logo
WV Senate approves bill loosening state's vaccination requirements; bill now moves to the House

WV Senate approves bill loosening state's vaccination requirements; bill now moves to the House

Yahoo21-02-2025

Sen. Laura Wake Chapman, R-Ohio, who sponsored Senate Bill 460, loosening the state's strict vaccination laws, holds up a map illustration how many other states allow only medical exemptions to school vaccine requirements. The Senate passed the bill Friday with a vote of 20 to 12. (Will Price | West Virginia Legislative Photography)
A bill that would loosen West Virginia's school mandated vaccine laws took a step forward on Friday. The West Virginia Senate passed Senate Bill 460 with a vote of 20 to 12.
All 50 states require school children to be vaccinated against a series of infectious diseases like measles and polio. West Virginia has been among five states that has not allowed religious or philosophical exemptions to those requirements. The state has allowed only medical exemptions.
If Senate Bill 460 becomes law, families who want a religious exemption to those requirements would submit a written statement to their school or day care administrator saying that the state vaccine requirements cannot be met because they conflict with the parents' or emancipated child's religious or philosophical beliefs.
The bill, as it passed the Senate, also loosens the medical exemption procedure, something bill sponsor and Senate Health Committee Chair Laura Wakim Chapman, R-Ohio, argued is unfair.
Current law requires the medical provider of the family seeking a medical exemption to provide documentation of the medical need for the exemption to the state immunization officer for approval. The immunization officer position would be eliminated under SB 460, Wakim said.
Most of the debate on the floor Friday, which lasted more than an hour, was over religious rights, both of students and schools. Senators voted down an amendment that would have allowed the schools to set their own policies for vaccines, independent of the legislation.
Sen. Ryan Weld, R-Brook, said the amendment would have corrected a 'grievous error,' in the bill of not allowing schools run by churches to require vaccinations if they're a part of their faith.
'Many states have religious exemptions, and West Virginia is the outlier in that but the absolute majority of those states also allow for a school that is run by a church to determine its own vaccination policy in line with the tenets of its faith,' he said.
The Catholic Diocese of Wheeling-Charleston, with more than 4,600 students in 24 schools statewide, has supported the state's current vaccine laws. Last year, after the Legislature passed House Bill 5105, a bill that would have allowed private and parochial schools to set their own vaccine requirements, the church said it would keep the requirements for its school the same. A spokesman for the diocese said the church is monitoring the bill making its way through the statehouse.
'We have always maintained our constitutional right to order our schools as we see fit in accord with our beliefs,' Tim Bishop, director of marketing and communications for the diocese, said in a statement.
Weld, who voted against the legislation, said the bill uses the power of the state to tell a church how it should operate. A line in the bill says that schools and day care centers shall not 'prohibit an individual exercising an exemption pursuant to this section from participating in extracurricular activities or from attending school-based events.'
'I cannot imagine what the reaction would be in this body if we read a news article that the state of California, their legislature passed a law that required all priests, pastors, reverends, ministers, rabbis, to marry every couple that comes through their doors,' Weld said. 'It would be unconstitutional, because the state should not dictate to a church how to operate.'
Church-run schools may have the option to become 'micro-schools' to have their own vaccination policies, he said, but that would disqualify them from participating in athletics through the West Virginia Secondary Schools Activity Commission, he said.
Sen. Tom Takubo, a Kanawha County Republican and physician, also voted against the bill. Takubo said the state has a lot of problems and ranks last in a lot of health outcomes, among other issues.
