logo
2 B.C. Interior ridings become battlegrounds as Liberals and Conservatives vie for gains

2 B.C. Interior ridings become battlegrounds as Liberals and Conservatives vie for gains

CBC16-04-2025

This is the first in a series of regional features focusing on issues and ridings in B.C. that could prove critical to the outcome of the federal election on April 28.
Speaking to a pumped-up crowd at a warehouse in B.C.'s Interior, Conservative Party Leader Pierre Poilievre shared a joke.
"The Okanagan is the best part of Alberta," he quipped, laughing along with his supporters who were packed in to see him speak in the community of Penticton, about an hour's drive south of Kelowna, on April 5.
Looking at more than 30 years of election results, though, his point is clear: people in B.C.'s Interior tend to vote for right-leaning parties, more in line with their eastern neighbours than their provincial counterparts in Vancouver and on Vancouver Island.
There have been exceptions over the years, including Penticton, which has been represented by the NDP since 2015.
But with polls indicating a widespread collapse in support for the New Democrats, Poilievre is touching down in B.C.-based ridings held by the NDP in an effort to complete a blue sweep of the province outside of its southwest corner.
WATCH Poilievre works the crowd in B.C.'s Okanagan Valley:
Poilievre draws big crowds in B.C.'s Interior
9 days ago
Duration 2:10
His efforts, though, may be spoiled by another potential change, this one in Kelowna, the largest city and only metro area in the B.C. Interior.
That's where Liberal candidate Stephen Fuhr senses a chance for victory which, if he pulls it off, would be a repeat of his shock 2015 win when he unseated the Conservative incumbent to become the first, and, so far, only Liberal MP elected in the B.C. Interior in 50 years — and a potential bellwether for the election race nationwide.
Longtime Liberal lockout in question
"Three weeks ago, this was a Conservative-safe riding. It is now a toss-up," Fuhr said, referring to the electoral district of Kelowna, which has recently been renamed and reconfigured to include most of the city of roughly 150,000 people, including the downtown core.
Dave Korzinski, a Kelowna-based research director at the Angus Reid Institute, said while he cautions at drawing too many conclusions from riding-level data on national campaigns, there are indications that the race in Kelowna is representative of a countrywide trend which sees voters making a choice between either the Liberals or the Conservatives, while other parties fade into the background — a reversal of previous decades where the regional race is often between the Conservatives and NDP.
Speaking specifically to Kelowna, he said the fast-growing city is getting younger, a trend which has tended to favour parties other than the Conservatives. The Liberals have also laid some groundwork in the region, hosting a caucus retreat there in 2019, and Carney briefly touched down in February to meet supporters during his bid for the leadership of the party.
Korzinski said most projections give the Liberal and Conservative candidates roughly even chances of winning in Kelowna as the election coalesces around the issue of who can best deal with U.S. President Donald Trump.
Knocking on doors, Fuhr has drawn the same conclusion, saying people are telling him they're ready to put "country over party," which is leading to pickups from voters who might otherwise lean NDP, Green or even Conservative.
Among those people is Fuhr himself, who says that for most of his life he had dutifully voted for centre-right parties, a practice he attributes to the social circles he had growing up in Alberta.
But by 2015, he says, people had begun to sour on Stephen Harper's leadership and were ready for a change. The sentiment ran deep enough in Kelowna that the local Green candidate dropped out of the race and endorsed Fuhr as the best way to defeat the Conservatives, providing an upset and giving Fuhr a seat in Parliament.
The honeymoon didn't last, though. Fuhr says that when he went door-knocking again during the election of 2019, he once again heard from voters who were tired of their prime minister, but only this time, it was Justin Trudeau. He lost his seat and opted not to run again in 2021.
A former pilot in the Royal Canadian Air Force, he says he's been pulled back into politics by a desire to help defend Canada against Trump's talk of annexation and trade wars and a belief in the new Liberal leader's ability to win people over.
