Scientists expose hidden dangers in widely used farming products — here's what you need to know
A new University of Missouri study found that slow-release fertilizers meant to nourish crops may be quietly polluting the planet with microplastics, according to an article posted on Phys.org.
The study, published in the Journal of Hazardous Materials, found that commonly used polymer-coated, controlled-release fertilizers may contribute to microplastic pollution.
The researchers reported that these fertilizers use plastic-based coatings to slowly release nutrients into the soil, delivering minerals over a sustained period for improved crop efficacy. But these plastic coatings do not fully degrade in soil. Instead, they break down into tiny plastic particles that pollute the environment.
The researchers warned that these microplastics could lead to degraded soil quality, contaminated waterways, and food safety issues.
While polymer-coated, controlled-release fertilizers are often marketed as efficient, this efficiency comes at an environmental cost. Microplastics never disappear from our environment, contaminating waterways, soil, and air. These pervasive particles can cause long-term damage to the environment, ecosystems, and human health.
Research on microplastics is still emerging, but what we know is alarming. Microplastics are prevalent in global waterways and, therefore, global drinking water. Runoff from agricultural fields can carry microplastics into nearby waterways, contributing to this environmental harm.
In the soil, these particles can disrupt natural microbial activity, reduce soil fertility, and degrade the long-term health of farmland. Microplastics can even travel through the air and enter our bodies through breathing. A 2020 study found that humans inhale approximately 16.2 bits of microplastics per hour — the equivalent of a credit card per week.
According to Harvard Medicine, exposure to microplastics has been linked to a wide range of human health impacts, including reproductive issues, cancers, inflammation, lung and liver effects, hormonal disruption, and changes to the gut microbiome.
The study encourages farmers to consider controlled-release fertilizer options with biodegradable coatings, often made from starch or cellulose. These options reduce plastic pollution while maintaining the same nutrient benefits as polymer-coated fertilizers.
Farmers can also switch to natural fertilizers to support their crops — and the planet. Natural fertilizers such as compost and mulch and seaweed can support a healthy garden using enriching organic biomatter. Growth strategies such as practicing crop rotation and growing polycultures can also support long-term soil vitality, naturally replenishing nutrients and promoting ecosystem balance.
Do you worry about pesticides in your food?
All the time
Sometimes
Not really
I only eat organic
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
For large commercial farms, soil testing, drip irrigation, and targeted nutrient application can ensure that crops receive only what they need. According to the Environmental Protection Agency, these tactics help reduce runoff, overfertilization, and pollution.
If farmers insist on using fertilizers with plastic coatings, the researchers recommend implementing effective stormwater management practices to reduce environmental risk.
Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Scientists make game-changing discovery that could transform aviation industry: 'I wasn't expecting that'
Researchers at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign have discovered several benefits of growing prairie grass for making sustainable aviation fuels. Switchgrass has grown in Midwestern soils for millions of years, but recent studies shared by pinpointed significant economic and environmental considerations for using it to help decarbonize the aviation industry. The switchgrass crop is forecasted to produce up to 230 million dry tons of biomass annually and is a particularly good candidate for SAF due to several beneficial traits. It can be harvested each year for a decade or more without repeated replanting, requires minimal nitrogen fertilizer compared to corn, and provides valuable ecosystem services, the report detailed. The key to these studies is that the U of I researchers focused on finding particularly productive switchgrass cultivars, while tracking fertilizer use and did so at a field scale to gauge real-world potential. "All the data that helps us estimate switchgrass suitability for SAF comes from small plot research or older forage-type switchgrass cultivars. We wanted to test high-yielding switchgrass cultivars on a larger scale to provide a more accurate picture of the benefits these new cultivars provide," said D.K. Lee, senior author of both studies and a professor at the school. The aviation industry is responsible for 2% of the world's carbon pollution, and sustainable aviation fuel has the potential to drastically reduce that number, according to the Department of Energy. Compared with regular jet fuel, using 100% SAF could reduce planet-warming pollution in the industry by up to 94%, depending on which feedstocks are used and how it's developed. The International Civil Aviation Organization reported that over 360,000 commercial flights have already used SAF. Adoption is also growing, going from five million gallons consumed in 2021 to 24.5 million gallons in 2023. To gauge the full economic potential and environmental impact of growing switchgrass for SAF, the researchers spent five years growing five different cultivars across four states, while tracking nitrogen fertilizer use. Should the government be able to control how we heat our homes? Definitely Only if it saves money I'm not sure No way Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. They found that Independence and Liberty cultivars were the most productive, and they can potentially generate higher profits than conventional row crops on less productive land, according to Nictor Namoi, who worked on the study. Nitrous oxide pollution and nitrate leaching were significantly lower than in corn crops, but that was expected given the reduced amount of nitrogen fertilizer used with switchgrass. There was one quirk with the crop, however, in that it produced more carbon pollution than corn after the second year. "I wasn't expecting that," Namoi said. "But there's a lot more biomass belowground in switchgrass, about five times that of corn." After years of study, the research team felt that the results were positive and that this SAF feedstock crop could help farmers earn more, while contributing to a cleaner environment by reducing reliance on dirtier fuel alternatives. "Our research ensures that we can feed productive cultivars into the SAF production system once the economy and the technology [are] ready to transition," Namoi concluded. Join our free newsletter for weekly updates on the latest innovations improving our lives and shaping our future, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Researchers make troubling discovery about dangerous health issue with bus stops: 'Like an oven'
