Chicago alderman slams mayor's hiring practices as 'giant leap in the wrong direction' amid DOJ probe
A Chicago alderman says the city is taking a "giant leap in the wrong direction" after the Department of Justice announced it is investigating Mayor Brandon Johnson's hiring practices.
During a May 18 service at the Apostolic Church of God, Johnson responded to people who claimed he only talked about hiring Black people.
"No, what I'm saying is, when you hire our people, we always look out for everybody else. We are the most generous people on the planet," he said. "I'm laying that out because when you ask, 'How do we ensure that our people get a chance to grow their business,' having people in my administration that will look out for the interests of everyone, and everyone means you have to look out for the interests of Black folks."
Johnson mentioned top officials who serve in his administration and emphasized their race. One example included his deputy mayor of business and economic development, a Black woman.
Doj Launches Investigation Into Blue State City Over Alleged Race-based Hiring
After his remarks, Harmeet K. Dhillon, the assistant attorney general for the Department of Justice's Civil Rights Division, notified Johnson his administration is being investigated to see if it utilizes discriminatory hiring practices.
Read On The Fox News App
"Considering these remarks, I have authorized an investigation to determine whether the City of Chicago is engaged in a pattern or practice of discrimination as set forth above. If these kind of hiring decisions are being made for top-level positions in your administration, then it begs the question whether such decisions are also being made for lower-level positions," Dhillon said.
Chicago Alderman Raymond Lopez told Fox News Digital he's glad the DOJ is looking into the Johnson administration's hiring practices, saying he thinks many Chicagoans have the same concern.
Chicago's Mayor Johnson Is So Focused On Race He Can't See The Truth About Humanity
"I am glad that they are looking into it. I think it validates the concerns that many Chicagoans have had that Brandon Johnson is a mayor, not for the entire city, but for only one demographic," Lopez said. "There are tens of thousands of individuals who work for the city of Chicago who feel as though they have been left out of promotions, left out of advancement or even left out from being hired as a whole even on the front line. And I think that needs to be looked into by the Department of Justice."
Lopez said he thinks the city is taking steps in the wrong direction in the way it hires.
"This is just one sad step backwards for the City of Chicago to have the mayor articulate so passionately that he prefers to hire one ethnic demographic at the expense of all others. It doesn't make sense to me how, in the 21st century, we've done so much to try to move beyond seeing each other just solely based on race, that we are now taking a giant leap in the wrong direction," he said.
The alderman said there are Black Chicago residents he talks to who disagree with Johnson when it comes to hiring decisions.
"Let me be 100%, 110% clear on this note. There are African Americans who don't like that statement either. There are many well-qualified leaders of departments who put blood, sweat and tears into lifting up Chicago, who now have been trivialized by his comments and are viewed through a lens of they're just here because they're Black," Lopez added.
In comments made after the DOJ launched its investigation, Johnson said it came from a place of fear.
"You can tell when someone is fearful is because they act out," Johnson said. "We have a president that is screaming and having tantrums right now because we have an administration that reflects the city of Chicago, but he would much rather have administrations that reflect the country club. Period."
Fox News Digital reached out to Johnson for comment.
Fox News' Greg Wehner contributed to this report.Original article source: Chicago alderman slams mayor's hiring practices as 'giant leap in the wrong direction' amid DOJ probe
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Black America Web
an hour ago
- Black America Web
Poll Shows Companies Maintaing DEI Intiatives Have Better Reputations
Source: Cheng Xin / Getty In news surprising to absolutely no one, it turns out companies that have walked back their diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiative have suffered measurable reputational damage with consumers. According to a poll conducted by Axios, companies that maintained their DEI policies saw their reputational scores actually increase. The scores are based on metrics that measure 'trust, culture, ethics, citizenship, vision, growth, and products and services.' Of the 100 companies centered in the poll, there was an average reputation decline of 2.34 points. A common trait shared by the companies that received these declines is that they walked back their commitments to DEI initiatives. The majority of these withdrawals came as a result of the Trump administration's ongoing assault against anything it sees as DEI. Yet notably, companies such as Costco and Microsoft, which have held their ground on their DEI commitments, saw their reputations increase at an average of 1.5 points. These results come as a recent Pew Research poll shows that the majority of Americans still believe DEI initiatives are good for the workplace. As I said in the headline, this news really isn't that surprising if you've been paying even the slightest amount of attention over the last several months. Target has really committed