"[Mark] Carney plays very well here," Fuhr said, saying the former banker appeals to voters like him who may have once leaned Conservative but feel uneasy about whether Poilievre can best handle the moment with the uncertainty caused by the United States.
Korzinski of the Angus Reid Institute said while it's true the Liberals are picking up new supporters, he doesn't see the same sort of "generational shift" of voters moving toward Carney that took place when Trudeau ran for prime minister in 2015, when younger Canadians were attracted by his message on issues like climate change and spending.
"There seems to be more pragmatism in this race in supporting Carney and the Liberals, rather than the charisma factor that Trudeau brought," he said in an email.
Conservatives target NDP voters in West Kootenay
Korzinski also noted that Angus Reid's polling has shown a tightening of the race in B.C., with Conservative Party gains coming at the expense of other parties, including the Liberals, following Poilievre's visits to both Penticton and Terrace in B.C.'s northwest.
He said the importance of the cost of living among voters polled has risen in recent weeks, while the weight of relations with the United States has declined on the priority list, a trend that could favour the Conservatives, as well.
Those trends speak to Dan Albas in the riding of Okangan Lake West-South Kelowna. First elected as a Conservative in 2011, he says he got into politics as a "frustrated small business owner" and is critical of the direction of the country over the past decade.
"Our GDP growth, wage growth, standard of living have fallen way behind other countries," he said.
He says that in addition to international relations, what voters he speaks to are focused on is things like public safety and stagnant economic opportunities, problems he says have gotten and will continue to get worse under the Liberals.
Albas joined Poilievre on stage in Penticton, where they are hoping for a Conservative win in the new riding of Similkameen—South Okanagan—West Kootenay.
Formerly South Okanagan—West Kootenay, the district has had its boundaries redrawn to extend further west into Vernon, an area that has historically voted Conservative and which the party thinks will help extend its chances of victory, particularly since the incumbent, the NDP's Richard Cannings, is not standing for reelection.
WATCH | What do voters care about in Kimberly, B.C.?
What matters to voters in Kimberley, B.C.?
3 days ago
Duration 2:25
The city of Kimberley, in the province's East Kootenay region, has been a tourist destination for decades. Voters in the city — part of the redrawn Columbia-Kootenay-Southern Rockies riding — spoke to the CBC's Corey Bullock about what matters to them ahead of the federal election, including climate change and the Canada-U.S. relationship.
Bill Bennett, a longtime provincial politician in the region with the now-defunct B.C. Liberals who has worked on federal Conservative campaigns, says he thinks the Conservative message appeals to the same sort of "working people" who have previously voted NDP.
"They're people that want to get ahead economically," he said. "They want to make sure they continue to have their jobs working in the mining industry and the forest industry and everything else that you do here."
Poilievre's message of lowering taxes and speeding up resource development, he said, resonates.
Linda Sankey, who has stepped in as the NDP candidate, also places cost of living at the top of the list of everyday concerns for voters, including a lack of housing and health care.
She's been out on the road making the pitch to voters that her party, which helped extend dental and pharmacy coverage, is best positioned to deliver tangible change.
"It's time to build, not to cut," she said, arguing that both the Liberals and Conservatives fail to work for "the people."
But Bennett says his time in politics has taught him that in a major campaign, it's the face of the party that matters more than the local candidate, so the direction this election takes in the Interior may come down to whether Carney or Poilievre can appeal more to voters in the region.
And with so much at stake for the country right now, he hopes people will take a close look at who they want to be prime minister in the weeks and years ahead.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

