
About 90 people gather for May Day march in Jamestown
May 2—JAMESTOWN — About 90 people showed up on Main Street in Jamestown on Thursday, May 1, for a peaceful May Day march to support working families and protest cuts to federal programs and workers.
Individuals gathered with signs opposing the Trump administration's actions in front of St. John's Lutheran Church before marching north on First Avenue. They stopped in front of the mural at Hugo's Family Marketplace where they were met with some honks in support and others in opposition.
Protesters gathered on streets nationwide on Thursday to recognize May Day, which is celebrated by workers across the globe as International Labor Day on May 1 each year.
"Well, we have just an interest in being proactive against the things that the Trump administration is doing and this seemed like a good opportunity to show that disagreement," said Don Caine, a Jamestown resident. "So we're just trying to be proactive in all of those things and this is one way to do it."
He said all workers have rights.
"We want equality for everyone," Caine said.
He said everyone should be benefiting from the federal government, not just the rich.
"We see that eroding under Trump, and so that's why we protest and do what we can," he said.
Barb Lang, a League of Women Voters member and organizer of the event, said there are concerns with what will happen to federal workers who work in Jamestown.
"We think we've got at least 100 families in Jamestown that are working for the federal government," she said.
She said those families have people who work at the Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Postal Service and the Pipestem Dam safety modification project.
"There's lots of federal workers here," she said. " ... We want to support them."
Jamestown resident Marty Toepke-Floyd said the No. 1 reason he joined the gathering is because the federal government's environmental policy has been thrown into chaos.
"We've got to get our act together and stop climate change," he said. "The current administration is going the opposite direction. It's opposite to the teachings of the church that I belong to, and it's violating solid science."
Toepke-Floyd said he's disappointed with the policies that are coming from Washington, D.C.
"They claim to be saving money and building efficiency, but so much of what they're doing is counterproductive," he said. "It's wasting money. It's ruining people's lives. Civil servants have moved and taken jobs and then had the rug pulled out from underneath them."
He also said the Trump administration is getting rid of federal workers, including those with the National Labor Relations Board and judges.
"They're just doing things that are just counter to labor and unions," he said. "They're trying to stop a lot of things. So it's just plain wrong, and it's violating people's civil and human rights."
Toepke-Floyd said it isn't right for Elon Musk, the world's richest man, to make decisions about people's lives without any kind of study or authorization from Congress.
"I don't understand why our Congress delegation from North Dakota isn't screaming bloody murder," he said. "If this had happened under (Joe) Biden or (Barack) Obama, they'd be screaming and people are just afraid of the man in the Oval Office, who is bullying the country."
Vicki Voldal Rosenau, of Valley City, North Dakota, said democracy is in peril.
'It looks as if it's up to the people to stop it," she said. "Congress is inert and the administration is locked by fear. I'm just afraid for the future."
She said she's upset about Donald Trump undermining and threatening judges and people getting deported.
"You can't say deporting, because nobody's getting deported," she said. "They're extraditing people without due process, which we know is completely illegal and yet they keep doing it."
Jamestown resident Brenda Jensen said she doesn't have a problem with downsizing federal government programs and getting rid of wasteful spending.
"The problem is that they're doing it really quickly and not systematic," she said.
Madison Lyonhart, a Jamestown resident who moved here last year, said Medicaid and education are in danger.
"I have two children that are in the public school system with special needs, and all of those things have come under attack during this present administration, and I'm fearful for the future of my family in this country," she said. "My husband's an immigrant. I'm fearful for his future."
Lyonhart said labor unions and federal workers are under attack.
"We see job loss all across the country, thousands of workers, and today we need to recognize that protections for all of us need to be in place so that we have safety in our job place, reliability for our families, and we don't have to end up asking for extra help," she said. "We should be able to work and provide for our family with our job and not need to work multiple jobs or ask for government assistance. We should just be able to get a living wage and have reliable employment."
Lyonhart also said tariffs and other legislative actions impact local farmers.