'In this instance, in immunizations, where we can protect the most vulnerable of our society — children — against preventable, and I think that's a key thing that everybody needs to remember, these are preventable childhood diseases that we're protecting our children [from], we rank No. 1, No. 1 one in the country,' Takubo said. 'I know there are arguments that they say, 'well, we other states have different exemptions.' Other states also have a lot of outbreaks, and they have a lot of death, a lot of morbidity.'
In Texas, a measles outbreak has now spread to 90 people. Of those, only five were confirmed to have been vaccinated. Sixteen of those 90 people have been hospitalized because of the virus, which is highly contagious and can lead to serious complications and death.
'Everything we do, we often compare ourselves to our neighbors and our neighbors' children have all suffered at the hands of preventable childhood disease, but we have a wall protecting West Virginia, protecting the children of West Virginia. I'm very proud of, very proud of,' Takubo said. 'So why? When you're No. 1, do you want to tear that down?'
Proponents of the bill have argued that the law as it is now violates families' rights by prohibiting children school entry unless they get a series of vaccinations.
'We, right now in this state, are prohibiting a public and private education to individuals,' said Sen. Patricia Rucker, R-Jefferson. 'We are prohibiting kids, children from participating in sports and extracurriculars. We are prohibiting them from summer camps. We are prohibiting them from 4-H. we are prohibiting them from FFA, we are prohibiting them from — there's a whole long list.'
Reading directly from the bill, she said: 'A number of citizens have religious and moral objections to one or more of the vaccines on the compulsory immunization list contained in this section. Compulsory immunization forces those West Virginians to choose between their religious belief and their children's fundamental right to a public education. Forcing West Virginians to vaccinate their children despite their religious and moral objections substantially burdens the free exercise of religion in violation of the Constitutions of the United States and West Virginia and, further, is against the public health policy of this state.'
'Now, that's not law yet, but that is what we are saying with this legislation,' Rucker said.
Sen. Mike Woelfel, D-Cabell, who also opposed the legislation, said the bill is likely to result in a lawsuit. The Catholic Church and others indicated in its statement it will go to court to protect its religious freedom, he said.
'So, last chance everybody,' Woelfel said. 'That judge in that case needs legislative history. He needs people to get up and tell the world what the compelling state interest is to impose the will of the government on a religious institution. So let's get up and say that, and sadly, you're going to lose the whole bill when this bill is declared unconstitutional. Two or three or four years from now, there will be a stay. In the meantime, [you'll] lose your whole bill.'
Chapman said that mothers who have seen their children harmed by vaccines want the legislation.
'They don't want to vaccinate anymore of their children or give them anymore,' she said. 'But guess what? Those children are being denied their education. We've all had those mothers show up at our doors.'
She said the bill would stand up to scrutiny.
'The senator from Brooke says it's a grievous error to pass this bill. This is existing language in the law,' she said. 'The governor didn't add private and parochial schools to this bill. I didn't add private and parochial schools to this bill. People in this very body 10 years ago added them to the law, and now they suddenly have a difference of opinion and think private and parochial schools shouldn't follow our public health laws.'
'If that's the case… then our private school laws don't have to follow our fire code, our sanitation laws or our public health laws, just get rid of it,' she said.
The Republican-led legislature has tried for years to loosen the state's strict vaccination laws. Last year, after lawmakers passed House Bill 5105, which would have allowed private and parochial schools to have their own vaccination requirements, former Gov. Jim Justice vetoed the legislation. Gov. Patrick Morrisey issued an executive order requiring the state to allow religious exemptions to those requirements on his second day in office.
The bill will next go to the House of Delegates for consideration.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NY state Senate approves doctor-assisted suicide bill, sends it to Hochul's desk for approval
NY state Senate approves doctor-assisted suicide bill, sends it to Hochul's desk for approval