LILLEY: Carney's multi-layered defence announcement is good news
LILLEY: Carney's multi-layered defence announcement is good news

Toronto Sun

time18 minutes ago

  • Toronto Sun

LILLEY: Carney's multi-layered defence announcement is good news

Government finally heeding decades of calls to boost military spending. Get the latest from Brian Lilley straight to your inbox Prime Minister Mark Carney greets Canadian troops of the 4th Canadian Division as he attends a tour of the Fort York Armoury in Toronto on June 9, 2025 in Toronto. Carney has pledged to meet NATO's 2% spending pledge this fiscal year. Photo by Cole Burston / GETTY IMAGES The announcement that the Carney Liberal government in Ottawa would increase defence spending was multi-layered. There was a domestic message about taking national security seriously, a message to Canadian industry that investment is coming and a message to Donald Trump that Canada is getting serious once again. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account While Carney said this message was for Canadians, Trump and the need for a trade deal was clearly a motivating factor. 'Canada will achieve NATO's 2% target this year, half a decade ahead of schedule,' the prime minister said during a speech at the University of Toronto. Canada has long promised to spend 2% of GDP on defence as part of being a member of NATO but hasn't hit that mark since 1990. That was under the Mulroney government at the end of the Cold War and after the fall of the Berlin Wall and the USSR, interest in defence spending faded away like Soviet communism. We got lazy, we became complacent, we relied too heavily on the Americans, and we believed no one would want to harm us, that is if they could reach us. 'The long-held view that Canada's geographic location will protect us is becoming increasingly archaic. Threats which felt far away and remote are now immediate and acute. And as our climate changes and the polar ice recedes Canada's arctic is becoming more accessible and more vulnerable,' Carney said. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. So, to that end, Carney announced that defence spending in Canada will rise from just shy of $40 billion in the current 2025-26 fiscal year to $62 billion. Some of that will happen by moving existing government spending to the defence budget, so there isn't really an increase. For example, the Canadian Coast Guard is currently part of Fisheries and Oceans to the Department of National Defence along with its current $4.5-billion budget. The Coast Guard will then also have additional duties 'to better secure our sovereignty and expand maritime surveillance.' There will also be a push to boost Canada's defence industrial capacity with contracts in areas like light armoured vehicles, ammunitions and more going to Canadian companies. On this front, Carney described the spending as increasing defence spending while also supporting good paying jobs in Canadian industries. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. 'We will ensure that every dollar is invested wisely, including by prioritizing made-in-Canada manufacturing and supply chains,' Carney said. There are real questions about whether DND can spend this much money and do it wisely. The Canadian Armed Forces are currently short almost 15,000 active-duty members. Recruitment has been a problem for the past several years, but so has retention as members leave in droves. A pay boost that will be part of this increase in defence spending should help with recruitment. Having up-to-date equipment instead of antiquated or broken equipment should help. In his remarks Monday, Carney noted that only one of our four submarines is seaworthy. Read More This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. How can a country like Canada operate a navy with just one working sub? To really increase recruitment the military doesn't necessarily need to spend more money, but they do need a culture change. They need to drop the woke mentality that has seen the Royal Canadian Navy push to drop Heart of Oak as their march song. The 2% pledge comes now; expect Carney to announce future increases either just before or at the NATO meetings taking place June 24-25 in The Hague. It's all part of trying to secure a new deal with the United States under President Donald Trump. While Trump's claim that the U.S. was subsidizing Canada were mostly false, on defence it was true. By making this announcement, the Carney government is helping set the table for an announcement of a new deal with the Americans before the G7 meetings start in Alberta this coming Sunday. RECOMMENDED VIDEO Toronto Blue Jays Olympics World Toronto & GTA Canada

The long history of Canada failing to hit its military spending targets
The long history of Canada failing to hit its military spending targets

