
Scottish ministers consider gull controls amid fears 'people may die'
The news comes after SNP MSP Fergus Ewing raised concerns about the impact aggressive seagulls are having in Moray – and suggested a public inquiry would be needed should one of the birds kill a person.
As it stands, all UK gulls are protected under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981, which makes it an offence to kill or injure the birds, as well as criminalising destroying their eggs or nests.
But pressure has been building on the Scottish Government to allow controls of seagulls after one of the birds reportedly attacked an elderly woman in Moray, causing her to fall over and break her leg – before attacking her again after returning home from hospital.
READ MORE: John Swinney accuses Scottish Tories of trans rights U-turn as old comments resurface
Speaking at Holyrood on Thursday, Ewing asked whether NatureScot could be directed 'to issue licences to control the birds and help prevent such injuries'.
He said: 'All too often in Scotland, where there is a serious injury or death which could and should have been avoided, we have a public inquiry, often costing millions of pounds, followed by a report to ministers who will say, we must learn lessons from this.
'Well, presiding officer, would it not be better to have taken the necessary action to prevent the injury or death ever occurring, where that risk is clear, direct, and foreseeable, as in this case.
'And given the risk of serious injury and death, will the minister now take the necessary action with the Section 11 order under the Natural Heritage (Scotland) Act 1991 before it is too late?'
Agriculture Minister Jim Fairlie (above) said in response: 'I very much recognise the points that Mr Ewing has made.
'To reduce the risk of health and safety concerns of gulls, NatureScot will be considering an area-wide gull licence to deal with the immediate concerns of the upcoming nesting season for the potential health and safety reasons.
'And I understand that there is an issue around what the potential issues are that Mr Ewing has highlighted, and I've made that very clear to NatureScot.
'But gull numbers are in decline and the longer-term solution cannot be further population reductions where mitigation action can be taken, and that requires collective action.
'So we will work together through a summit that I will hold later this year with key partners, including local authorities, to ensure that appropriate measures are in place ahead of next year's breeding season.'
He added that "people standing at the side of a pier throwing chips out" would only make the issues worse.
READ MORE: 'You're being had': BBC audience urged to 'get angry' over Scottish energy crisis
The remarks from the minister represent a shift in position compared to last month, when Fairlie told Tory MSP Douglas Ross that while he understood that gulls could be a problem, 'killing them and giving licences out willy-nilly is not the answer'.
Speaking on Thursday, Ross said he had received a 'Freedom of Information response from NatureScot, when I had asked how many injuries they had recorded by gull attacks in each of the last five years, and they have said in their response that they do not hold that information'.
He added: 'How can they be taking decisions on these licences when they don't know the impact?
'And I've also put this to the minister before, they are refusing licences at the moment for reasons such as businesses could give customers umbrellas to protect themselves by walking in and out, and they won't be attacked by gulls if they've got umbrellas. Does he agree that that is utter madness and NatureScot have got to treat this as a serious issue?'
Fairlie said: 'I have raised these points with NatureScot. We have come to the conclusion that there will be actions taken this year in order to make sure that we deal with the immediate problem of this year, but there will be a summit that will allow us to make sure we take the appropriate action to preserve the status of the gulls, but at the same time, make sure we can live beside them.'
There have not been any reported fatalities in the UK from a seagull attack, although in 2012 the London Evening Standard reported that an 80-year-old man had died from a heart attack during an encounter with a flock.
He had disturbed a nest of chicks while trying to clean bird droppings from the roof of his garage in Anglesey, north Wales, the report said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


South Wales Guardian
3 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
Sarwar says surprise by-election win could help Labour back to power at Holyrood
Mr Sarwar and his party celebrated in the early hours of Friday morning after Labour's Davy Russell was elected as the new MSP for Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse, winning the seat from the SNP. With the votes showing a swing of more than 7% from the SNP to Labour, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said on Friday the result showed people have 'voted for change'. The by-election had been held following the death earlier this year of Scottish Government minister Christina McKelvie. When the votes were counted, Mr Russell polled 8,559, SNP candidate Katy Loudon took 7,957 votes, while Reform's Ross Lambie secured 7,088. And although Mr Russell was elected with fewer votes than Labour secured in the seat in the 2021 Scottish Parliament election, the SNP's support fell from just over 46% of all ballots then to 29.35% in the by-election. Reform UK deputy leader Richard Tice insisting they were 'delighted' with coming third – despite speculation prior to the count that they could come in second or may even pull off a surprise victory. Labour's win came after Scotland's First Minister John Swinney – who made numerous campaign visits to the area – had declared the contest to be a 'two-horse race' between the SNP and Nigel Farage's Reform. But speaking at a media event in Hamilton on Friday morning, Mr Sarwar accused the SNP leader of running a 'disgraceful' campaign. Mr Sarwar also insisted the by-election could 'help lead the way' to him becoming Scotland's next first minister in the May 2026 Holyrood elections. The Scottish Labour leader said he believed the victory to be 'even more significant' than the party's win in the nearby Rutherglen and Hamilton West by-election in October 2023 – which he said had been key in helping to secure Labour's general election win in July last year. Mr Sarwar declared: 'I think in some ways this by-election result is even more significant than the Rutherglen by-election result two years ago. 'It is right to say, I believe, the result in Rutherglen helped lead the way in helping to elect a UK Labour Government and I also believe the by-election result here will help lead the way to elect a Scottish Labour government next year.' Looking ahead to that election, Mr Sarwar told the PA news agency: 'I want us to gain scores of seats across the country so we can remove this SNP government from office.' He went on to accuse Mr Swinney of running a 'disgraceful campaign' in the by-election, saying that despite the SNP having been in power for 18 years, 'the best he had to offer was 'vote SNP to stop Farage''. And while Reform UK came in third in the by-election, Mr Sarwar said Mr Farage's party could not win the Scottish Parliament elections. He insisted: 'Nigel Farage is not standing to be first minister. 'It is a straight choice – it is either going to be John Swinney, or it's going to be me.' The Scottish Labour leader continued: 'The choice is stark next year. Our Parliament is not about protests, our election is not about protest, it is about choosing a government here in Scotland. 'The choice is stark – a third decade of the SNP with John Swinney as first minister or a new direction for Scotland with me as first minister.' However, Mr Tice told BBC Radio 4's that the result in Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse was 'truly remarkable'. He said: 'We've come from nowhere to being in a three-way marginal, and we're within 750 votes of winning that by-election and just a few hundred votes of defeating the SNP, so it's an incredible result.' Mr Swinney, meanwhile, said the SNP was 'clearly disappointed' with the result. The party leader said Labour had 'won by an absolute landslide' in Rutherglen and Hamilton West – noting the SNP 'came much closer' this time round. But he added: 'The people of Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse have made clear that we still have work to do. 'Over the next few days, we will take time to consider the result fully.'


