logo
Spokane overhauls homeless strategy after camping ban struck down by state Supreme Court

Spokane overhauls homeless strategy after camping ban struck down by state Supreme Court

Yahoo05-05-2025

This story was originally published on MyNorthwest.com.
The City of Spokane is overhauling its strategy regarding its homeless population after the Washington State Supreme Court struck down the city's camping ban last month.
Mayor Lisa Brown announced a new comprehensive homeless plan Thursday, which includes adding housing units at all income levels, expanding home ownership, and increasing healthcare access in the city.
'We have needed a plan for years, and now we have one,' Brown said. 'Some of that is rental assistance, some of that is working with people to prevent evictions, some of that is connecting them with resources they're qualified for but they don't even know it.'
The plan has been dubbed 'Home Starts Here.' Under this plan, if officials discover an encampment, the housing outreach team would have seven days to connect that unhoused person with services provided by the city, according to KXLY. If they remain after a week, police can remove the tent, but officers still would have to work to connect these people with services for housing or treatment. The City of Spokane wants to avoid homeless people 'just (moving) from one area to the next.'
Proposals responding to the rejection of Proposition 1 will be discussed in upcoming city council meetings.
Spokane's Proposition 1, which outlawed homeless people from setting up campsites within 1,000 feet of schools, parks, and childcare facilities throughout the city, with a few designated areas established in the outskirts, was overruled by the state Supreme Court. The decision came despite approximately 75% of Spokane voters approving Prop. 1 last November.
The 2018 Martin v. Boise federal court decision was cited in the decision. That case led to the ruling that cities could not criminalize a homeless person sleeping on public property unless shelter space was available.
Council members Jonathan Bingle and Michael Cathcart, who represent the conservative minority of Spokane's city leadership, claimed they were left in the dark with this decision.
'The majority loves to leave out the word majority; they do this consistently,' Cathcart told The Center Square after Brown made her announcement. 'They act as though something has been collaborated with all of the council, and it's simply not true. There was no conversation with myself.'
Brown and other officials held a briefing with local media outlets last week so they could ask questions ahead of the announcement of 'Home Starts Here.' Bingle and Cathcart claimed they weren't told about this until just hours before the unveiling.
'There was absolutely a private press conference, a gaggle, whatever it is, and I don't know who all was there, but I was told it was written media,' Cathcart told The Center Square.
Cathcart received an invite for a Thursday meeting and announcement of 'Home Starts Here,' but wasn't told what it was about. Bingle added that he received an invitation for the 8:30 a.m. meeting with the mayor, like the rest of the council, but claimed his invite said 9 a.m. Brown also had to leave shortly after Bingle arrived, so there wasn't much back and forth regarding the proposed overhaul.
The administration and council majority 'aren't interested in working with' him or Cathcart, Bingle told The Center Square.
Follow Frank Sumrall on X. Send news tips here.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump bid to ban foreign Harvard students temporarily blocked by judge
Trump bid to ban foreign Harvard students temporarily blocked by judge

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Trump bid to ban foreign Harvard students temporarily blocked by judge

A federal judge has temporarily blocked a proclamation by President Donald Trump that banned foreign students from entering the US to attend Harvard University. Mr Trump's proclamation, issued on Wednesday, was the latest attempt by his administration to prevent the nation's oldest and wealthiest college from enrolling a quarter of its students, who account for much of Harvard's research and scholarship. Harvard filed a legal challenge the next day, asking for a judge to block Mr Trump's order and calling it illegal retaliation for Harvard's rejection of White House demands. Harvard said the president was attempting an end-run around a previous court order. A few hours later, US District Judge Allison Burroughs in Boston issued a temporary restraining order against Mr Trump's Wednesday proclamation. Harvard, she said, had demonstrated it would sustain 'immediate and irreparable injury' before she would have an opportunity to hear from the parties in the lawsuit. Ms Burroughs also extended the temporary hold she placed on the administration's previous attempt to end Harvard's enrolment of international students. Last month, the Department of Homeland Security revoked Harvard's certification to host foreign students and issue paperwork to them for their visas, only to have Ms Burroughs block the action temporarily. Mr Trump's order this week invoked a different legal authority. If Mr Trump's measure were to survive this court challenge, it would block thousands of students who are scheduled to come to Harvard's campus in Cambridge, Massachusetts, for the summer and autumn terms. 'Harvard's more than 7,000 F-1 and J-1 visa holders — and their dependents — have become pawns in the government's escalating campaign of retaliation,' Harvard wrote in a court filing on Thursday. While the court case proceeds, Harvard is making contingency plans so students and visiting scholars can continue their work at the university, president Alan Garber said in a message to the campus and alumni. 'Each of us is part of a truly global university community,' Mr Garber said on Thursday. 'We know that the benefits of bringing talented people together from around the world are unique and irreplaceable.' Harvard has attracted a growing number of the brightest minds from around the world, with international enrolment growing from 11% of the student body three decades ago to 26% today. Rising international enrolment has made Harvard and other elite colleges uniquely vulnerable to Mr Trump's crackdown on foreign students. Republicans have been seeking to force overhauls of the nation's top colleges, which they see as hotbeds of 'woke' and antisemitic viewpoints. Mr Garber says the university has made changes to combat antisemitism. But Harvard, he said, will not stray from its 'core, legally-protected principles', even after receiving federal ultimatums. Mr Trump's administration has also taken steps to withhold federal funding from Harvard and other elite colleges that have rejected White House demands related to campus protests, admissions, hiring and more. Harvard's 53 billion dollar (£39 billion) endowment allows it to weather the loss of funding for a time, although Mr Garber has warned of 'difficult decisions and sacrifices' to come.