Vancouver Sun

timean hour ago

  • Vancouver Sun

The long history of Canada failing to hit its military spending targets

In an ever-more insecure world, Canada's federal government has announced it will spend two per cent of its GDP on military spending. That's the standard that members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization all agreed to back in 2006, but Canada has long been a laggard, to the extent that other governments, particularly the United States, have browbeaten the country for its meagre military spending. At present, Canada spends 1.37 per cent of GDP on the military. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. In 2024, NATO released a report detailing which nations hit the two-per-cent target. Twenty-three of the defence's group's members were either at or above two per cent. This includes Montenegro, a Balkan country with a population smaller than that of Mississauga, and the two most recent NATO members, Sweden and Finland. Eight countries, including Canada, had not. Canada spends less than Italy on defence but more than Belgium. The lowest-spending NATO nation, Spain, puts 1.28 per cent of its GDP towards military spending. In July 2023, the Wall Street Journal editorial board called Canada's military spending 'pathetic .' NATO is currently considering bumping its threshold from two per cent to five per cent, something that world leaders are expected to discuss at the annual summit at The Hague in two weeks' time. Peter MacKay, who served as defence minister in the former Conservative government, told National Post in 2023 that he regrets that the Conservatives hadn't hit the target while they were in power. By 2014, he said, there was a 'great deal of fatigue around defence spending,' due to the years Canada had spent fighting in Afghanistan. 'We, the (Stephen) Harper government, were putting a lot of money into this effort to reach two per cent. And the department literally couldn't spend it fast enough,' he said. 'They would take the money and we would get wrapped around the axle literally on these big (procurement) projects. And we would, at the end of the year, have to send money back to the Treasury.' Prime Minister Mark Carney announced Monday that Canada will spend an additional $9.3 billion on defence during the 2025-2026 fiscal year, for a total of more than $62 billion, or about two per cent of GDP. But this isn't the first time that a Canadian prime minister has promised that the country would hit the target. Here's a non-exhaustive list of when Canada has promised to hit its NATO target and where its defence spending was at over the years. 1970s: At this point, Canada was spending 2.8 per cent of its GDP on its defence budget . While the 1970s were technically a period of détente in the Cold War, there were a number of close calls in the 1960s and the 1970s were a deeply unstable period. Throughout the mid-1970s, Canada's military spending began to decline, averaging about 1.9 per cent of GDP, before growing slightly through the 1980s to 2.1 per cent. April 1989: In the 1989 budget, Canada planned to cut $2.7 billion from its defence budget and close 14 of its Cold War bases. An entire military program, nearly $700 million for an icebreaker, was scrapped. November 2006: NATO member countries commit to two per cent of GDP going towards the military. At the time, Canada's defence spending was around 1.2 per cent of GDP. January 2007: During the war in Afghanistan, Stephen Harper's government was spending just over one per cent of GDP. In January 2007, the Defence Department presented Harper's cabinet with three spending options to grow the defence budget. The middle option was to spend $35 billion by 2025. As of 2025, defence spending was a bit above $30 billion . September 2014: At the NATO summit in Wales, allies reaffirmed their commitment to spending two per cent of GDP on military spending. However, just days before the meeting, figures released by the Department of National Defence showed that the federal government intended to shrink defence spending by $2.7 billion. (The government was pushing to balance the budget in advance of the 2015 election. Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau won a majority government in that election.) June 2017: Then defence minister Harjit Sajjan announced an increase of $13.9 billion in military spending over the next decade, and a plan that would put 5,000 more troops in uniform, but still leave Canada short of hitting the two per cent target. At the time, defence spending was at around 1.19 per cent of GDP. October 2020: Canada's defence spending jumped to 1.45 per cent of GDP. However, that was not because of any new spending increases, but because the economy contracted during the COVID-19 pandemic. May 2022: Then defence minister Anita Anand said that Canada is on an ' upward trajectory ' when it comes to meeting NATO targets. However, in a virtual discussion hosted by the Canadian Chamber of Commerce, she stopped short of committing to a timeline. June 2022: The Parliamentary Budget Office said that if Canada was to reach the two-per-cent target by 2027, the country would need to spend more than $75 billion more over five years . April 2023: A leaked Pentagon assessment obtained by the Washington Post revealed that Trudeau had privately told NATO officials that Canada would never reach the alliance's defence-spending target of two per cent of GDP. July 2023: NATO released a statement saying that all members have agreed to spend at least two per cent. Canada agreed to the target, but at the time had no plan to reach it. In recent years, officials have defended the government's failure to meet the two per cent target, saying that Canada has increased its military spending by 70 per cent since 2014. The Liberals announced $2.6 billion over three years on Canada's mission in Latvia, $40 billion on NORAD modernization and billions in spending on the new F-35 fighter jets (a contract that is now being reviewed.) April 2024: The Canadian government unveiled its updated military policy — Our North, Strong and Free — which included $8.1 billion in further spending. However, it was not a commitment to reach two per cent. It would get Canada to 1.76 per cent by 2029-30. June 2024: Then prime minister Justin Trudeau announced at the end of the 2024 NATO summit that Canada would reach two per cent of GDP on military spending by 2032. 'We continually step up and punch above our weight, something that isn't always reflected in the crass mathematical calculation that certain people turn to very quickly,' Trudeau said at the time. 'Which is why we've always questioned the two per cent as the be-all, end-all of evaluating contributions to NATO.' In July, Blair said: 'It was important to be realistic about how long it was going to take to make these investments, to do it the right way.' November 2024: Exclusive Postmedia-Leger polling showed that 45 per cent of Canadians don't believe that Canada will hit its commitments on military spending. In order to achieve that, Canada would need to nearly double defence spending. Just one-fifth of Canadians told pollsters they think it's possible. January 2025: Then minister of national defence Bill Blair said that Canada could accelerate its timeline of hitting the two per cent target. Instead of 2032, Blair said that Canada could hit that benchmark by 2027 by simply accelerating the timeline set out in June 2024. April 2025: During the federal election, both the Liberals and the Conservatives promised to meet the NATO spending targets. The Liberals said they would do so by boosting spending by $18 billion over four years, while the Conservatives pledged to spend $17 billion over four years. In March, U.S. President Donald Trump said that the United States wouldn't defend NATO allies that had not met their spending targets. Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here .

