Lawmakers reintroduce ban on hauling horses in double-deck trailers
WASHINGTON — Rep. Steve Cohen, D-Tenn., has been advocating for more humane transportation of horses by livestock haulers since 2008, but he believes he finally has the support to get legislation addressing the issue through Congress.
Cohen and Reps. Dina Titus, D-Nev., and Brian Fitzpatrick, R-Pa., reintroduced on Thursday the Horse Transportation Safety Act, a bill to ban the transportation of horses across state lines in double-deck trucks or trailers containing two or more levels stacked on top of one another.
'Double-deck trailers do not provide adequate headroom for adult horses, and accidents involving double-deck trailers are a terrifying reminder that the practice is also dangerous to the driving public,' Cohen said in a press statement.
'I look forward to seeing this measure move forward as it did last year and be signed into law. Transporting horses can be precarious even under the best circumstances, and we should not compound the risks with unsafe double-deck trailers.'Double-deck trailers can accommodate livestock such as cattle and hogs but usually do not provide enough headroom for horses to stand upright.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture issued rules in 2001 prohibiting livestock haulers from using double-deck trailers to carry horses to slaughter. 'The purpose of the regulations is to establish minimum standards to ensure the humane movement of equines to slaughtering facilities via commercial transportation,' USDA stated in the rule.
However, the rules did not ban the commercial transport of horses in double-deck trailers over long distances to feedlots, for example, or to other interim points before they are transferred to single trailers for final transportation to a slaughter facility. Cohen's bill would close this loophole.
'Transporting horses in stacked double-deck trailers isn't just inhumane – it's dangerous,' Fitzpatrick said. 'These trailers were never designed for animals of this size and using them puts both horses and drivers at serious risk. This bill is long overdue, and it's time to get it across the finish line.'The bill made it through the House twice, in 2020 and 2022, when it was attached to larger pieces of legislation, but has yet to get through the Senate.
If passed, the measure would likely affect only a small sector of trucking, based on owner-operator data.
In a 2022 member survey conducted by the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association Foundation, only 1% of respondents indicated that livestock trailers were the type of trailers they primarily pull.
FreightWaves has reached out to OOIDA for comment.
Lawmaker introduces bill codifying English proficiency for truckers
Legislation aims to jump-start rollout of driverless vehicles
Lawmakers propose tax relief for truck drivers
Click for more FreightWaves articles by John Gallagher.
The post Lawmakers reintroduce ban on hauling horses in double-deck trailers appeared first on FreightWaves.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
24 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Trump formally asks Congress to claw back approved spending targeted by DOGE
WASHINGTON — The White House on Tuesday officially asked Congress to claw back $9.4 billion in already approved spending, taking funding away from programs targeted by Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency. It's a process known as 'rescission,' which requires President Donald Trump to get approval from Congress to return money that had previously been appropriated. Trump's aides say the funding cuts target programs that promote liberal ideologies. The request, if it passes the House and Senate, would formally enshrine many of the spending cuts and freezes sought by DOGE. It comes at a time when Musk is extremely unhappy with the tax cut and spending plan making its way through Congress, calling it on Tuesday a 'disgusting abomination' for increasing the federal deficit. White House budget director Russ Vought said more rescission packages and other efforts to cut spending could follow if the current effort succeeds. ' Here's what to know about the rescissions request: The request to Congress is unlikely to meaningfully change the troublesome increase in the U.S. national debt. Tax revenues have been insufficient to cover the growing costs of Social Security, Medicare and other programs. The Congressional Budget Office estimates the government is on track to spend roughly $7 trillion this year, with the rescission request equaling just 0.1% of that total. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters at Tuesday's briefing that Vought would continue to cut spending, hinting that there could be additional efforts to return funds. 'He has tools at his disposal to produce even more savings,' Leavitt said. Vought said he can send up additional rescissions at the end of the fiscal year in September 'and if Congress does not act on it, that funding expires.' 