Greenpeace joins anti-Bezos protest with Venice banner complaining about billionaire tax breaks
Greenpeace on Monday joined the smattering of protests in Venice against the upcoming wedding of Amazon founder Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sanchez.
A half-dozen protesters unfurled a giant banner early Monday in St. Mark's Square reading: 'IF YOU CAN RENT VENICE FOR YOUR WEDDING YOU CAN PAY MORE TAX.' Local police quickly folded it up and took it away.
The demonstration followed other anti-Bezos initiatives last week including a banner draped from the San Giorgio bell tower, one from the lagoon city's famous Rialto Bridge and posters plastered up around town complaining about the upcoming wedding and the effects of overtourism on Venice.
The 'No Space for Bezos' movement — a play on words also referring to the bride's recent space flight — has united a dozen Venetian organizations including housing advocates, anti-cruise ship campaigners and university groups.
Activists argue the wedding exemplifies broader failures in municipal governance, particularly the prioritization of tourism over resident needs.
Greenpeace said it teamed with the British group 'Everyone Hates Elon,' which has smashed Teslas to protest Elon Musk, for Monday's banner. Greenpeace said it wanted to draw attention to the comparitively low taxes many billionaires pay while allegedly exacerbating the climate crisis with environmentally unsustainable lifestyles.
Italian and Venetian officials have strongly criticized the protests and welcomed the Bezos-Sanchez nuptials, which are scheduled for later this week.
Over the weekend, as the protests continued to make headlines in Italy, a Venetian environmental research association, Corila, said Bezos' Earth Fund was supporting its work with an 'important donation.'
Corila, which unites university scholars and Italy's main national research council in researching Venetian protection strategies, wouldn't say how much Bezos was donating but noted contacts began in April, well before the protests started.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
28 minutes ago
- Times
‘We were never friends.' JK Rowling rebuffs Stephen Fry in trans row
JK Rowling has issued a withering rebuff to Sir Stephen Fry after he claimed she had become 'radicalised' over trans issues and described her as being a 'lost cause'. The broadcaster and author previously dined regularly with Rowling and narrated the audiobook versions of her seven Harry Potter novels. However, last week he claimed the Edinburgh-based writer's views had become 'inflammatory and contemptuous'. Jolyon Maugham, the barrister and author, took to social media to echo Fry's views. 'Really creditable this, from Stephen Fry. I've spoken to so many of JKR's once friends who now despair at her privately but won't do so publicly, which is very much the British way and why nothing ever changes for the better,' he wrote. 'So well done Stephen'. Rowling, however, appeared to suggest that Fry was mistaken in his belief that they were once close. 'It is a great mistake to assume that everyone who claims to have been a friend of mine was ever considered a friend by me,' she wrote, responding to Maugham on X. Rowling has become one of the most outspoken campaigners for women-only spaces, becoming a target for criticism from transgender rights activists. Supreme Court judges ruled in April that under equality law the definition of a woman is based on biological sex and biological men cannot become women regardless of whether they hold a gender recognition certificate. The ruling was the culmination of a long-running legal battle and has significant implications for how sex-based rights apply across Scotland, England and Wales. The court sided with campaign group For Women Scotland, which brought a case against the Scottish government challenging its guidance on gender representation. Rowling had donated £70,000 to the group to help fund their challenge. Fry, speaking on The Show People podcast, suggested her views had become extreme. 'She started to make these peculiar statements and had very strong, difficult views,' he said. 'She seemed to wake up, or kick, a hornets' nest of transphobia, which has been entirely destructive. I disagree profoundly with her on this subject.' Fry, who is gay, said he was angry that Rowling had failed to disavow 'some of the more revolting and truly horrible' things people say. 'She says things that are inflammatory and contemptuous, mocking and add to a terribly distressing time for trans people. She has been radicalised, I fear,' he said, suggesting she had been hardened by the vitriol thrown at her. 'I am sorry because I always liked her company. I found her charming, funny and interesting and then this thing happened and it altered the way she talks and engages with the world.'