It's time to tax the wealthiest and invest in a Rhode Island that works for all of us
It's time to tax the wealthiest and invest in a Rhode Island that works for all of us

Boston Globe

time2 hours ago

  • Boston Globe

It's time to tax the wealthiest and invest in a Rhode Island that works for all of us

Get Rhode Map A weekday briefing from veteran Rhode Island reporters, focused on the things that matter most in the Ocean State. Enter Email Sign Up We reject the tired, misleading narratives pushed by opponents like the Advertisement 'Taxing the 1% is the fair thing to do. Rhode Island's economy is growing; everyone should pay their fair share for the growth and economic well-being of our state,' says Vennicia Kingston, a member of RIBBA and CEO of Eagle Eye Construction in Johnston, R.I. Advertisement Meanwhile, the wealthiest among us often benefit from tax loopholes and wealth management strategies that lower their effective tax rates well below what most working families pay. Many high-income earners receive income through pass-through entities, investments, and capital gains — all taxed at lower rates than the wages earned by small business owners and everyday Rhode Islanders. According to the — a clear sign of a regressive and inequitable system. It's time to fix that. The revenue from this proposal would directly support the critical services that create a strong, thriving economy: education, child care, health care, transportation, housing, and senior care. These investments are not just social goods, they are economic multipliers that benefit everyone, including the business community. Let's also reject the fear-based claim that wealthy residents will According to the Economic Progress Institute's 2024 Rhode Island Standard of Need 68 percent of single adults, 78 percent of single parents with two children, and 34 percent of two-parent households with two children cannot afford to meet their basic needs without public assistance. That is not sustainable. That is not fair, and is not a Rhode Island where we want to live. Advertisement RIBBA works every day to close the racial wealth gap, and we see firsthand how tax and budget decisions shape economic opportunities. When we underfund the services that help families thrive, it's Black, Brown, immigrant, and working-class Rhode Islanders who pay the price. That's why this legislation is about more than revenue — it's about justice, equity, and building a Rhode Island where everyone has a chance to succeed. 'This is much needed legislation. We at MAAT Future believe that what is fair is fair. Rhode Island should be proud and begin to move faster and progressively with the times,' state Mike and Tamara Tardy, members of RIBBA and owners of R.I.-based MAAT Future, LLC. We urge the General Assembly to pass H-5473/S-0329. Let's stop balancing our state budget on the backs of those who can least afford it, and start asking those who've benefited the most to contribute their fair share. The people are ready. The evidence is clear. The time is now. Let's tax the 1 percent — and reinvest in the 99 percent. Lisa Ranglin is the president and CEO of RIBBA, a nonprofit that works to advance opportunities for Rhode Island businesses and career professionals.

