
Why Chinas auto, tech giants threaten Tesla's self-driving future
Key assisted driving equipment costs 20-40% lower in China: study
BYD, others offer advanced driver-assistance as standard feature
Tesla charges 64,000 yuan for FSD in China
BYD's scale seen as advantage in 'training' assisted driving system
AUSTIN, Texas June 10 - Chinese electric-vehicle makers led by BYD beat Tesla in the competition to produce affordable electric vehicles. Now, many of those same fierce competitors are pulling into the passing lane in the global race to produce self-driving cars.
BYD shook up China's smart-EV industry earlier this year by offering its 'God's Eye' driver-assistance package for free, undercutting the technology Tesla sells for nearly $9,000 in China. 'With God's Eye, Tesla's strategy starts to fall apart,' said Shenzhen-based BYD investor Taylor Ogan, an American who has owned several Teslas and driven BYD cars with God's Eye, which he called more capable than Tesla's 'Full Self-Driving' .
It's not just BYD. Other Chinese auto and tech companies are offering affordable EVs with FSD-like technology for a relative pittance. China's Leapmotor and Xpeng, for instance, offer systems capable of highway and urban driving in $20,000 vehicles. A slew of Chinese firms are chasing the same technology, an industry push backed by China's government. BYD's assisted-driving hardware costs are far lower than Tesla's, according to analyses performed for Reuters by companies that dismantle and analyze vehicles for automakers. The comparisons, which have not been previously reported, show that BYD's costs to procure components and build a system with radar and lidar are about the same as Tesla's FSD, which doesn't have such sensors. That undercuts Tesla's unusual technological approach, which aims to save costs by nixing such sensors and relying solely on cameras and artificial intelligence. The rising competition from Chinese smart-EV players is among the chief problems confronting Tesla CEO Elon Musk after his rocky tenure as a Trump administration advisor as he refocuses on his business empire - as Tesla vehicle sales are tanking globally. The stakes are made higher by a moment-of-truth challenge this month in Tesla's home base of Austin, Texas, where it plans to launch a robotaxi trial with 10 or 20 vehicles after a decade of Musk's unfulfilled promises to deliver self-driving Teslas.
Tesla did not respond when reached for comment about its Chinese competitors. Previously, Musk has described Chinese car companies as the most competitive in the world. Chinese competition was one factor driving Tesla's strategic pivot away from mass-market EVs last year, when Reuters reported it had killed plans to build an all-new EV expected to cost $25,000. Musk has since staked Tesla's future instead on self-driving robotaxis, the hopes for which now underpin the vast majority of the automaker's stock-market value of roughly $1 trillion. Now Tesla faces the same stiff competition on vehicle autonomy from many of the same Chinese automakers who undercut its affordable-EV plans. Adding to the challenge are tech firms including Chinese smartphone giant Huawei, which supplies autonomous-driving technology to major Chinese automakers. Short of full autonomy, today's driver-assistance systems offer a critical competitive edge in China, the world's largest car market, where Tesla sales are falling amid a protracted price war among scores of homegrown EV brands. Tesla is further handicapped by China's regulations preventing it from using data collected by Tesla cars in China to train the artificial intelligence underpinning FSD. Tesla has been negotiating with Chinese officials, so far without success, to get permission to transfer such data back to the United States for analysis. Tesla's competitors in China do benefit from subsidies and other forms of policy support from Beijing for advanced assisted driving technology. Their advantages also stem from another consequential factor: cut-throat smart-EV competition that has characterized their industry over the past decade. The resulting EV boom created economies of scale and the industry's tendency to forgo some profit margins to expand new technologies' market penetration quickly, leading to lower manufacturing costs.
BYD investor Ogan, of Shenzhen-based Snow Bull Capital, has a front-row seat to China's autonomous-tech battleground. He recently drove several BYD models equipped with God's Eye, he said, and didn't have to take over driving in any of them while traveling the congested streets of Shenzhen, a bustling southern China megalopolis of 18 million people.
Another notable smart-EV player in China is Huawei, experts say.
Huawei lends its technology and branding to a half dozen automakers including heavyweights Chery, SAIC and Changan, and has lower-profile partnerships with more than a dozen other carmakers, Huawei representatives said.
