Jailed without hope: Ministers block 128 prisoners on indefinite jail terms from moving to open conditions
The government has blocked 128 prisoners trapped under cruel indefinite jail terms from moving to open conditions in the past 12 months, The Independent can reveal.
Figures show the justice secretary has refused to allow scores of inmates serving abolished Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) jail terms to progress to an open prison despite the Parole Board recommending their transfer.
Politicians and campaigners have hit out at the 'scandalous' number of prisoners being stopped from progressing to a lower category prison where they may be eligible for day release, warning it reinforces the sense that IPP is the sentence of 'no hope'.
More than 2,600 are languishing under the 'torture sentences' with no release date 12 years after the indefinite terms were abolished amid human rights concerns.
These include shocking injustices highlighted by The Independent such as James Lawrence, who is still in prison 18 years after he was handed an eight-month jail term; Thomas White, who set himself alight in his cell after serving 12 years for stealing a phone; and Abdullahi Suleman, who is still inside 19 years after he was jailed for a laptop robbery.
At least 90 IPP prisoners have taken their own lives as they lose hope of ever being freed.
The government has come under fire for refusing to resentence IPP inmates, with prisons minister James Timpson last month telling the House of Lords it was 'right' that release decisions are made by the independent Parole Board.
Instead, he said IPP inmates must focus on progressing towards being approved for release by the Parole Board despite more than 700 having served at least 10 years longer than their minimum term.
However, in answer to a parliamentary question from Labour MP Kim Johnson, justice minister Sir Nicholas Dakin said that the secretary of state is free to accept or reject the Parole Board's recommendations to move someone to an open prison.
And figures reveal that the government has refused to follow Parole Board recommendations to progress IPP prisoners in 61 per cent of cases in the past year.
In the first four months of 2024, under the previous Tory government, every single IPP prisoner recommended for progression was denied a move to open prison.
The numbers allowed to transfer have increased since the Labour government was elected in July, although 45 per cent were still blocked from transferring in the last six months of 2024.
The figures come as a former justice secretary called for thousands of prisoners to be moved to open prisons to tackle overcrowding and help prepare inmates for release,
David Gauke, who has been commissioned by the government to lead a review of sentencing policy, believes the move would save money and help reduce reoffending.
Urging ministers to look to Spain where one in four prisoners are allowed to leave prison walls during the day, he told The Times: 'We don't make as much use of open prisons as we might do.'
Lord Woodley, who has tabled a private member's bill for IPP prisoners to be resentenced, said the figures of those blocked from moving to open prisons were 'scandalous'.
'Without wishing to sound cynical, some might say the government seem happy to hide behind the Parole Board when it suits them, but to ignore their advice when it doesn't,' he said.
Reformed IPP prisoner Marc Conway, who was one of the heroes of the Fishmongers' Hall terror attack, said the shocking figures only serve to reinforce the feeling that IPP is the sentence of no hope.
'It is concerning that people have done everything that the Parole Board has asked and they have said they are in a good position to move to open conditions, then the government stepped in to override it,' he said.
'Rulings like this actually reinforce that IPP is the sentence of no hope. It will enforce their feeling that no one cares about them.
'It's the people at the top who have got the power. When you feel like you are fighting a whole establishment rather than an individual process you start to feel dehumanised. You start to feel like you are not worthy. These are all factors as to why people attempt suicide and self-harm.'
Last year Nicholas Bidar, 36, became the first IPP prisoner to have his parole hearing held in public. He described himself as a political prisoner after he was recommended for transfer to open conditions in 2021, but this was blocked by Dominic Raab, the home secretary. He remains in maximum security HMP Long Lartin.
A family member said the refusal to move him, despite the panel of parole board experts advising he was ready, was 'devastating'.
'His words to us afterwards were literally, 'I don't want to wake up, I don't want to be here,'' they told The Independent.
'He said, 'I am not coming home, I'm going to die here.' That's how he has felt since that happened.'
Bernadette Emerson, co-founder of IPP Committee in Action, has been fighting for her husband Abdullahi Suleman, who is still inside 19 years after he was jailed for a laptop robbery.
She said the figures show why IPPs feel like they have 'no chance whatsoever'.
'They are trapping IPPs either way,' she said. 'Without resentencing going ahead what's going to happen for IPPs if the government is doing these blocks all the time?
