Trump meets Zelenskyy and says higher Nato spending may deter future aggression
US PRESIDENT DONALD Trump has met with Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelensky on the sidelines of the Nato summit and suggested that increased spending by the transatlantic alliance could help prevent future Russian aggression against its neighbours.
Nato members agreed to raise their spending targets by 2035 to 5% of gross domestic product
(GDP) annually on core defence requirements as well as defence- and security-related spending.
That target had been 2% of GDP.
'Europe stepping up to take more responsibility for security will help prevent future disasters like the horrible situation with Russia and Ukraine,' Trump said at the summit-ending news conference shortly after meeting with Zelenskyy.
'And hopefully we're going to get that solved.'
The US president also reiterated his belief that Russian President Vladimir Putin wants to end the war in Ukraine that began with Moscow's invasion in February 2022.
'He'd like to get out of this thing. It's a mess for him,' Trump said.
'He called the other day, and he said, 'Can I help you with Iran?' I said, 'No, you can help me with Russia'.'
Trump's meeting with Zelenskyy was their first face-to-face session since April when they met at St Peter's Basilica during Pope Francis's funeral.
Trump also had a major confrontation with Zelenskyy earlier this year at the White House.
Zelenskyy, in a social media post, said The Hague talks were substantive and he thanked Trump for the US assistance.
'We discussed how to achieve a ceasefire and a real peace. We spoke about how to protect our people. We appreciate the attention and the readiness to help bring peace closer,' Zelenskyy added.
Trump left open the possibility of sending Kyiv more US-made Patriot air defence missile systems.
Donald Trump gestures during a press conference after the plenary session at the NATO summit in The Hague, Netherlands.
Alamy Stock Photo
Alamy Stock Photo
Asked by a Ukrainian reporter, who said that her husband was a Ukrainian soldier, Trump acknowledged that sending more Patriots would help the Ukrainian cause.
'They do want to have the antimissile missiles, OK, as they call them, the Patriots,' Trump said.
Advertisement
'And we're going to see if we can make some available. We need them, too. We're supplying them to Israel, and, they're very effective, 100% effective. Hard to believe how effective. They do want that more than any other thing.'
Over the course of the war, the US has routinely pressed for allies to provide air defence systems to Ukraine.
But many are reluctant to give up the high-tech systems, particularly countries in Eastern Europe that also feel threatened by Russia.
Trump laid into the US media throughout his news conference but showed unusual warmth towards the Ukrainian reporter.
'That's a very good question,' Trump said about the query about Patriots.
'And I wish you a lot of luck. I mean, I can see it's very upsetting to you. So say hello to your husband.'
Ukraine has been front and centre at recent Nato summits.
But as the alliance's latest annual meeting of leaders opened in the Netherlands, Zelenskyy was not in the room.
The Trump administration has blocked Ukraine's bid to join Nato.
The conflict with Russia has laid waste to Ukrainian towns and killed thousands of civilians.
Just last week, Russia launched one of the biggest drone attacks of the war.
During Trump's 2024 campaign for the White House, the Republican pledged a quick end to the war.
He saw it as a costly conflict that, he claimed, would not have happened had he won re-election in 2020.
Since taking office in January, he has struggled to find a resolution to the conflict and has shown frustration with both Putin and Zelenskyy.
Zelenskyy spent Tuesday in The Hague shuttling from meeting to meeting.
He got a pledge from summit host the Netherlands for military aid, including new drones and radars to help knock out Russian drones.
