarios for possible escalation or de-escalation almost as soon as the first Israeli missiles hit Iran in the early hours of Friday morning. Laskaratos says his Europe-based traders were at their desks by about 4:30 or 5:00 a.m. Read Bloomberg's live blog on the latest from the Middle East Analysts at Goldman Sachs Group Inc. raised their oil price forecasts for the coming months $2-$3 a barrel, but laid out possible scenarios ranging from a surge in prices above $100 a barrel in the worst-case scenario, to a drop below $50 next year in their most bearish scenario. 'The potential of further escalation in the Middle East implies that the short-term risks to our price forecast are now skewed to the upside,' the analysts including Daan Struyven wrote. Still, they maintained their call for prices to drop below $60 by the fourth quarter of this year. A surge of trading in out-of-the money call options showed that many were seeking to hedge against the possibility of a price spike. Among the most traded options were call options that would pay out if prices rise above $85 a barrel by Jun. 25; a measure of the price of WTI call options relative to the price of put options surged to the highest since March 2022, when the market was rocked by Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine. The most worrying possibility for the oil market is a disruption of shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, through which about one-fifth of global oil supply flows. Most analysts reckon that's unlikely. 'It is our understanding that it would be extremely difficult for Iran to close the strait for an extended period given the presence of the US Fifth Fleet in Bahrain,' said Helima Croft, head of global commodity strategy at RBC Capital Markets LLC, and a former CIA analyst. Still, even if small, any increase in the chance of disruption is enough to drive prices. 'The possibility that the Strait of Hormuz closes is such a huge binary event, it makes forecasting balances challenging,' consultancy FGE NexantECA wrote in a report. 'Most market participants we have spoken to are not expecting the Strait of Hormuz to be closed; the consequences are just too great.' Other possible scenarios worrying oil traders include the possibility of strikes on Iran's oil infrastructure – though Israel has so far avoided that – or the potential for sanctions against Iran to be ramped up if Tehran responds to the strikes by accelerating its nuclear program. For now at least, most traders are viewing current events through the lens of recent history. 'For the past decade, events like this have been sell-the-rip situations. They didn't escalate. Fears were worse than what actually happened,' Dan Pickering, chief investment officer at Pickering Energy Partners LP, an energy-focused investment bank in Houston, wrote on X. The strikes may even turn out to be bearish. Trump on Friday called on Iran to make a deal or face 'even more brutal' attacks. If Tehran were to heed his advice, a nuclear deal would likely involve a relaxation of sanctions, potentially lifting Iran's exports. FGE NexantECA said that market participants were 'looking at the recent price action and starting to consider the events as a 'sell' opportunity.' 'However, they acknowledge that taking a short position right now is hard given the risk/expectation of further escalation in tensions in the weeks ahead.' Even if there is a disruption, OPEC+ members Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates have significant spare capacity that could be brought on to potentially help cool prices. 'It would take a lot of courage for someone to go against it but that said we can't see this rally being sustained in the long term,' said Laskaratos of AB Commodities. 'We don't believe the fundamentals have changed on supply and demand as things stand.' --With assistance from Anthony Di Paola, Nayla Razzouk, Salma El Wardany, Hayley Warren and Demetrios Pogkas. American Mid: Hampton Inn's Good-Enough Formula for World Domination The Spying Scandal Rocking the World of HR Software New Grads Join Worst Entry-Level Job Market in Years As Companies Abandon Climate Pledges, Is There a Silver Lining? US Tariffs Threaten to Derail Vietnam's Historic Industrial Boom ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Wall Street Journal
5 hours ago
- Wall Street Journal
Verrocchio's Equestrian Statue of Bartolomeo Colleoni: A Bronze to Die For
When Bartolomeo Colleoni died in 1475, he left a significant portion of his wealth to the Venetian Republic he had ably served as a professional soldier (condottiere). The will included a provision that a bronze equestrian statue of himself be erected in Piazza San Marco. The Venetian Signoria dithered for four years, desiring to accept the rich bequest but hesitant to honor a private individual in the city's most prominent location. Equestrian statues generally were reserved to honor rulers and emperors, the Marcus Aurelius in Rome being the well-known antique exemplar. Given the political potency of such a sculpture, the Venetians understandably were leery of erecting an imperial monument in a city that prided itself on its egalitarian ethos. As one Venetian contemporary complained, we should not be 'imitating the custom of the pagans.' Florence too shied from placing an equestrian statue in Piazza della Signoria until 1594, when Giambologna's Cosimo de' Medici appeared on the square. The Venetians were cleverer. In a brilliant legalistic maneuver, the Signoria finally agreed to accept the terms of Colleoni's bequest: The equestrian statue would be erected—not in Piazza San Marco, but in front of the Scuola di San Marco on Campo Santi Giovanni e Paolo, an important but politically neutral location that served as a favorite trysting spot of the infamous lover Giacomo Casanova.
