logo
NY lawyer with no California elections experience tapped to run Shasta's Elections Office

NY lawyer with no California elections experience tapped to run Shasta's Elections Office

Yahoo01-05-2025

Shasta County supervisors picked an attorney with no experience in managing an elections department in California as the next registrar of voters, making it the second time they pass over the assistant clerk in that office.
Clint Curtis, an attorney licensed in New York who lives in Florida, emerged on top of four other finalists after a public interview with the Board of Supervisors at a special meeting Wednesday afternoon.
Curtis was chosen over Shasta County Assistant Registrar of Voters Joanna Francescut, who said after the meeting in an interview with the Record Searchlight she will run for the office in June 2026. Francescut has worked in the Shasta County elections department since 2008.
In voting for Curtis, Supervisors Kevin Crye, Chris Kelstrom and Corkey Harmon said they had nothing against Francescut but argued it was time for a change. Supervisors Allen Long and Matt Plummer wanted Francescut for the job.
'I can't think of anybody better, well personally, maybe a Republican, but I can't think of anybody better ... to right what I think is wrong with elections,' Crye said of Curtis.
Many local election skeptics who for years have alleged wrongdoings in the county elections office with no verifiable evidence wanted Curtis to get the job.
Both Long and Plummer said Curtis did not have the experience and questioned what they saw as discrepancies on his application.
'This is a highly detailed job where you have to get the details right and even in the application to our county there are a number of things that don't add up and don't make sense,' Plummer said.
Among them, the District 4 supervisor said, Curtis stated he worked with Germany to transition away from the use of voting machines in 2004.
"2005, they still used electronic voting machines. It wasn't until 2009 that they changed the constitution," Plummer said.
Curtis crusaded for hand-counting ballots. He said he would increase the number of cameras inside the elections office to provide more transparency.
He told supervisors he knows My Pillow CEO Mike Lindell, who once promised to financially support Shasta County in its failed effort to hand-count election ballots.
Lindell was pulled into Shasta County politics in early 2023 when Crye visited him to ask him about plans to terminate the county's contract with Dominion Voting Systems and transitioning to a hand-count method of tabulating ballots.
But Curtis, like everyone who interviewed Wednesday, said hand-counting votes is against the law in California, and he won't break the law.
'Once they can see everything that goes on (inside the elections office), they shouldn't have any problem or any reason to doubt anything,' Curtis told the Record Searchlight after the meeting of how he would convince his detractors.
Curtis is expected to take office as county clerk and registrar of voters on May 13, pending a background check.
Francescut and Curtis were finalists for the job last June when the board voted 3-2 to hire Tom Toller. Curtis had the backing of Supervisor Chris Kelstrom and former Supervisor Patrick Jones, but the supervisors flipped and voted for Toller after Crye said he was going to vote for Francescut if they did not back Toller.
But less than a year on the job, Toller announced his resignation in late March due to health issues. He endorsed Francescut as his successor.
Francescut told the Record Searchlight after the meeting that she is still passionate about the job.
'My heart is in this for the community. I do this job because I love this community where we live and I look forward to running for office,' Francescut said.
She said she is going 'to do my best to stay on and continue the work that I love to do. I have a passion for it. I enjoy waking up every day and getting to count people's votes. That's a pretty awesome job that I get to do.'
Curtis said he had no plans to change the staffing at the elections office.
'I think … if she (Francescut) was telling the truth what she said in there she's actually willing to go whichever way she needs to go as long it stays within the law, which is good,' Curtis said.
Also interviewing for the job Wednesday were Elle Leigh Sharp, integration specialists for Nevada Secretary of State elections division; and Robin Underwood, deputy clerk in Eastpointe, Michigan.
DeNay Harris, director of elections and general registrar in Charles City County, Virginia, was also a finalist but did not show up for Wednesday's meeting.
David Benda covers business, development and anything else that comes up for the USA TODAY Network in Redding. He also writes the weekly "Buzz on the Street" column. He's part of a team of dedicated reporters that investigate wrongdoing, cover breaking news and tell other stories about your community. Reach him on Twitter @DavidBenda_RS or by phone at 1-530-338-8323. To support and sustain this work, please subscribe today.
This article originally appeared on Redding Record Searchlight: Shasta's new elections chief has never run an election in California