Reuters journalists rode in an Aito M9 — a luxury electric SUV from Seres with Huawei driver-assistance technology — as it navigated Shenzhen roadways in April. With a driver's hands off the wheel, the vehicle exited a highway seamlessly into a congested urban zone, where the M9 proceeded cautiously and slowed to a crawl as a construction worker appeared like he might walk into the roadway. At one point the vehicle turned right and slowly drifted left to avoid two men unloading boxes from a parked truck. The vehicle then parallel parked itself at Huawei's Shenzhen headquarters.
Huawei was among several Chinese companies, including automakers Zeekr, Changan and Xpeng, that touted progress towards fully-autonomous cars at April's Shanghai auto show, even as Beijing announced a new marketing crackdown on terms such as 'smart' and 'intelligent' driving in the wake of a deadly crash in a Xiaomi vehicle involving driver-assistance technology.
Huawei said it's ready to undergo a new validation regime being developed by Chinese regulators to certify so-called Level 3 driving systems, meaning they are capable enough to allow drivers to look away unless notified by the system to take over. Zeekr, a luxury brand of China auto giant Geely, also plans to soon sell cars with Level 3 systems.
Tesla has yet to release such an "unsupervised" version of FSD because its technology needs more training to operate without a driver's hands on the wheel and eyes on the road.
Tesla plans to launch self-driving robotaxis in Austin this month. Little is known about its plans. The company has said it aims to initially deploy between 10 and 20 fare-collecting driverless robotaxis in restricted geographic areas of the city, which Tesla has not publicly identified.
Chinese EV makers are moving quickly to develop driver-assistance systems in a market where car-buyers are demanding them at a faster pace than in other regions, analysts say. Their ability to do so at lower costs poses the biggest threat to Tesla's new autonomy-based business model.
BYD buyers can get an FSD-comparable version of God's Eye as a standard feature in cars priced at about $30,000. The cheapest FSD-equipped Tesla in China is a Model 3 selling for about $41,500.
According to an analysis by A2MAC1, a Paris-based tear-down firm that benchmarks components, the mid-level God's Eye version most comparable to Tesla's FSD runs on an Nvidia computing chip with data collected through 12 cameras, five radars, 12 ultrasonic sensors, and one lidar sensor, at a cost of $2,105. That compares to $2,360 for Tesla's FSD, which uses cameras without sensors and two AI chips, the firm estimates.
Cameras, radar and ultrasonic sensors are 40% cheaper in China than comparable devices in Europe and the United States, A2MAC1 estimates. Lidar sensors cost about 20% less, the firm says. Sensor costs have fallen because China's EV boom created economies of scale, said A2MAC1 engineer Elena Zhelondz. The fierce competition also pushed carmakers and suppliers to accept lower profits on driver-assistance equipment, she said.
BYD's 22% gross margin will likely fall as it gives away God's Eye but it will benefit from a vehicle-sales boost, said Chris McNally, head of global automotive and mobility research for advisory firm Evercore.
MORE CARS, MORE MILES, BETTER AI
Falling behind the Chinese brands on driver-assistance technology would compound Tesla's challenges in China, where it's already losing market share to rivals including BYD, which sells an entry-level EV for less than $10,000. The growing scale of BYD and others could also provide a technological advantage: Racking up more miles on China roads helps train the AI technology needed to perfect automated-driving systems.
BYD has a 'clear and ongoing market-share driving advantage' over Tesla in gathering such on-road data to refine God's Eye, Evercore's McNally said, adding that advantage might only increase as offering God's Eye for free helps sell more BYD vehicles. BYD's scale also helps lower costs by providing uncommon leverage over suppliers. In November, a BYD executive in charge of passenger-vehicle operations wrote to suppliers telling them that the automaker sold 4.2 million vehicles last year because of 'technical innovation, economies of scale, and a low-cost supply chain.' The executive noted the new year would likely bring more growth, but also fiercer competition. Without specifically mentioning God's Eye, he ended the letter by asking the suppliers for an across-the-board 10% price cut on all parts and systems starting on January 1, calling the new year a final 'knockout round.'