New York Post

time2 hours ago

  • New York Post

NY state Senate approves doctor-assisted suicide bill, sends it to Hochul's desk for approval

ALBANY – State Senate Democrats passed highly controversial legislation that would allow terminally ill people to take their own lives with the help of doctors in a razor-thin vote Monday — leaving it up to Gov. Kathy Hochul whether to sign it into law. 'This is one of the great social reforms of our state,' state Sen. Brad Hoylman-Sigal (D-Manhattan), the bill's sponsor in the upper chamber, touted at a press conference earlier in the day Monday — putting the measure on the same tier as the legalization of gay marriage. 'This is about personal autonomy, this is about liberty, this is about exercising one's own freedom to control one's body,' Hoylman-Sigal continued. 3 The 'Medical Aid in Dying Act' passed the state senate Monday evening, meaning it only needs Gov. Kathy Hochul's signature to become law. Vaughn Golden The measure passed 35 to 27, with six Democrats – Senators April Baskin, Siela Bynoe, Cordelle Cleare, Monica Martinez, Roxanne Persaud, and Sam Sutton – voting against it. 'The governor will review the legislation,' a spokesperson for Hochul said. The bill's passage follows a years-long campaign that was fought tooth and nail by a diverse group of critics, including disability rights activists and the Catholic church, as well as many black and Orthodox Jewish communities. 'The Governor still has the opportunity to uphold New York's commitment to suicide prevention, protect vulnerable communities, and affirm that every life—regardless of disability, age, or diagnosis—is worthy of care, dignity, and protection,' The New York Alliance Against Assisted Suicide wrote in a statement following the vote. A Catholic group slammed the bill's passing as 'a dark day for New York' and also called on Hochul to refuse to sign it. 'For the first time in its history, New York is on the verge of authorizing doctors to help their patients commit suicide. Make no mistake – this is only the beginning, and the only person standing between New York and the assisted suicide nightmare unfolding in Canada is Governor Hochul,' Dennis Poust, Executive Director of the New York State Catholic Conference, wrote in a statement. 3 The state Senate voted 35-27 Monday night to legalize physician-assisted suicide for people with terminal illnesses. AP Ahead of the vote, the nearly three-hour debate on the Senate floor got emotional, with several lawmakers holding back tears as they explained their votes. Syracuse-area state Sen. Rachel May (D-Onondaga) shared the story of her late husband, who was receiving morphine in the final stages of his battle with cancer, which he eventually succumbed to at 32 years old. 'I don't know if the last largest dose he took also took his life, but I know that he died in peace,' May said. 'It isn't about controlling the disease or controlling the pain, it's about having control at the end of your life,' she said before voting in favor. Critics fear the legislation lacks critical safeguards over how doctors approve patients looking to receive the prescription for a lethal cocktail of drugs, such as a statutory waiting period, establishing clear chain of custody for the pills, mandating the doctor and recipient meet in-person, and requiring a disclosure that someone indeed used the drugs to take their own life. Under the bill, recipients would need approval from two doctors and a sign-off from two independent witnesses, after which they would receive a prescription for drugs they could use to take their life at a time of their choosing. 3 Gov. Kathy Hochul has not signaled whether she will sign the assisted suicide bill. Lev Radin/ZUMA / Doctors also do not have to conduct a mental health screening for each patient, but may refer a patient for one under the legislation. 'I don't think requesting end-of-life medication when an individual is suffering and in pain and dying suggests a mental health condition, if anything, I think it's quite rational,' Hoylman-Sigal said. Hoylman vowed the bill would not lead to such 'unintended consequences.' 'It was a professional organization that provided us crucial guidance, that helped us develop the state-of-the-art safeguards in this legislation that gave my colleagues and the general public, I believe, the assurance that there will not be unintended consequences,' he said. The legislation is referred to by its supporters as the 'Medical Aid in Dying' bill. 'The option of medical aid in dying provides comfort, allowing those who are dying to live their time more fully and peacefully until the end. I am profoundly grateful to Senate Majority Leader Stewart-Cousins for giving her conference the space to have this important and emotional discussion,' Corinne Carey, Senior Campaign Director of Compassion and Choices, the main group driving the effort to pass the bill, wrote in a statement.

Illinois woman with terminal illness fights for legal right to die
Illinois woman with terminal illness fights for legal right to die

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Illinois woman with terminal illness fights for legal right to die