'They need to drastically improve the situation for IPPs and give them the chance to progress to release and be given their life back.'
A Ministry of Justice spokesperson said: 'It is right that IPP sentences were abolished. We recently terminated the lifetime licences of more than 1,700 rehabilitated offenders, and are improving the rehabilitation and mental health support for those still in prison.
'The Lord Chancellor considers the recommendations from the independent Parole Board as to whether to place IPP prisoners in the open estate and public safety is at the heart of any decision.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
an hour ago
- Spectator
Is Reform a right-wing party?
If the problem with Labour is that it believes in nothing, the problem with Reform is that it believes in everything. The dispute over the burqa is only the latest example. In pushing Keir Starmer to ban the burqa 'in the interests of public safety', new MP Sarah Pochin undoubtedly spoke for a significant section of the party's supporters. For that matter, polling has previously indicated the British public's backing for a ban. For some, it is indeed a safety issue: presented with a stranger, covered head-to-foot, identifiable only by their eyes, how can we know who that person is, whether they ought to be there, and what their intentions are? For others, it's a symbol of the cultural separatism that sees entire communities of Muslims live parallel lives in Britain, indifferent or hostile to our inherited customs and conventions.
Scotsman
2 hours ago
- Scotsman
Why Tories must stop agreeing with Farage and start attacking him to survive
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... On April 15, 2010, the UK held its first-ever televised general election debate, pitting Labour's Gordon Brown, the then Prime Minister, against David Cameron of the Conservatives, with Nick Clegg expected to do little more than make up the numbers. However, if that was the anticipated script, no one told Clegg, who spoke so persuasively that the catchphrase of the night was 'I agree with Nick' as both Cameron and Brown sought to side with him. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad In a snap YouGov poll after the contest, 51 per cent declared the Liberal Democrat leader to be the winner, with Cameron on 29 and Brown on 19. While 'Cleggmania' proved short-lived, the clear lesson was that agreeing with a political opponent tends to benefit them. Delegates at the Conservative party conference in 2023 pose for a photograph with Nigel Farage (Picture: Oli Scarff) | AFP via Getty Images A political cataclysm looms Fifteen years later, and the Conservatives' current strategy to defeat Reform UK, by echoing its rhetoric, is backfiring even more badly. While the 2010 debate was a one-off event, the Tories have effectively been campaigning for Reform for years. In Thursday's Hamilton by-election, the Conservative candidate received just 1,621 votes, down from 6,332 at the last Scottish Parliament election, while Reform got 7,088, not far behind the winner, Labour's Davy Russell, and the SNP in second. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad As the Scottish Tories prepare for their party conference this week, a major topic of discussion must be about finding ways to disagree with Reform, if they wish to survive what threatens to become a political event as cataclysmic as the collapse of the old Liberal party after the First World War. Farage is out to destroy the Tories, and they must be as determined and ruthless. There is much to go at. Many of Reform's policies are patently ridiculous and some are downright dangerous. Keir Starmer's claim that Farage would 'crash the economy' like Liz Truss was a good line, and the Conservatives need to find similarly resonant ways of highlighting the very real dangers of voting for Reform.