itself to being a corporate lolcow this year, as its steps to wind back its DEI initiatives have blown up spectacularly in its face. In fact, let's speed run through how bad this has gone for Target. Almost as soon as the company announced it would be rolling back its DEI initiatives, consumer boycotts began in earnest. Initially, there was anecdotal evidence of their effect as foot traffic had been noticeably down in Target stores in the weeks following the boycotts. The impact was so bad that the company reached out to Rev. Al Sharpton to help figure out how they could rebuild trust with the Black community. Source: picture alliance / Getty Target's 2025 woes were compounded during an earnings call in late May, where they revealed a 2.8 percent decrease in sales in the wake of the boycotts. This didn't help the continuous decline of Target's stock price, with shares dropping 3.5 percent after they revealed the sales dip. Target was one of the companies included in Axios' poll, and its reputation went down by five percentage points and was listed in the bottom 25 percent when it came to ethics. Meanwhile, Costco's been out here big stepping with that 'I ball too hard, my girl too bad, my money too tall'-type energy. Shareholders overwhelmingly voted to keep their current DEI measures intact, and consumers seem to have noticed. Last week, Costco revealed that its earnings and revenue increased eight percent over the last quarter. Just speaking for myself and my family, the money that we would usually spend on a Target run has instead been redirected to Big Kirkland, and I wouldn't be surprised if that was true of many Black households throughout the country. Target's ongoing woes have proved to be a warning sign for a significant number of American retailers. Companies such as Walmart and Home Depot listed consumer boycotts as a potential risk in their annual regulatory filings. The numbers don't lie; withdrawing from DEI initiatives has proven to be a bad business. Here's hoping American companies finally take the hint (they won't, though, let's be real). SEE ALSO: They Scared: Target, Walmart Warn Investors About Consumer Boycotts Affinity Graduations Canceled Amid Trump's DEI Crackdown Surprise! Poll Shows Companies Maintaing DEI Intiatives Have Better Reputations was originally published on
Black America Web
an hour ago
- Black America Web
Redistricting: Majority Black Voting Maps Rejected In Louisiana
Source: Mario Tama / Getty One of the most innocuous yet insidious ways voter suppression rears its head is through redistricting, a process by which a state legislature draws up voting maps along political lines. Despite a federal judge finding that their current legislative map violates the Voting Rights Act, Louisiana lawmakers have rejected a new map that would've included eight new, majority Black districts. The Louisiana Illuminator reports that Bill 487 and Bill 488, which would've redrawn the legislative maps for the Senate and House of Representatives, respectively, were struck down in a 9-6 and 9-5 vote that fell along party lines. The current maps were drawn in 2022 and utilized census data from 2010, despite the fact that the state's Black population has only increased over the last decade. Black voters make up a third of Louisiana's population, but the current voting maps only have one majority Black district. Rep. Edmond Jordan (D-Baton Rouge), ithe chairman of the Louisiana Legislative Black Caucus, authored both bills. He explained the changes were necessary to address a ruling by a federal judge last year that found the current map disenfranchised Black voters. 'By us not upholding our obligation and redrawing these maps … I think it sends a signal that we are unwilling to do so,' Jordan told his fellow legislators. 'Rather than wait on the court to come up with a decision, I think it's incumbent upon us to get ahead of that and maybe draw these maps and show the court that we're willing to comply with Section 2' of the Voting Rights Act. The Republican opposition explained that they didn't feel the need to update the maps as the ruling is currently under appeal, and they believe that the courts will rule in their favor. They also brought up concerns that the new district lines would require current elected officials to move in order to still represent their district or possibly have to run against another incumbent to maintain their seat in the legislature. Jordan understood those concerns but stated his priority was giving Black voters an equal voice in determining who represents them. 'What we're trying to do is attempt to unpack and uncrack these districts so that they would comply with Section 2,' Jordan said. Source: Juan Silva / Getty From the Louisiana Illuminator: Packing is a type of gerrymandering that forces a large number of voters from one group into a single or small number of districts to weaken their power in other districts. Cracking dilutes the power of those voters into many districts. Jordan's plan would have added new majority Black House districts in Natchitoches, Lake Charles, Shreveport and Baton Rouge, and Black Senate districts in Baton Rouge, Shreveport and Jefferson Parish. In what can only be described as saying the quiet part out loud, state Republicans added that they found Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act to be outdated. For clarity, Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act prevents any voting law or measure 'which results in a denial or abridgement of the right of any citizen of the United States to vote on account of race or color.' Considering that they're