Telegraph
31 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Trump comes, not to bury Nato, but to save it
This week Nato will mark its first 76 years at its summit in The Hague. All eyes will be on Donald Trump and his robust 'America First' approach on the world stage, which has already involved the use of decisive military force against Iran's nuclear facilities. The US president has been a firm critic of Nato, but has also been responsible for a dramatic revival of the alliance. Trump has made it clear that Nato's survival depends on America's fellow members stepping up to fully participate in burden sharing with the US. The Russians have clearly viewed Nato as weak and divided and are increasingly willing to test its resolve. The US presidency must apply concerted pressure on America's allies to do far more to foster partnership rather than dependency, especially as the United States must increasingly focus on the immense threat in the Indo-Pacific presented by Communist China. In 2024, only 22 Nato members spent the 2 per cent of GDP on defence agreed to by the alliance in 2014. This is unacceptable. It leaves the alliance dangerously vulnerable when it should be projecting strength and resolve. Countries that spent less than 2 per cent of real GDP on defence last year included Italy (1.5 per cent), Canada (1.4 per cent), Spain (1.3 per cent), and Belgium (1.3 per cent). In contrast, Poland (4.1 per cent), Estonia (3.4 per cent), Latvia (3.2 per cent), and Greece (3.1 per cent) all spent above 3 per cent of GDP. Justin Trudeau's now departed Canadian government was among the very worst Nato slackers, consistently underinvesting in Canada's military with shockingly low figures for a nation with the 10 th largest GDP in the world. His successor as prime minister, Mark Carney, has vowed to raise Canadian defence spending to 2 per cent, but this is simply not enough. Ottawa needs to be serious about Nato's mission, and playing a full part in the alliance in the coming decades. As Heritage Foundation research has shown, 'European Nato members have collectively underfunded their own defence by $827.91 billion since 2014 – nearly equal to the entire annual US defence budget.' This is a staggering figure – a damning indictment of a culture of complacency and dependency in many Nato allies over the past decade. Not only should every Nato member immediately invest the minimum agreed level of spending on their own defence, they should also commit to matching the current US level of 3.5 per cent of GDP, and pledge to reach 5 per cent of GDP, which is expected to be the new benchmark set at the forthcoming Nato summit according to Nato Secretary General Mark Rutte. President Trump's pressure on Nato partners to spend more on defence is already having a major impact. After decades of reckless underinvestment, Germany, the world's fourth-largest economy and the biggest in Europe, has announced plans for a dramatic increase in defence spending, and has accepted in principle that German spending must eventually rise to 5 per cent of GDP if it is serious about defending its own borders from a potential attack by Russia. France, which has barely reached the agreed minimum 2 per cent of GDP on defence in recent years, has announced that it will push European defence spending levels to 3-3.5 per cent of GDP ahead of the Hague summit. Even Belgium, one of Nato's most lacklustre members, has declared it will boost defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP. The UK has just announced a $20 billion investment in its nuclear warhead programme, and the construction of 12 nuclear-powered attack submarines, as part of its new Strategic Defence Review, released this month. The Baltic States and Poland are already building on their robust records by pledging significant further increases in the years ahead. Poland will spend 4.7 per cent of GDP on defence this year, while Estonia has committed to spending 5.4 per cent through until 2029. Lithuania will spend 5-6 per cent on defence from 2026 to 2030, and Latvia will spend 5 per cent by 2026. The positive developments in Europe should be warmly welcomed in Washington. In just the first few months of his presidency, Donald Trump has already significantly strengthened Nato. President Trump is not the alliance's destroyer, as his critics have alleged, but is in fact its saviour. Previous US presidents had urged European allies to do more, but their entreaties fell on deaf ears. It took the no-nonsense straight talk of Donald Trump to make European leaders sit up and take notice. In many ways the Trump presidency has been the antithesis of the weak-kneed Biden presidency. The humiliating debacle of Biden's reckless Afghanistan withdrawal would not have happened under Donald Trump, and nor would Russia's reckless invasion of Ukraine. With bold US leadership at the helm, Nato still has the vision, capacity and energy to thrive and prosper for another 76 years. American exceptionalism is the most powerful force for liberty in the world today. It is greatly strengthened by America's alliances with key partners, and Nato is at the very heart of the transatlantic partnership.
Reuters
34 minutes ago
- Reuters
Caribbean delegation to travel to Brussels, London to discuss slavery reparations
LONDON, June 23 (Reuters) - A Caribbean delegation is set to travel to Brussels and London next month to bring the highly divisive issue of reparations for slavery and colonialism to the table, organisers have told Reuters. At least 12.5 million Africans were kidnapped, forcibly transported by European ships and sold into slavery from the 15th to the 19th centuries. Calls for reparations are longstanding but have been gaining momentum, particularly among the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) and the African Union (AU). Backlash against it has also been growing, and many of Europe's leaders have opposed even talking about reparations. Organised by the Repair Campaign, a group advocating for reparations in the Caribbean, the trip will start in Brussels on July 1, where the delegation will host a briefing with European Union (EU) lawmakers. In 2023, the EU said Europe inflicted "untold suffering" on millions of people but even though some member states have acknowledged past wrongs, no country has agreed to reparations. The delegation will then travel to London, where they will hold a briefing in parliament on July 2. The delegation's aim is to "open a dialogue" with European and British representatives about their countries' roles in advancing reparations, according to organisers. The delegation includes Caribbean academics and policy experts, as well as members of national reparations committees established by CARICOM member states and backed by their respective governments. CARICOM has a reparations plan, which, among other demands, calls for technology transfers and investments to tackle health crises and illiteracy. The AU is developing its own plan. Opponents of reparations argue that contemporary states and institutions should not be held responsible for their past. But advocates say action is needed to address the legacies, such as racism. Britain, which transported an estimated 3.2 million people, the most active European country after Portugal, has also rejected calls for reparations.