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced that the United Kingdom will provide 350 air defence missiles to Ukraine, funded by £70 million raised from the interest on seized Russian assets.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
17 minutes ago
- RTÉ News
'Important step' as tribunal on Russian aggression agreed
Ukraine and the Council of Europe human rights body have signed an agreement on forming the basis for a special tribunal intended to bring to justice senior Russian officials for the crime of aggression against Ukraine. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and Council of Europe Secretary General Alain Berset signed the accord in the French city of Strasbourg at the Council's headquarters. "This is truly a very important step. Every war criminal must know there will be justice and that includes Russia. We are now boosting the legal work in a serious way," Mr Zelensky told the ceremony. "There is still a long road ahead. Today's agreement is just the beginning. We must take real steps to make it work. It will take strong political and legal cooperation to make sure every Russian war criminal faces justice, including (President Vladimir) Putin". Ukraine has demanded the creation of such a body since Russia's February 2022 invasion, accusing Russian troops of committing thousands of war crimes. It is also intent on prosecuting Russians for orchestrating the invasion. The 46-member Council of Europe, set up after World War II to uphold human rights and the rule of law, approved the tribunal in May, saying it was intended to be complementary to the International Criminal Court and fill legal gaps in prosecutions. The ICC has issued an arrest warrant against Mr Putin, accusing him of illegally deporting hundreds of children from Ukraine. Mr Berset said the next step to set up the tribunal, which the Council of Europe hopes could start work next year, would be an enlarged agreement to "allow the widest possible number of countries to join, to support, and to help manage the tribunal". It has not yet been decided where the tribunal would be based. "International law must apply to all, with no exceptions and no double standards," said Mr Berset. This is the first time such a tribunal has been set up under the aegis of the Council of Europe, the continent's top rights body. The 46-member Council of Europe is not part of the EU and members include key non-EU European states such as Turkey, the UK and Ukraine. Russia was expelled in the wake of its invasion of Ukraine. According to the Council of Europe, the tribunal will be set up within the framework of the body "with the mandate to prosecute senior leaders for the crime of aggression against Ukraine". It said the tribunal "fills the gap" created by the "jurisdictional limitations" of the ICC. Russian Defence Minister Andrei Belousov said that European supplies of arms and mercenaries to Ukraine had increased the threat of destabilisation in Europe, the Interfax news agency reported. "Attempts to prolong military actions by supplying Ukraine with arms and mercenaries increase the threat of destabilisation. Including in Europe itself," Mr Belousov was quoted as saying. Meanwhile Russia's air defence units destroyed 50 Ukrainian drones overnight, the Russian defence ministry said. Nearly half of the drones were downed over the Kursk region on the border with Ukraine, while the rest were destroyed over several Russian regions, including three over the Moscow region, the ministry added. Moscow Mayor Sergei Sobyanin, writing on the Telegram messaging app, said specialists were examining debris on the ground. Moscow's Vnukovo International Airport suspended departures and arrivals in response to the threat, news agencies quoted aviation watchdog Rosaviatsiya as saying. Restrictions were also in place for a time at airports along the Volga River.
Irish Independent
33 minutes ago
- Irish Independent
Nato praises ‘daddy' figure Donald Trump after he secures historic rising defence spend
Agreement comes amid backdrop of heightened global military tension ©UK Independent European leaders in Nato have agreed to a historic 5pc increase in defence spending and have praised Donald Trump for driving the uplift. Nato secretary general Mark Rutte fawned over the US president and praised him for intervening in the conflict between Iran and Israel, comparing him to a 'daddy' figure stuck between the two warring Middle Eastern parties.