Could Elon Musk Be Deported By Donald Trump? What to Know
Could Elon Musk Be Deported By Donald Trump? What to Know

Newsweek

time2 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Could Elon Musk Be Deported By Donald Trump? What to Know

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Steve Bannon has called for Elon Musk to be deported from the United States, after the dramatic bust up between the tech billionaire and President Donald Trump. In his War Room podcast Thursday, Trump's former White House chief strategist from his first term said: "Elon Musk is illegal … Deport immediately." The validity of Bannon's claim about Musk's naturalized U.S. citizen status is now likely to face more scrutiny than ever. Newsweek contacted Musk for comment on Friday via emails sent to the press offices of Tesla and SpaceX, where he serves as CEO, outside of regular office hours. Why It Matters Over the past few months Musk had been one of Trump's closest political allies spending $292 million to support him and other Republicans during the 2024 presidential election, providing vocal support on his social media platform X and heading the newly created Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) which he left at the end of May. However, in the past week this relationship unraveled and Musk has now suggested Trump should be impeached and replaced by Vice President JD Vance, while the president suggested Musk's companies could lose government contracts potentially imperiling SpaceX's relationship with NASA. What To Know Speaking to the New York Times on Thursday, prominent conservative commentator Bannon said: "They should initiate a formal investigation of his immigration status because I am of the strong belief that he is an illegal alien, and he should be deported from the country immediately." Bannon later doubled down on this argument during an appearance on his War Room podcast when he said: "Elon Musk is illegal, and he's got to go. He's illegal? Deport immediately." "You're going to ship these other people home. Let's start with the South Africans, OK?" In October, 2024, the Washington Post published an article claiming that Musk had previously "worked illegally in the United States" by setting up a company while on a student visa in 1995, despite never enrolling in Stanford University as promised. Citing "former business associates, court records and company documents" the publication said Musk used a J-1 student visa to enter the U.S. but instead worked on a startup that became Zip2 without the requisite work visa. According to the Post, in a 2005 email used in a defamation lawsuit, Musk admitted that he applied to Stanford because he otherwise had "no legal right to stay in the country." President Donald Trump speaking at a roundtable in the State Dining Room at the White House on June 05, 2025 in Washington, D.C. (left) and Elon Musk addressing reporters in the Oval Office of the... President Donald Trump speaking at a roundtable in the State Dining Room at the White House on June 05, 2025 in Washington, D.C. (left) and Elon Musk addressing reporters in the Oval Office of the White House on May 30, 2025 in Washington, D.C. (right). More Anna Moneymaker/Kevin Dietsch/GETTY The case was raised at a campaign event by then President Joe Biden who said: "That wealthiest man in the world turned out to be [an] illegal worker here when he was here. "I'm serious. He was supposed to be in school when he came on a student visa. He wasn't in school. He was violating the law. He's talking about all these illegals coming our way?" In a post on X shortly after the Post's story was published Musk denied the allegation against him, saying: "I was in fact allowed to work in the U.S." Born in Pretoria, South Africa, in 1971, Musk moved to Canada in 1989 and later to the United States in 1992 to attend the University of Pennsylvania. He became a U.S. citizen in 2002 through the naturalization process after several years of living and working in the country. U.S. law states that citizenship gained through naturalization can be revoked if it was "procured by concealment of a material fact or by willful misrepresentation." Speaking to Wired about Musk, Professor Stephen Yale-Loehr, an immigration law expert at Cornell Law School, said that if the claims of illegal working are true "on purely legal grounds, this would justify revoking citizenship, because if he had told the truth, he would not have been eligible for an H1-B, a green card, or naturalization." Amanda Frost, a legal expert at the University of Virginia, said: "If a noncitizen violated the terms of a nonimmigrant visa, and then adjusted to immigrant (green card) status without admitting the violation, and then naturalized without admitting the violation, that person could be denaturalized on the ground that their naturalization was 'illegally procured." In a string of attacks on Friday, Musk called for Trump to be impeached, described what the president called his "Big Beautiful [spending] Bill" as "The Big Ugly Bill" and said Trump's tariffs policy would cause a recession in the second half of 2025. Trump fired back on his Truth Social website claiming Musk "just went CRAZY" adding: "The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!" As the row intensified Musk posted: "Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public." What People Are Saying In a post on X, conservative commentator Charlie Kirk said: "Let me get this straight: Democrats tried to put Trump in prison for 700 years, take his business empire from him, impeach him twice, take him off the ballot, and censor him on all social media—all the while they were sitting on info that Trump was on the Epstein list? This is total and complete nonsense." Reacting to the Trump-Musk bust up House Democrat Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said: "Oh man the girls are fighting aren't they?" On X, Ashley St. Clair, the mother of one of Musk's children, posted: "hey @realDonaldTrump lmk [let me know] if u need any breakup advice." What's Next It remains to be seen whether the Trump-Musk feud will continue and if so to what extent it will influence government policy. Trump has not given any indication he think's Musk's American citizenship should be investigated and according to Politico the two men are due to speak on Friday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store