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Dozens of environmental groups sign letter opposing return of Utah public lands sale
Dozens of environmental groups sign letter opposing return of Utah public lands sale

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Dozens of environmental groups sign letter opposing return of Utah public lands sale

People rally in opposition of Utah's lawsuit attempting to take control of federal lands at the Capitol in Salt Lake City on Saturday, Jan. 11, 2025. (Photo by Spenser Heaps for Utah News Dispatch) Organizations from around the country signed a letter on Monday urging U.S. senators not to include a controversial proposal to sell thousands of acres of federal land in Congress' budget bill. The letter comes in the wake of reports that Utah Sen. Mike Lee is considering reviving an amendment to the bill originally proposed by Rep. Celeste Maloy that would dispose of nearly 11,500 acres of Bureau of Land Management land in southwestern Utah, and about 450,000 acres in Nevada. Lee, when asked by a Politico reporter last week if he intended to reintroduce the disposal, responded, 'I gotta go vote, but yes.' SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX Lee's office did not respond to a request for comment on Monday, and it's unclear whether Utah's senior GOP senator is considering bringing back an exact copy of Maloy's amendment, or something different. But more than 100 organizations and nonprofits around the country are sounding the alarm, telling Senate leaders to 'heed how dramatically unpopular this idea is and reject any misguided attempt to get public lands sales back in this bill.' 'Decisions about the future of public lands should remain in public hands. Leaders in the House and Senate, extractive industry, and private developers are using the reconciliation process to sell off federal lands to pay for billionaire tax cuts. But such moves are deeply unpopular. Polling has repeatedly shown that the public — especially westerners — strongly believes in keeping public lands in public hands and, across partisan lines, rejects any efforts that would lead to the sale of these shared and cherished lands,' reads the letter, signed by Utah groups like the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, Conserve Southwest Utah, Save Our Canyons, Great Basin Water Network and Back Country Horsemen of Utah. Public lands sale may return to 'big, beautiful' bill with Mike Lee amendment The letter is addressed to Lee, who chairs the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, New Mexico Democrat Martin Heinrich, the committee's ranking member, Senate Majority Leader John Thune, a South Dakota Republican, and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, a New York Democrat. Maloy's amendment was dropped from the budget bill after it received pushback from all sides of the aisle. That includes Montana Republican Rep. Ryan Zinke, who previously said selling public lands is a line he would not cross and rallied support from a bipartisan group of lawmakers to strip the proposal from the bill. 'The public had no opportunity to participate in the process of identifying these parcels, let alone time to understand the long-term effect of selling off these public lands,' the letter reads. Maloy's proposal identified parcels owned by the Bureau of Land Management to sell to Washington and Beaver counties, the Washington County Water Conservancy District and the city of St. George. The land would have been used for water infrastructure (like reservoirs and wells), an airport expansion in St. George, new and widened roads, recreation and housing. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

S.C. senator attempt to stop state lawmaker pay increase
S.C. senator attempt to stop state lawmaker pay increase