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Trump's perfectly landed swear word was his best performance yet
It's been nearly a year since a gunman attempted to assassinate Donald Trump , leading to the most memorable photo op of all time. It left me considering a similar Trumpian superlative: is he the greatest media performer of the 21st century? I have seen little since to disabuse me of the notion: the YMCA, the McDonald's stunt, the nutty Truth Social posts that cut through and generate their own column inches in newspapers. It's a self-sustaining, organic whirlpool of attention. And on Tuesday he gave the world his best performance yet. Standing on a lawn in front of a helicopter, unable to corral his anger at Israel breaking the terms of a ceasefire hours after it was brokered, he told reporters: 'We basically have two countries that have been fighting so long and so hard that they don't know what the f**k they're doing.' It at least made this writer – no acolyte of Trump – mutter, 'You know what? Fair enough.' Trump's speeches are convoluted, confused, long-winded, undulating and lack any beginning, narrative arc or obvious end point. These are not the traditional characteristics of a great speaker. His writing is frenetic and too reliant on the CAPS LOCK BUTTON to demarcate him as a great literary talent, or even a competent one. And yet it is impossible to look away. Pages are dedicated to parsing his social media posts. When he speaks, everyone listens – in a way that was not true of Joe Biden , as just one example. So what is the secret? He is funny – the nicknames for political opponents may be puerile but they do elicit a smirk. He is casual – you could hardly say many of his rhetorical interventions feel scripted, or prepared. He is extraordinarily rude – a recent screed about Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez read: 'Stupid AOC, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, one of the 'dumbest' people in Congress, is now calling for my Impeachment, despite the fact that the Crooked and Corrupt Democrats have already done that twice before.' READ MORE 'Funny' and 'casual' might be desirable qualities in a friend. 'Extraordinarily rude' is an undesirable trait in anyone. All three at once in a politician of Trump's rank? Is that genuinely unprecedented? But more importantly than all that, as far as his fans are concerned, Trump never veers towards the worthy or po-faced. He does not launch moralising invectives. He is not burdened by a humourlessness otherwise endemic to the Democrats, the Irish left, and indeed the left almost everywhere else. I suspect the left – unless they sort this out – will be condemned to trail in the populist right's wake for eternity. Take the Social Democrats in Ireland. The party should be sweeping at the ballot box: there is a young captive audience who lean in its political direction. On Gaza alone they could galvanise large numbers, not to mention cost of living, housing, and their leftish side of the culture wars. And yet the party couldn't even make 5 per cent in last November's election (if this is the Soc Dems' best ever electoral performance, something significant has to change). [ The idea that the Kremlin has kompromat on Trump seems increasingly plausible Opens in new window ] I am thinking of Holly Cairns 's speech at the Social Democrats' conference last year. She is presentable, sharp, professional and oh so worthy (furrowed brow, enumerating Ireland's failures, I did not laugh). In fact, all the Soc Dems are so rhetorically staid they somehow manage to make the top brass of Fianna Fáil look like raconteurs. This is a shame: first, because it is not inevitable that the left be devoid of fun while the right hoovers up attention; second, because it is an act of political self-harm. [ 'I couldn't think of anything worse to attend': Some Opposition TDs snub invite to US Independence Day celebration Opens in new window ] And now look to London: Keir Starmer's Labour is nearly as unpopular as the moribund Conservative Party , only one year into office. There are plenty of reasons: flip-flopping on welfare; an insurgent Nigel Farage ; running a government full of MPs who are very used to opposition and completely unfamiliar with power. But the scaffolding holding this coalition of bad qualities together is Starmer's buttoned up, staid, uninspired method of talking. There is no story, no tie-loosening, no flair; there are no jokes. Donald Trump expressed frustration at Iran-Israel ceasefire violations, by dropping the 'F' word when being questioned by media on the White House lawn And back to Trump, who disarms the viewer and demands their attention because he subverts expectations. He feels like a person – an odd one, no doubt – more than a media-trained politician. And with all of that he exposes the staggering rhetorical limitations of the Democrats . They lost last year because the establishment conspired to keep Biden in position way longer than was ever suitable. But they are still losing now because they cannot speak to the country like Trump. Either they don't know how, or they will not permit themselves to. Trump's rhetorical talent is not something to be celebrated. He has taken a sledgehammer to European security, political propriety and American civil norms. That he does this all with a wink and a wry smile and a perfectly landed swear word is impressive – and disarming. Changing language will not rescue the politics. But the left – or the centre, or even the centre-right – can meet the threat of the populist right with a bit of a lighter tone, a joke or two, and less moral posture. You can ventriloquise the problems of a nation without a permanently furrowed brow; it is not illegal to crack a smile.