actively using legislative districts to curb the power of Black votes, it's clear Section 2 is still a necessity to maintain voting rights within majority Black communities. Redistricting is always a partisan affair, with the legislative map being drawn by whatever party has power. Far too often, though, the redistricting efforts by state Republicans are largely built around minimizing Black voting power to keep Republicans in office. This isn't only an issue in Louisiana, as several states have drawn legislative maps that explicitly undermine Black votes. Redistricting plans in the state of Texas are also facing legal challenges due to allegations of racism. There's an ongoing fight in Texas's Tarrant County over redistricting plans that several state legislators believe violate the Voting Rights Act, and there's currently a federal case underway against the Texas state government over its 2021 voting map that was believed to have 'diluted the power of minority voters.' One of the worst offenders is Alabama, whose redistricting efforts have been deemed racist by federal judges several times. State Republicans have said that if they don't receive a favorable ruling in their appeal on the decision, they won't update the voting map until 2030 to avoid federal oversight. There is nothing more on brand for the modern GOP than having a temper tantrum when being told to be less racist. If anything, this is a reminder that in America, the boring, procedural racism is often the worst kind. SEE ALSO: Poll Shows Companies Maintaing DEI Intiatives Have Better Reputations MIT Becomes Latest University To Back Away From DEI Initiatives SEE ALSO Redistricting: Majority Black Voting Maps Rejected In Louisiana was originally published on Black America Web Featured Video CLOSE
Black America Web
an hour ago
- Black America Web
Surprise! Poll Shows Companies Maintaing DEI Intiatives Have Better Reputations
Source: Cheng Xin / Getty In news surprising to absolutely no one, it turns out companies that have walked back their diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiative have suffered measurable reputational damage with consumers. According to a poll conducted by Axios, companies that maintained their DEI policies saw their reputational scores actually increase. The scores are based on metrics that measure 'trust, culture, ethics, citizenship, vision, growth, and products and services.' Of the 100 companies centered in the poll, there was an average reputation decline of 2.34 points. A common trait shared by the companies that received these declines is that they walked back their commitments to DEI initiatives. The majority of these withdrawals came as a result of the Trump administration's ongoing assault against anything it sees as DEI. Yet notably, companies such as Costco and Microsoft, which have held their ground on their DEI commitments, saw their reputations increase at an average of 1.5 points. These results come as a recent Pew Research poll shows that the majority of Americans still believe DEI initiatives are good for the workplace. As I said in the headline, this news really isn't that surprising if you've been paying even the slightest amount of attention over the last several months. Target has really committed itself to being a corporate lolcow this year, as its steps to wind back its DEI initiatives have blown up spectacularly in its face. In fact, let's speed run through how bad this has gone for Target. Almost as soon as the company announced it would be rolling back its DEI initiatives, consumer boycotts began in earnest. Initially, there was anecdotal evidence of their effect as foot traffic had been noticeably down in Target stores in the weeks following the boycotts. The impact was so bad that the company reached out to Rev. Al Sharpton to help figure out how they could rebuild trust with the Black community. Source: picture alliance / Getty Target's 2025 woes were compounded during an earnings call in late May, where they revealed a 2.8 percent decrease in sales in the wake of the boycotts. This didn't help the continuous decline of Target's stock price, with shares dropping 3.5 percent after they revealed the sales dip. Target was one of the companies included in Axios' poll, and its reputation went down by five percentage points and was listed in the bottom 25 percent when it came to ethics. Meanwhile, Costco's been out here big stepping with that 'I ball too hard, my girl too bad, my money too tall'-type energy. Shareholders overwhelmingly voted to keep their current DEI measures intact, and consumers seem to have noticed. Last week, Costco revealed that its earnings and revenue increased eight percent over the last quarter. Just speaking for myself and my family, the money that we would usually spend on a Target run has instead been redirected to Big Kirkland, and I wouldn't be surprised if that was true of many Black households throughout the country. Target's ongoing woes have proved to be a warning sign for a significant number of American retailers. Companies such as Walmart and Home Depot listed consumer boycotts as a potential risk in their annual regulatory filings. The numbers don't lie; withdrawing from DEI initiatives has proven to be a bad business. Here's hoping American companies finally take the hint (they won't, though, let's be real). SEE ALSO: They Scared: Target, Walmart Warn Investors About Consumer Boycotts Affinity Graduations Canceled Amid Trump's DEI Crackdown SEE ALSO Surprise! Poll Shows Companies Maintaing DEI Intiatives Have Better Reputations was originally published on Black America Web Featured Video CLOSE