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

S.C. senator attempt to stop state lawmaker pay increase

COLUMBIA, S.C. (WSPA) – A legal battle is underway over state lawmakers giving themselves more money. One senator said the way it was done is unconstitutional, but the lawmaker who pushed for the increase the state's new budget, lawmakers voted to more than double their in-district compensation, increasing it from around $1,000 a month to $2,500 a month. The move was led by Republican Senator Matt Leber (R – Charleston), who said it's not a pay raise but a reimbursement to help public servants cover travel and district costs. Leber sponsored a bill that had the same language and said he will try to pass the bill in January. He said lawmakers have not gotten a raise in in-district expense since 1994, and they need to adjust for inflation. Therefore, he said it's not a salary raise. 'If we don't make this at least affordable for the everyday person to run for office, then we're not going to get the everyday person to run for office,' Leber said. 'It's just going to be elites up there running everything, and they love this argument. ' Not everyone agrees on the decision. '$1,000 a month arrives in legislators bank accounts via direct deposit. There are no receipts required to submit for reimbursement. It's just $1,000 deposit into the account. Legislators are free to expend those funds however they deem appropriate,' said Senator Wes Climer (R – York). The increase was passed as an amendment to the budget and Climer said it wasn't the right way to do it. 'Regardless of how you feel about a legislative pay raise, this is the wrong way to do it. Violate the principle that the legislature cannot take the people's money and appropriate it to themselves in real time,' Climer added.'The proviso method is there for us to use more difficult for the current crop of legislators to continue to work. I felt like it was right to go for it now. ' Climer is now suing the State Treasurer's Office, and said the South Carolina Constitution bans lawmakers from increasing their own compensation before an election. He and retired Senator, Dick Harpootlian, have asked the South Carolina Supreme Court to step in, arguing the vote violates the state constitution. 'We are standing here and have filed the suit in order to protect or to defend the constitutional safeguards against the general assembly,' Climer added. Governor Henry McMaster chimed in on the issue last week. 'They are the ones that are trying to pay those expenses. In good faith, if they use that money for the in-district expenses as they're supposed to, then if that amount is legitimate, then that's a proper law,' McMaster said. The South Carolina Supreme Court has issued a scheduling order requiring the state to respond to the injunction request by next Monday. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Mark Green to resign from House after final vote on ‘big, beautiful bill'
Mark Green to resign from House after final vote on ‘big, beautiful bill'

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Mark Green to resign from House after final vote on ‘big, beautiful bill'

Rep. Mark Green (R-Tenn.) on Monday said he plans to resign from Congress after the House holds a final vote on the party's 'big, beautiful bill,' giving up his seat as well as his leadership post on the House Homeland Security Committee. Green said he has already lined up a job outside of Congress. 'It is with a heavy heart that I announce my retirement from Congress. Recently, I was offered an opportunity in the private sector that was too exciting to pass up. As a result, today I notified the Speaker and the House of Representatives that I will resign from Congress as soon as the House votes once again on the reconciliation package,' Green said in a statement. 'Though I planned to retire at the end of the previous Congress, I stayed to ensure that President Trump's border security measures and priorities make it through Congress. By overseeing the border security portion of the reconciliation package, I have done that. After that, I will retire, and there will be a special election to replace me.' His decision to stay until the House gives the GOP's tax cuts and spending package a final stamp of approval is a relief for Republican leadership, who are contending with a razor-thin majority and passed the same bill by a single vote last month. Senate Republicans are planning to make a host of changes to the legislation, and the House is expected to hold a vote this summer on approving the revised bill. It's the second time Green has said he plans to resign. Green said in February 2024 that he planned to resign from Congress, but he ultimately reversed course and kept his seat, saying he decided to seek reelection after encouragement from the public and President Trump. The decision earned a muted response from Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.), the Homeland Security panel's ranking member. 'While he was only chair for a couple years, I join our colleagues in wishing him well in the private sector,' Thompson said in a statement. Green's resignation will leave the House with 219 Republicans and 212 Democrats, meaning the GOP can only afford to lose three votes and still pass party-line legislation, assuming all members are present — the same dynamic that currently stands. Green's departure will open up a sought-after chair position on a panel that reviews much of Trump's signature immigration policies. Under former President Biden, Green was a vocal critic of the administration, holding numerous hearings focused on fentanyl deaths and bringing in parents who had lost children in deaths they deemed connected to immigration or the border. Under Trump, the committee has held hearings focused on Biden-era immigration policies and budget issues as the White House pushes to vastly expand deportation operations. Green, a physician, is also a veteran, and he served tours of duty in Iraq and Afghanistan. He was given the gavel after just two terms in Congress, and will leave during his fourth term. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store