"We want our farmers to be able to do their job, to have predictability, so that they know what to plant, when to plant it," she said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNN
9 minutes ago
- CNN
Analysis: What exactly is Trump's new travel ban about? Not national security
Any reasonable American could objectively ask what exactly President Donald Trump's new travel ban, which affects a dozen countries, is about. Is it about protecting Americans from 'murderers,' as Trump said Thursday, or punishing small countries for a modest number of students who overstayed their visas? The drive for Trump's first-term travel ban in 2017 and 2018 was clear. He was seeking to deliver on an ugly campaign promise to ban all Muslims from entering the US. That morphed, over the course of years as the administration adapted to court cases, into a ban on travel to the US by people from certain countries, most of which were majority-Muslim. It was only by agreeing to ignore Trump's anti-Muslim 2016 campaign statements and focus solely on the security-related language in his third attempt at a travel ban that the US Supreme Court ultimately gave its blessing to that ban. '… We must consider not only the statements of a particular President, but also the authority of the Presidency itself,' wrote Chief Justice John Roberts in the majority opinion. Trump is using that authority again in his second term. But this time, as he said Thursday in the Oval Office, the ban is about removing 'horrendous' people who are in the country now and about keeping murderers out. The data suggest the travel ban will primarily affect students and businesspeople from countries in Africa, Asia and the Caribbean as well as the Middle East. It was an attack on Jewish community members in Colorado by an Egyptian national that convinced Trump to speed up plans to ban people from a dozen countries from entering the US, restarting the travel ban policy he pioneered during his first term. But Egypt is not on the travel ban list. Neither is Kuwait, the country where Mohamed Sabry Soliman, the suspect in the Boulder attack, lived before coming to the US. 'Egypt has been a country we deal with very closely. They have things under control,' Trump told reporters Thursday. Instead, the travel ban includes countries that Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who assembled the list, feel don't have things under control. That includes places like Equatorial Guinea in Africa and Burma, also known as Myanmar, in Asia. Neither is a nexus of terror threatening the American homeland. Trump's order announcing the travel ban explains that these countries have high rates of students and other travelers overstaying their visas in the US. It points to a report of DHS 'overstay' data from 2023 to argue that for more than 70% of people from Equatorial Guinea with US student visas, there is no record of them leaving the US when their visa ended. In real numbers, that equals 233 people with student visas. The numbers are similarly small for other African countries. 'They're just throwing things at the wall,' said David Bier, an immigration expert at the libertarian-leaning Cato institute and a Trump immigration policy critic. 'There's not really a coherent philosophy behind any of this,' Bier added. The reinstated travel ban does include countries associated with terrorism, including Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen, all of which were also included in Trump's first-term travel ban. But it's worth noting that no immigrant or traveler from one of these countries has launched a terror attack on the US in recent years, according to a review by the Washington Post during Trump's first term. A man from Sudan killed one person at a Tennessee church in 2017. 'The president claims that there is no way to vet these nationals, yet that is exactly what his consular officers and border officials have successfully done for decades,' Bier said. The man responsible for the ISIS-inspired truck bomb in New Orleans in January, Shamsud-Din Jabbar, was a Texas-born Army veteran and US citizen. The new travel ban also includes Afghanistan, which could jeopardize many Afghans related to those who aided the US during its war there, as Shawn VanDiver, president of the aid organization #AfghanEvac, told CNN's Jim Sciutto on Thursday. 'There are 12,000 people who have been separated through the actions of our government, who have been waiting for more than three and a half years,' he said. The Trump administration recently paused the processing of student visas, interrupting the plans of thousands of people to study in the US. In the Oval Office, Trump said he was not interested in banning students from China. 'It's our honor to have them, frankly, we want to have foreign students, but we want them to be checked,' Trump said, suggesting there will be even more strenuous background checks in the future. The existence of the travel ban list could also factor into tariff negotiations the Trump administration has taken on with nations across the world, as well as its effort to countries nations to take back migrants it wants to deport. 'It's about power and control and manipulating both the US population to suppress dissent as well as trying to manipulate foreign relations with these countries by getting them to do whatever he wants in order to get off the disfavored nation list,' Bier said.


Bloomberg
11 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Trump, Musk's Public Feud
The Pulse with Francine Lacqua Elon Musk signaled he would move to cool tensions with US President Donald Trump, after differences between the two exploded Thursday into an all-out public feud. Earlier in the day, Musk called for Trump's impeachment and insinuated he was withholding the release of files related to disgraced New York financier Jeffrey Epstein because of his own presence in them. Trump, in turn, proposed cutting off the billionaire's government contracts, following his onetime adviser's repeated exhortations for Republicans to vote against the president's signature tax legislation. Musk's olive branch came after Tesla Inc. shares tanked 14% and his personal wealth dropped by $34 billion. Today's guests: Emmanuel Cau, Barclays European Equity Strategy Head, Gregory Peters, PGIM Fixed Income Co-CIO, Maria Demertzis, The Conference Board Economy, Strategy & Finance Center Europe Lead. (Source: Bloomberg)


Bloomberg
11 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Bessent Looks to Revamp Currency Monitoring After Damage Done
I'm Chris Anstey, an economics editor in Boston. Today we're looking at the US Treasury's semiannual foreign-exchange report. Send us feedback and tips to ecodaily@ And if you aren't yet signed up to receive this newsletter, you can do so here. The first US Treasury semiannual assessment of American trading partners' exchange-rate policies since Trump returned to the White House read, in substance, much the same as the last one under President Joe Biden.