The Brief Debra Robertson, a Lombard woman with terminal cancer, has been advocating for the right to die with dignity. The Illinois General Assembly failed to legalize medical aid in dying during its spring session. Supporters say the bill would provide terminal patients with end-of-life options, while skeptics argue it could allow doctors to violate their oath to "do no harm." LOMBARD, Ill. - Lombard resident Debra Robertson has been fighting for the right to die on her own terms for the last three years. She's been advocating for a bill that was considered but ultimately not passed by state lawmakers, to allow her the option to stop her suffering. The backstory Robertson said she understands why that might be controversial, but she has one request: don't call it suicide. "I get very upset when people talk about this being assisted suicide," Robertson told FOX 32 Chicago. "I'm already dying. I want to die with dignity and I wanna die the way I wanna die." Robertson was diagnosed with an aggressive rare form of cancer in 2022, called neuro-endocrine carcinoma. She was given six months to live. "I think I was just in denial for a while because I couldn't believe that's where I was at, because the doctor said I was gonna die," she said. Three years and four debilitating rounds of treatment later, Robertson said she's out of options and fears she will suffer if not given the option to die via medication. "I know that my death is going to be painful based on the type of cancer I have," she said. Robertson said she's already expressed her wishes to her two children and grandchildren, and they've come to accept her decision. "At first they struggled because they said, 'Granny are you gonna die now? Are you gonna die today?'" Robertson said. "And I said no and I explain to them about what medical aid in dying is and what it means to me and other people, and now they're very supportive of it. They have some sort of a peace." Big picture view Illinois would become the 11th state in the nation to legalize medical aid in dying if the legislation passes. Last month it stalled in the Senate, after some Democrats joined all Republicans in opposition. The sponsor, State Rep. Robyn Gabel (D-Evanston), said the debate was passionate, and lawmakers simply ran out of time. "These complex pieces of legislation need time to make sure we get them right," Gabel said. Under the bill, a patient would need to be diagnosed with a terminal illness and given six months or less to live. They must be evaluated for mental health concerns and get verbal and written approval from two physicians, five days apart. And doctors who prescribe would be immune from any prosecution, unless they coerce a patient, in which case, they would face felony charges. Gabel said the bill is simply about giving terminal patients end-of-life options. "Just because you ask for the medicine doesn't mean you have to take it – 38% don't take it. What they tell me is it gives them peace of mind knowing they can," Gabel said. Downstate Republican Rep. Bill Hauter is also a physician. He said the medical community is split, but believes the bill would allow doctors to violate their Hippocratic oaths that state "first do no harm." "Medicine is a field of healing, taking care of patients and comforting them and trying to solve their issues and not to partake in the act of suicide," Hauter said. Gabel said she believes lawmakers will have the votes to pass the bill next year. Robertson realizes she might not be around to see it, but said she hopes to pave the way for others that are suffering. "I'm dying and I don't have any control over it. The only thing I could have control over is how I die if this was passed," she said. A representative from the Illinois State Medical Association said the organization took an official position to support the bill, but that they "remain a house divided," with physicians advocating passionately on both sides of the issue.

GOP scores win as Legislature repeals health care for undocumented adults
GOP scores win as Legislature repeals health care for undocumented adults

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

GOP scores win as Legislature repeals health care for undocumented adults

GOP scores win as Legislature repeals health care for undocumented adults originally appeared on Bring Me The News. Minnesota lawmakers voted Monday to strip MinnesotaCare health insurance from undocumented adults. The measure, which was the most controversial of the legislative session, passed both the House and Senate after leaders reached a budget agreement to avoid a government shutdown. In the evenly-divided House, DFL caucus leader Melissa Hortman was the only Democratic lawmaker to vote for the bill's passage. In the DFL-controlled Senate, Majority Leader Erin Murphy, Sen. Ann Rest, DFL-New Hope and others joined Republicans in voting for the bill. "I cannot vote to shut down our state, I just can't," Rest said in brief remarks on the Senate floor. "I made an agreement, I gave my word," Murphy said shortly before the vote. "I will vote for this. And it's among the most painful votes I've ever taken." The move rolls back a 2023 legislative accomplishment for Democrats, handing a major win to GOP lawmakers who refused a series of offers from DFL leaders and continued to leverage the threat of a government shutdown to get the bill across the finish line. Around 17,000 undocumented adults are currently enrolled in MinnesotaCare, which offers state-subsidized health care plans for low income people who pay premiums in exchange for coverage. The move is expected to save the state $56.9 million in the 2026-27 biennium. Opponents of the bill decried the measure as shameful and several Democratic lawmakers have said the change will cause some undocumented immigrants to die as serious health issues go undetected or untreated. Democrats have also claimed fiscal responsibility is not the motive of the GOP, as the change could drive costs associated with emergency hospital care. This story was originally reported by Bring Me The News on Jun 9, 2025, where it first appeared.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store