While transportation accounts for over 20% of planet-warming pollution, public transit reduces it and provides a more affordable and safe alternative for commuting. More than two-thirds of public transit users walk to transit stations, according to the American Public Transportation Association, but extreme temperatures can make getting to these stations difficult. Shelters at transit stations are designed to protect users from extreme temperatures and weather. However, a study at the University of Texas Health Science Center in Houston discovered some of these shelters worsen the problem, increasing temperatures and transit users' risk for heat stress. The study measured wet bulb globe temperature –– which combines air temperature, humidity, wind speed, and solar radiation –– in shaded and unshaded areas at bus stops in Houston. While shade reduced WBGT, one type of shelter increased temperatures. The ground in this type of shelter, when unshaded, was about 5 degrees Fahrenheit hotter than the ground outside the shelter, the researchers discovered. These types of shelters contained aluminum frames and translucent acrylic walls, which "trapped radiation inside the shelter" and made them "like an oven," researcher Kevin Lanza said, per Hot temperatures at bus stops increase bus riders' risk for heat stress, which includes "a combination of factors, not just the temperature," according to Lanza, and can develop into life-threatening heat stroke.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Scientists investigate little-known side effect of next-gen power plants: 'So important'
In a study from the University of California, Davis published in Nature Water, scientists explained how floating solar projects impact birds and other wildlife, as explained in a summary published on Since 71% of the Earth is covered by water, placing solar panels on bodies of water is becoming a popular way to increase affordable energy projects without displacing land use. However, few studies have been done about how solar panels on water, or floating photovoltaics, affect aquatic wildlife. According to the National Audubon Society, more than 33% of bird populations in the U.S. are at high or moderate conservation concern. "Habitat loss due to agricultural intensification and urbanization is arguably the biggest threat to birds, along with climate change," said Virginia Tech associate professor in the College of Natural Resources and Environment Ashley Dayer in a school press release. "That's why it's so important to understand how waterbirds are going to respond to floating solar and if there is the possibility for conservation concessions at new floating solar facilities," said Elliott Steele, a UC Davis Wild Energy Center postdoctoral scholar who co-authored the study, per the summary. "We want to advance clean energy while promoting healthy, functional environments," Steele continued. "Achieving this balance requires that we rigorously study and understand how wildlife responds to floating solar so we can ensure that negative impacts are avoided and potential ecological benefits are realized." In the study, UC Davis scientists investigated how floating photovoltaic projects could impact birds. They documented a wide diversity of birds and their interactions with floating solar panels, as well as human interactions with wildlife on solar panels, sometimes trying to deter them. "We immediately knew this was a very important interaction, especially given the precipitous decline in waterbird numbers globally," said UC Davis professor Rebecca R. Hernandez in the summary. "We leveraged our team's expertise in ecology and energy system science to identify risks and solution pathways such that waterbirds and floating PV can coexist." "While we're at this critical threshold of renewable energy development, we want to put more thought into the design that can benefit birds and other wildlife as we go forward," said UC Davis Ph.D. candidate Emma Forester, per The scientists concluded that more research needs to be done to further explore how waterbirds interact with floating solar panels, as well as the effects they have on each other. What's the biggest obstacle stopping your organization from using solar panels? They're too expensive Don't know where to start They're an eyesore We already use solar panels Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. According to the summary, the authors have continued studying this in the field, noticing "black-crowned night herons resting on a floating solar structure before dawn, double-breasted cormorants jockeying for a favorable site, black phoebes nesting under panels, and more." Solar panels can help decrease harmful planet-warming pollution from other energy sources, like coal and natural gas, which contribute to loss of habitat for waterbirds. However, solar panels do take up land. According to the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, it would take up to 0.8% of the entire area of the United States to meet our energy needs. With floating solar panels, scientists could create solar systems that don't destroy habitats. Incorporating solar panels onto bodies of water or in farm systems could have added benefits, including water retention and space savings. Fortunately, scientists have noticed positive interaction with water birds and floating solar panels so far. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