'It's one of the reasons why we are not putting all of our expectations in a typical rescissions process,' he added. A spokesperson for the White House Office of Management and Budget, speaking on condition of anonymity to preview some of the items that would lose funding, said that $8.3 billion was being cut from the State Department and the U.S. Agency for International Development. NPR and PBS would also lose federal funding, as would the U.S. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, also known as PEPFAR. The spokesperson listed specific programs that the Trump administration considered wasteful, including $750,000 to reduce xenophobia in Venezuela, $67,000 for feeding insect powder to children in Madagascar and $3 million for circumcision, vasectomies and condoms in Zambia. House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., complimented the planned cuts and pledged to pass them. 'This rescissions package reflects many of DOGE's findings and is one of the many legislative tools Republicans are using to restore fiscal sanity,' Johnson said. 'Congress will continue working closely with the White House to codify these recommendations, and the House will bring the package to the floor as quickly as possible.' Members of the House Freedom Caucus, among the chamber's most conservative lawmakers, said they would like to see additional rescission packages from the administration. 'We will support as many more rescissions packages the White House can send us in the coming weeks and months,' the group said in a press release. Sen. Susan Collins, chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, gave the package a less optimistic greeting. 'Despite this fast track, the Senate Appropriations Committee will carefully review the rescissions package and examine the potential consequences of these rescissions on global health, national security, emergency communications in rural communities, and public radio and television stations,' the Maine lawmaker said in a statement. Boak writes for the Associated Press.
Wall Street Journal
30 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Whose Pork Do You Mean, Elon?
Elon Musk's work at the Department of Government Efficiency made him persona non grata in the Beltway, and most criticism was nasty and unfair. That's what Washington does to outsiders who want to shrink its power. But that makes it all the more unfortunate that Mr. Musk is now joining the Beltway crowd in trying to kill the House tax bill. 'This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination,' the Tesla CEO tweeted Tuesday, as the Senate begins considering its version of budget reconciliation. 'Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.'
Washington Post
32 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Musk rails against Trump tax bill, calling it ‘a disgusting abomination'
Billionaire Elon Musk blasted the massive tax and immigration bill at the heart of President Donald Trump's agenda on Tuesday, calling the measure 'a disgusting abomination' that would burden the country with 'crushingly unsustainable debt.' Though Musk — who on Friday left his post as head of the U.S. DOGE Service, Trump's cost-cutting effort — had previously criticized the bill in gentler terms, his posts on X, the social media platform he owns, represented his sharpest attack yet on the Trump White House. For months, Musk had played the role of the president's 'First Buddy,' joining Trump frequently in the Oval Office and exhorting the administration to cut government spending. The posts appeared to complicate the path to passage for the legislation, which barely passed the House late last month after conservatives revolted over its enormous price tag — the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office says it would increase the national debt by $2.4 trillion over the next decade. The Senate began consideration of the measure this week, as GOP leaders hope to have it to Trump's desk by July 4. Trump has encouraged lawmakers to pass the measure. But some Republican Senate budget hawks applauded Musk's attack on Tuesday, a potential sign of trouble. 'This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination,' Musk posted on X. 'Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' He wrote minutes later: 'It will massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit to $2.5 trillion (!!!) and burden America citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt.' That post appeared to confuse the annual deficit with the overall increase to the debt over 10 years. Shortly after that, he wrote, 'In November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people.' The bill would extend tax cuts enacted during Trump's first term and make good on new campaign promises — including no taxes on tips or overtime wages — while devoting hundreds of billions of dollars in new spending to defense and immigration enforcement. Musk's attack landed while Senate Republicans huddled for a lunch with National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett, who predicted robust economic growth if the legislation passes, lawmakers said. Many economists outside the White House disagree with that projection, arguing that rising national debt will crowd out private-sector investment. In the Senate, lawmakers are haggling over whether to make additional budget cuts in the legislation — which would already slice more than $1 trillion from social safety net and anti-poverty programs — and to preserve some Biden-era clean energy initiatives, which would add to the bill's cost. Mainstream Republicans in the lunch meeting with Hassett greeted Musk's posts with 'an eyeball roll,' Sen. Kevin Cramer (R-North Dakota) said. 