BBC News
5 hours ago
- BBC News
LGBT veterans will not lose other benefits after compensation
Veterans due to receive payments from the LGBT Financial Recognition Scheme will not lose out on other benefits after a change to Scottish government has confirmed that 1,200 armed forces members who suffered under the ban on lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) personnel have now applied to the UK government's payment ban was in place within the UK military from 1967 to 2000 and, after years of campaigning, the UK government announced the payments last December. Up to £75m has been set aside to acknowledge hurt and discrimination, with affected veterans able to receive awards of up to £70,000 each. Some veterans currently receive financial help, on a means-tested basis, through the council tax reduction scheme. But Finance Secretary Shona Robison said regulations would be now changed to ensure any compensation payments do not affect eligibility for Robison said: "As we mark 25 years since the lifting of the ban on LGBT people serving in the armed forces, it is important to recognise the hardship that so many faced, with widespread homophobic bullying and harassment."Nothing will make up for the difficulties that LGBT veterans faced, however, our action will ensure those in Scotland receive every penny that they are entitled to."Under the UK government scheme, those who were dismissed or discharged from the armed forces because of their sexual orientation or gender identity could receive £50, service personnel who suffered harassment, intrusive investigations or even imprisonment could receive further payments of up to £20,000. Peter Gibson, chief executive of Fighting with Pride, said the group had "campaigned for justice for LGBTQ+ veterans for many years, helping to secure reparations and financial recognition of their horrendous treatment prior to 2000".He added: "As we slowly see the UK government deal with those financial payments, protected from benefit and taxation impact, it is wonderful to see the Scottish government taking action to ensure other benefits such as council tax benefit is also protected too."We continue to seek out veterans who were discharged or dismissed from the military to support them, and this news is one more step towards helping those in Scotland."


STV News
5 hours ago
- STV News
Hundreds apply to compensation scheme set up after armed forces LGBT ban
More than 1,200 Scots have applied for payments from a compensation scheme set up to help members of the military impacted by a ban on LGBT personnel serving in the forces. The Scottish Government confirmed the figure as it vowed to act to ensure those who suffered under the ban – which was in place until 2000 – get 'every penny they are entitled to'. It comes after the UK Government announced in December last year that it was setting up the LGBT Financial Recognition Scheme, with up to £75m set aside for payments. These could see former services personnel who were impacted by the ban receive up to £70,000 each. With veterans also potentially able to receive financial help through the council tax reduction scheme, Finance Secretary Shona Robison said regulations will be changed to ensure any compensation payments do not affect eligibility for this. Robison said: 'As we mark 25 years since the lifting of the ban on LGBT people serving in the armed forces, it is important to recognise the hardship that so many faced, with widespread homophobic bullying and harassment. 'Nothing will make up for the difficulties that LGBT veterans faced, however our action will ensure those in Scotland receive every penny that they are entitled to.' Under the UK Government scheme, those who were dismissed or discharged from the armed forces because of their sexual orientation or gender identity could receive £50,000 in compensation. Former service personnel who suffered harassment, intrusive investigations or even imprisonment could also receive payments of up to £20,000. Peter Gibson, chief executive of Fighting with Pride, said it had 'campaigned for justice for LGBTQ+ veterans for many years, helping to secure reparations and financial recognition of their horrendous treatment prior to 2000'. He added: 'As we slowly see the UK Government deal with those financial payments, protected from benefit and taxation impact, it is wonderful to see the Scottish Government taking action to ensure other benefits such as council tax benefit is also protected too. 'We continue to seek out veterans who were discharged or dismissed from the military to support them, and this news is one more step towards helping those in Scotland.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country