The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Labour's by-election win only highlights SNP's detachment from reality
Boothman of The Times is also here of course. 'What the hell's going on then, John,' I ask him. 'Some people are telling me the Labour vote has collapsed,' he tells me. To be fair to Boothman though, he's among the first later to suggest that the smiles on the threshing floor where the count will take place are all on the faces of Labour folk. I attempt to mock his initial analysis. 'Didn't you say Labour's vote was collapsing,' I say. 'Aye it's collapsed into the ballot box,' he says. Boothman's an old fox and not easily caught out. Read More: There's Hutcheon of the Record, scurrying hither and yon, fresh from having chivvied Sir Alex Ferguson and Graeme Souness into backing Davy Russell to take the seat for Labour. If he had lost badly then to Hutcheon would have fallen the task of finding some lipstick for his front page the following day. The changes that social media have wrought in the newspaper industry are never starker than when applied to an election night. The task now is to transmit your thoughts as they're happening and based on little more than the body language of the participants and the snatched asides of party activists which you must first rinse of its in-built prejudice. Even as you're sending out your 20-word digital despatches you know you risk being confounded at any moment by incoming kites and the excursions and alarums of the counting floor. My paper is now asking for a selfie of me with Mr Learmonth and Ms McCurdy where the trick once more is to channel an air of authority and confidence that I'm not really feeling. Our editor, Catherine Salmond, kindly calls us her 'top team' in her social media post. On my feed though, a chap is begging to differ. He calls us 'filthy partisan sock puppets for England.' Always mindful of everyone's mental health, I'm glad he's got it off his chest. McKenna, Learmonth and McCurdy: Salmond's top team (Image: Newsquest) The night then becomes all about juggling narratives. And in the 48 hours since Mr Russell's seemingly unlikely victory it's been about trying to discern the runes of what his win portends. The most profoundly important consequence of Labour's triumph and Reform's massive electoral breakthrough here is that Scottish independence is off the table for another generation, effectively killed off by the SNP's own folly. The SNP now exists for one purpose only: to try to cling to power in Holyrood by any means necessary. Sir John Curtice has already predicted that Reform, on the basis of their showing on Thursday, could win up to 28 seats in 2026. That alone kills independence until at least 2031 and then only as an unlikely prospect. What should worry the SNP most is that the Yes vote in 2014 was reinforced by up to 30% of traditional Labour voters who backed independence as a means of decoupling from a UK polity which was being controlled by the hard right Toryism of Boris Johnson and Jacob Rees-Mogg. Now that the SNP have effectively ditched independence there's no reason for any former Labour voter to stay with them. During this campaign, the SNP's obsession with gender politics also came home to roost: not so much on the doorsteps, but in the calibre of people they sent out to them. The course of the GRR debate didn't harm them as much as the resignations en masse of hard-working, intelligent and reasonable female activists who had been the backbone of their success between 2007 and 2024. They were missing at the UK election in 2024 and again last week in South Lanarkshire and the results are there for all to see. The disconnection between professional politics and the everyday people of Scotland has never been more starkly evident than with this party. A slew of poisonous social media attacks in the last 48 hours on the Hamilton, Stonehouse and Larkhall voters by prominent SNP supporters (and at least one Councillor) has been depressing to behold. The clock is now ticking for John Swinney's leadership as the wage thieves on his backbenches begin to tumble to this and what it means for their mortgages and school fees. But time has already been called on Scottish independence. Counting begins for the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election at the South Lanarkshire Council headquarters in Hamilton. (Image: Jane Barlow/PA Wire) Meanwhile, Scottish Labour should probably calm down now. To read some analysis of their admittedly adroit campaign in South Lanarkshire you'd have thought it had been run by alchemists who'd found the secret of turning base metal into gold. Behave yourselves. Labour has a longer term problem here and solving it will mean getting real about the challenge of Reform. In Scotland there has always been a large cohort of aspirational working class: well-informed; skilled and conservative in their community and family values. It was these people who handed the Conservatives the only electoral majority vote percentage in a Scottish election as they did in 1955. It has been thought that societal changes; the upward progression of the Irish/Catholic community in Scotland and the class malevolence of Thatcherism had killed mass Toryism for good. To admit to voting Tory in some of Scotland's working-class communities was to risk becoming a social and cultural pariah. But here's the nightmare scenario for Labour in Scotland. What if these voters hadn't merely held their noses and voted reluctantly for Reform as a howl against a supercilious Holyrood elite? What if instead they'd gladly voted for them because it didn't indicate class betrayal and was thus safe to do so? One senior Labour figure told me yesterday that the Scottish left in general, faced with the challenge of Reform, must re-imagine what it actually stands for. 'The Left in Scotland has been too focused on identity politics and flying flags for issues that aren't of concern to ordinary working people,' he told me. Scottish Labour's Davy Russell arrives at the count before being declared winner for the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election (Image: Jane Barlow/PA Wire) 'There needs to be some very deep thinking on what we stand for on what it means to be on the Left. And then we must seek to communicate those priorities. You can say what you like about Tony Blair, but he built a broad coalition in a party where John Prescott, Gordon Brown and John Reid thrived.' It's doubtful if these men would get house-room inside Keir Starmer's Labour Party now. UK Labour is currently speaking to no-one but some of London's salon neighbourhoods around Canary Wharf, Islington and Shoreditch and the café society of the Southside of Glasgow. What Davy Russell represents is more in tune with what their former voters expect of Labour.