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
41 minutes ago
- Mint
China's Bankers Ditch Global Hotel Chains as Travel Budgets Bite
(Bloomberg) -- These days, Shanghai-based banker Jason Zhang can no longer stay at the Westin hotel in downtown Beijing's financial district after his company cut its travel budget. Instead, he had to settle for a cheaper domestic hotel chain. To his surprise, the discount in room rate didn't lead to a discount in experience. Yes, the expansive breakfast buffet is gone, but Zhang relishes the local dishes served at the domestic chain Atour. Its pillows and comforters are so popular that many guests buy them after checking out. There's no scramble to pack and leave in the morning as checkout can wait until 6 p.m. Zhang is not alone in switching hotels. Chinese banks have scaled back travel perks since last year, barring staff from flying business class and booking pricey hotels, as China's economy slows and companies tighten their purse strings. And while it's making things tough for the top-end international brands, the greater financial prudence has opened up opportunities for smaller local chains that focus on the needs of business travelers. While spending on work-related travel in China slowed in 2024, it still grew to a record $372.5 billion, according to market researcher China Trading Desk. But much of the growth is being captured by hotels offering modest accommodation rather than the luxury end of the spectrum. Mid-range local brands could expand their market share from 45% in 2023 to up to 75% by 2028, the consultancy says. That's giving domestic chains a boost. Atour Lifestyle Holdings Ltd posted record revenue growth of 55.3% to 7.25 billion yuan ($1 billion), thanks in part to sales of its pillows and comforters. Another hotel chain H World Group Ltd saw revenue jump almost 10% year on year. This is in contrast to the major international brands, which are struggling in the Greater China region compared to the rest of the world. InterContinental Hotels Group Plc saw room revenue for business trips in the region decrease 5%, compared with a 2% increase globally. Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. says its revenue per room in Asia Pacific was flat, dragged down by China. Marriott International Inc. also saw its Greater China revenue decline, citing weaker domestic demand. 'The primary driver behind this transformation is corporate cost-cutting measures,' said Subramania Bhatt, chief executive officer of China Trading Desk. 'Beyond price, local brands have developed several competitive edges that appeal to business travelers.' While tighter travel budgets are a key reason some are switching hotel brands, it's only part of the story. Local chains unable to match international five-star chains in prestige and glamor are trying to make up in other ways. Yongbin Xu, a director at a private fund management company in Shanghai, used to stay at Marriott or Shangri-La hotels on work trips but has now switched to Intercity, an upper mid-scale brand operated by H World Group. He made the change not because of corporate cutbacks, but because he likes the location and service of Intercity hotels. A room at a Shangri-La or Marriott hotel in Shenzhen costs between 1000 yuan and 1200 yuan per night, while Intercity charges around 700 yuan for a room in the central business district. 'Of course, those hotels sacrifice some services, but for business trips, I don't have time to use the swimming pool or other high-end services,' said Xu. Xu's favorite service at H World: Robots that help ferry food deliveries from the hotel entrance to his room upstairs, whereas international brands ask guests to go all the way down to the entrance to pick them up themselves. Another perk that has won over many local travelers is free laundry, either through self-service washing machines or through a pick-up service. By contrast, it normally costs from 30 to 100 yuan per item for laundry services in the five-star hotels in Beijing and Shanghai. Local chains have also sought to gain an advantage over their larger rivals by the strength of their mobile apps, through which guests can access a broad array of services, such as selecting your own room or requesting more water, without having to speak to reception. While Chinese domestic hotel brands have become more competitive, they also face a number of challenges, including rising operational expenses and cut-throat price competition due to the surge in the supply of rooms in smaller hotels, guesthouses and home-rental apps in the country. By the end of 2024, the number of hotels in China had risen to 348,700, with 17.6 million rooms, both record highs, according to a report by the China Hotel Association. This weighed on the average room rate for both domestic and international brands, which declined between 2% and 7% last year. And prices may face even greater pressure in the coming years as the major chains keep expanding to meet rising demand from Chinese travelers. 'The downward trend in hotel prices and profits will continue this year due to oversupply, increasing the risk of investing in new hotels,' said Zhao Huanyan, a Shanghai-based independent hospitality industry consultant. Despite stronger sales, H World Group saw its profit decline last year due to expenditure on renovation and service upgrades. For Atour, its breakneck expansion appears to have led to a lapse in quality control. The pillow cases at one of its hotels in Hangzhou were found out to be ones meant for a hospital, sparking widespread media and online scrutiny. Atour later explained in a statement that it was a sorting mistake by its laundry supplier and temporarily closed down the location to replace all bed linen. In response to rising local competition, international hotel chains have been expanding their mid-range options in China. Almost 80% of the new hotels IHG has in the pipeline in the Greater China region belong to their more affordable brands, compared with around 20% in their luxury segment. Marriott's chief financial officer Leeny Oberg highlighted in the company's earning call in May the 'terrific interest' in their mid-tier brands. But for Zhang, it's unlikely to be enough to persuade him to switch his allegiance back from China's domestic chains. 'I expect I'll continue to stay at Atour hotels in the future, even for personal trips, as I've come to like them.' More stories like this are available on