Carney easing into the job, and Canadians' low expectations suggest they're just fine with that
Carney easing into the job, and Canadians' low expectations suggest they're just fine with that

Winnipeg Free Press

timean hour ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

Carney easing into the job, and Canadians' low expectations suggest they're just fine with that

Opinion It's the honeymoon that is defying all the odds. Six weeks or so after the federal election, Prime Minister Mark Carney continues to do a remarkable job of growing support for his government. National public opinion polls show Carney's Liberal government gaining modestly in popularity even though, other than striking a new cabinet, jousting with U.S. President Donald Trump and gathering with Canada's premiers to talk about strategic infrastructure, he hasn't done that much. In some cases, he's done nothing at all. CHRIS YOUNG / THE CANADIAN PRESS Prime Minister Mark Carney has not done much since being elected, and yet his support continues to grow. The new prime minister, for example, has turned aside demands from inside and outside the House of Commons to table a budget before Parliament breaks for the summer at the end of this month. Among the biggest concerns about not having a budget is the fact that Carney would be making spending decisions without the direction of the House of Commons, a bad look for a minority government. Those arguments have not swayed Carney, who became the Liberal leader in early March and almost immediately called a federal election. He has promised to introduce a new spending plan sometime this fall. No matter. Carney's decision to skip the budget has had zero negative impact on his popularity. Nanos Research found that in early June, right as Carney was shunning demands for a budget, the Liberals had opened up a six-point lead over the Conservatives. That may not seem like a huge margin but when you consider how tight the April election was, it is statistically significant. Meanwhile, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre's trend line is heading in the opposite direction. In the same Nanos poll, Poilievre's approval rating is hovering at about 28 per cent, a 12-point drop from the election. The fact that Poilievre lost his seat in the election but refused to resign as leader has, no doubt, contributed to his declining support. It all adds up to a somewhat surprising scenario: Carney has not really done anything since getting elected, and yet his support is continuing to grow. Abacus Data found that in early June, the Carney government had a 53-per-cent approval rating, up an astounding 30 points from the beginning of the year when former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau was still in charge. As well, Abacus found 38 per cent of Canadians believe the country is headed in the right direction, the highest level of optimism in government in three years. What, you may ask, is the basis for our growing optimism? Inflation has moderated and interest rates have gone down slightly, but not because of anything the Carney government has done. And none of his biggest campaign pledges — most notably approving strategic national infrastructure and easing the housing crisis — have been even partly fulfilled. Carney's continuing honeymoon appears to be built on a series of external factors that have combined to create a safe port in an otherwise stormy political environment. The biggest of these advantages is the simple fact that Carney is neither Trudeau nor Poilievre, two politicians that Canadians clearly did not want leading the country. Carney also continues to benefit from the fact that he has proven to be an able foe for the Trump administration's volatile rants and irrational trade policies. Carney is also, rather surprisingly, benefiting from historically low expectations. A Nanos survey taken in the first few days of June found that 38 per cent of respondents do not expect the Carney government to deliver on major pledges, or solve big problems, before the end of the year. Although 17 per cent do think there should be measurable progress on big files by summer, an almost equal number (about 12 per cent think) think tangible results won't come until next year. The final advantage that Carney is exploiting is that there are no other alternatives for voters to consider. The Tories remain shackled to Poilievre's desperate plan to remain as leader and await a byelection so he can be readmitted to the House of Commons. It's a bad idea that poll results suggest is only getting worse in the eyes of voters. Tuesdays A weekly look at politics close to home and around the world. The argument for keeping Poilievre was based on the fact that he received more votes and won more seats than the Tories had in the previous election. However, Poilievre's supporters ignore the fact that he has always been significantly less popular than his party, which makes him less of a saviour and more of a millstone going forward. And then there is the NDP, the only other party in the current political melodrama that has a theoretical hope of denting Carney's Teflon surface. Lamentably, nobody seems to want the job of leading the party now that Jagmeet Singh has been dispatched to the political graveyard. Without a dynamic leader, it's hard to imagine the NDP eating into anyone else's support. The stars have clearly aligned for the Carney government. He hasn't had to do the tough work of drafting a budget and his principal political opponents are too disorganized to mount any serious threat of toppling the minority government and triggering a new election. It won't last forever. But right now, with nothing but political tailwinds pushing Carney forward, it feels like it just might. Dan LettColumnist Dan Lett is a columnist for the Free Press, providing opinion and commentary on politics in Winnipeg and beyond. Born and raised in Toronto, Dan joined the Free Press in 1986. Read more about Dan. Dan's columns are built on facts and reactions, but offer his personal views through arguments and analysis. The Free Press' editing team reviews Dan's columns before they are posted online or published in print — part of the our tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press's history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates. Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber. Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store