'We have a difference of opinion. He's entitled to that opinion. We're going to proceed full speed ahead,' Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-South Dakota) told reporters. But for budget hawks — and Democrats — Musk provided a shot in the arm. Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wisconsin) called for splitting up Trump's legislation into multiple smaller bills, saying one sweeping measure with such a large deficit hit couldn't get the votes to pass the upper chamber. 'I think Elon is exactly right that we need to cut more spending, and I hope and believe that the Senate will make the bill substantially better,' said Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), who interviewed Musk on his podcast in March and has described him as a friend. Asked how much more spending he would like to cut from the bill, Cruz said, 'As much as humanly possible.' Democrats enjoyed watching the GOP infighting. 'I hear something happened while we were at lunch,' Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-New York) joked while holding up a poster board of Musk's tweets, 'which led me to make some news here today and say something I didn't think was imaginable: I agree with Elon Musk.' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt brushed off Musk's posts. 'The president already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill,' she said. 'It doesn't change the president's opinion. This is one big, beautiful bill, and he's sticking to it.' The legislation would undo most of the Biden-era Inflation Reduction Act, which poured federal tax incentives into production of electric vehicles, batteries and solar energy — cornerstones of Musk's businesses. Tesla, in particular, has suffered as Musk's DOGE effort became less popular: The EV maker reported a 71 percent plunge in profits in the first quarter. One person who has interacted with Musk over the years and closely followed his journey from Tesla to the White House said the bill could prompt frustrations with Republicans similar to Musk's irritation with Democrats under the Biden administration. 'It increases the deficit by trillions of dollars, kills solar and battery credits, sunsets battery production credits in 2028, kills the EV tax credit,' the person said, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss a sensitive subject. 'Elon and the Republicans were united in not liking the previous administration. As they get into governance, they are finding that is where the similarities end.' House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana) pushed back on Musk's criticism. 'With all due respect, my friend Elon is terribly wrong about the One Big Beautiful Bill,' Johnson told reporters. The speaker said he talked by phone with Musk for 20 minutes on Monday about the legislation and other topics, and the two appeared to end the conversation on common ground. 'Elon is missing it, okay?' Johnson added. 'And it's not personal. I know that the EV mandate [is] very important to him; that is going away because the government should not be subsidizing these things as part of the Green New Deal. And I know that has an effect on his business, and I lament that. … But for him to come out and pan the whole bill is, to me, just very disappointing, very surprising, in light of the conversation I had with him yesterday.' The main focus of the legislation is extending parts of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which Trump signed into law in his first term, that are set to expire at the end of the year. Virtually every tax filer would pay more if the bill doesn't pass. It would also devote $150 billion for immigration enforcement, another Trump administration priority. To pay for the tax cut extensions, the bill would tighten eligibility for Medicaid, which the Congressional Budget Office says would leave millions of people uninsured. The bill would also pass billions of dollars of expenses for SNAP, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program formerly known as food stamps, on to states. That could lead local officials to either sharply raise taxes or enact policies that kick families off the program. Republicans also want to use some of the unilateral spending cuts that Musk's DOGE operation made — many of which are being challenged in court — to balance out the costs of the tax cuts. Musk on May 20 said he would stop spending on political causes and leave the White House to return to his companies, including SpaceX and Tesla. He spent nearly $300 billion, almost entirely on Republican candidates and causes, in the 2024 election cycle. Last Friday was his last day in the White House, and he and Trump spoke to reporters in the Oval Office. Faiz Siddiqui, Mariana Alfaro, Liz Goodwin and Abigail Hauslohner contributed to this report.