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Harvard may get some of its funding back. But on one condition, says Education Secretary
Education Secretary Linda McMahon said on Tuesday that Harvard and other universities could get back some of the federal funding cut by the Trump administration if they changed their policies. 'It would be my goal that if colleges and universities are abiding by the laws of the United States and doing what we expect of them, that they can expect taxpayer funded programs,' the secretary said at a Bloomberg News event. McMahon said that the Trump administration was "making progress in some of the discussions" with Harvard, despite the ongoing legal battles. The secretary emphasised that the federal funding has a role to play in academic research at the universities. 'I think if we look at our research as for the public good, which I think is intended, then taxpayers are willing to see their tax dollars to support that kind of really good research. And so I'm sure that would continue at the university level,' she said. President Donald Trump has frozen more than $2.6 billion in federal research funding to Harvard and has moved to cancel its federal contracts. The Trump administration justified the actions as part of its effort to eliminate antisemitism on campus. Meanwhile, Harvard has also taken the fight to the court with two lawsuits against the Trump administration, challenging both the loss of federal funding and a decision by the Department of Homeland Security to revoke its license to enrol foreign students. The administration reportedly also asked the university to share its records about misconduct by international students on campus. However, it said that the college has not offered enough information to satisfy their requests. The Trump administration and Harvard have been at loggerheads, with the President repeatedly singling out the institution and taking aim at its perceived left-leaning and admission practices. Trump has proposed that Harvard's federal funding be moved to trade schools and called for its tax-exempt status to be removed. President Donald Trump recently said that the Massachusetts-based school was "starting to behave". Meanwhile, Harvard has rejected the administration's demands that it implement "viewpoint diversity" on campus in its hiring and admission practices. Columbia University has also lost about $400 million in federal funds and did not sign onto the "friend of the court" argument. Other private colleges, including Cornell University, Princeton University and Northwestern University, also have seen funding revoked in the Trump era.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Clean air zones set to transform Vijayawada, Vizag neighbourhoods from July
1 2 Vijayawada: Come July, select neighbourhoods in Vijayawada and Visakhapatnam could breathe easy, thanks to the phased implementation of the Clean Air Zones (CAZ) project. In a major step towards improving urban air quality, the Andhra Pradesh Pollution Control Board (APPCB) on Tuesday hosted a multi-agency workshop in Vijayawada to kick-start the phased implementation of CAZs. It brought together key officials from municipal corporations, police and transport departments of the two fast-growing cities and featured the expertise of Transport for London (TfL). Areas close to Ramesh Hospital Junction, Siddhartha College Junction in Vijayawada and King George Hospital in Visakhapatnam will benefit from the CAZ initiative and are gearing up for the implementation. "The phased approach will allow authorities to tailor solutions for these neighbourhoods to inspire more city-wide efforts, while building the foundation for broader, long-term clean air strategies across Andhra Pradesh", said P Krishnaiah, chairman, APPCB. Based on the broader vision of chief minister Chandrababu Naidu to foster healthier, future-ready urban environments, Artha India — a Mumbai-based organisation supporting governments for effective urbanisation and digitalisation implementation efforts — is leading implementation support for the project. Technical expertise for the project is coming from London and Delhi-based partners, TfL and TERI, respectively. Artha India is also expected to be onboarded as a knowledge partner to Andhra Pradesh for climate resilience and health. "A successful implementation of Clean Air Zones will improve air quality and particulate matter concentration at local hotspots. For the past two years, we have been gathering technical inputs and mapping stakeholders to support implementation of site-specific emission-reduction measures involving congestion management, streamlining public transport, last-mile connectivity, and other green initiatives", says Artha India CEO, Pritika Hingorani. The forthcoming phase of CAZ implementation will also include area improvement projects that include optimising parking arrangements and novel nature-based solutions like permeable pavements and Miyawaki forests at junctions. "We are confident that the participation and efforts of all stakeholders in implementing pollution control measures starting next month, including low-cost continuous air monitoring, will make CAZs a success. We are also exploring how to make this initiative sustainable and low-cost in the long run by involving businesses as partners in building a green and clean Vijayawada", said Dr. Swapna Kota, project manager , Sustainability and Resilience Unit, Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation.